Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS DOS'd my entire network

2017-05-09 Thread Dan McDonald
> On May 9, 2017, at 4:40 PM, Schweiss, Chip wrote: > > Here's the screen shot: Interesting. So notice that the IP address in question is 10.28.17.29 (uggh, the leading-0 is a Mentat-ism we need to fix in -gate already). And notice that the other node's MAC is

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS DOS'd my entire network

2017-05-09 Thread Dan McDonald
> On May 9, 2017, at 3:32 PM, Schweiss, Chip wrote: > > This was a first for me and extremely painful to locate. > > In the middle of the night between last Friday and Saturday, I started > getting down alerts from most of my network. It took 4 engineers including >

[OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS DOS'd my entire network

2017-05-09 Thread Schweiss, Chip
This was a first for me and extremely painful to locate. In the middle of the night between last Friday and Saturday, I started getting down alerts from most of my network. It took 4 engineers including myself 9 hours to pinpoint the source of the problem. The problem turned out to be one of

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

2017-05-09 Thread Ludovic Orban
Don't worry too much about it, I have a workaround in place that suits me well. I just wanted to report this problem. Thanks, Ludovic On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > On May 9, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > > When

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

2017-05-09 Thread Dan McDonald
> On May 9, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > When I get home I'll provide more details, but you should try bloody or still > in beta r151022. > Well shoot. It appears I have pretty much the same problem in OmniOS bloody (and therefore r151022):

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

2017-05-09 Thread Dan McDonald
When I get home I'll provide more details, but you should try bloody or still in beta r151022. Dan Sent from my iPhone (typos, autocorrect, and all) > On May 9, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Nahum Shalman wrote: > > As a data point, I tested this on a very recent SmartOS and was

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

2017-05-09 Thread Nahum Shalman
As a data point, I tested this on a very recent SmartOS and was unable to reproduce: root@ksh-debian:~# set -o xtrace ; /native/usr/bin/uname -a; uname -a ; cat /etc/debian_version ; dpkg-query -l ksh | grep ksh ; /bin/ksh93 + set -o xtrace + /native/usr/bin/uname -a SunOS ksh-debian 5.11

[OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

2017-05-09 Thread Ludovic Orban
Hi, I've installed the real ksh93 (this stuff: https://packages.debian.org/jessie/ksh) on a r151020 LX zone running the latest Debian ( https://images.joyent.com/images/e74a9cd0-f2d0-11e6-8b69-b3acf2ef87f7) and it behaves strangely. Here is what I get: root@debian-8:~# /bin/ksh93 # ls / ^C^C