Re: [OmniOS-discuss] questions

Here's a quick thought: if you are copying your files with scp, you might be CPU bound because of all the crypto work. You should try to copy with a much more CPU-lightweight tool. I personally usually use netcat for this kind of stuff. Just my 2 cents. -- Ludovic On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:26

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

ned and pleasant to use OS! On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Dan McDonald <dan...@omniti.com> wrote: > Wow, thank you for the further deep-diving. > > > On May 10, 2017, at 5:21 AM, Ludovic Orban <lor...@bitronix.be> wrote: > > > > Looking at ksh' sources, my un

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

In x86 asm, cmpl is both signed and unsigned, it's the following jump that decides to work signed or not. In this case it's jl "jump if less" so it's signed (vs jb "jump if before" that is unsigned). But I digress. I've recompiled ksh93 with debug, no stripped symbols and no optimizations (the

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

Don't worry too much about it, I have a workaround in place that suits me well. I just wanted to report this problem. Thanks, Ludovic On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > On May 9, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > > When

[OmniOS-discuss] LX: real ksh93 broken

Hi, I've installed the real ksh93 (this stuff: https://packages.debian.org/jessie/ksh) on a r151020 LX zone running the latest Debian ( https://images.joyent.com/images/e74a9cd0-f2d0-11e6-8b69-b3acf2ef87f7) and it behaves strangely. Here is what I get: root@debian-8:~# /bin/ksh93 # ls / ^C^C

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?

I personally don't need ipadm in my LX zones, nerver missed it and I'm pretty certain I wouldn't use it even if it was available. I'd *much* prefer to have 7388 though (sorry for insisting, I couldn't resist ;-)) On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Guenther Alka wrote: >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS bloody update

Understood, your plate already is more than full. Thanks anyway! On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Dan McDonald <dan...@omniti.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 29, 2017, at 3:48 AM, Ludovic Orban <lor...@bitronix.be> wrote: > > > > Would you, by any chance, have the t

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS bloody update

Would you, by any chance, have the time to look at 7388 and hopefully manage to make it go into this bloody ? A patch has been submitted months ago but is still pending review. AFAICT it looks good to me, but I don't think my opinion has much weight. Thanks in advance, Ludovic On Wed, Mar 29,

[OmniOS-discuss] LX zones documentation

Hi, So far, LX zones have been working great for me. Thanks for that! I did find a few things that would be worth better documenting though: - The folder containing the zonepath should be a dataset, otherwise zoneadm install fails with a cryptic error. - You can run dhcp with all bells and

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX zone - installation error

l path) > set special=/tank/media (global zone path) > set type=lofs > end > > The Solaris docs I followed are these: > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19044-01/sol.containers/817-1592/gcziw/index.html > > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 at 12:31 Ludovic Orban <lor...@bitr

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX zone - installation error

, Ludovic On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Ludovic Orban <lor...@bitronix.be> wrote: > That was the exact cause of my problem, thanks for your help! > > Now maybe that should be documented on the LXZones wiki page (I > checked, and it doesn't speak about having to create a files

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX zone - installation error

again, Ludovic On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Jaakko Linnosaari <jaakko.linnosa...@polarshift.fi> wrote: > >> On 23 Nov 2016, at 10.24, Ludovic Orban <lor...@bitronix.be> wrote: >> >> I've compiled a list of the information I believe would be useful >&g

[OmniOS-discuss] LX zone - installation error

Hi, I tried following the instructions on https://omnios.omniti.com/wiki.php/LXZones to try out creating a LX zone but got rewarded with a cryptic "ERROR: " message without any further information. I've compiled a list of the information I believe would be useful double-checking what I did over

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Upgrading Java to OpenJDK8 - any advice?

Quite frankly I wouldn't bother with a JDK 8 upgrade. JDK 8 is not 100% backwards compatible despite what Oracle says and IMHO the last bits of code in gate that rely on java should be gutted or rewritten. Here is what I would do: stick to KYSTY by eventually upgrading to the latest OpenJDK 7 and

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Bloody // mailwrapper & mta mediator

It looks like dma (the DragonFly BSD Mail Agent) would almost perfectly fit that bill. The only problem I see with it is that it depends on openssl to be able to connect to secured smtp servers, and there doesn't seem to be an option to disable that in its build. It shouldn't be rocket science to