At 9:19 PM -0500 on 4/9/00, Sean Harper wrote:
Lots of
gnu projects have todo lists, there doesn't seem to be one for
Freecard.
http://Freecard.sourceforge.net/, then click on the 'task manager' icon.
At 12:49 PM -0700 on 4/10/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
I am hip to the importance of not changing the subject
headings so that they thread correctly, but take a
look at our mail in the last week. It's impossible to
know what is what without reading them.
As long as you put a was: part in the header,
At 12:47 PM -0700 on 4/10/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Anthony: Because I happen to have a good way of
rewriting the syntax without killing performance.
Alain: Oh! I thought that your main objections to the
'do' command were security-related. My impression now
is that speed is the overriding
Come to think of it, it would be easy to to leave out commands that are
implemented in FreeScript with that dynamic syntax extension thing :)
At 11:37 PM +0200 on 4/9/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
But they follow your guidelines, correct? And why don't you just put
them in use?
I do. But openStack is never sent when a stack is start-used.
We can add a message for that.
I didn't mean to give it cryptic syntax, however, I was thinking
A _very_ underfeatured NuParser is now (or will be in a few minutes) in
CVS. The fronend's grammar support should be done; its integrated
debugger and tester are not even started (nor will they be until the
backend is done).
The backend only supports 'normal' nodes (i.e., strings). It does not
At 4:54 PM +0200 on 4/8/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Anthony,
scope is again a problem. Even if you define that command in an openStack
handler, where the scope is almost clear, this would then probably modify
the behaviour of all other stacks.
Yes. That's the idea. It would not be for casual
At 11:21 AM -0700 on 4/8/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
[And actually, as soon as I get a gcc for it, I plan
to have an Interpreter running on my TI-89]
Alain: A programmable calculator? ;-)
What's so odd about that? It already is programmable, in TI-BASIC and
M68K assembly -- why not FreeTalk?
At 8:29 PM +0200 on 4/8/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
I'm talking about interruptions, not low level interrupts. I.e.
command-period being pressed, a runtime error causing a script to exit
prematurely etc.
So am I. That can't happen when a command add is in progress.
You shouldn't be sending
At 12:54 PM -0700 on 4/8/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: The Mac is always the renegade, eh!
Ironically, their 'different' way of doing things is a
hindrance to you. Perhaps we should consider
developing FreeCard for Unix/Linux, THEN port it to
Mac. It would make our development efforts more
At 3:03 PM +0200 on 4/5/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
remap "look up %1 in %2 (using method %3)" to "lookUp"
Ak -- no. It's not English-like enough.
Of course, a command like the above "remap" could be used
to give more comprehensible syntax to plug-in commands. I guess that's what
you wanted to
At 3:06 PM +0200 on 4/5/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
I have no problem with adding this to the Interpreter. A cinch, really.
Anthony,
just a suggestion: Use the same code for user properties as is used for
variables, and make sure that when support for arrays is added they work in
user
At 1:52 PM +1000 on 4/4/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Adrian: Hmm, while I haven't fully thought this through, with *my* parser
you should be able to get it to parse new syntax into bytecode (which has to
be already supported by the interpreter) without a recompile. :P Ahh,
competition already!
At 12:21 PM -0700 on 4/4/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: For the record, I would like to have as much
of FreeCard in stack-form as possible. Stack-based
tool(s) to create Xternals and/or a stack-based
FreeCard syntax editor (e.g. augment FC's parser
with new vocabulary or grammar).
Uli: I
At 3:49 PM +0200 on 3/31/00, Jean-Jacques Wagner wrote:
2) Improve the stack used as plug-in (start using)
it would be good to have the possibility to force the parth hierarchy
through a list of stack, which would be defined in the stack dialog window.
This make programming more easy,
At 11:36 AM -0700 on 4/3/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
and/or a stack-based
FreeCard syntax editor (e.g. augment FC's parser with
new vocabulary or grammar).
With a recompile, this is what NuParser will do. Someday, you'll be
able to do it without a recompile.
The non-stack-based
FC-core should/will
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/03/27/0717244
Notes on documentation. We'll need it, unfortunately ;-)
I think that the first item -- documentation that adjusts to the user's
experience -- is a great idea, and is something that could be pulled off
in FreeCard. It'd also be a significant
http://freecard.sourceforge.net/
If we're lucky, the script managed to convert the entire thing to PHP
files without any human intervention without any mistakes. The former is
sure; the latter is not. Please test.
[Now we just need to see about getting it into CVS :)]
At 9:21 PM -0500 on 4/2/00, Sean Harper wrote:
Ummm.. I would like to contribute, but where do I download the code
from? and what is most important for me to help with?
CVS. I'm working on getting all the code into CVS.
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
if I remember correctly.
At 6:18 PM -0800 on 3/31/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Adrian: I am currently in the process of mirroring as
much of the FreeCard website as I can to
freecard.sourceforge.net ...
I hope you have heard of `wget --mirror`
Alain: I hope you started with the downloads and other
non-web-site stuff. I
At 11:15 PM +1000 on 4/1/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Adrian: I have one more request. Do you have an automated way to add
the line:
?require("/footer.require")?
to each html file of the web site, just before the /BODY tag?
Use a sed/mv combination on SourceForge's Unix login.
At 12:36 PM +1000 on 4/2/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Adrian: I can't use IE to log in, as I recall you use Netscape though right?
I'll find someone to contact about this.
I use Netscape, and it's fine.
At 9:20 PM -0500 on 3/29/00, Mark Rauterkus wrote:
Hi All,
We are talking about LINKING. I'm confused. And, I'm sorta going to lean to
derobert's views.
I'm confused to. We're treading new territory, and no one knows. AFAIK,
no open-source license has ever had a day in court; relativly few
At 12:09 PM -0800 on 3/29/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: Good point, Anthony. When the patches start
coming in (e.g. are added to the FC version), the
licencing of these patches will be FC-GPL. Can you
then add these patches to your own version(s) and
continue to licence these other versions
At 12:50 PM +1000 on 3/31/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Adrian: You also need to suggest names for the general discussion list (the
replacement of this one). The names will be of the form
freecard-name@lists.sourceforge.net freecard-discussion is currently the
best name I can think of. Remember
You'll be happy to know that it works.
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,35258,00.html
Some of the info about licences in this wired article is scary... Should
we go along with the FSF and require code to be signed over?
At 8:11 AM +1000 on 3/21/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Adrian: Actually, by licencing something under the GPL it means that we
have to continue to licence it under the GPL - no other licence is
compatible with the GPL.
The GPL does not take away any of the author's rights -- tha author may
licence
At 7:37 PM -0500 on 3/20/00, Mark Rauterkus wrote:
Case in point with FC: Say the FC community releases FC to the public under
the GPL. And, say the FC community releases FC to MetaCard under a different
license.
I was under the impression we were only licencing the Home stack to
MetaCard
At 1:18 AM +0100 on 3/25/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Hi,
I recently downloaded HeaderDoc from http://publicsource.apple.com and it
looks like it'd be perfect for creating a base for our programmers'
documentation. Trouble is, it was written for a Unix version of Perl
(Darwin's probably) and it
At 1:02 AM +0100 on 3/21/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
"linking" is a technical term here and refers to machine-language source
code being combined in a way that one routine uses another. It does not
apply to putting two files in a folder and having one file display the
others' contents (very
At 12:59 PM +0200 on 3/27/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Alain,
it's simple: Netscape does as it's supposed to and uses the MIME types to
identify files, why IE goes by the suffixes. The bug in Netscape fixes the
I think you mean
At 6:50 PM -0500 on 3/18/00, Mark Rauterkus wrote:
And we might run into further
problems in other fronts as we do the human interface and want it to be part
of the suite offered by MetaCard. The co-mingling of GPL and PROPRIETARY
licenses is something that needs full ADVANCE awareness, and it
They've missed a very important thing: FreeCard does not act like a
compiler. It isn't a compiler. It's like the Perl interpreter, exceppt
that the standalone is a combination of the interpreter, lots of
support stuff, and the script in one file.
At 12:20 AM +0100 on 3/14/00, toniK wrote:
You've never ran an X server. Who says you can only run graphics on a
local machine? Certainly not X.
Well, if that worked, that'd be cool.
It works -- I've done it. They're even X servers for Macs Windows.
At 9:43 AM +1000 on 3/17/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Adrian: Java is so 1900's. :P Nope, this year C is the language to know for
my course. Speaking of which, that assignments due next week... Sigh. I'm
also doing Software Engineering - and for the record, we're doing it
entirely wrong in this
At 5:36 PM +0100 on 3/11/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
shrug. Run CVS on Linux/ppc. Though I have a Mac CVS client that I
think works on backup somewhere -- I'll look.
Anthony,
find me a Linux that runs on a Macintosh Performa 5300 and I'll gladly do
that.
What's the Performa 5300 equivelent to?
At 5:29 PM +0100 on 3/11/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Render larger, shrink on copy. Avoids pixelization.
Anthony,
at small sizes it doesn't. Then you'd just have a irregular black bar if
you're unlucky.
Playing with text that small by any method can easily give you a mess.
For small text, we
At 2:36 PM +0100 on 3/6/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
I think dumping random data to random blocks and reading it out would
give it a better testing. Basicly, perform random actions to the file.
Include some erroneous ones (tryign to read non-existant blocks, for
example).
Anthony,
well, I'll
At 7:17 PM -0800 on 3/8/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: The debate rages on! Are CGI programs that
don't do HTTP headers by definition 'broken'? Despite
the fact that they have been in use for several years
already without any complaints from my thousands of
'captive' clients?
Yes. The HTTP/1.0
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/03/07/1123211mode=nested
This is just cool. Now we can compile our code on systems we don't even
have. Should be great for testing compatability.
I just did a test from outside of Erol's, where I do get the whole
page. Your CGI is not sending a single header. It is categorically,
without question, broken. That it works _anywhere_ stuns me.
See: ftp://NIS.NSF.NET/internet/documents/rfc/rfc2068.txt
At 2:23 PM -0800 on 3/5/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: The newest (local non-CGI) version will be
available to everyone who has an FTP account with
FreeCard. We will establish some kind of check-in and
check-out process to insure that only one person makes
changes to it at any given time.
At 1:50 PM +0100 on 3/5/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
BTW: I noticed something neat -- X on Unix allows reals for the number
of points in a font. Hmmm...
Anthony,
just reminds me that I have code to draw text in a box. That is, scaled to
exactly fit into the box, stretched and skewed as
At 2:01 PM +0100 on 3/5/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Sometime we're going to have to consider a version numbering system. I'm
into doing something interesting for Interpreter; perhaps convergence on
pi (this would mean that 1 is a newer version than 10, but both are
older versions than 3). That
FC.cgi is unquestionably broken. I have tested this by dumping
every packet sent between my computer and your server.
The outgoing packets are correct. The incomming ones are
masacred. The only place for the massacre to occur is at the
router-level webcache my ISP is running, and your site is
http://advogato.org/article/39.html
Discussion on calling C routines from non-C languages. We certainly want
to make it easy to interface to FreeCard in any language.
I'm sure Uli will become more and more assertive of this, too, as he
keeps trying to write C++ XThings. Actually, with the way
http://advogato.org/article/40.html
Sometime we're going to have to consider a version numbering system. I'm
into doing something interesting for Interpreter; perhaps convergence on
pi (this would mean that 1 is a newer version than 10, but both are
older versions than 3). That would be a cruel
http://advogato.org/article/42.html
Article on internationalization. I imagine we have plenty of expertise
on this list on that subject already, but another perspective will not
hurt.* Also, if covers some of the software availible to help.
*this sentence should be taken out and shot
At 4:04 PM +0100 on 3/3/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Hi,
I have just uploaded three HTML files with details on our license:
http://ufp.uqam.ca/fclicens.htm
404...
Subject says it all.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/03/03/096223mode=nested
At 3:05 PM +0100 on 3/2/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
put "hello" after standardOutput
You can't use put with standard output because standard output is NBOT
seekable, and explaining to users why they can only put to the end of
standard out is a mess. Write, OTOH, only allows append.
Besides,
At 3:38 PM +0100 on 3/1/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Anthony,
I heave an idea that should help debugging the FreeCard code base and to
do some prototyping: We could compile the code into XCMDs/XFCNs which the
scripters on this list could then use. This would make it extremely easy
for any
- Alain on the web site
- Eric on the editor interface (aka FreeUI)
- Adrian on the voting CGI
- Anthony on NuInterpreter
- Me on the file format (aka XBF)
I wrote the bug tracking CGI, which also includes voting, passwords,
etc. No one seemed interested, however, so I didn't quite finish
At 8:15 PM -0800 on 2/29/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Good evening fellow freecarders.
Here is the most recent incarnation
of my web site generator, accessible
via our home page: http://ufp.uqam.ca/index.html
Ummm... I don't see any pages, just file not found errors. Are you
updating it right now?
At 2:01 PM +0100 on 2/27/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
well, good to know that. Since the file format will be cross-platform
anyway, I don't think this'll be a problem. As to stdin and stdout --
MetaCard has stdin and stdout (as well as long forms standardInput and
standardOutput in preparation),
At 12:42 PM -0800 on 2/28/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Eric: I'm going to have to continue my UI paper
after hearing this. Drat. Was hoping to avoid it...
Alain: Does your paper deal mainly with aesthetics, or
is it focused on the knowledge-engineering aspects of
GUI design? (ergonomie cognitive).
At 3:06 AM -0700 on 2/28/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to have to continue my UI paper after hearing this. Drat. Was
hoping to avoid it...
--PLEASE tell me what you want then - you would be far more likely to get it
because I cannot read minds.
That's what my UI paper is. It's rather
At 12:32 PM -0700 on 2/25/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than that I think the MC interface is just fine. Ok, some more menus
would be nice, neater palettes, and again these are just cosmetic changes.
I'm going to have to continue my UI paper after hearing this. Drat. Was
hoping to avoid
At 5:49 PM +0100 on 2/25/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Also, if we write code and
put it under this licence now and in three months decide to use a different
one, we would have to write all code anew if the licenses are not
compatible. Once code is under a licence we cannot revoke it if we are
At 5:33 PM +0100 on 2/25/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Of course. But it working without X is very, very, very important for
CGI's on Unix.
Anthony,
only NuInterpreter itself would be useful in that context. The whole
stack/UI stuff wouldn't be needed for that. Would it?
I'm guessing you'd want
At 7:40 PM +0100 on 2/23/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Anthony,
this would be possible, but someone would have to port FreeCard to a
console API for that, since the buttons etc. would be C GUI API calls after
all.
Of course. But it working without X is very, very, very important for
CGI's on
snip
Alain, there has been a slight miscommunication. Somehow the sides have
gotten mixed up. I want the luser who thinks he can undo the GPL by a
stupid notice to get the 20-ton LART, not the other guy!
I'll use names next time to prevent any confusion.
At 12:14 AM +1000 on 2/25/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
I tried WindowMaker, but it segfaulted. Havn't gotten around to making
it work -- I'll try again sometime. I hear it looks good, too.
At 4:31 PM -0500 on 2/24/00, Mark Rauterkus wrote:
But what does this mean in the 'real world?' By this I mean that the GPL is
sorta sacred and NOT to be altered. We are making a change to it, right? Is
this type of thing done eleswhere?
We're not changing the GPL -- we're just making an
At 9:00 PM -0500 on 2/23/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/22/2000 1:27:08 AM, you wrote:
Linux is getting more and more user friendly. Ever seen a Linux box
with Enlightenment?
Could you elucidate?
A linux box with X and the Enlightenment window manager.
At 12:52 PM -0800 on 2/23/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: What does this move entail for you, Anthony. In
what way is it a PITA? We only have the mere
beginnings of a web site, a half-dozen FTP accounts,
and our mail is handled by MetaCard. Besides, I
thought that the CVS, bugTracking and such
At 2:16 PM +1000 on 2/24/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
It's ugly and difficult to use? I never liked Enlightenment, but yes, Linux
is getting much more user friendly.
Gnome Enlightenment looks pretty nice. What do you use?
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/02/23/2014205mode=nested
Guy thinks he cna make people who download his binaries give up their
right to source under the GPL. Hopefully, he gets a nice 20-ton LART in
court. If he wins on the other hand Very Bad Thing.
Forwarded from e RISKS digest:
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 09:28:42 -0500
From: "Jeremy Epstein" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YAIESB: Yet Another Internet Explorer Security Bug
Under certain circumstances, a web server can force an IE client to serve up
the contents of a file on a local hard drive.
An interesting piece of software -- should help us:
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:35:00 -0800
From: John Viega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Announcement of the ITS4 software security scanner
[This is a nifty piece of work, and presents one more argument for
open-source software -- although I
At 6:49 PM +1000 on 2/22/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
could you possibly elaborate what SIGTSTP does?
Tells the process to pause. Makes it stop eating CPU time.
Adrian: Actually, it tells it that it's not going to get any more CPU time
for a while - the application doesn't have a choice in the
At 6:48 PM +1000 on 2/22/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Adrian: My apologies to you Anthony, I hadn't received any of your messages
for some strange reason. (I just got a whole heap of them then).
Enjoy :)
I'd love
to know why it doesn't work for Netscape for you - it works for me.
Well, I've got
At 11:41 AM -0500 on 2/22/00, Mark Rauterkus wrote:
Yes, we should move our core efforts to SourceForge or some other outlet
like that. But, I see no need to shop around.
Huh? Moving it around -- especially after people start to know about
the site, bookmark to it, etc. -- would be a major
At 11:31 AM -0700 on 2/22/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that we will eventually need to convert these to hyperCard?
No -- we'll eventually need to convert them the FreeCard, though.
I presume the freekard gui will be done as stackware and not in C++. Is that
presumption correct?
Uli, I plan to add at least the following to the Interpreter
o function disabling
o maximum execution times
o levels of trust
and possibly:
o taint checking
And more, s I think of them. I plan to use Interpreter for other work
as well as FC. It will be fairly
At 2:46 PM +0100 on 2/22/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Alain: This does seem strange to me, because: (1) I am
not employing any change recently made to JavaScript.
(2) Not long ago, several months in fact, I was using
Netscape 4.0.x with an earlier version of my system.
(3) Over 4000 students (and a
At 2:49 PM +0100 on 2/22/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Adding in antivirus stuff might be really useful. Sounds like a 1.1
feature to add a way of locking the home stack to prevent infections.
Uli, it'll be in the first Interpreter I release. Basicly, the
Interpreter will be able to disable
the website (or at least everything linked directly/indirectly from
index.html) as an iCab webarchive:
http://ufp.uqam.ca/OpenCard/WebSite.icab.hqx
At 8:19 AM +1000 on 2/21/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:
instead of having to browse that interface from
hell?
Alain: Boy, do I feel like a piece of shit right now !!!
Adrian: Well, I still don't see what's so bad about it.
Adrian, you must of missed it: It does not work for my on *any* browser
I
At 10:51 AM -0800 on 2/20/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
--- DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's under the HyperCard section, this is all I
get with NN 4.08:
03)"Advantages of using the Translator interface
HyperCard Translator, in-depth
Alain: I really don't get it. In my
At 5:14 PM -0800 on 2/20/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
BTW: I'll consider making my own. Definitely will
make my own NuParser Interpreter pages.
Alain: Here is the URL of the contents page of the
portion of my web site concerning NuParser:
http://ufp.uqam.ca/opencard/WebSite/Page5200.html
QUite a
Looking at the FC page, idea #1...
Suspend and resume used to be used before launching a new program
without MultiFinder on System 6 and prior.
However, it still has a perfectly good meaning on some systems
(e.g., Unices), for when the process is sent SIGTSTP
I have problems with:
http://giguere.dsc.uqam.ca/freecard/index.html
It's part of a project I am working on. I can't seem to get it to work
with any browser I have (all 6 of them!), and am wondering if the common
factor is ISP.
Anyway, here are the problems I experiance:
Javascript
At 12:46 PM -0800 on 2/21/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: On a societal-level, I will hazard the
prediction that an enormous backlash against the Web
is brewing in the near future. Instead of moving
forward with CSS, XML and client-side scripting (JS or
VB), we are heading in the opposite
At 10:54 PM +0100 on 2/20/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
KUTGW.
Pardon?
Keep up the good work
^^ ^ ^^
At 3:34 PM +0100 on 2/21/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
could you possibly elaborate what SIGTSTP does?
Tells the process to pause. Makes it stop eating CPU time.
At 12:15 AM +0100 on 2/22/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
they will be. After all, our porting criteria also include that HyperCard
virii like MerryXmas etc. will run. Of course, we could add some protection
schemes that prevent the home stack from being modified etc.
I'm inclined to put access
At 3:43 PM +0100 on 2/21/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
As to Netscape 4.08, that looks really like a problem.
Same with Communicator.
I've asked other people on my ISP to check. A bcc should come across the list.
At 5:30 PM -0800 on 2/21/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: Home for sure, but it is not the only sensitive
component. All scripts should be protectable. Make
sure, among other things, that nefarious programs like
The Devil's Workshop are effectively barred access.
Possible?
There is no way to make
At 3:17 PM -0500 on 2/21/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/21/2000 9:19:20 AM, you wrote:
It's in ftp://upf.uqam.ca/Downloads/Uli/Elektra.sit.
I get server not found.
He made a typo -- s/upf/ufp/
At 9:08 AM -0700 on 2/21/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Enclosed are four stacks/palettes (and just some of my creations...)
http://ufp.uqam.ca/OpenCard/Downloads/Eric/%21propert.mc
http://ufp.uqam.ca/OpenCard/Downloads/Eric/%21vission.mc
http://ufp.uqam.ca/OpenCard/Downloads/Eric/easel.mc
At 12:09 AM +0100 on 2/22/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Hi,
here's a first licence proposal: GPL (or for some parts maybe LGPL) plus
the following exception:
- SNIP! -
As a special exception, you may distribute integrated combinations
of FreeCard in executable form with the your files
At 2:28 AM +0100 on 2/19/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Maybe we could require that if you make any changes and use the special
exception, you must submit the changes back to the FreeCard group? Did
you ask RMS about this?
Anthony,
If they have to submit changes, they won't be able to go on
At 2:40 AM +0100 on 2/19/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
pop up a small window
whenever the program quits that says "Created using FreeCard 1.0, available
*at no charge* at http://ufp.uqam.ca/freecard" or something like that).
I'll see what Richard says.
Read the gnu website -- especially the part
At 3:25 PM -0800 on 2/18/00, Alain Farmer wrote:
Alain: Are you still experiencing problems with our
web site? I visited it a few minutes ago. Everything
works like a charm.
Yes.
Anthony: I got to the Interpreter pages, then clicked
the two links there and got this in NS's JS log: ...
Page is
At 2:20 AM +0100 on 2/19/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
Oh yeh... that's right. Die R/B tree, die! :)
Anthony,
you wouldn't guess who I met at the funeral ... Multimap!
KUTGW.
At 5:38 PM -0500 on 2/18/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/18/2000 12:36:50 PM, you wrote:
As a special exception, integrated combinations of FreeCard in
executable form with your stacks to be displayed using
FreeCard is permitted under your choice of license, provided
If it's under the HyperCard section, this is all I get with NN 4.08:
03)"Advantages of using the Translator interface HyperCard Translator,
in-depth
I don't think we have one. Especially since "international" usually
implies that people from all over the world meet in this one same place,
right?
Yes, international usually means that. But they have sub-regionals and
regionals first, and then the winners go on to the international one
1 - 100 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
