Re: OODL: Unanimity and consensus are not equivalent

1999-12-29 Thread M. Uli Kusterer

If you and Uli want to tell me every partner has a veto power and no one
is a dictator but some person appointed unanimously by the partners can
make decisions in spite of another partner's objections, OK.

Hi,

 if I appeared to say that, I guess my English is even worse than I
believed. I'm exactly trying to prevent this. Unanimity is important, as
else a biger part of the partnership could do something the smaller part
doesn't want, probably nullifying the other partner's resources or whatever.

 I think we won't need more than 8 partners, everything else can be done by
associates. Partners are just the core, so there's a tangible body that
doesn't change on which FreeCard users can rely. Associates may come and go
and are the informal group we already have.


Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer


 http://www.weblayout.com/witness
   'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'

--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html




OODL: Unanimity and consensus are not equivalent

1999-12-28 Thread Alain Farmer

 Alain: We are talking about Unanimity. We are NOT
 talking about Consensus. Consensus is not a synonym
 for Unanimity.

Anthony: Alain, let's go to the dictionary. Today's
dictionary is: Merriam-Webster's online WWWebster
dictionary. Today's definition is:

 consensus = 1 a : general agreement

Alain: GENERAL agreement necessarily implies UNANIMOUS
agreement ??

 UNANIMITY the consensus of their opinion based on 
 reports... from the border -- John Hersey

Alain: Yes, sometimes consensus is ambiguously taken
to mean unanimity, just as one of the definitions of
the term anarchy means disorder while in fact it was
originally a political school of thought.

 b : the judgment arrived at by MOST of those
concerned 
 the consensus was to go ahead

Alain: I agree indeed that consensus means "MOST of
those concerned". Most is not equivalent to All.

 2 : group solidarity in sentiment and belief

Alain: Exactly!  I particularly like this definition
of consensus because it conveys the spirit of what I
mean when I use the term consensus.

Anthony: So, yes it is a synonym for unamity.

Alain: Selective perception, eh!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com



Re: OODL: Unanimity and consensus are not equivalent

1999-12-28 Thread Rob Cozens
>Anthony: So, yes it is a synonym for unamity.

I'll see your Merriam-Webster's and raise a Funk  Waganalls: 

"unanimous: ... showing or resulting from the assent of all concerned" 

[emphasis mine]

If you want to tell me "consensus" is a synonym for unanimity, OK.  

If you and Uli want to tell me every partner has a veto power and no one is a dictator but some person appointed unanimously by the partners can make decisions in spite of another partner's objections, OK.

The US sold weapons to Iran and Iran returned hostages to the US; but it wasn't arms for hostages eitherright?


Rob Cozens, CCW
http://www.serendipitysoftware.com/who.html

"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."

from "The Triple Foole" by  John Donne (1572-1631) 

Re: OODL: Unanimity and consensus are not equivalent

1999-12-28 Thread DeRobertis

At 4:24 PM -0800 on 12/28/99, Alain Farmer wrote:

 2 : group solidarity in sentiment and belief

Alain: Exactly!  I particularly like this definition
of consensus because it conveys the spirit of what I
mean when I use the term consensus.

Maybe I should look up solidarity


Anyway, I'd just like to point out that a definition like this is _very_
hard to work with. When you say 'unanimous', you can objectivly determine
that. When you say '60% of those voting/those present' you can objectivly
determine that. When you say 'a consensus' and don't mean a unamity, you
can't objectivly determine that. If you disagree, please give a method.