On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 6:08 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Antonio Borneo wrote:
Should every file in the project be converted to TAB width = 4 ?
NO!!!
I'm inclined not to touch the patch. I'm kinda whitespace blind
and this seems to be an area
David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Antonio Borneo wrote:
Should every file in the project be converted to TAB width = 4 ?
NO!!!
Why not?
I do not like tab=4 myself, but if the styleguide says to use that
tabwidth for OpenOCD, then every file should conform to
Hi Flemming,
--- Flemming Futtrup f...@deif.com schrieb am Mi, 30.12.2009:
I have run into trouble with a new board holding the SST
39VF6401B external flash.
TAP: lpc2468.cpu (enabled)
Make sure the buffering is disabled in EMCStaticConfig0 of the LPC2468 (board
config file?).
If
Flemming Futtrup wrote:
Info : Flash Manufacturer/Device: 0x00bf 0x236d
Error: Could not probe bank: no QRY
Try workaround w/0x555 instead of 0x55 to get QRY.
Error: Could not probe bank: no QRY
Error: auto_probe failed -900
At this point I assumed that the concerned Flash device is a
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Does it have anything to do with this?
src/flash/nor/cfi.c:
/* enter CFI query mode
* according to JEDEC Standard No. 68.01,
* a single bus sequence with address = 0x55, data = 0x98
should put
* the device
Exactly. I tried a workaround some time ago, but the CFI data in the SST
flashs was not really useable.
So are you thinking about creating a patch for the other cases than the
one that is already handled in OpenOCD?
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
So are you thinking about creating a patch for the other cases than the
one that is already handled in OpenOCD?
No. I think it is best to handle these SST flashs as non-CFI, because I
am not sure how to sanitize the CFI data from these parts in a uniform way.
cu
Hi,
in the file ./tcl/interface/parport_dlc5.cfg the line
parport_port /dev/parport0
is not correct, since the argument for such command must be an integer.
Error message is:
Error: Invalid command argument
parport_port option value ('/dev/parport0') is not valid
Command handler execution failed
Sounds reasonable.
Pushed.
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Segfault conditions:
- target is arm926ejs (any arm9tdmi should behave same)
- board is powered off, or JTAG is missing
- start openOCD (obviously complains that cannot reach target)
- type command arm9tdmi vector_catch reset
Get segfault at arm9tdmi.c:845 for NULL pointer arm7_9-eice_cache
Such
Hi Michael,
Thanks for all the comments Good to know that I might be on the track.
Here are my comments/questions:
So something goes wrong when running the programming algorithm on the
target. One possible area would be the command-completion check, where
the toggle/error bits differ between
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Antonio Borneo wrote:
Fix, in attachment, just tests target has been already examined.
I believe this is the proper place for the check, but please confirm.
This is right; good patch, thanks. Merged.
___
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Antonio Borneo wrote:
In attachment there is the first patch of the set, compressed.
It just touches the following files:
./BUGS
./NEWS-0.2.0
./NEWTAPS
./PATCHES
./README.Win32
./TODO
./bootstrap
./configure.in
./doc/manual/primer/commands.txt
Hi Rolf,
Following commands are called on reset_init:
## -- Event handlers --
proc reset_init { } {
jtag_khz 200
# Force target into ARM state
armv4_5 core_state arm
# -- 1. Disconnect the PLL with one feed sequence if PLL is already
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Michael Schwingen wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Antonio Borneo wrote:
Should every file in the project be converted to TAB width = 4 ?
NO!!!
Why not?
I do not like tab=4 myself,
That's part of it. I have
Hi Guys,
I am a little lost:-)
What is this code part about? If it is about querying - the flash was already
identified, but it is probably not...
Thanks Flemming
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
On Monday 28 December 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
The refactor is not to support our patch, just to clean up the ft2232
driver. My comment is in response to something that was said should
probably be done anyway, not specifically to support our device. I
think support for our device could be
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Laurent Gauch wrote:
The idea of the JTAG and Debug port over FT2232 as with the Amontec
JTAGkey ( now JTAGkey-2, in 2010 JTAGkey-3 ),
So on Friday (2010!) we'll be hearing all about JTAGkey-3! ;)
is to use one port for
JTAG / RTCK / TRST / RESET signal /
Flemming Futtrup wrote:
The Error: protect: cfi primary command set 2 unsupported message only
appears when I run the protect command in the script.
That is OK - AMD (02) commandset flashs usually do not have per-sector
protection, so the protect/unprotect operation is
On Monday 28 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I'm not quite up to speed on the SWD stuff yet, but I want
to follow this closely enough that I can implement hardware
acceleration of the SWD protocol on the ZY1000(an embedded
OpenOCD host).
My l33t mind-reading powers have improved. I knew
Flemming Futtrup wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for all the comments Good to know that I might be on the track.
Here are my comments/questions:
So something goes wrong when running the programming algorithm on the
target. One possible area would be the command-completion check, where
On Tuesday 15 December 2009, Dubreuil, Thomas wrote:
on the other hand, the dump_image function seems working but it's very
low : 50 sec for 1024 bytes ! Is it normal? My Jtag speed is 6 MHz.
I don't know about that MIPS code, but as a rule there's not
been a lot of work on making it fast to
Same issue of former patch ARM9TDMI: Fix segfault., but in additional places.
When target board is powered off, or JTAG cable disconnected, target
is not examined and pointer arm7_9-eice_cache is NULL.
How to verify:
- create a simple openocd.cfg file containing following 2 lines:
source
Hi Flemming,
--- Flemming Futtrup f...@deif.com schrieb am Mi, 30.12.2009:
Including this:
mww 0xFFE08200 0x0081
Which I believe to be what you mention?
Yes. And it's ok! (The buffer is disabled)
flash bank cfi 0x8000 0x80 2 2 $_TARGETNAME jedec_probe
I'm surprised
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Antonio Borneo wrote:
Same issue of former patch ARM9TDMI: Fix segfault., but in additional
places.
Someone is getting some good testing and bugfixing done ... :)
Merged; thanks.
Do you have a strategy for finding these, or are you just
tripping over these
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Flemming Futtrup wrote:
I will stop referring to the obscure forum:-)
FWIW that Sparkun forum is only moderately obscure.
It's the one Olimex points its customers to, and we
mention it as a User's Forum in our documentation.
However, it *is* something that's not
-Original Message-
From: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:17 PM
To: Laurent Gauch
Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de; Austin, Alex
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] [patch/rfc] Add support for
multiple-ports on FT4232H
...
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Would it hurt too much to start out creating a library that wraps
either libftd2xx or libftdi depending on configuration and exposes
the same interface either way?
I suspect it would, but I've not looked at that issue.
On the other hand,
Hi All,
Thought I might throw this out there while I was working in Eclipse. If we
are ignore the random crap introduced by Eclipse IDE, we were missing some
things in the .gitignore file. This just adds those things. They were
annoying me :).
--
// Dean Glazeski
From
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Dean Glazeski wrote:
are ignore the random crap introduced by Eclipse IDE,
Merged.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
30 matches
Mail list logo
