Re: AES, counter mode, etc.

2002-02-19 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake John Viega: Additionally, with respect to counter mode, it might be best to implement external to the EVP proper interface, just like HMAC. There are a few issues I see that make counter mode a bit different from other modes: 1) You should be able to insert your own function

Re: EVP macros for AES

2002-02-19 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake Dr S N Henson: Maybe. It would be good to the the CFB and OFB modes working properly in general for other numbers of bits. The code for this is trivial; define me an API and I'll write the code underneath. I thought about moving the whole cipher mode handling to the EVP layer

Re: EVP macros for AES

2002-02-19 Thread Dr S N Henson
Stephen Sprunk wrote: Thus spake Dr S N Henson: Maybe. It would be good to the the CFB and OFB modes working properly in general for other numbers of bits. The code for this is trivial; define me an API and I'll write the code underneath. Well I was thinking of something almost

RE: [MiNT] M68020 bn_asm

2002-02-19 Thread Howard Chu
From the overwhelming lack of response I guess no one on this list cares about Motorola 68k implementations. Just a final note in case anyone is listening. The previous file I sent works fine, passes all the tests. I noticed that my use of roxl/roxr in the bn_add_words and bn_sub_words functions

Re: [MiNT] M68020 bn_asm

2002-02-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Howard Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] hyc From the overwhelming lack of response I guess no one on this hyc list cares about Motorola 68k implementations. A less melodramatic interpretation is that there is a lack of time to take care of everything at once. For the record, I'm interested. Not