Great! Please clarify this for me, can I say F-secure is not compatible
with standards or has the vendor possibility to choose the key format?
Thanks for quick resolve.
Regards,
Jarmo
Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
OK, there are several issues here.
First of all, your private key is
Thanks, the new OID has been added for 0.9.7 and later.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The doc says :
Create an OCSP request and write it to a file:
openssl ocsp -issuer issuer.pem -cert c1.pem -cert c2.pem -reqout req.der
In my test, I try to do exactly that with :
openssl ocsp -issuer ocsp_ca.pem -cert ocsp_valide.cer -cert
ocsp_revoque.cer -reqout req.der
But no
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 5 14:48:52 2002]:
ck_ssl.c: In function k_tn_tls_negotiate':
ck_ssl.c:3232: ID_uniqueIdentifier' undeclared (first use in this
function)
ck_ssl.c:3232: (Each undeclared identifier
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 08:55:05 2002]:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 5 14:48:52 2002]:
ck_ssl.c: In function k_tn_tls_negotiate':
ck_ssl.c:3232: ID_uniqueIdentifier' undeclared (first use in this
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
dkaufman On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
dkaufman
dkaufman Can I assume that sed exists and works properly? dirname can be
dkaufman coded like this:
dkaufman ...
dkaufman This won't work in systems where an
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 5 Jun
2002 08:05:10 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dkaufman On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
dkaufman
dkaufman Can I assume that sed exists and works properly? dirname can be
dkaufman coded like this:
dkaufman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 5 Jun
2002 23:48:36 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dkaufman Or perhaps, if you want to use perl, use File::Basename. This
dkaufman implementation works for unix, DOS, Cygwin, VMS, etc.
Excellent!
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
For instance, mod_ssl 2.8.8-1.3.24 use workaround:
#ifndef NID_uniqueIdentifier
#define NID_uniqueIdentifier 102
#endif
I don't like this option. As it is now, the new (correct)
NID_uniqueIdentifier is
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
For instance, mod_ssl 2.8.8-1.3.24 use workaround:
#ifndef NID_uniqueIdentifier
#define NID_uniqueIdentifier 102
#endif
I don't like this option. As it is now, the new (correct)
NID_uniqueIdentifier is
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:27:11AM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
For instance, mod_ssl 2.8.8-1.3.24 use workaround:
#ifndef NID_uniqueIdentifier
#define NID_uniqueIdentifier 102
#endif
I don't like
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 08:52:53 2002]:
Great! Please clarify this for me, can I say F-secure is not
compatible
with standards or has the vendor possibility to choose the key
format?
F-secure doesn't seem to be compatible with standards. There are a
number of structures that a
Mike Pechkin via RT wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
The problem is caused by inconsistent definitions for the OID values.
According to RFC2256, the OID 2.5.4.45 is assigned to
X500UniqueIdentifier. UniqueIdentifier was assigned to
In revision 1.81 of Configure, the automatic run of 'make depend' was
commented out. IIRC, this was done because we had a dependency
rebuild war happening a little now and then back then. Since then,
we've unified the results of dependency generation with the domd
script, so this kind of war
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:47:24PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:01:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
The correct PERL interpreter is passed via commandline.
RCS file:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 4 19:47:25 2002]:
OK, I've a few comments:
--- openssl-0.9.7/Configure.orig 2002-05-30
10:08:08.0 -0800
+++ openssl-0.9.7/Configure 2002-06-02 15:23:38.0 -0800
@@ -513,6 +513,9 @@
Cygwin-pre1.3, gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 6 Jun 2002
11:17:18 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Lutz.Jaenicke The correct solution would therefore be, to pass all
Lutz.Jaenicke options back from withing test/Makefile (which would
Lutz.Jaenicke call crypto/ and ssl/ builds in case
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
I would like to see more discussions about this issue. I have looked
around some more and still find referrals like
http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/2.5.4.45.html
with the UniqueIdentifier term instead of X500UniqueIdentifier.
This is the original name of this
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Also, markus@ created this temp patch:
+@@ -102,6 +104,13 @@
+ !ERROR This module requires OpenSSL 0.9.5a or higher
+ #endif /* OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER */
+ #endif /* SSLDLL */
++
++#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Also, markus@ created this temp patch:
+@@ -102,6 +104,13 @@
+ !ERROR This module requires OpenSSL 0.9.5a or higher
+ #endif /* OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER */
+ #endif /* SSLDLL */
++
++#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 12:39:50PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Also, markus@ created this temp patch:
+@@ -102,6 +104,13 @@
+ !ERROR This module requires OpenSSL 0.9.5a or higher
+ #endif /*
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 6 Jun 2002
11:17:18 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Lutz.Jaenicke The correct solution would therefore be, to pass all
Lutz.Jaenicke options back from withing
Hi,
I have generated PKCS12 files using openSSL pkcs12. I am now trying to
access these files programmatically through Java
KeyStore and am getting (in Java 1.4):
java.security.UnrecoverableKeyException: Could not perform unpadding:
invalid pad byte.
at
Hi
I am getting this erro when I tried. 128 Bit.
digest too big for rsa key
Here is my code sinppet
=
RSA *key; /* Key Generated */
unsigned char *sigret=NULL; /* Signature Return */
unsigned int siglen;/* Signature length */
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:05:08PM -0400, Dusty Phillips wrote:
Is there no action on this list?
Well, no, there isn't. One reason is that Patrick hasn't had time to get
nightly snapshots working, so I'm embarrassed to talk about changes
immediately when we do them (eg. the recent really
Hi,
I have generated PKCS12 files using openSSL pkcs12. I am now trying to
access these files programmatically through Java
KeyStore and am getting (in Java 1.4):
java.security.UnrecoverableKeyException: Could not perform unpadding:
invalid pad byte.
at
It seems like there might be some problems on newer versions of
OpenSSL, where times() should be used rather than ftime() for certain
time measurements. Does anyone know from which version of MacOS X
times() exists?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken
Hello,
I was trying to build the OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta1 source.
The steps that I went through were
perl Configure VC-WIN32
ms\do_ms
nmake /f ms\ntdll.mak
I was able to build libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll but the make process
failed while building evp_test.c. The exact message produced was :
28 matches
Mail list logo
