There seems to be some confusion here.
James, I understand the tpm engine as an external project, not part of the
OpenSSL source proper and not intended to be.
However, openssl-dev@openssl.org is a list focused on the development of
OpenSSL proper. That makes it a bit odd to discuss the tpm
> > I'm still waiting on a reply ... I assume holidays are contributing to the
> > delay.
> > However, openssl_tpm_engine is a DCO project, so that concern is
> > irrelevant here.
>
> Sorry, I'll push to get the bylaws made public, is that what you need?
The OSF bylaws are now linked to from
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 16:11 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 02:52:43PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This patch adds RSA signing for TPM2 keys. There's a limitation to
> > the way TPM2 does signing: it must recognise the OID for the
> > signature. That fails for the
In message <1483487075.2464.59.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Tue, 03 Jan 2017
15:44:35 -0800, James Bottomley said:
James.Bottomley> On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 12:19 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
James.Bottomley> > There seems to be some confusion here.
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 18:22 +, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > I'm still waiting on a reply ... I assume holidays are contributing
> > to the delay. However, openssl_tpm_engine is a DCO project, so that
> > concern is irrelevant here.
>
> Sorry, I'll push to get the bylaws made public, is that what
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 12:19 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
> There seems to be some confusion here.
>
> James, I understand the tpm engine as an external project, not part
> of the OpenSSL source proper and not intended to be.
>
> However, openssl-dev@openssl.org is a list focused on the
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 00:04 +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> On 03/01/17 12:44, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > > > I'm still waiting on a reply ... I assume holidays are
> > > > contributing to the delay.
> > > > However, openssl_tpm_engine is a DCO project, so that concern
> > > > is
> > > > irrelevant
-Original Message-
From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of James
Bottomley
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 6:23 PM
To: Jason Gunthorpe
Cc: trousers-t...@lists.sourceforge.net; tpmdd-de...@lists.sourceforge.net;
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 16:40 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:22:56PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I think it is very important to natively support the sign-only
> > > key usage restriction. TPM1.2 goes so far as to declare keys that
> > > can be used for arbitary
On 03/01/17 12:44, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>> I'm still waiting on a reply ... I assume holidays are contributing to the
>>> delay.
>>> However, openssl_tpm_engine is a DCO project, so that concern is
>>> irrelevant here.
>>
>> Sorry, I'll push to get the bylaws made public, is that what you need?
>
10 matches
Mail list logo