Hi Dan,
On 21/01/21 19:22, Dan Heinz wrote:
[...]
Thank you all for the helpful suggestions. When I removed no-asm and
built using nmake in the Developer Command Prompt for Visual Studio
2015, I ended up getting an error "VC-WIN64A X86 conflicts with target
x64". From the command prompt I
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael
Wojcik
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 9:28 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1g Windows build slow rsa tests
> >From: openssl-users On Behalf Of
> >Dr Paul Dale
> >Sent: Wednesday
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Dr Paul
> Dale
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 January, 2021 19:28
>
> I'd suggest giving a build without the no-asm option a try. The
> performance difference is usually quite significant.
I agree. It just doesn't explain what Dan's email claims.
> Statis vs dynamic
I'd suggest giving a build without the no-asm option a try. The
performance difference is usually quite significant.
Statis vs dynamic builds wouldn't normally be associated with such a
large difference. If the difference were routinely this large, nobody
would use dynamic linking.
Pauli
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Dr Paul
> Dale
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 January, 2021 16:19
>
> Try building without the no-asm configuration option.
That was my first thought, but according to Dan's message, the firedaemon
version is also built with no-asm.
The only relevant differences I see
Try building without the no-asm configuration option.
Pauli
On 21/1/21 6:18 am, Dan Heinz wrote:
Hello,
I’m building openssl 1.1.1g on multiple platforms and I found that the
rsa speed tests are significantly slower in my build than on the other
OS platforms (Linux and macOS).
I
Hello,
I'm building openssl 1.1.1g on multiple platforms and I found that the rsa
speed tests are significantly slower in my build than on the other OS platforms
(Linux and macOS).
I downloaded a Windows 64-bit binary distribution of openssl from
