- Original Message -
From: Michael Still michael.st...@canonical.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net, openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 5:12:22 AM
Subject: [Openstack] [Nova] How common is user_data for instances?
Greetings.
I'm seeking
+1 Excellent reviews and contributions as well!
- Original Message -
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: Openstack (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
(openstack@lists.launchpad.net) openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:09:14 PM
Subject:
+1. Nice work Michael!
- Original Message -
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: Openstack (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
(openstack@lists.launchpad.net) openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:13:54 PM
Subject: [Openstack] [nova] Proposal to
+1. Nice work Yun.
- Original Message -
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: Openstack (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
(openstack@lists.launchpad.net) openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:10:41 PM
Subject: [Openstack] [nova] Proposal to add
-
From: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Mailing List openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2012 9:59:54 PM
Subject: Glance/Swift tenant specific storage
I started working on the Glance swift-tenant-specific-storage
blueprint last week.
I've got a working branch
- Original Message -
From: David Kranz david.kr...@qrclab.com
To: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 9:15:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Glance/Swift tenant specific storage
Dan, I am involved in a project (not Glance) that is doing something
similar
- Original Message -
From: Dave Walker davewal...@ubuntu.com
To: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net, John Garbutt john.garb...@citrix.com
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 6:01:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] PEP8 checks
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:28:04AM
- Original Message -
From: Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
To: andrewbog...@gmail.com
Cc: Andrew Bogott abog...@wikimedia.org, openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 3:26:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] best practices for merging common into specific
and is not managed by the CI team. Dan Prince
does
a great job with it, but it's not a resource that we have the ability
to
fix should it start messing up, so we have not granted it the
permissions to file blocking votes.
I would add that if anyone else is interested in collaborating on making
I went ahead and implemented the fix here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8943/1/nova/virt/libvirt/connection.py
Once we do this the version requirement should be back at 0.9.6 (I think).
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
- Original Message -
From: Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2012 5:50:45 PM
Subject: [Openstack] Comparing roles - case (in)sensitivity
tl;dr - Should we
Hey Jim,
Any updates or new ideas on the cause of the intermittent hangs?
I mentioned these on IRC with regards to one of the Essex failures one
thing I've seen with Glance recently is that both the glance-api and
glance-registry now use (and try to auto create) the database by default.
- Original Message -
From: Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:07:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] The right way to deprecate things in nova?
On 06/13/2012 01:35 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
snip
So up until this
- Original Message -
From: Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 3:50:45 PM
Subject: [Openstack] The right way to deprecate things in nova?
I'm in the process of deprecating the old way that we do virt drivers
so
that
Hey Jim,
I actually turned off SmokeStack earlier today for potentially the same reason.
I was out for a couple days last week and haven't quite put my finger on all
the things that are wrong. I'm seeing about half of the functional test runs
fail.
This issue seems to be the cause of most of
- Original Message -
From: David Kranz david.kr...@qrclab.com
To: Daryl Walleck daryl.wall...@rackspace.com
Cc: openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:43:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack-qa-team] deleted flavor
- Original Message -
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:27:07 PM
Subject: [Openstack-qa-team] Single failed test case needs fixing...
deleting a flavor
All, if anyone has a few spare cycles to look into
use the nova-manage
commands - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/7215/
2) Remove nova-manage commands. The data won't have been migrated out
yet, but you won't have any interface to it through Nova. I'm
waiting on an OK from Dan Prince here, as I don't want to break
SmokeStack!
OK. I put
- Original Message -
From: John Garbutt john.garb...@citrix.com
To: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 10:56:44 AM
Subject: RE: [Openstack] database migration cleanup
I may have
Several people asked me on IRC about SmokeStack being down.
I'm having some issues with the image snapshot I used to spin up server groups
for XenServer testing... so until I get a couple hours to go have a look at
either creating a new snapshot or fixing the existing snapshot the XenServer
- Original Message -
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:14:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] database migration cleanup
+1. Might be nice to have some kind of test
- Original Message -
From: Monsyne Dragon mdra...@rackspace.com
To: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
Cc: Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 1:46:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] database
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:13:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] database migration cleanup
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
Mirations don't appear
- Original Message -
From: Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com
To: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 5:45:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] database migration cleanup
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/6847/
Nice
Russell Bryant wrote the Nova Qpid rpc implementation and is a member of the
Nova security team. He has been helping chipping away at reviews and
contributing to discussions for some time now.
I'd like to seem him Nova core so he can help out w/ reviews... definitely the
RPC ones.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 10:21:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] database migration cleanup
On 04/26/2012 03:24 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
snip
I think this scheme would support users
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 10:20:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] database migration cleanup
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
The OpenStack Essex release
The OpenStack Essex release had 82 database migrations. As these grow in number
it seems reasonable to clean house from time to time. Now seems as good a time
as any.
I came up with a first go at it here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/6847/
The idea is that we would:
* Do this early in
This week, we switched Smokestack over to use a Fedora/puppet configuration
that Derek Higgins and I have been working on. You can see those results in
gerrit now. It seems very stable and supports running Nova smoke tests and
Torpedo.
We plan on focussing our trunk chasing on
Hi David,
See below...
- Original Message -
From: David Kranz david.kr...@qrclab.com
To: openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:58:47 AM
Subject: [Openstack-qa-team] Tempest performance
I have noticed that running tempest takes longer than I
to correct me!
Best,
-jay
One final note:
We are looking at adding dual support for Fedora/puppet and Ubuntu/chef to
SmokeStack in the near future. A guy named Derek Higgins from Red Hat has
made excellent progress on this front.
--
Dan Prince
princ...@alumni.jmu.edu
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Dan Prince
princ...@alumni.jmu.edu
to coordinate making these types of changes?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:09pm
To: OpenStack Mailing List openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Integration test gating on trunk
Dan Prince dan.pri
Hi Jim,
A couple of questions for you:
1) You mentioned how to coordinate changes between glance and nova but what
about devstack. Does that same process apply to devstack as well? For example
if there were a configuration file change (api-paste changes often and can
cause failures) would
an explicit cleanup for /tmp/glance-tests to
make sure we have a clean slate for each test run.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 7:14am
To: Dan Prince dan.pri...@rackspace.com
Cc: Openstack openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re
Hello all,
We just turned on a [https://github.com/dprince/bellows] Bellows feature that
will automatically update Gerrit reviews with SmokeStack test results. Each
Gerrit review should have a comment that looks something like this:
SmokeStack Results (patch set 2):
Unit Success:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:05pm
To: openstack (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] Proposal for Mark McLoughlin to join nova-core
Mark is maintaining openstack
I Kiran,
If you are interested in functionally testing the various openstack API's you
might check out the following:
https://github.com/rackspace-titan/stacktester (v1.1 OSAPI tests written in
Python)
https://github.com/dprince/openstack_vpc/tree/master/tests/ruby (v1.0 OSAPI
tests
The nova-tarmac jobs gets hung quite often lately. I know a lot of fingers have
been pointing at Launchpad issues but I'm not sure that is the case here. When
its hung the console output of the job is almost always at:
Running test command: /home/jenkins/openstack-ci/test_nova.sh
This is
. In
Launchpad we typically had people naming their branches w/ either a feature/fix
name or the ticket number. So in Launchpad my branch would be called something
like 'lp:~dan-prince/fix_ec2_metadata' or whatever. In Gerrit the branch names
up for review are rather cryptic 'refs/changes/76/176/1
We are getting lots of conflicts with migration numbers in merge props.
What are thoughts on using date time stamps (UTC format) instead of sequential
numbering?
So instead of:
021_rename_image_ids.py
We'd use:
20110402122512_rename_image_ids.py (or something similar).
Rails projects now
+1
Brian is a rock solid python developer.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 3:16pm
To: Openstack openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] Proposal for Brian Lamar to join Nova-Core
While I was checking branch
Hey Sandy,
So the API version works in the sense that if you hit /v1.0 you'll get the
older v1.0 style API. Likewise for /v1.1.
The big things still in flux as far as v1.1 support in nova:
-making the JSON and XML serialization match the spec. On the JSON side there
are some collections
Soren/Monty,
The most recent glance PPA packages fail due to the fact that glance trunk now
uses separate files for glance-api.conf and glance-registry.conf. This merge
prop should fix it:
https://code.launchpad.net/~dan-prince/glance/ubuntu-glance-api-version/+merge/61001
Cheers,
Dan
+1
I just SmokeStack'ed a couple more suspiciously old branches and marked them
needs fixing because they didn't merge w/ trunk. Most of which already had
needs fixing for other reasons anyway.
---
Also, I've been sitting on lp:~dan-prince/nova/chown_vdb_device for a month
now. I'm happy
Hi Fred,
The image format for the old S3 image service (local image store) changed a bit
in Cactus. I believe there is a 'nova-manage image convert' command you can use
to convert the old naming scheme to the Cactus image store format.
Or like Todd pointed out below you can also manually do
to build nova ubuntu packages
on Maverick:
lp:~dan-prince/nova/ubuntu-hunking-fixes
lp:~dan-prince/nova/ubuntu-fix_installinit
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2011 10:16am
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack
Hello all,
After a bit of rest I got a public SmokeStack setup here:
http://184.106.189.251/
Trunk tests with libvirt ipv4 currently fail due to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/773412
--
Is there interest in making accounts available in SmokeStack this for any and
all nova devs? It
are to reaching parity in some of the larger (meta) blueprints.
I bounced the idea around some of the teams within Rackspace and blueprint
seemed right for this one. Perhaps I was wrong.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, March 4, 2011 10:27am
To: Dan Prince
/openstack-api-server-passwords
http://etherpad.openstack.org/openstack-api-server-passwords
Dan Prince
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More
I'm not a big fan of 'known bugs' in unit tests. Unit tests should always pass.
How practical is it that I'm going to invest the time to write a unit tests on
a bug which I'm then not able to fix in the same merge. In many cases writing
the test cases are actually harder than writing the code
51 matches
Mail list logo
