On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Varun Lodaya varun_lod...@symantec.com wrote:
Hi,
We were trying to use haproxy as our LBaaS solution on the overlay. Has
anybody done some baseline benchmarking with LBaaSv1 haproxy solution?
Also, any recommended tools which we could use to do that?
Hey folks,
I wanted to get some feedback from the Nova folks on using Cinder's
Brick library. As some of you
may or may not know, Cinder has an internal module called Brick. It's
used for discovering and removing
volumes attached to a host. Most of the code in the Brick module in
cinder
Thanks , we will try to deploy it manually
I guess PowerDNS and bind are supported. This link may help you:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/designate/getting-started.html
*Best Regards?*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter?Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-01-27 02:46:03 -0800:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
I'm open to alternative suggestions on where the list of tags,
I believe I was the one who changed the default value of this. When we
upgraded our internal cloud ~6k networks back then from folsom to grizzly
we didn't account that if the dhcp-agents went offline that instances would
give up their lease and unconfigure themselves causing an outage. Setting a
On 01/27/2015 01:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-01-27 02:46:03 -0800:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
I'm open to alternative suggestions on where the list of tags, their
definition and the list
On 30 January 2015 at 09:04, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
I think there are two points. First, the original requirement (in the first
email on this thread) is not what's wanted:
...looking at the response body and HTTP response code an external system
can’t understand what exactly went
Hi ML2'ers,
We encounter use case of large amount of vlan network deployment, and
want to reduce ARP storm by local responding.
Luckily from Icehouse arp local response is implemented, however vlan
is missed for l2pop. Then came this BP[1], which implement the plugin
support of l2pop for
Hi, Experts
I am writing a template to start a multi node devstack cloud inside overcloud.
Heat Engine got exception after started the first controller VM. I am using the
latest Heat code.
Here is the stack trace:
Feb 4 15:10:21 minicloud-allinone-controller0-i7bnc6baumzl heat-engine:
There's clearly not going to be any amount of time that satisfies both
concerns here.
Just to get some other options on the table, here's some things that would
allow a non-zero dhcp lease timeout _and_ address Kevin's original bug
report:
- Just don't allow users to change their IPs without a
hi Bob,
is there any news on the CI work?
do you think the idea of small proxy program can work?
i think Terry Wilson's ovsdb effort will eventually need
something similar, unless we will maintain two versions of
the library forever.
btw, when will the next XenAPI IRC meeting be?
(i checked
- Sent from my phone
On 3 Feb 2015 10:39, wujiangtaoh...@163.com wrote:
Hi , I have some qestions about the project of Designate.
1、Can Designate be used with openstack icehouse ? how about Juno or kilo ?
Yup, we have both icehouse and Juno releases. We are currently working on Kilo,
so if
On 2015-02-03 16:40:59 +0200 (+0200), Eduard Matei wrote:
We have some questions regarding the Gerrit workflow and what
should we do next for our patch to be merged:
1. Once we have a CodeReview +2 and a Jenkins Verified +1 what
should we do next to get the patch merged?
A core reviewer for
Andrew Pashkin apash...@mirantis.com wrote:
Mike Bayer wrote:
The patch seems to hardcode the conventions for MySQL and Postgresql.
The first thought I had was that in order to remove the dependence
on them here, you’d need to instead simply turn off the
“naming_convention” in the MetaData
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:05:24PM +0100, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:44:37AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:00 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:44:09AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make use of
On 2015-02-03 08:15:39 -0500 (-0500), Victor Stinner wrote:
[...]
Debian Testing (Jessie) and Unstable (Sid) provide Python 3.4.2.
[...]
Yep, I'm playing now with the possibility to run jobs on Debian
Jessie, but due to circumstances with the providers who donate
computing resource to us I'm
Hi team,
We have some questions regarding the Gerrit workflow and what should we do
next for our patch to be merged:
1. Once we have a CodeReview +2 and a Jenkins Verified +1 what should we do
next to get the patch merged?
2. If we have a CodeReview +2 and we want to fix an issue, does the next
2015-02-03 22:40 GMT+08:00 Eduard Matei eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com:
Hi team,
We have some questions regarding the Gerrit workflow and what should we do
next for our patch to be merged:
1. Once we have a CodeReview +2 and a Jenkins Verified +1 what should we
do next to get the patch
Mike Bayer wrote:
The patch seems to hardcode the conventions for MySQL and Postgresql.
The first thought I had was that in order to remove the dependence
on them here, you’d need to instead simply turn off the
“naming_convention” in the MetaData if you detect that you’re on one
of those two
Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested,
We'll have a cross-project meeting today at 21:00 UTC, with the
following agenda:
* Horizon reviews for project (e.x. Sahara, Trove) panels (SergeyLukjanov)
* openstack-specs discussion
* Add TRACE definition to log guidelines [1]
*
I think the user resource should not have roles in it. There should be a
Role Assignment resource that grants roles to users on either tenants
(projects) or domains. On the other hand, the user resource should have a
domain association. Also, consider adding support for groups and in the future
I'm writing this in regard to several reviews concering tagging
functionality for EC2 API in nova.
The list of the reviews concerned is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/ec2-volume-and-snapshot-tags,n,z
I don't think it's a good
On 02/02/2015 08:58 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
This is pretty good but I think it leaves unresolved the biggest
question I've had about this process: What's so great about
converging the APIs? If we can narrow or clarify that aspect, good
to go.
+1, really good point
The implication with your
I’d recommend taking a look at Brandon’s review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144834/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144834/
which aims to simplify exactly what you’re describing. Please leave feedback
there.
Thanks,
doug
On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam
I’d recommend taking a look at Brandon’s review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144834/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144834/
which aims to simplify exactly what you’re describing. Please leave feedback
there.
Thanks,
doug
On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam
I’d recommend taking a look at Brandon’s review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144834/
which aims to simplify exactly what you’re describing. Please leave
feedback there.
Thanks,
doug
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam
vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi:
In
Hi All,
Due to too many members of the team being unable to attend today, we're going
to postpone the meeting until next week.
p
Peter J. Pouliot CISSP
Microsoft Enterprise Cloud Solutions
C:\OpenStack
New England Research Development Center
1 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02142
P:
On 02/02/2015 02:51 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
To improve developer experience converging the OpenStack API to
a consistent and pragmatic RESTful design. The working group
creates guidelines that all OpenStack projects should follow,
avoids introducing
Hi Vijay,
My understanding was that each vendor will have different behavior for entity
creation. LBaaS apis will mark each entity as PENDING_CREATE (?) initially and
its up to specific vendor driver whether to mark entities as DEFERRED or
actually CREATE them on LB. Vendor logic can decide the
On 02/03/2015 05:10 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
The unicast DHCP will make it to the wire, but if you've renumbered the
subnet either a) the DHCP server won't respond because it's IP has changed as
well; or b) the DHCP server won't respond because there is no mapping for the
VM
on it's old
Hi Paddu,
I think this is less an issue of the pluggable IPAM than it is the Neutron
management layer, which requires an IP for a port, as far as I know. If the
management layer is updated to allow a port to exist without a known IP, then
an additional IP request type could be added to
Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote on 01/28/2015 11:32:16 AM:
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 01/28/2015 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [api] Get
Andrew Pashkin apash...@mirantis.com wrote:
Mike Bayer wrote:
there’s always a naming convention in place; all databases other than
SQLite produce them on the fly if you don’t specify one. The purpose
of the Alembic/SQLAlchemy naming_convention feature is so that you
have *one* naming
As some of you are aware the spec for replication
is not up to date,
The current developer documentation,
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/cinder/api/cinder.volume.driver.html,
cover replication but some folks indicated that it need additional details.
In order to get the spec and
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:44:37AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:00 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:44:09AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make use of huge pages as described in
Jesse Pretorius wrote:
I think that perhaps something that shouldn't be lost site of is that
the users using the EC2 API are using it as-is. The only commitment that
needs to be made is to maintain the functionality that's already there,
rather than attempt to keep it up to scratch with newer
I really like some benefits of this approach:
- easy use in functional tests (did not require additional job)
- every user can try from this moment
- we can use both code ways in the same time without service restarting
So I really close to give my +1, if someone give answers on questions from
On 02/02/2015 09:07 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
On Feb 2, 2015, at 7:24 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/02/2015 05:35 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 01/29/2015 12:41 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Correct. This actually came up at the Nova mid cycle in a side
conversation with
On 02/03/2015 08:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jesse Pretorius wrote:
I think that perhaps something that shouldn't be lost site of is that
the users using the EC2 API are using it as-is. The only commitment that
needs to be made is to maintain the functionality that's already there,
rather
Hi,
It's good to move forward to Python 3.4 :-)
[2] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1367907
This bug was introduced in Python 3.4.0 and fixed in Python 3.4.1. It's too bad
that Ubunbu Trusty didn't upgraded yet Python 3.4 to 3.4.1 (released 6 months
ago) or 3.4.2. Request to upgrade python 3.4 in
Hi:
In OpenStack neutron lbaas implementation, when entities are created/updated by
the user, they might not be associated with the root entity, which is
loadbalancer.
Since root entity has the driver information, the driver cannot be called by
lbaas plugin during these operations by user.
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2015-02-03 02:40:44 -0800:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to choose
whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations. For some
Thanks. I will try these solutions. I think it is because I have not yet
joined the foundation.
John
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Abhishek L abhishek.lekshma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:47 PM, John Villalovos
openstack@sodarock.com wrote:
I have attempted
I think we should switch to clean migration path. We do have production
installations but we can handle initial db uprgade case by case for
customers. It is better to fix this issue now when we have few customers
rather then doing later at larger scale.
Thanks
Georgy
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:05
I have attempted over the last two days to sign the ICLA (
OpenStack Individual Contributor License Agreement)
Each time I do it I get the following error:
Code Review - Error
Server Error
Cannot store contact information
Any ideas who I can contact to fix this?
Thanks,
John
On 2015-02-03 09:17:53 -0800 (-0800), John Villalovos wrote:
I have attempted over the last two days to sign the ICLA (
OpenStack Individual Contributor License Agreement)
Each time I do it I get the following error:
Code Review - Error
Server Error
Cannot store contact information
Either we do specs, or we don't. Either every one has to land their specs
before code or no one does. Its that simple.
What should be sorted out? It is unavoidable that people will comment and
ask questions during development cycle.
I am not sure that merging spec as early as possible, and than
Hi
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:47 PM, John Villalovos
openstack@sodarock.com wrote:
I have attempted over the last two days to sign the ICLA (
OpenStack Individual Contributor License Agreement)
Each time I do it I get the following error:
Code Review - Error
Server Error
Cannot store
On 02/02/15 19:52, Steve Baker wrote:
A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to
choose whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations.
For some context you should read the spec first [1]
Rather than doing this, I would like to propose the following:
I
On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:07 AM, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/02/2015 08:58 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
This is pretty good but I think it leaves unresolved the biggest
question I've had about this process: What's so great about
converging the APIs? If we can narrow or clarify that
On 02/03/2015 01:49 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
I think where we want to focus our attention is:
* strict adherence to correct HTTP
* proper use of response status codes
* effective (and correct) use of a media types
* some guidance on how to deal with change/versioning
* and _maybe_ a standard
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-02-03 10:00:44 -0800:
On 02/02/15 19:52, Steve Baker wrote:
A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to
choose whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations.
For some context you should read the spec first
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 18:49 +, Everett Toews wrote:
I’ll echo Mike’s sentiment that we should be very mindful of the idea
that these are guidelines not hard standards. H…even that might be
a bit restrictive. In the Openstack HTTP error codes [1] discussion
I’m getting the impression
I¹ve opened a bug to track this effort for DevStack (and to help point
others in the right direction when they stumble upon this):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1417735
- Marty
On 1/12/15, 10:02 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 01/09/2015 05:24 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Sure, makes sense. The placeholder I was referring to would be communicated to
the IPAM plugin. Though, if there is no IP, it may be just best not to involve
the IPAM subsystem.
From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.commailto:blak...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
Over the last couple of meetings, we have discussed holding a hackathon
this Thursday and Friday. You each have some code you are working on. Let’s
each pick a 3-4 hour block of time to intensively collaborate. We can use
the #congress IRC channel and google hangout.
Reply to this thread, so we
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Everett Toews wrote:
On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:07 AM, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/02/2015 08:58 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
I think where we want to focus our attention is:
* strict adherence to correct HTTP
* proper use of response status codes
* effective (and
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:19 PM, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote:
that's something i hadn't thought about, the process behind a list of this
sort. i don't mind having this list as a starting point, but i also agree
with Everett for the need to establish an open and transparent working
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 02 February 2015 16:19
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] [all][log] Openstack HTTP error codes
On 02/01/2015 06:20 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Putting on my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2015 08:18 PM, Ryan Hsu wrote:
Hi All,
There was a change [1] 2 days ago in django-openstack-auth that
introduces a new requirement oslo.config=1.6.0 to the project,
which is now present in the 1.1.9 release of django-openstack-auth.
Hi!
A bit earlier than expected due to personal circumstances I'm announcing
first stable release of ironic-discoverd: 1.0.0 [1]. It contains
implementations of 6 blueprints and fixes for 17 bugs. Full release
notes can be found at [2], here is the summary:
* Redesigned API, including
Le 03/02/2015 06:08, Dugger, Donald D a écrit :
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (8:00AM MST)
1)Remove direct nova DB/API access by Scheduler Filters -
https://review.opernstack.org/138444/
https://review.opernstack.org/138444/
2)Status on cleanup work -
Hi all,
Glance v1 APIs provides 'x-glance-api-copy-from' and
'x-image-meta-location' headers that can be used if the image contents has
to be served out from external store.
On the same lines, what is the parameter/header that provides same
functionality
in Glance v2 API ?
(Could not found the
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to choose
whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations. For some
context you should read the spec first [1]
Rather than doing this, I would
So do we just use whatever name we want instead? Can we use 'referrer'? ;-)
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2015 09:07 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
On Feb 2, 2015, at 7:24 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/02/2015
I agree that the priority at the moment for Nova should be getting our
EC2 implementation working well enough that it buys us time to
transition people to whatever the future may be.
Its unfortunate that we have approved the spec for this work in Kilo,
but I think that's an indication that we
On 3 February 2015 at 00:48, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
The only thing this discussion has convinced me of is that allowing users
to change the fixed IP address on a neutron port leads to a bad
user-experience.
...
Documenting a VM reboot is necessary, or even deprecating this (you
If you had created a second network and subnet this would have been
dropped (different broadcast domain).
Well that update wouldn't have been allowed at the API. You can't use a
fixed IP from a subnet on a network that your port isn't attached to.
Changing a neutron port to a different network
Hi,
We were trying to use haproxy as our LBaaS solution on the overlay. Has anybody
done some baseline benchmarking with LBaaSv1 haproxy solution?
Also, any recommended tools which we could use to do that?
Thanks,
Varun
__
Hi , I have some qestions about the project of Designate.
1、Can Designate be used with openstack icehouse ? how about Juno or kilo ?
2、I have tried to deploy Designate using devstack of master branch. but only
PowerDNS are supported. Can bind9 be supported ?
3、when deploy designate using
+1, that would ease the development and also drive adoption IMO, as people
could start using/experimenting with it earlier, and more eyes == less
bugs. You can never predict all the ways how users would use and abuse your
new shiny feature :)
Best regards,
Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Software Engineer
Now in my understanding our services does not log to user. The user gets
whatever error message/exception it happens to be thrown at. This is exactly
Why we need some common identifier between them (and who ever offers request ID
being that, I can get some of my friends with well broken English
I guess PowerDNS and bind are supported. This link may help you:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/designate/getting-started.html
*Best Regards！*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
*My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow
The unicast DHCP will make it to the wire, but if you've renumbered the
subnet either a) the DHCP server won't respond because it's IP has changed
as well; or b) the DHCP server won't respond because there is no mapping
for the VM on it's old subnet.
We aren't changing the DHCP server's IP here.
I totally agree with Andrew.
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote:
Either we do specs, or we don't. Either every one has to land their specs
before code or no one does. Its that simple.
What should be sorted out? It is unavoidable that people will comment and
If we have ports without IPs, I don't think we need a placeholder, do we?
Wouldn't a port without an IP address be the same thing as a port with a
placeholder indicating that it doesn't have an IP address?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com
wrote:
Hi Paddu,
On 02/03/2015 06:54 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
So do we just use whatever name we want instead? Can we use 'referrer'? ;-)
:) How about Content-Length?
-jay
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2015 09:07 PM, Everett Toews
I definitely understand the use-case of having updatable stuff and I don't
intend to support any proposals to strip away that functionality. Brian was
suggesting was to block port IP changes since it depended on DHCP to
deliver that information to the hosts. I was just pointing out that we
would
78 matches
Mail list logo
