Hi all,
hopefully this message is not completely garbled by Apple Mail ...
>
>
> […]
>
> Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99
> on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another
> important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production"
Hi all,
hopefully this message is not completely garbled by Apple Mail ...
>
>
> […]
>
> Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99
> on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another
> important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/16 00:20, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> HI,
>
>> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth
>> wrote:
>>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/16 00:20, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> HI,
>
>> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth
>> wrote:
>>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
> defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for
> clang, but might even differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
> defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for
> clang, but might even differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote:
> On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote:
> On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but
On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but might even
> differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept the gnu89 default of
On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but might even
> differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept the gnu89 default of
10 matches
Mail list logo