Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-30 Thread Jens Neuhalfen
Hi all, hopefully this message is not completely garbled by Apple Mail ... > > > […] > > Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99 > on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another > important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production"

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-30 Thread Jens Neuhalfen
Hi all, hopefully this message is not completely garbled by Apple Mail ... > > > […] > > Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99 > on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another > important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production"

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-29 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/08/16 00:20, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote: >> HI, > >> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth >> wrote: >>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote: On

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-29 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/08/16 00:20, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote: >> HI, > >> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth >> wrote: >>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote: On

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-29 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote: > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which > defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for > clang, but might even differ per distro. > > One of the reasons to accept

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-29 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote: > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which > defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for > clang, but might even differ per distro. > > One of the reasons to accept

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-29 Thread Selva Nair
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote: > On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote: > > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults > > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-29 Thread Selva Nair
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote: > On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote: > > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults > > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-28 Thread Steffan Karger
On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote: > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but might even > differ per distro. > > One of the reasons to accept the gnu89 default of

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH (master)] Drop gnu89/c89 support, switch to c99

2016-08-28 Thread Steffan Karger
On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote: > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but might even > differ per distro. > > One of the reasons to accept the gnu89 default of