Something I stumbled upon which is tangentially related, is the Evolutility
project http://www.evolutility.org/ .
May be worth a look . basically, the old data driven idea applied to
databases with ASP.NET page rendering.
_
Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia
Sorry, I think I didn't make it clear, the person who asked me us to do this
was a Senior Developer on their team. They too could be lurking these
mailing list, which would be cool if they replied too! :D
So it's not so much about educating them... I'm sure they are Senior
enough to know the
So often those things are black and white. They can be done one way, and the
other way can be argued wrong. But then on the other hand there are reasons
why the other way can be right.
When I come across people who believe in the inverse of myself it's usually
in the middle of something that
Subject: Re: ASP.NET Control databinding, member properties, dynamically fetch
property name?
Thank you.
What is the name of concept we are dealing with here, Lambda and Property
Binding ?
On 27 May 2010 06:23, David Kean david.k...@microsoft.com wrote:
Here's an example:
class Property
.
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Arjang Assadi
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 2:37 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: ASP.NET Control databinding, member properties, dynamically
fetch property name?
Thank you.
What
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, David Kean david.k...@microsoft.com wrote:
I’m really interesting in hearing why people think this is a bad idea. I’ve
done this in a few code bases (not ASP.NET, but WinForms) and it nothing but
pure goodness from my perspective.
Why do you do it? Is it only
Not quite related. It's basically just Lambda Expressions, google that.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.comwrote:
it seems this is called lambda dependency and lambda binding
I found this :
?
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of silky
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 4:59 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: ASP.NET Control databinding, member properties, dynamically fetch
property name?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, David Kean david.k...@microsoft.com wrote:
It's not for variable names, it's for properties and methods. I have to
refactor code all
the time - I'm not smart enough to get it right the first time.
I don't understand this. Why make it like some sort of joke
Silky it is not a joke.
What Dean is saying and I also agree with is this:
We the programmers need to palm off as much as possible to tools we use.
I am not smart enough to remember all the strings in my code either,
that is why I am stuck with type safety and compiler to help me out.
There
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.com wrote:
Silky it is not a joke.
What Dean is saying and I also agree with is this:
We the programmers need to palm off as much as possible to tools we use.
I am not smart enough to remember all the strings in my code
, member properties, dynamically fetch
property name?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, David Kean david.k...@microsoft.com wrote:
It's not for variable names, it's for properties and methods. I have
to refactor code all the time - I'm not smart enough to get it right the
first time.
I don't
not answering your questions directly but another option is to define
the datasource in the markup and link it to the combobox which lets
you change the property names without needing to regenerate the
assembly.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Winston Pang winstonp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Their issue is refactoring, when changing the type names, string's won't be
part of refactoring.
I have put them in the markup whenever possible, however there are
instances, where I have to do it int he code behind, as the third party
control, requires me to hook into an event to retrieve this
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Winston Pang winstonp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
This is more of a question of whether or not this sounds feasible and has
anyone seen anyone do this:
Typically with most ASP.NET controls, lets take the ComboBox for an example,
it'll be like
On 26 May 2010 08:35, Winston Pang winstonp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
This is more of a question of whether or not this sounds feasible and has
anyone seen anyone do this:
Typically with most ASP.NET controls, lets take the ComboBox for an example,
it'll be like
Well, firstly. The client is govt, and we're really dealing with their
internal IT team, who would eventually do supporting for the system.
I have no say in whether we do it or not, I've told them, it's redundant,
and uncommon, and a bit too much. I've done all I can, can't fight anymore
about
Or
Just an opportunity to do something different, that is what they want
that is what we will give them,
or even better ask them why? where did they get the idea to have it
like that from and understand their real concerns that has facilitated
the odd requirements, maybe there is method to their
18 matches
Mail list logo
