Re: Build

2011-09-22 Thread Miguel Madero
schluter From: Scott Barnes Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 11:36 AM To: ozSilverlight Subject: Re: Build WinUXG. In reality your windows focued only now and given XAML / HTML5 + WinRT etc... will cross-polynate why limit yourselves to just XAML? I saw

Re: Build

2011-09-22 Thread Scott Barnes
...@hotmail.com wrote: Here here. Just when Sydney sddn was looking for a new name too. -Jason schluter From: Scott Barnes Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 11:36 AM To: ozSilverlight Subject: Re: Build WinUXG. In reality your windows focued only now and given

Re: Build

2011-09-21 Thread David Burela
Earlier this year I sent out a newsletter, saying that I'd made the decision to change the Melbourne SDDN group to be a XAML usergroup, to cover Silverlight + Windows phone (+ WPF). For me there was enough crossover to stop it being an exclusively Silverlight usergroup. My plans for the rest of

RE: Build

2011-09-21 Thread Carl . Scarlett
Subject: Re: Build Earlier this year I sent out a newsletter, saying that I'd made the decision to change the Melbourne SDDN group to be a XAML usergroup, to cover Silverlight + Windows phone (+ WPF). For me there was enough crossover to stop it being an exclusively Silverlight usergroup. My

Re: Build

2011-09-21 Thread Stephen Price
: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] *On Behalf Of *David Burela david.bur...@gmail.com *Sent:* Thursday, 22 September 2011 8:53 AM *To:* ozSilverlight ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com *Subject:* Re: Build ** ** Earlier this year I sent out a newsletter, saying that I'd made the decision

RE: Build

2011-09-21 Thread Carl . Scarlett
Good point. From: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com [mailto:ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] On Behalf Of Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 9:37 AM To: ozSilverlight ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com Subject: Re: Build WinUXG. In reality