On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:50 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-02-13 05:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI: I agree with Roman. I already removed the 0.42 aliasing feature
from Pd-extended 0.42.5
FYI: i agree with Roman, but i don't think it's a good idea to divert
the behaviours of
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 16:55 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:50 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-02-13 05:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI: I agree with Roman. I already removed the 0.42 aliasing feature
from Pd-extended 0.42.5
FYI: i agree with
On 2010-02-13 05:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI: I agree with Roman. I already removed the 0.42 aliasing feature
from Pd-extended 0.42.5
FYI: i agree with Roman, but i don't think it's a good idea to divert
the behaviours of PdX and Pd in such cases: it will only make transition
even
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 18:39 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks, but that doesn't help so much with with the max to pd conversion. If
I made it an external, I would be able to use it to
replace the internal, right?
I _think_ that this is not possible with Pd = current
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 09:40 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 18:39 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks, but that doesn't help so much with with the max to pd conversion.
If I made it an external, I would be able to use it to
replace the internal, right?
conversion. If I made it an external, I would be able to use it to
replace the internal, right?
-Jonathan
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Andrew Faraday jbtur...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Andrew Faraday jbtur...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: [PD] Alias an internal with an abstraction
To: jancs...@yahoo.com, pd-list
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: [PD] Alias an internal with an abstraction
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 10:21 AM
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 09:40
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] Alias an internal with an abstraction
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, pd-list@iem.at, Andrew Faraday
jbtur...@hotmail.com
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 1:35
From: João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] Alias an internal with an abstraction
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, pd-list@iem.at, Andrew
Faraday jbtur...@hotmail.com
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 1:35 PM
you're doing the conversion anyway
with patches saves in text
Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: [PD] Alias an internal with an abstraction
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 10:21 AM
On Fri
Hello,
I'm not sure if I wrote that correctly-- I'd like to use an abstraction
called t.pd in place of trigger. So I put the abstraction in my patch's
folder but it won't alias [t] because I guess Pd only searches for
abstractions after it searches for internals.
Basically I want to
This might be too much of an obvious answer, but try calling it something else?
tt.pd?
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:28:43 -0800
From: jancs...@yahoo.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: [PD] Alias an internal with an abstraction
Hello,
I'm not sure if I wrote that correctly-- I'd like
Subject: RE: [PD] Alias an internal with an abstraction
To: jancs...@yahoo.com, pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 1:41 AM
This might be too much of an obvious answer, but try
calling it something else? tt.pd?
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:28:43 -0800
From: jancs
13 matches
Mail list logo
