Great!
I'll try it out, and if you want I can help with abstractions (I already
have som GUI stuff done with raw OSC) and so. We need, on the network side,
mostly message passing between clients and server (we usually have a local
server, that outputs all the audio), chat and some kind of
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:59 +0100, Quim Llimona wrote:
Great!
I'll try it out, and if you want I can help with abstractions (I
already have som GUI stuff done with raw OSC) and so. We need, on the
network side, mostly message passing between clients and server (we
usually have a local
Hi all,
The Barcelona Laptop Orchestra has been working with some network
abstractions built specifically per piece (chats, OSC sync and so). I was
thinking on making a whole, reusable framework, but then I read about the
NetPd system... I'd like to develop stuff from it (some GUI abstractions,
Hi Quim
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:27 +0100, Quim Llimona wrote:
Hi all,
The Barcelona Laptop Orchestra has been working with some network
abstractions built specifically per piece (chats, OSC sync and so). I was
thinking on making a whole, reusable framework, but then I read about the
NetPd
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 02:40 +0100, Max wrote:
log in!
Sorry, that was too late (or too early) for me. Did anyone join you?
Roman
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Am 15.01.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Roman Haefeli:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 02:40 +0100, Max wrote:
log in!
Sorry, that was too late (or too early) for me. Did anyone join you?
hi roman, well we were 3 people in the same room, i thought maybe someone will
join us remotely.
it was fun anyways. is
log in!
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 21:56 -0500, Josh Lawrence wrote:
Hello list,
I just recently discovered netpd, which is frigging AWESOME for those
of us newbies that can't program PD very well just yet. However, I
have a problem - when I open up _chat.pd, it's looking for people on
my own LAN. Can
Hello list,
I just recently discovered netpd, which is frigging AWESOME for those
of us newbies that can't program PD very well just yet. However, I
have a problem - when I open up _chat.pd, it's looking for people on
my own LAN. Can I jam with folks across the internet? Is there a
main server
Am 12.09.2008 um 15:26 schrieb Josh Lawrence:
Hello list,
wellcome josh.
I just recently discovered netpd, which is frigging AWESOME for those
of us newbies that can't program PD very well just yet. However, I
have a problem - when I open up _chat.pd, it's looking for people on
roman or
Hello list,
I just recently discovered netpd, which is frigging AWESOME for those
of us newbies that can't program PD very well just yet. However, I
have a problem - when I open up _chat.pd, it's looking for people on
my own LAN. Can I jam with folks across the internet? Is there a
main server
hi john
sorry for late reply (i currently only have internet sporadically)
i tried to make a netpd-server based on [tcpserver] from mrpeach instead
of [netserver] from maxlib. it wasn't that straightforward as i thought
in the beginning, because i had to use another library pdstring from
moocow
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 07:13 -0500, John Harrison wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
i would be interested to know, what conditions are needed to crash
pd/server-patch on your box. does it behave the same?
it appears to behave the same i.e. crashes about the same amount of time
and I don't
Roman Haefeli wrote:
i would be interested to know, what conditions are needed to crash
pd/server-patch on your box. does it behave the same?
it appears to behave the same i.e. crashes about the same amount of time
and I don't detect a consistent pattern to the crashes.
I saw the same
My interest has been piqued by netpd and a bunch of us here have been
playing with it. It's pretty fantastic --- there's only one caveat,
which is that the netpd server crashes and pretty easily at that. I've
seen the netpd.org server crash a bunch of times now. I downloaded and
installed the
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 08:25 -0500, John Harrison wrote:
My interest has been piqued by netpd and a bunch of us here have been
playing with it. It's pretty fantastic --- there's only one caveat,
which is that the netpd server crashes and pretty easily at that. I've
seen the netpd.org server
On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:12 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 08:25 -0500, John Harrison wrote:
My interest has been piqued by netpd and a bunch of us here have been
playing with it. It's pretty fantastic --- there's only one caveat,
which is that the netpd server crashes and pretty
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 17:49 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Sounds like you guys should try Martin Peach's [tcpserver].
yeah, that is actually the plan on the mid-term/long run. since
basically only [netserver] and [netclient] are really needed from
maxlib, i would like to switch to
Yo,
I can confirm it with a day-or-two-old Pd-Extended autobuild.
I did some playing with this, and if you cut and paste the [pd
1-subsub] object it will start receiving messages like normal. So, it
seems that dynamically created subpatches don't get a receiver...
A possible workaround for this
Hmm, I think I might have broken the subpatch receive symbols a
couple of days ago, which might be the cause of this. I just fixed
my mistake, so tomorrow, they should work again.
.hc
On Jun 1, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Luke Iannini wrote:
Yo,
I can confirm it with a day-or-two-old Pd-Extended
BAD BOY!
but thanks for fixing it.
Am 2008-06-01 um 19:59 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
Hmm, I think I might have broken the subpatch receive symbols a
couple of days ago, which might be the cause of this. I just fixed
my mistake, so tomorrow, they should work again.
.hc
On Jun 1, 2008,
i can open netpd, log in, chat... but as soon as i open creator i get
error: pd-cr.singletons: no such object
and a empty windows pops up: pd cr.singletons (no dash)
netloading a netpd patch doens't work
now i got it to. just tried it with:
Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080531-macosx105-i386
it
Am 2008-05-29 um 23:54 schrieb Roman Haefeli:
just a little remark (you might know it already):
[declare -*path] works locally in the sense, that pathes are added
only
for the patch, that holds the [declare]. for testing the netpd
stuff, it
really only works, if you try it within the
problem with ~ and a new one with matrix
(only working as iemmatrix/matrix).
now i tried pd-netpd-osx.tar.gz from http://netpd.org/download
and it worked surprisingly well. ~, matrix, t3_del all creates fine..
i suggest to try this one too.
hi eni,
the exact version i have here is 0.40.3-extended
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:27 +1000, Max Neupert wrote:
servus roman, list,
i wanted to demonstrate netpd today here in melbourne and failed.
on a intel mac os x 10.5:
with a fresh pd-extended 0.4xx and downloaded netpd.zip i can open
_chat.pd. then when i click on creator additionally a
as iemmatrix/matrix).
now i tried pd-netpd-osx.tar.gz from http://netpd.org/download
and it worked surprisingly well. ~, matrix, t3_del all creates fine..
i suggest to try this one too.
cheers eni
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account
servus roman, list,
i wanted to demonstrate netpd today here in melbourne and failed.
on a intel mac os x 10.5:
with a fresh pd-extended 0.4xx and downloaded netpd.zip i can open
_chat.pd. then when i click on creator additionally a blank patch
pops up called pd cr.singletons the console
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 20:42 +1000, Max Neupert wrote:
Am 2008-05-29 um 19:54 schrieb Roman Haefeli:
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:27 +1000, Max Neupert wrote:
servus roman, list,
i wanted to demonstrate netpd today here in melbourne and failed.
on a intel mac os x 10.5:
with a fresh
Am 2008-05-29 um 19:54 schrieb Roman Haefeli:
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:27 +1000, Max Neupert wrote:
servus roman, list,
i wanted to demonstrate netpd today here in melbourne and failed.
on a intel mac os x 10.5:
with a fresh pd-extended 0.4xx and downloaded netpd.zip i can open
_chat.pd.
Hi Max,
Coincidently i tried this last night (or night before)
and got the exact same error - pd cr.singletons.
Actually i think there was a hyphen in the error so it
was pd-cr.singletons
The error occurred using the latest autobuild
2008-05-28 for mac intel.
I then got an older build i was
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 23:14 +1000, Max Neupert wrote:
ok here my findings:
after another
[declare -path /Users/max/Desktop/netpd/includes]
i could not make an object like [netpd-f]
strange thing is: that even after adding the path to the paths-
preferences of pd, then restarting pd
after sitting in on a session last week, i decided to try and learn
netpd. it's pretty great i have to say.
here's my first test track with it. looking forward to net time!
http://ia341035.us.archive.org/2/items/Dim-sumNetpdTest_905/dim_sum-small.ogg
--
Mechanize something idiosyncratic.
Very nice electronica, lots of interesting sounds well blended.
Watch your levels, (or ease off the maximiser/compressor).. it's way
redlined in places :)
thanks for sharing!
Andy
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:00:26 -0700
star morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after sitting in on a session last week,
Max Neupert wrote:
it would be nice to have netpd (_chat.pd) starting from the pd-
extended menue!
but i guess there are some security issues.
m.
hi max
accessing netpd's _chat.pd through the menu would be a nice feature.
i don't know if a connected [netclient] is already a security
yo hi
i try to explain how i see things, comments are still welcome, of
course. i am busy with my diploma project these days, so i might not be
accurate in every detail and i probably won't find time to work on netpd
for the next few months.
i don't think that netpd should be delivered with
Hey,
I agree in that I don't think netpd should be included in Pd-
extended. It's an application in its own right, so it makes sense to
keep it separate. What would make sense is to make libraries out of
netpd functionality and include that in Pd-extended.
For example, it would be
hi list
i'm testing netpd on pd-0.40.3-extended-20080114.app on ppc osx 10.4.11,
although some synths are missing an object i think it's quite usable atm.
the first problem i ran into was
touch ~/Library/Preferences/org.puredata.pd.plist
emptied the plist but didn't remove it. so it didn't load
On 15/01/2008, at 17.13, Enrique Erne wrote:
the first problem i ran into was
touch ~/Library/Preferences/org.puredata.pd.plist
emptied the plist but didn't remove it. so it didn't load zexy and
maxlib, which is necessary for netpd to start and load the _chat.pd.
removing the
it would be nice to have netpd (_chat.pd) starting from the pd-
extended menue!
but i guess there are some security issues.
m.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 6/18/07, Roman Haefeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luckily just yesterday, i had a (very simple) idea, for which i waited
for years:
instead of opening the netpd-patches with the (for me) inconvenient
'open'-message, i want to load them as abstractions. this has the BIG
advantage, that i can
. and if your pd crashes
then, it doesn't harm the session at all. you can just restart pd/netpd
and join the session, without the others noticing that you crashed.
So now, with this new idea,
you would be able to close these windows in the normal way without it
affecting netpd sessions.
yeah
On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:46 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It would very nice if it was just plug and play. It would not be
that hard to do it. I think you could spend a day on it and have it
working smoothly. It would be very
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 19:05 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:46 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It would very nice if it was just plug and play. It would not be
that hard to do it. I think you could
On Jun 14, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Patco wrote:
does getdir work without [import]?
Why wouldn't it work without [import]? I've got it working so fine
without the help of any ohter stuff than vanilla.
Pk
ah i am not sure about pd-extended's flatspace. when to use
[ggee/getdir], [import ggee],
Hallo!
ah i am not sure about pd-extended's flatspace. when to use
[ggee/getdir], [import ggee], -lib ggee, or just [getdir]
If getdir is in ggee, then you can use
[ggee/getdir]
or
[import ggee] and [getdir]
or
-lib ggee and [getdir]
LG
Georg
___
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:17:57AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
the question is: how should they be included? should they be included as
they are now, with the gui and their dependency on the netpd-framework?
or would it make more sense to strip everything off to get a working
subset of
Hallo,
Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
One thing that would be cool for us to come up with is some way to
abstract the core, and gui of abstractions separately in such a way that
they could be used in multiple different state saving/communication paradigms.
For
Hello,
Frank Barknecht a écrit :
All that would be necessary are a clean and documented
interfaces for the DSP abstractions.
Yes exactly.
Things like state saving, GUIs or
network control then could easily be built as wrapper abstractions.
It might be necessary to have a bridge
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:07 -0500, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
You can submit edited patches to the bug tracker on the sourceforge
page [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=55736atid=478070
direct link].
I am now wondering something: why haven't these awesomely functional
netpd object been
Hallo Roman!
i'd rather do not include the abstractions/patches myself and i'd rather
do not make the decision on how they should be included. but i'd be
willing to deliver stripped off abstractions with helpfiles from my own
netpd-patches, so someone else could could include/organize them in
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 11:26 +0200, Enrique Erne wrote:
Many patches won't work out of the box almost always because it will
miss an external, or an abstraction, here we come again on the fact
that
the patches misses some comments,
defining a way to specify the externals a certain
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 08:57 -0500, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Yes, what I am talking about is not to add 'netpd the whole
application' to Pd-extended, but merely the modules, which are
functional and quite useful on their own.
yeah, that is what i think as well.
These seem to be the best
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 09:11 -0500, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
On that tip, I'm curious if there is a tarball of all the current
netpd instrument/effects/utility abstractions, of will I have to go to
each description page on the netpd site?
yes, i think so (unfortunately). it would be surely very
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 09:11 -0500, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
On that tip, I'm curious if there is a tarball of all the current
netpd instrument/effects/utility abstractions, of will I have to go to
each description page on the netpd site?
yes, i think so (unfortunately). it
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 16:48 +0200, patrice colet wrote:
No, I seriously think that if I miss an abstraction, there is something
wrong with the documentation, or comments, and I am not talking about
net-pd. I'd rather rebuild my own set of abstractions than looking for
the missing patch if I
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 11:45 +0200, Enrique Erne wrote:
However, this machinery is
ideal for implementing a preset system for the instruments, so that
could be very nice.
there has been a state saving system for a long time and on it
a preset administrator (which i just fixed yesterday)
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 00:40 -0500, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Rather than reinvent the wheel, why not take the fruits of the netpd
community and make them accessible to users who might just want a
wikkid bassline or GOP mixer abstraction?
yeah, absolutely. as often, it is a question of someone
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:17 +0200, Georg Holzmann wrote:
Hallo!
maybe some chosen patches could be converted to work standalone,
but it would be lots of work ... and introduce new bugs.
some systems like the fx-library system for the mixer were
specially developed that different users
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:42 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
netpd has been changing a lot over the last years, and things that
change a lot don't work well in Pd-extended. You get version
troubles, etc.
maybe i am blind to see the obvious solution, but the main problem i see
in
Enrique Erne a écrit :
yep there was a working patch with qlist.
http://www.netpd.org/NetpdPlayer
hmm good!
but be aware it records whole patches and abstractions as well.
maybe it could [route #N #X] before recording to get rid of the
pd-files.
the difficult part would be to build a
than difficulty of
installing netpd. newbies often just download pd-netpd for win or osx
and that works just out of the box.
It would very nice if it was just plug and play. It would not be
that hard to do it. I think you could spend a day on it and have it
working smoothly. It would
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:46 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Alex Quessy and I tried to run the latest version on netpd working
for a network jam last Sunday, we both failed. He got further than
me, he got some sounds out, but neither got it all working. Both of
us know quite a
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:21 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think it should not be too hard to make netpd double-clickable with
no extra setup at all (setting .pdrc, etc.) without embedding it into
it's own Pd install.
but this works smoothly and i think it is the only option, so
They also cooked me dinner.
the netpd guys are way up there with the best people i have ever met on the
internet. i bet the girls all love them too.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
The helpfile aspect would be very much appreciated!
I think that modular is better so that people can reuse netpd elements
in their own patches. Of course, being able to use the sequencers and
mixer + fx would be the primary Reason (forgive the semi-pun) for
newbies to adopt the objects.
~Kyle
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:46 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It would very nice if it was just plug and play. It would not be
that hard to do it. I think you could spend a day on it and have it
working smoothly. It would be very worthwhile, but I think you have
already spent far
Good idea. There could be a script called by cron to automatically
tarball this dir every week.
~Kyle
On 6/14/07, moritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 09:11 -0500, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
On that tip, I'm curious if there is a tarball of all the current
Great! This seems easy enough. I think that this is the simplest
solution for now anyway. Eventually being able to separately use
modules and even create alternate GUIs for them would be nice too. Of
course, I think that the GUIs in netpd are one of the most attractive
aspects for new users (and
Hello Eni,
Enrique Erne a écrit :
does getdir work without
[import]?
regards
eni
Why wouldn't it work without [import]? I've got it working so fine
without the help of any ohter stuff than vanilla.
Pk
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
Roman Haefeli a écrit :
the aim of netpd is to provide a framework, in which selfwritten code
can be used. i think this selfwritten code should stay in the authority
of the author and not be moved to some 'superior' authority. something
that we all want, are patches, that just work and are
Roman Haefeli a écrit :
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 16:48 +0200, patrice colet wrote:
what do you mean with original abstractions ?
Let's say: an abstraction that isn't into the pd documentation
are you still talking about netpd?
roman
Well I have to review one more time
i'm glad you like it. was it hard to install?
if i'd maintain it into cvs first thing i would do is add plain/basic
netpd.
then i would add some patches to the 2 directories netpd/patches and
netpd/abs.
btw. if you disconnect the chat from the netpd server everything works
locally.
it opens a
Hi Eni~
I also am curious about Roman's opinion, but I'm glad that you're on board!
Installation was surprisingly simple. I just copied the netpd
directory to my normal ~/Pd dir, and edited my .pdrc file for -path
and -helppath stuff. After that, it was a snap to grap the stuff from
you (luckily
hello hans
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:46 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
on one hand i would like to see netpd included in pd-extended, but not
on cost of the current package. it is important that netpd and all
patches work on linux, osx and windows.
if people start to write netpd patches with
hi Kyle
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
anarchic democracy that exists in the netpd performance
world.
hehe, nice expression.
As a side question, has anyone ever tried to write all the netpd
events to a [textfile]-based sequencer so that they can easily record
and
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:10 AM, Enrique Erne wrote:
hello hans
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:46 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
on one hand i would like to see netpd included in pd-extended,
but not
on cost of the current package. it is important that netpd and all
patches work on linux, osx
Kyle,
I agree with your impression of this anarchic democracy. These guys
were generous enough to let me sit in with them when I was in in
Zurich and I was really impressed. They also cooked me dinner. As a
relative beginner I had Netpd up and running easily.
cheers to Enrique, Moritz, and
Hallo!
maybe some chosen patches could be converted to work standalone,
but it would be lots of work ... and introduce new bugs.
some systems like the fx-library system for the mixer were
specially developed that different users can develop effects
without touching the mixer itself. somehow
After playing around a little bit with netpd over the past few days, I
think that it would be possible to write a dummy _controller.pd that
would allow a user to have the netpd experience without an internet
connection. Maybe this could be included with a pd-extended netpd
library (as well as the
On Jun 9, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Enrique Erne wrote:
I am now wondering something: why haven't these awesomely functional
netpd object been included as abstractions within Pd-extended?!?!
on one hand i would like to see netpd included in pd-extended, but not
on cost of the current package. it is
Hallo!
I am not meaning that people will add to netpd from Pd-extended.
Rather, it would be neat to 'steal' the great functional modules that
are in netpd and use them as standalone modules for rapid building of
non-netpd patches. Say, if a person has been using Reason for a few
years, but
grüezi patrice
On Jun 10, 2007, at 5:41 PM, patrice colet wrote:
Le dimanche 10 juin 2007 à 12:24 +0200, Enrique Erne a écrit :
please tell me which patch is missing an abstraction and where you got
it from, sp i can fix it. at least it should be mentioned in the wiki.
Concerning net-pd,
hi Georg
On Jun 11, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
I am not meaning that people will add to netpd from Pd-extended.
Rather, it would be neat to 'steal' the great functional modules that
are in netpd and use them as standalone modules for rapid building of
non-netpd patches. Say, if
good morning Kyle
i would only add the basic netpd to Pd-extended without any
instrument, so that any user can get the newest version of the
instruments through creator without maintaining all the instruments
in cvs.
the netpd-instruments are using some basic netpd-abstractions
for broadcasting,
Hallo,
Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote:
i'm pretty green about cvs. over the pasat 3 years there have been
at least 10 different people writing instruments for netpd.
how is this done in other projects... like pixeltango or rradical
are they maintained in cvs by one person or
On Jun 9, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
On that tip, I'm curious if there is a tarball of all the current
netpd instrument/effects/utility abstractions,
there is no tarball. and if there would be it would be not up to date
within short time.
of will I have to go to
each
Good afternoon, Eni, :)
Le dimanche 10 juin 2007 à 12:24 +0200, Enrique Erne a écrit :
good morning patrice
i thought you got the patch through netpd's creator.
I'm sorry, I've mixed two different discussions, this part wasn't
net-pd related.
please tell me which patch is missing an
: cr.filecheck abs/jamx.pd a 0.1.26 4
print: cr.filecheck abs/pad.pd a 0.2.12 4
print: cr.filecheck abs/i2mx~.pd a 0.6.28 4
print: cr.filecheck abs/mx_manager.pd a 0.6.16 4
print: cr.filecheck abs/if4.pd a 0.0.0 4
print: cr.filecheck abs/mx_manager.pd a 0.6.16 4
print: cr.filecheck /Users/pd/netpd/patches
Hallo!
Yes, would be nice - someone would have to integrate them to pd-extended
(using [import] and etc.) ...
Everyone could integreate them to her/his own pd-extended using a
simple -path flatspace, as AFAIK everything netpd uses is already
there and people not using pd-extended wouldn't
Yes, what I am talking about is not to add 'netpd the whole
application' to Pd-extended, but merely the modules, which are
functional and quite useful on their own.
These seem to be the best developed set of GOP objects that would be
immediately understandable to those coming from the
On that tip, I'm curious if there is a tarball of all the current
netpd instrument/effects/utility abstractions, of will I have to go to
each description page on the netpd site?
The largest challenge with this idea is the extra machinery for
synchronization between netpd elements. However, this
(assuming that this message didn't arrive to the list, sorry if you've
received this mail twice, I've also corrected the end of the message)
Hi eni,
Le samedi 09 juin 2007 à 11:26 +0200, Enrique Erne a écrit :
hi patko
if you miss an abstraction there is something wrong with your setup.
No,
You can submit edited patches to the bug tracker on the sourceforge
page [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=55736atid=478070
direct link].
I am now wondering something: why haven't these awesomely functional
netpd object been included as abstractions within Pd-extended?!?!
Seriously, they
Hallo!
You can submit edited patches to the bug tracker on the sourceforge
page [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=55736atid=478070
direct link].
Yes, or if you have a useful bundle of patches that work out of the box
with pd extended just send them to me or to the list and I will add
Anyone in my timezone (Australia) up for a netPD jam?
*May* have a net connection at a demo i am giving for a couple of
afternoons.
This comming weekend in fact. Saturday Sunday.
Would be nice if there were others online at the time
(noon onwards Sydney time, 3am onwards GMT).
(the attached patch works only with netpd)
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:07:54 +
Von: padawan12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: pd-list@iem.at
Betreff: Re: [PD] netpd download all patch
Yeah, I've been looking at it a lot recently.
Even if your
Is there a net-pd howto or something?
yes, there is a very cheap little tutorial in netpd (netpd/tut)
some useful links here:
http://www.netpd.org/Devel
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
hm,
attached package should have
(i hope) all abstractions
for playstation.pd
[eo~]
moritz
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:50:03 +0100
Von: moritz w. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: padawan12 [EMAIL PROTECTED], pd-list@iem.at
Betreff: Re: [PD] netpd download all patch
hi all,
is there a way to download all the netpd-patches
(http://www.netpd.org/NetpdPatches\)\? maybe a release each week/month?
pat
hi pat
i know a way to do that. if got 122 patches in my netpd/patches directory and
242
in netpd/abs. some of them are testfiles and some are instruments
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 22:15 -0500, patrick wrote:
is there a way to download all the netpd-patches
(http://www.netpd.org/NetpdPatches)? maybe a release each week/month?
hi
the best option surely is to run netpd - start _chat.pd and open
_creator.pd - and ask someone online to open all
100 matches
Mail list logo
