On 17/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
That 24 includes team members and a few lurkers you'll meet when you get
there.
Bill
Sounds dangerous! :)
The lurkers will all have a rectangular black card over their eyes.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 05:33, Simon King wrote:
It can be confusing, I spent the first 12 months on this list thinking Cotty
was a woman.
Simon
I know the feeling, I applied for a job to mr. so and so last week by
email, and she replied my email.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever I decide about the MZ-S as a camera, I'm not convinced it meets
my view of an FA limited camera. Such a camera would presumably be
a bit more retro in appearance and control layout, as the lenses are.
I think the MZ-S is slightly retro
Hi Aaron! Welcome!
Also, I've bought stuff from some PDMLers (Tonghang Zhou and Joe Wilensky and Paul
Eriksson),
all of which was good and exactly as described. Beats eBay puffery and jive any time!
Same here. I've bought my stuff from some other members - Leon Altoff,
Mark Cassino, Bruce
I think if you are using tele lenses often MLU is well worth having. I
seem to remember shooting at 1/4 sec (or it was some similar slow speed)
that MLU is advantageous also. My 645N doesn't have it and I don't
notice any mirror vibration but it does have anti vibration mirror
system. The
In a message dated 2/18/2004 1:21:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The lurkers will all have a rectangular black card over their eyes.
Cheers,
Cotty
Hehehe.
Cotty, you're one funny gal.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
i wonder if the 45 in the other hand had anything to do with it g.
Alan
Cotty wrote:
On 16/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I gave the clerk a ten dollar bill for an $8.59 purchase. She placed
3.50 change in my hand. I said, sorry, too much change, and tried to
hand it all back to her,
Was it toasted g
Alan
Larry Hodgson wrote:
Just to let you know. My internet provider has a virus scanner that scans my
messages before they get to me. It just picked up the Bagel virus from
someone in this list and isolated it before it got to me.
Larry from Prescott
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nikon did it and produced FM3A which hasn't sold that well. Why would
Pentax
risk it? Besides, what if I tell you LIMITED lenses were built nowhere
near
the same mechanical quality as M or earlier lenses? (I am serious) I know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of years ago I bought a 6X7 kit, a body, four lenses
and various filters and hoods all in good condition. The body
is an early model with no MLU; I had it serviced by Harrow Technical.
I'm amazed by the quality of the big negs, I've had no
trouble with
Folks.
I have come into possession of a bunch of Sunpak 6x6 flash brackets. As you
may know, Sunpak and Pentax are interchangeable as regards the majority of the
generic flash accessories. These are new and boxed.
Listed at Adorama $27.95@
UK PDMLers £9.99@ + £2 recorded delivery
European
At some point I wrote:
The VF in the ist-D is surprisingly good. I had an LX before the D and
was
pretty spoiled (by 35mm standards). Compare the D to the Olympus E-1 or
Nikon D-100 and the D is the big winner.
to which DJE responded:
I keep hearing this. Honestly as a D100 user I don't
Hey list, some advice needed.
after a few unpretty episodes with clark, i am looking for an online =
place to print my pictures. anyone got experience with a good place?
thanks
arnie
Hi Robert,
The biggest problem with the older 6x7 bodies is winder failure.
One (or more) of the gears involved isn't up to the task and often
fails. Parts are no longer available from Pentax, so even if you can
find someone who will work on it there is no guarantee that they will be
able
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/17/2004 7:53:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lasse
P.s. Is Marnie always female?
Yup.
I was gring at Bob's signature line, though.
But what the ___, I'll take apologies from any quarter.
Doe aka Marnie
On 18 Feb 2004 at 11:27, Malcolm Smith wrote:
I've had no problem with mirror shake on my non-MLU 6x7, but the longest
lens I have is the standard 105mm. At some stage - particularly with more
and more MF equipment coming on the market at reasonable prices - I would
like to get longer lenses
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely framed, good exposure, nice and sharp.
Nope, it's nothing like my stuff, Mark! g
Seriously, nice shot. Love her expression.
I don't think I've ever had a whole thread named after me before blush.
What makes the photo for me is the guy's head in
Given how similar the 85/1.8 SMCT and 105/2.8 SMCT are in most
respects,
Well, the SMCP 85/1.8 and the SMCP 105/2.8 are ~very~ different in
their bokeh characteristics.
They also have a very different optical design. The 85/1.8 employs
6 elements in 6 groups, while the 105/2.8 uses a somewhat
My EF 85/1.8
What's an EF 85/1.8, Paul?
Fred
On 18 Feb 2004 at 23:18, Paul Ewins wrote:
Hi Robert,
The biggest problem with the older 6x7 bodies is winder failure.
One (or more) of the gears involved isn't up to the task and often
fails. Parts are no longer available from Pentax, so even if you can
find someone who will work on
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuesday, February 17, 2004, 4:30:36 PM, you wrote:
You mean an MZ-S?
Gee, that was my very thought when I read that...
Ditto.
In the future, when film SLR's are a rarity, the MZ-S is going to be
remembered along with the Spotmatic and LX as one of the
At 02:44 AM 18/02/2004, you wrote:
After much discussion on this list, my Zx-5n eye cushion has also up and
wandered off. I'm wondering whether I am better off getting a replacement
from BH or just do without. What say the list?
Pat in SF
I lost the eyecup to my MZ-S a couple of months after I'd
They are a theatrical group of Harvard undergraduates that write and
perform their own plays. They give awards every year to performers for
making a lasting and impressive contribution to the world of
entertainment. (this from the website) The award is well regarded
and most of those who get
Wrap a small rubber band around the eyecup. Looks geeky, but beats $30.00
to replace one. If you can find a black rubber band, you'll not notice it.
I used a blue one on my *ist D to match the blue icons on the back of the
camera 8-)
Bill
I lost the eyecup to my MZ-S a couple of months after
Hi Pat,
Maybe the generic slide on eyecups might work. The camera shops
around here carry a good assortment.
P.S., Thanks for taking the time to comment on my PUG image!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: P Kong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem is that people are never taught the tricks of arithmetic
anymore. I worked in a store growing up, and I learned that the correct
way to make change is to start with the purchase amount and add up to
the amount given, e.g., 8.59, give a penny 8.60, give a dime, 87.0, give
a nickel,
I like a roomie that buys fruit and pie with great lighting. . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/17/04 01:29PM
My friend Andy went to the market to get fresh
Just try some duct tape.
:)
CRB
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: RE: pentax 67 ques.
And a pretty common little problem is that the chain breaks in
the assembly
that couples the aperture to the metered prism.
This is a common but fairly easily avoided problem.
Don't mount the meter prism with a
- Original Message -
From: Fred
Subject: Re: 85 and *istD
My EF 85/1.8
What's an EF 85/1.8, Paul?
EF is the Canon EOS mount.
William Robb
I think that Pentax's limited RD budget will be spent on DSLRs and any
film camera that can be derived from them. I suspect that you simply
shift the nature of your manufacturing from primarily mechanical
products to primarily electronic ones. Leica has decided to stick with
mechanical but this
The lurkers all wear sunglasses and hoods. . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/17/04 06:44PM
That 24 includes team members and a few lurkers you'll meet when
Arnie,
I use Ofoto (http://www.ofoto.com) and have been very pleased with
the results. I have even printed 2 photos from the *ist D at 16x20
with WONDERFUL results. I can't wait to try 20 x 30. Of course, ofoto
offers prints in 'regular' sizes also, so no need to worry about that
Put a rubber band around the eyepiece. It works fine.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/18/04 08:09AM
At 02:44 AM 18/02/2004, you wrote:
After much discussion
Spike TV had a show the other night about shooting the SI swimsuit
edition, One of the photographers was using a Pentax 67. I was only
watching in hopes of making a Pentax sighting, of course . . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
So what is the consensus on this -- does a split-image screen in an
AF camera interfere with spotmetering and/or matrix metering or not?
I've thought about it, although I have found I can focus quite well
manually on the PZ-1p's standard screen.
Joe
It may be true that no AF cameras come
Oops. Cotty beat me to this comment. Damn Brits and their different
time zones . . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/18/04 04:12AM
On 17/2/04, [EMAIL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because it is too expensive? If so, why do they continue to offer
some really expensive pro glass?
This has always mystified me. Last I looked, Pentax made a 600/4.0,
a 300/2.8, and an 80-200/2.8. Last I looked, the equivalent Nikon and
Canon lenses were CHEAPER.
I was watching the original CSI two weeks ago and I swear one of the cameras
they used was an ist-D. It was a black SLR, probably digital, and was way
to small to be a Nikon or Canon. In the past I have seen massive Nikons on
the show.
Several other times I have seen them use digicams
I have not had experience with the limited lenses but I can say that my
FA*85 took a fall from about 4 feet into a concrete gutter. It received a
2mm scuff in the finish, no dent, no real discernable damage and still works
like new. Very tough lens. As far as the MZ-S being as limited camera,
A while back Juan Buhler and I went out shooting in San
Francisco. Anyone heard from Juan in the last year or so?
Anyway, this was one of the shots I grabbed that day.
Comments welcome.
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/sfpic2.html
Composition is great but I'm more concerned about the
I don't know ... he saw me photographing him, didn't
object. I think he was more ambivalent than anything else.
I wanted to catch a neutral expression to contrast with the
harder look of the advertising poster.
Andre Langevin wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/sfpic2.html
A while back Juan Buhler and I went out shooting in San
Francisco. Anyone heard from Juan in the last year or so?
Anyway, this was one of the shots I grabbed that day.
Comments welcome.
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/sfpic2.html
Composition is great but I'm more concerned about the
I enjoy using my Spotmatics and MXs -- I bought them last year and the
Spotmatics in particular are so much cheaper now than when I was a boy!
Then, they were completely out of reach, I think even an H1a with a
standard lens was close to $200 new during the 60s, which is probably
equivalent
Yeah, it could have been because those are very SLRish. Come to think of
it, the digicams they use look liky Olympus as well.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: OT: CSI Miami
Nikon did it and produced FM3A which hasn't sold that well. Why would Pentax
risk it? Besides, what if I tell you LIMITED lenses were built nowhere near
the same mechanical quality as M or earlier lenses? (I am serious) I know
they are metal, but really, I bet they can't take the same
Just curious ... how do you know you will never shoot film
again. Can you not imagine a circumstance when using film
might be required or preferred? Not intending to start a
film-digi debate, just aware that future situations are hard
to predict.
Christian wrote:
Keep the LX and dump the
Because it is too expensive? If so, why do they continue to offer
some really expensive pro glass?
Because they aren't pro tools, but high-end toys to satisfy
non-commercial
shooters or consumers. That's the difference between C/N P.
Why are they not pro tools? Is it because pros don't use
I thought the problem was by installing a split screen the autofocus no
longer worked correctly?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Split-image screens in AF cameras?
So
I know myself and what I like to do with photography. Shooting film is not
in my future. Digital (as in a good DSLR) fits with my style and fills my
needs perfectly.
I can't imagine any circumstances when film would be proffered (to me,
remember, this is about MY preferences). Never say never
Not knowing who Juan is of course, but I wondered if that was him on the
bench because of the backpack he is holding. It looks sort of like it might
be a padded camera backpack type. I thought he looked really comfortable
with the idea of being photographed, maybe too comfortable. He's doing a
Seems you, even today, were not aware of the Nicad Pack M (very similar
to the
LX nicad pack). The AA battery grip was just a cheaper less convenient
alternative to it, though I have known aerial photographers who loved it.
Au contraire. I owned Nicad Pack M. I owned Nicad Pack LX. Both
I think I would agree with keeping the LX and the other bodies, at least
one. I would think if the need arose that you would want to use the LX,
although I've never actually owned one, they must be awesome for people to
put up with all the service they seem to require. That same need for
service
That's not Juan ... Juan was grabbing a slice of pizza at
the time the shot was taken. This was just some guy who
happened to be sitting there with an expression that seemed
to counterpoint the look of the poster guy.
David Miers wrote:
Not knowing who Juan is of course, but I wondered if
was
pretty spoiled (by 35mm standards). Compare the D to the Olympus E-1 or
Nikon D-100 and the D is the big winner.
to which DJE responded:
I keep hearing this. Honestly as a D100 user I don't have any problem
with it and am uncomfortable with the *istD. Of course I'm USED to
Christian wrote:
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The lurkers all wear sunglasses and hoods. . .
hoods? did someone say hoods? leather or latex?
nah - that would be screw-in, clip-on, or bayonet
of course!
Bill
Possibly of interest to those scanning your film. I recently acquired a
copy of Grain Surgery for Photoshop. I have been primarily using PSP 7
instead of Photoshop because of grain issues while scanning. Ive not
perfected my use of this yet, but preliminary results seem quite good. Much
Wow, this is amazing. I haven't read the pdml for a while, even though
I still keep my subscription, and have procmail set to put the
messages in a folder. This morning there was a short glitch and two or
three messages we not filtered, going to my main inbox. Shel's message
below was one of
Frank,
You've made it. You're a celebrity. Your every word is examined for
pearls of
wisdom. Women will soon be throwing themselves at your feet and large sums
of money
will be finding their way to your pockets...
(What am I drinking, I must find more).
At 08:24 PM 2/17/04, you wrote:
That's an interesting idea. I am always reluctant to use a powder
because most have some abrasive effect. Is this not a problem?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/18/04 10:27AM
The problem I've had with volatile liquids (alcohol, acetone, etc...)
is
that while they'd dissolve many oils greases, they'd
Well the FA 70-210 feels much better than it looks on any camera. (It
makes very nice
photographs as well).
At 09:44 PM 2/17/04, you wrote:
Even the FA limited lenses are sort of odd that way--if you are willing
to pay premium prices for good optics and good build quality and retro
styling,
It's a Harvard political club.
At 10:36 PM 2/17/04, you wrote:
and i forgot to ask: anyone ever see this picture before? who is hasty
pudding?
- Original Message -
From: arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:20 PM
Subject: istD sighting
...well
Lasse,
You're in trouble now, I remember a year or so ago I made the mistake
of accidentally referring to Marnie with the masculine pronoun...
At 10:57 PM 2/17/04, you wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 2/16/2004 8:51:00 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I won't say it, no, no, no. I just won't...
At 11:33 PM 2/17/04, you wrote:
It can be confusing, I spent the first 12 months on this list thinking Cotty
was a woman.
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2004 11:58 AM
To:
It really hurts to bite your tongue like this,really...
At 11:54 PM 2/17/04, you wrote:
does this mean frank's not a bunny?
-Original Message-
From: Simon King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Apologies (Was: Lens
It's a nice shot. I wonder if you could have pointed more to the left.
I find the street distracting, but I really don't know how bad the other
half would have been. The tonal range in the two faces nice however.
As a matter of fact, I like the range of tones in the entire image.
Steven
I replaced the eyecup from the MZ-3 with an old third party M style eyecup, I
find it works better than the original equipment and when I don't need it I
just take it off.
At 12:41 AM 2/18/04, you wrote:
After much discussion on this list, my Zx-5n eye cushion has also up and
wandered off. I'm
Given how similar the 85/1.8 SMCT and 105/2.8 SMCT are in most
respects,
Well, the SMCP 85/1.8 and the SMCP 105/2.8 are ~very~ different in
their bokeh characteristics.
I meant that their angle of view is pretty similar. I wouldn't normally
put both an 85 and a 105 in my bag. Normally, I'd
Peter Alling wrote:
Frank,
You've made it. You're a celebrity. Your every word is examined for
pearls of
wisdom. Women will soon be throwing themselves at your feet and large sums
of money
will be finding their way to your pockets...
(What am I drinking, I must find more).
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/puffy.html
Part of my furry friends fotos series.
Well let's see, the FM3A isn't auto-focus. The limited lenses are more
fragile because they are auto-focus the focusing helical has to be lighter
and I don't have other than the 43mm to compare but I've beaten the hell out
of mine and it still seems to work fine.
At 03:03 AM 2/18/04, you wrote:
You can if you can find her!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: William Robb[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16/02/04 15:29:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD Comments on Leica Photo.net
I'm disappointed because I can't get pictures of Gillian
Anyway, I've got several Pentax film bodies that are basically collecting
dust at the moment. I want to keep at least one film body around as a
backup on trips in case something happens to the *ist-D.
A PZ-20 is (was) my wife's main camera, and she does not want to sell it
(for now). I
Most of what you are interesting in finding out is available here
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
including a discussion of the transition of lens mount versions and
pictures of every known K mount lens and accessory made by Pentax.
At 03:34 AM 2/18/04, you wrote:
I was just taking a look at a
Why are they not pro tools? Is it because pros don't use Pentax?
Everything I've read suggests that optically and mechanically they
are as capable as N and C (and Minolta, another underrated maker
of good glass).
Or are you saying that they are vanity lenses that pentax doesn't
really
I would have thought a gag would be more appropriate.
At 04:12 AM 2/18/04, you wrote:
On 17/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
That 24 includes team members and a few lurkers you'll meet when you get
there.
Bill
Sounds dangerous! :)
The lurkers will all have a rectangular black card over
On 18/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
The lurkers will all have a rectangular black card over their eyes.
Cheers,
Cotty
Hehehe.
Cotty, you're one funny gal.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
See you in the ladies room Marnie!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 18/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Oops. Cotty beat me to this comment. Damn Brits and their different
time zones . . .
HAR!!!
(tm) W. Robb
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK
On 18/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I've been following the list via the archive for a while now, and decided
to make my presence known at last.
Hi Don.
I've been using Pentax gear for a number of years, and have recently made
the switch to digital (with the *ist-D, of course). I was
On 18/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
A while back Juan Buhler and I went out shooting in San
Francisco. Anyone heard from Juan in the last year or so?
Anyway, this was one of the shots I grabbed that day.
Comments welcome.
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/sfpic2.html
Nice
On 18/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
The lurkers all wear sunglasses and hoods. . .
hoods? did someone say hoods? leather or latex?
Tulip-shaped.
Now I'm wondering if I've made a mistake by committing to another event and
missing GFM
Christian
YES. Cancel your other commitment
Hi,
Hi everybody. I'm still very much shooting, although mostly with the
Leica. I was in Paris last September taking a workshop with Peter
Turnley,
Wow indeed! nice to have you back - I hope you're going to tell us more about
this workshop. I am a big fan of both the Turnleys and have all of
Hi,
that has rather a nightmarish quality.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 6:57:19 PM, you wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/puffy.html
Part of my furry friends fotos series.
I might have an impression or feeling that the renditions of the two
lenses were different without being able to wrap the concept of
bokeh around my observations.
It is also possible that the SMCP and SMC Takumar lenses do differ,
even if their optical formulas are supposedly the same.
I wonder if
On 18/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I know myself and what I like to do with photography. Shooting film is not
in my future. Digital (as in a good DSLR) fits with my style and fills my
needs perfectly.
I can't imagine any circumstances when film would be proffered (to me,
remember, this
Just made a speculative bid on eBay for a
brand new body only, not
expect ing to get it - unfortunately I won it for £732.56! How do I tell my
wi fe?
Help!
Nick (happy really, I think!)
Let me know how you make out with your wife. I have to tell
Nick Clark wrote:
Just made a speculative bid on eBay for a brand new body
only, not expecting to get it - unfortunately I won it for
£732.56! How do I tell my wife?
Help!
Nice!
If your wife reacts like mine to the camera, you'll only see it once in a
while anyway. She thinks it's
The stuff is as soft as talc. No harm will come to your lenses or coatings
from the lamp black. FYI, this is the substance preferred by photographers
of yore.
Be very careful not to spill it. If you do, and it's on the carpet, and you
are married, you will probably soon be single.
Regards,
Does Pentax Photolab make a better job of conversion to TIFF than the camera, or are
they equivalent? I use Photoshop 5LE and Elements.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: alex wetmore[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16/02/04 18:51:50
You don't need to use Photoshop CS to process RAW, it
Just made a speculative bid on eBay for a brand new body
only, not expecting to get it - unfortunately I won it for
£732.56! How do I tell my wife?
Help!
Mine was quite happy to take over the Optio S.
Bill
I've done this a couple of times Shel, usually when I have some doubts about
whether a film was rated up or down accidentally. The last time I asked a
commercial processor to do it was when I knew my original ME was giving
inconsistent exposures (turned out it was so inconsistent that only about
On 18 Feb 2004 at 21:25, Nick Clark wrote:
Does Pentax Photolab make a better job of conversion to TIFF than the camera, or
are they equivalent? I use Photoshop 5LE and Elements.
The advantage of post processing the file is that you have greater flexibility
and control. IMHO the quality isn't
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However the Photolab program is a dog, point it towards
a sub with a couple of hundred RAW images and it'll gag. It's just crap.
Are you referring to batch processing using PhotoLab or previewing with the
Pentax Photo Browser?
Yes, well,
Marnie's and Cotty's gender identification issues have nothing to do with my
species identification issues. I don't see what the connection is.
Always happy to help.
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Hi,
I've had this done on several occasions. Over here we call it a 'clip
test'. As far as I know, any pro lab will do it.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 9:49:15 PM, you wrote:
I've done this a couple of times Shel, usually when I have some doubts about
whether a film was
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also got it. I didn't open the attachment, it was an sprs.exe file,
but I use Linux to do my browsing and email stuff, so I am safe with
this one. Strange that my IP passed it along, as they scan the email for
viruses.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2142532
Sometimes I like it. Others, I think it's horrible. If you have an
opinion, feel free to share.
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
I don't see why not.
At 03:28 PM 2/18/04, you wrote:
Interesting read. Just a quick question - would Leica screw mount lenses
work on the *istD with the PK-M42 and M42-39mm adaptors? That might really
sell it to the Leica crowd.
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff[EMAIL
On 18 Feb 2004 at 17:11, Christian wrote:
Are you referring to batch processing using PhotoLab or previewing with the
Pentax Photo Browser?
Preview. I have set the preferences Folder at start to Last folder used (
which contained 200+ RAW files and have had to kill the process in order to
Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm afraid I agree with Christian. Isnip
Why are you afraid to agree with me. This is the second time in a week that
you've said that!
Personally, I'd be worried about Cotty agreeing with me!
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
