Very cute. I wish that brush on the left of his head was just a bit
less intruding into his head. The difference between the barber and
your grandson's look on their faces is great. Obviously someone had
more fun than the other. It tells a nice story.
Thanks for sharing,
Bruce
Saturday,
Historically it´s the other way round. Teabags were invented to prevent tea
being forged so that the producer could guarantee the good quality of the
tea inside. Not all shop owners were honest.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http:\\www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-
Hi,
As for availability - in the early and mid-70s, in the UK, I used
to buy tea from either Jacksons of Piccadilly (no longer in business)
The company is still in business, even if they don't have any stores
any more.
http://www.jacksons-of-piccadilly.com/tradition/early1.asp
Their products
Hi,
http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/IMGP1988-bw.jpg
You should have seen his before pics. Wow, what a change!
Comments and critique welcome.
eat your heart out, Norman Rockwell! Nice shot.
--
Cheers,
Bob
At 02:56... :-)
http://bemil.chosun.com/movie%20link/su-35.wmv
Alan Chan
ICQ: 42516180
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months
FREE*
On Jun 20, 2004, at 2:57 AM, graywolf wrote:
Well, there are certain laws of physics involved here. Reflected light
images (prints) will never match transmitted light images.
Yes, you are correct here. That's the whole basis of the digital
colour workflow.
The worst thing is that with prints
On 19/6/04, MARK T-BAG ROBERTS, discombobulated, offered:
Tea, Earl Grey, Hot, a classic. No milk, no sugar. A very good drink,
Not an option for me. I've got a bloody great container of PG Tips to
finish off...
Nyuk nyuk nyuk
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
So send up a GFM shot!
graywolf wrote:
Everyone is probably on vacation (grin).
Jostein wrote:
This month's theme is Vacation ,,
So far, there are only 17 submissions for the June gallery.
This is how I do it. 2-3 small prints for adjustments,
then 1 for the final is all that is _usually_ necessary.
Ever try to get a perfectly neutral BW out of a color
printer this way, though? I can't quite nail it: there's
always a color cast somewhere in the grey tones.
Of course, the easy way
Thank you, Crustless.
This one goes in the keeper file.
I'm gonna shoot a CrazyRoll, take it to the worst lab I know,
experiment with the 4-shot strips, and hopefully learn to cut
down on scan spotting without PEC.
William Robb wrote:
You can dose the negs pretty heavily, actually. If there is a
Read any book about the technical aspects
of photography, and you'll run across
diffraction limiting, which is usually
supposed to kick in at an F stop of 16 or
22 and be noticable by 32.
Now compare the absolute size of, say,
a 20mm prime stopped down to f22 and a 100mm
prime at f22. Your
I like this one a LOT Gonz.
Perfect BW Photo. Only change would I'd have liked is to have the items on
the counter frame his face a little better.
Great family photo though.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 11:10
Hi all.
My submission for this week is from Saturday's horse show. Nothing special,just that
the
training of the
new horse is finally starting to show and i got a good shot of her jumping.
Excuse the warmness here.I was experimenting with
what other lenses do you have to compare sharpness with? FWIW, i find my FA
24-90/3.5-4.5 that many people here rave about for sharpness is just
adequate, and i am sure that it is not a lot different from other instances
of this same lens. my opinion on the DA 16-45/4 is that it is sharper than
Very nice. WB looks about right to my eye, but I am on a laptop with an
uncalibrated screen.
I presume the artifacts are .jpg rather than in the original. Nice
camera and nice shot.
Antonio
On 20 Jun 2004, at 12:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
My submission for
Thanks.
I just added a bit of fill flash in PS Elements and did a colour cast click to help
bring
it up a bit.
I hope its the .jpg.:-) Did not see anything in the original .
Dave
Very nice. WB looks about right to my eye, but I am on a
laptop
with an
This one time, at scanner camp, Dr. Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No deal Shel. I'm 1,500 kilometres from the nearest place likely to have
a scanner of that type, let alone somewhere to rent time on one. I'll be
looking for a cheap scanner in time...
1500km!? where are you?
Kevin
Karratha
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at scanner camp, Dr. Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No deal Shel. I'm 1,500 kilometres from the nearest place likely to have
a scanner of that type, let alone somewhere to rent time on one. I'll be
looking for a cheap scanner in time...
I despise this photo:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2457638
But I'm posting it anyway. Comments are always welcome.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
Lon Williamson wrote:
Question: Is it the absolute diameter of the aperature,
or some formula taking into account diameter _and_
distance from the film that causes diffraction limiting?
My understanding is that diffraction gets much worse as the aperture gets
further away from the film plane.
The short answer is yes.
There's a quick description of why at *Robert Monaghan's web site:
http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/diffraction.html
*
Lon Williamson wrote:
Read any book about the technical aspects
of photography, and you'll run across
diffraction limiting, which is usually
supposed to kick in
The flip comment would be: As well you should! But on reflection I
have to ask why. It's not
at all bad. Not enough Camera movement? (I couldn't resist I'm sorry).
frank theriault wrote:
I despise this photo:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2457638
But I'm posting it anyway.
Graywolf mentioned:
So, I was not suggesting he try to get the S-20, but that he look for
something
currently on closeout somewhere.
Understood. By now this may have become lost in the discussion, but my original
reply was intended to say that I agreed in principle (look for a deal on a
I'm looking for a companion MX, in better shape than my present one
(which is not all that distressed anyhow!) but not at that price!
Cotty wrote:
Just mentioning this auction because I seriously doubt any PDMLer is
watching it with a view to bidding at this high a price!
Black will not print. Tried new cartridge, clean nozzles, no luck.
Anyone got an idea?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
The dent could be a refelction. Its easily repaired - take of the bottom
plate and use a rubber hammer from the inside. I did that with my Super A.
I guess I should hav kept my black MX, which waa my first Pentax, bought new
i April 1981 (guess I paid almost 300USD for it). (So, I've been a
PA: This came out wrong. I don't recall the price of the body (400 USD I
guess), but I paid a little less than 300 USD for the 35mm lens.
The dent could be a refelction. Its easily repaired - take of the bottom
plate and use a rubber hammer from the inside. I did that with my Super A.
I guess
Hi Butch,
why should there be any problems? All flashes can use rechargable
batteries. I have powered my big Sunpak (can't remember the number, but
it was their second-best model) with custom-built NiMH batterypack,
without any problems. If I remember Sunpak even sold a batterypack
No guarantee, but try lightly burninshing the contacts on the cart
and corresponding printer contacts with a clean cloth. I've had
gunk on one set of contacts cause failure before.
Steve Larson wrote:
Black will not print. Tried new cartridge, clean nozzles, no luck.
Anyone got an idea?
Steve
Nice, classic' horsejumping shot, eh Dave? vbg
Weill done. I like the background blur from the pan.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi!
My submission for this week is from Saturday's horse show. Nothing special,just that the
training of the new horse is finally starting to show and i got a good shot of her
jumping.
Excuse the warmness here.I was experimenting with WB on the D2H and had it on
cloudy-2.Straight cloudy would
A marvelous picture. Everything but the people just out of focus and
those two expressions. Give a copy to the barber for her collection.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This thread reminds me of a an old saying about fools and their money.
Of course a like new black MX is probably worth more than $400 to a collector.
However a mere ex+ with damage, which this one seems to be, is worth far less.
There are just too many around. Hell at least he did not call it
HEY!,
No posting Ebay auctions Buck-O!
Cory
kidding, of course
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
There is an A*85/1.4 on the bay and the moment for the measly sum of
US$1095
with bonus scratch on the rear element :-)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked
On 20 Jun 2004 at 10:31, cbwaters wrote:
HEY!,
No posting Ebay auctions Buck-O!
There are some real clangers out there at the moment for anyone who can type
SMC at the search prompt :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since my monitor is set to sRGB (which fairly closely matches the output of my
printer) all your images should display about the same. They do not, so I can
only conclude that there is something strange about them (like maybe they are
adjust to to show what the person is trying to show no
I guess I should mention that The letters DL placed upon lenses by the
advertising department seldom, if ever, means the lens is diffraction limited.
If they were taken to court about it they would probably say it means DeLuxe.
--
graywolf wrote:
Actually it is both. Diffraction is based upon
I kind of like Wagner's myself. Though for camping or long term storage I like
the sealed packaging of Bigelow. However, I think serious tea drinkers claim
that only whole leaf tea is acceptable.
--
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Twinings is available at most U.S. supermarkets (Walmart, Krogers, etc.)
Graywolf wrote:
I guess I should mention that The letters DL placed upon
lenses by the advertising department seldom, if ever, means
the lens is diffraction limited.
If they were taken to court about it they would probably say
it means DeLuxe.
Gosh - I've got 'DL' on the back of our
David,
That's a nice pleasant photo, but the heavy border around it diminishes its
impact. Thinner borders will help move the impression your fotos make up a
notch or two. As it is now, every shot you post has to compete with that
god awful fat, black frame you put around it.
Shel
Actually, Frank, Norman Rockwell was a great photographer. All his painting were
first shot on film in his studio then he painted the picture using the photo as
a reference. Remember, he started out before color photography. I tend to think
of him as an illustrator rather than an artist myself.
You've every reason to dislike it, Frank, although I do think despise may
be a little over reactive ;-))
First, it's a cliche subject. Every jamoke with a long lens has something
like this in their portfolio. There's nothing new or innovative here, and,
imo, you choice of focal length is all
Big thanks to Bill Owens, who made this shot possible.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/spam.html
Cheers,
Jostein
-
Unfortunately, it was married with low quality eyepiece, just like
all other MZ models except the MZ-S.
Low quality eyepiece?
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:30:33
That's very reassuring to know.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:39:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Viewfinders
Pentaprism.
John Whittingham wrote:
While your on the
Well, the question now is, how did you like it?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 11:27 AM
Subject: OT; Spam attack
Big thanks to Bill Owens, who made this shot possible.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/spam.html
Hi, Bill,
As canned ham goes, I think it's a bit too salty. But the meat is of fair
quality.
... and to be honest, I skipped the honey...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 5:30 PM
Subject: Re:
The honey might have been good, but for a real taste treat, try it with
REAL, 100% maple syrup
-Paul
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: OT; Spam attack
Hi, Bill,
As canned ham goes, I think
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson
Subject: Epson C80 Problems
Black will not print. Tried new cartridge, clean nozzles, no luck.
Anyone got an idea?
A friend of mine takes the head of his Epson out periodically and
soaks it in Windex. It's a trick he read about on the leben
Rob Studdert wrote:
There is an A*85/1.4 on the bay and the moment for the measly sum of US$1095
with bonus scratch on the rear element :-)
How'd I miss that bargain. (That bonus scratch makes it very enticing).
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
Tom wisely wrote:
Actually it is both. Diffraction is based upon the diameter of the
aperture diameter and the dispersion angle of the light rays which is
affected by focal length. So the shorter the lens, and the smaller the
aperture, the worse the diffraction.
The lens will be best at the
Well getting the head out and cleaning it properly sounds like a great idea,
except on my epson 785 I've not been able to figure out how to get the heads
out yet for such an attempt. What I have done is use the highest grade of
Isopropyl alcohol I can find to limit the amount of residue this
Be nice if you'd warn people before you send them chasing a 12 mb download.
Joe
Where and what is the exact name of this leben list William?
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Epson C80 Problems
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson
Subject: Epson C80
My god they saw you coming, I picked up my chrome MX in '76, (I could
have had black for $10.00 more), with 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 70-150 f3.5
M42-K adapter, and never-ready case for $240.00 + tax. (The 70-150mm
was selling for 140-180 alone). This wasn't a kit price, just a bargain.
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: David Miers
Subject: RE: Epson C80 Problems
Where and what is the exact name of this leben list William?
I will find out for you.
Bill
Yeah, the same seller has teh 135 A*1.8 and a nice 200/2.5 also for a
lot of dosh.
For a $1,000 cant you buy a new Pentax or even Nikon 85mm 1.4, but of
course the scratched rear element you would have to do yourself, which
could be tricky...
Mind you, perhaps this is the way old kit prices
You almost make a Spam and eggs breakfast seem attractive.
Jostein wrote:
Big thanks to Bill Owens, who made this shot possible.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/spam.html
Cheers,
Jostein
-
Incidentally, anyone know how the Pentax 85mm 1.4's compare to their
Nikon counterparts? I love my Pentax film bodies but you've gotta admit
that so far their digital offering is a bit light on the ground.
A.
On 20 Jun 2004, at 19:02, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Yeah, the same seller has teh 135
Wot the heck is a tea press?
Keith whaley
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Twinings is available at most U.S. supermarkets (Walmart, Krogers, etc.)
As a matter of fact, many now also stock loose teas as well. I buy
loose tea for the chemistry dept. at the Lexington coffee shop, which
specializes in coffee
Hi Herb,
The only other lens I have in the DA 16-45's range is a Sigma P/KA 18/3.5,
which I haven't found to be super sharp.
My sharpest pictures have been taken with my Pentax-F 50/1.7 and my Tamron
90/2.5. I'm not sure how meaningful it would be to compare them
(especially the 90) to the DA
Diffraction limiting is a technical term. Diffraction is one of the things
that cannot be mitigated by the wonders of modern glass or lens design.
Diffraction is solely determined by the physical size of the aperture and
it's deleterious effects relative to the image at the focal plane is solely
Hey, the photo is fine, except for the smallish glass of stale beer! g
Oh, and the bare toast! What goes on that? Honey? Not butter or jam?
And is that another fried egg under the two on top? Yummy!
A stick-to-the-ribs breakfast indeed! Good thing I've just eaten...
keith
Jostein wrote:
Big
W Robb wrote:
All I can tell you is how I work.
My situation is perhaps a bit different from yours. I have a lot of
experience dealing with colour theory that you may not have.
All that is moot however.
Quite true I'm sure.
Calibrate your monitor using Adobe Gamma.
Import an image file into
Thanks Bill! I'm working on that, seems to be a stickler just
to get the cover off, but I'll get it if I have to use a sledge.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:03 AM
I suppose this is a silly question, but, considering that I'm not a
full-blown inkjet printer repairman, one can remove the print head readily?
I wish!
I have continual problems with ink occluding the print head nozzles...
Mine is the Epson Stylus Photo 820, and there's no WAY I could get a
- Original Message -
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The honey might have been good, but for a real taste treat, try it with
REAL, 100% maple syrup
-Paul
Pardon me, Paul
Yuck!!
Please don't take it personally.
Jostein
LOL
I had to have my son finish off the last egg and the last piece of spam.
Stick to the ribs, you bet!
As I said, I passed on the honey. I don't like overly sweet things together
with meat.
To me, the worst horror of the American food experience was finding out that
my breakfast butter was
Again, you're a first, Jostein!
I've never heard of anyone NOT liking real maple syrup!
I grew up in one of the U.S.' most prolific states' producer of maple
syrup (and other products...) -- Northern Ohio.
Thing is, not ALL maple syrup is made the same. Far from it...
If the only maple syrup
On 20/6/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
HEY!,
No posting Ebay auctions Buck-O!
Sorry Cory - I didn't realise you were bidding on it!!!
Cory
kidding, of course
Yeah yeah - let's just check on that bid history buddy ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 20/6/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
HEY!,
No posting Ebay auctions Buck-O!
There are some real clangers out there at the moment for anyone who can type
SMC at the search prompt :-)
SCM
CsM...
MCs..
Sms...
oh hell
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Big thanks to Bill Owens, who made this shot possible.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/spam.html
Hmmm, nice. Not sure about the flowers though - the petals look a bit dry
- maybe some extra virgin olive oil on them?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 20/6/04, KEITH, discombobulated, offered:
Wot the heck is a tea press?
http://www.teaandcoffee.net/
:-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
You shouldn't have any problem with an AF280T on your MZ-S.
Jens Bladt wrote:
How do you measure this without triggering the flash?
I often use the AF280T. Could it harm the MZ-S?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Frits Wüthrich
Chai is very popular
and all the coffee shops carry it. In addition, coffee
presses has become very popular and so are commonly
available.
Many supermarkets carry it...very funny...It cracks me up that chai has
become trendy. :) Although I myself am guilty of drinking chai made
from a tea
This is Heresy, real maple syrup is light and flavorful. The really
ghastly stuff is the stuff that contains
1 or 2% of the real thing and is mostly corn syrup, amber coloring and
artificial maple flavor. Log Cabin
and Aunt Jemima's come to mind immediately. US Grade A light amber,
(very
Thanks Brian, I'll look into it.
Cheers
Shaun
Brian Walters wrote:
Shaun
Photo CD can be organised through any Kodak shopfront - do they have an agency
in NW West Aus?
I've used Photo CD extensively in the past for photos for the ASGAP website -
quality seems a bit variable. It seems to cope OK
Replied to off list with glee
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Dr. Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karratha
Ahh, nice spot, have not been there since... about 1981 I think
Anywho, I have a CanoScan FS-4000US I could send to you as a loaner.
Basically, you pay
On 20 Jun 2004 at 19:05, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Incidentally, anyone know how the Pentax 85mm 1.4's compare to their
Nikon counterparts? I love my Pentax film bodies but you've gotta admit
that so far their digital offering is a bit light on the ground.
I don't know about Nikons offerings
On 20 Jun 2004 at 19:02, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Yeah, the same seller has teh 135 A*1.8 and a nice 200/2.5 also for a
lot of dosh.
The price on the 200/2.5 is extraordinary but at least if the copy is to
believed it's not damaged.
For a $1,000 cant you buy a new Pentax or even Nikon 85mm
On 20 Jun 2004 at 10:50, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Interesting. Pentax thinks that the DA 16-45 gives its best mtf
performance wide open (f4.0) between 16 and 24 mm., and f4.5 thereafter.
So is the DA 16-45 a diffraction limited lens? And in terms of everyday
shooting, what does that mean?
I think you do not have to worry with anything new enough to have TTL flash
metering. What you do need to worry about are flashes that have been made for a
long time like a Vivitar 283. Newish ones are OK, my old one has 250V across the
sync terminals which can destroy electronic circuits in
Has anyone here disassembled the Pentax Cable Switch F? If so is the switch
body screwed or glued?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
On Jun 20, 2004, at 1:05 PM, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
ompare to their Nikon counterparts? I love my Pentax film bodies but
you've gotta admit that so far their digital offering is a bit light
on the ground.
It's the same chip as the Nikon 6.1 megapixel camera. Yet it's smaller
and feels more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very cute. I wish that brush on the left of his head was just a bit
less intruding into his head. The difference between the barber and
your grandson's look on their faces is great. Obviously someone had
more fun than the other. It tells a nice story.
Thank you Bruce.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A marvelous picture. Everything but the people just out of focus and
those two expressions. Give a copy to the barber for her collection.
Thank you. Yes, as I was looking at the photos shot during this
occasion, this one was my favorite and I thought it would make a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/IMGP1988-bw.jpg
You should have seen his before pics. Wow, what a change!
Comments and critique welcome.
eat your heart out, Norman Rockwell! Nice shot.
Thank you. Wow, thats a hell of a compliment! I love Rockwell's sense
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonderful shot, Gonz!!
Thank you.
You caught the moment there, not only the grandson, but the semi-scowl
of the barber (do we call them stylists these days?).
Yes, she kept telling me to keep her out of the frame, but this one was
just too tempting! I'm sure she'll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz,
Love those expressions!
Thanks Bob. I know, that's the first thing that caught my eye when I
reviewed the photos. I knew that I had possibly a real interesting shot
when I snapped it, but it wasn't until I went home and looked at them
that I realized what a
Very nice shot Dave. Excellent timing. How much latitude do you have
in timing a shot like this? If you were fast/slow by 1/10 sec would it
have ruined the shot? The only change I would like, but which is out of
your control is the folks in the background are distracting. The
composition
Shel,
When I took it (I actually took about 4 or 5 frames), I thought, hey, this
may be cool. I got the contact back, and thought, hey, this is cool. I
got the 8x10 back, and thought, Wow, this is bad.
But, I thought, What the hell, I paid for the 8x10, I'll post it as a PAW
anyway, just to
The leben list is apparently defunct, however there is a yahoo group
it seems.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epson-inkjet/
William Robb
IIRC it takes about 40 gallons of maple sap to make a gallon of syrup.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: OT; Spam attack
Again, you're a first, Jostein!
I've never heard of anyone
Held by 3 screws.
Alan Chan
ICQ: 42516180
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Has anyone here disassembled the Pentax Cable Switch F? If so is the switch
body screwed or glued?
_
MSN Premium includes powerful parental controls and get 2
I am attempting, unsuccessfully, to network my desktop computer to my
laptop.
The desktop is on WinXP Pro, the laptop is on WinXP Home
I am running both machines into a router.
Anyone out there who knows how to do this, and can give me a hand
with it, could you please contact me offlist?
Thanks
Hi Alex,
I'd agree with all that's written, and certainly the AF280T would be fine. If using
anything else, the figure I've heard as a limit is 6v. In addition, I got this reply
about a similar question from the local Pentax rep...
Please ensure that the extra contact pins for TTL etc on the
'Bout right, as I recall...
keith
Bill Owens wrote:
IIRC it takes about 40 gallons of maple sap to make a gallon of syrup.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: OT; Spam attack
Again, you're
Ok. Are you going to keep us in suspense???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's pretty much just what *will* happen after I make a certain move
to a certain new city in a certain new country...
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 19 June
Yup. My aunt and uncle own a sugar bush (sugar and black maples) in Quebec.
They once told me (best as I remember) that it takes 40 to 45 gallons sap
per gallon syrup, depending on sugar content of the sap, eh? (- for the
Canadians among us.) My youngest son likes the fake stuff better... prefers
I'm not saying anything more until I have some idea of what exactly is
happening, so sorry Gonz, I guess the answer is yes...
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 21 June 2004 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Last Two Days
Ok.
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
