Thanks Tim!
On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
But what's wrong with kippers?
Nada ... I like Manx Kippers a lot. It's a handoff line ... ;-)
they're the ones with no tail, right?
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Lisp is truly beautiful, you have to try to see its beauty.
The concept
of a program that can write itself at run-time and then be evaluated
(executed) is truly brilliant.
Not too sure about that. I had an excellent training in programming
all those years ago. In my first job as a
On Friday 26 January 2007 22:51, Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2007
I'd recently changed design of my website, adding image rollovers to
show large previews when visitor moves mouse over the thumbnails. I hope
I didn't create a mess for Internet Explorer users. Please take a
I'll ask again, maybe nobody noticed.
What was the sequence of the model release dates?
D, DS, DS2, DL , DL2 or what?
jco
Are you thinking of buying one?
John
The information
The friend of mine from the PAW list who first bought a Pentax DS
had the FA24/2. He sold it pretty fast because the CA wide open was
too much of a bother ... why carry such a heavy, big lens around if
you have have to shoot with it stopped down all the time?
I bought it for use on the
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:59:05 -0500, John Francis wrote:
Writing a utility that can perform wildcard and/or directory tree
operations in a cross-platform manner will be difficult enough.
If he will be using 'C' I can supply a generic wildcard/treewalk
function that uses a callback function that
Lisp is truly beautiful, you have to try to see its beauty. The concept
of a program that can write itself at run-time and then be evaluated
(executed) is truly brilliant. Given the time when it was envisioned...
I've never coded it, but I've seen it. They syntax makes it
Congratulations, Juan - that's great!
- MCC
Juan Buhler wrote:
Hi all,
The current issue of the British Black and White Photography magazine
has a nice portfolio article about my photos, written by Mike
Johnston, and including seven of my pictures. There isn't much online,
but here is a
I like the idea Ann, but the background is distracting.
Sorry
Dave
On 1/24/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5498964
posted one more shot from my Nora project
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Any thoughts on setting up a computer and printer(s) in a basement
setting that is coldish in winter and dampish in summer.
However i run a dehumidifier in summer and a wood stove in winter.
I know the latter is not that great cause of dust etc.
The only reason i ask is that i had my very first
Wow :-)
I'll buy the mag, if the edition turns up here. It sometimes do, sometimes
don't.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan
Buhler
Sent: 26. januar 2007 20:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Barry Rice wrote:
Indeed! That's it!
But I guess I won't be doing it anytime soon, myself! Alas.
The effect, by the way, is really extraordinary and far beyond what
you'd
expect from just using a stopped down ultra-short focus lens. Really
remarkable.
You
On 1/27/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Barry Rice wrote:
Indeed! That's it!
But I guess I won't be doing it anytime soon, myself! Alas.
The effect, by the way, is really extraordinary and far beyond what
you'd
expect from just using a stopped
On 1/26/07, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current issue of the British Black and White Photography magazine
has a nice portfolio article about my photos, written by Mike
Johnston, and including seven of my pictures. There isn't much online,
but here is a link to their site:
Cold doesn't hurt much but damp is hell on electronics and fine
printer nozzles.
Insulate, dehumidify, heat to a standard room temperature. Computer
equipment does best in cool, dry environments.
G
On Jan 27, 2007, at 6:20 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Any thoughts on setting up a computer and
As many has said. You really need to simplify your homepage. It has a ton of
distracters making it hard to see your photography. The menu system looks
messy, I don't think it is displayed right (Firefox 1.5.0.9). I used to use
explorer, same thing there.
IMO the rollovers helps. It makes it
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:36 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
I bought it for use on the MZ-3, I really liked the build and bright
viewfinder image it afforded. The Smegma does have the advantage of
diminutive size and light weight and I love the dedicated hood but
wish it
was reversible. Here's a
Roman, it seems to work on my FireFox 2.0.
Boris
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2007
I'd recently changed design of my website, adding image rollovers to
show large previews when visitor moves mouse over the thumbnails. I hope
I didn't create a mess for Internet Explorer
Thanks so much for all the great tips, Pål! We were planning to rent a
4 wheel drive just in case, so that's not a problem. I didn't realize
there were puffins around Vik, so that's good to know. At this point I
think we might just keep the vacation a little short and stick to the
south.
Re.
Nice shot ...
Thanks!
Hard to say much about any lens from a low-rez web photo, but it
looks like it does ok. I don't usually buy Sigma lenses because the
experiences I've had with Sigma equipment have not been positive.
They are known to have problems particularly in Canon mount.
I
They work at my computer too. But they are displayed partly outside the
screen, so they are no good if you want us to see the photos (I guess thats
the main idea).
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Thanks, George! That dvd looks great, and I ordered one. :)
Amita
On 1/26/07, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita -
Michael Reichmann took one of his photographic tours to Iceland. It's
one of the topics on Luminous Landscape Video Journal number 8.
I see.
Thanks... I think I experienced this few times in my (previous) life...
Well, there is always much I could learn.
Thanks!
Boris
Tom C wrote:
Thanks Boris.
I was loosely using the term to refer to the near whiteout conditions I
was experiencing, which when the most extreme leave
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16420full=1
This time I processed it in rather different environment.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Godfrey, I am almost ;-) ready to admit that LR RAW processing engine is
*far* superior than that of CS2 ;-).
If LR is priced reasonably, it may be just the sweet spot for me ;-).
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Challenge? no.
Here are two quickie conversions, one in Lightroom and the
Roman,
I agree with Tim. I find the rollovers a pain: the
expanded pic goes beyond the bottom of the screen on
my laptop, and when I try to scroll the cursor leaves
the thumbnail and the large pic disappears.
Rick
--- Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As many has said. You really need to
In a message dated 1/26/2007 11:53:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
The current issue of the British Black and White Photography magazine
has a nice portfolio article about my photos, written by Mike
Johnston, and including seven of my pictures. There isn't
Picked up a copy last night. Good stuff. The very first line of the
article is a reference to the PDML. So we're all famous! I guess we
should be on our best behavior for a while - we may have some
newcomers. vbg
Anyway, good article and wonderful photographs. Congrats again, Juan!
On
IMO the rollovers helps came out wrong.
Should be: IMO the rollovers don't help.
Sorry.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Øsleby
Sent: 27. januar 2007 16:11
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16421full=1
I hope it at least makes you chuckle ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Congratulations.
Long time not posting, just want to share my joy: I've become the
happy owner of a K10D. To celebrate I undusted an old macro lens (that
now is image stabilized hurray!!!) and took some shots. My office
moved from downtown Toronto to Markham (north of TO) so macro was the
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I don't code much, and when I do it's generally low-level
hardware-in-the-loop, realtime stuff. For that, C is about perfect
IMO... all the power and flexibility of assembly, with the ease of use
of... assembly.
C is assembly in a whore's outfit. That's what
It was a small jpg - I'll upload it to my home page instead, though and
send you the link
Nost everyone that has mentioned the feathers seems disappointed in what
I did except for
the family I did it for :) but they were all at the site and saw the
real thing and were amazed
I even got what I
David J Brooks wrote:
Any thoughts on setting up a computer and printer(s) in a basement
setting that is coldish in winter and dampish in summer.
Cold isn't a problem but damp can be if it's damp enough. I doubt
your basement is damp enough unless you've built a mini rain forest
down there.
Mark, I think it work fine as part of a series of images. As a stand
alone image, it is not that strong...
Boris
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
From experience, the one thing cold does is make things not want to
start up, particularly harddrives and printers. Once they get going,
it's fine.
When I say cold, I'm talking below 10C and really approaching 0C.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Cold doesn't hurt much but damp is hell on
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:36 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
I bought it for use on the MZ-3, I really liked the build and bright
viewfinder image it afforded. The Smegma does have the advantage of
diminutive size and light weight and I love the dedicated hood but
wish it
I would not judge based on a quickie conversion effort, Boris. I have
a workflow that is well developed for Photoshop CS2 with Camera Raw
that's quite different from how I'm learning to work in Lightroom.
When I work with ACR, for me, I design the output to be edited to a
finish rendering
Markus .. here is the link
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/feathers0027orig.jpg
sending it through PDML just in case your server doesnt like stuff
directly from my server :)
I'm guessing you were sending me info on freeware archiving because you
thought I had nowhere
to post stuff on
I don't code much, and when I do it's generally low-level
hardware-in-the-loop, realtime stuff. For that, C is about perfect
IMO... all the power and flexibility of assembly, with the ease of use
of... assembly.
C is assembly in a whore's outfit. That's what I love about it. ;-)
David J Brooks wrote:
I like the idea Ann, but the background is distracting.
Sorry
Dave
I know - its awful - when you see the full frame shot it will be even
more so...
I couldn't get the trees to blur - but I had to document the feathers
being there.
The next day the string was
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I don't care about beauty, I
care about readability and understandability.
I find well written, well formatted Lisp to be quite readable. Same
for C, Pascal, BASIC, and even FORTRAN up to a point. Even good
assembly language can be readable.
C++ gives
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I would not judge based on a quickie conversion effort, Boris. I have
a workflow that is well developed for Photoshop CS2 with Camera Raw
that's quite different from how I'm learning to work in Lightroom.
When I work with ACR, for me, I design the output to be
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:40:22AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I don't care about beauty, I
care about readability and understandability.
I find well written, well formatted Lisp to be quite readable. Same
for C, Pascal, BASIC, and even FORTRAN up
Hi Folks,
Thanks to the evangelical zeal of my brother Francis (who has lately
been tooting about his photo contest victory), I recently converted to
Pentax and bought a K10D. I made this purchase just before I leaving
Canada for a month in Berlin, and the assortment of lenses I bought on
eBay
I doubt that LR is far superior. In this case, I think Godfrey's LR
conversion is slightly more pleasing, but a few tweaks on the ACR
version would make it identical. Both are very good and illustrate
that there was no problem with the original RAW file.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 11:30 AM,
My studio, computer equipment and printer are all in the basement.
But it has forced air heat, air conditioning and a dehumidifier. It's
actually a more stable environment than most above ground rooms.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Cold doesn't hurt much but damp
that's the January edition. In the shops here (UK) they no longer seem
to have it, and the Feb edition is on the shelves.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Loveless
Sent: 27 January 2007 16:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 1/27/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's the January edition. In the shops here (UK) they no longer seem
to have it, and the Feb edition is on the shelves.
--
Here in the States it's on the stands about a month late. Just a
couple of weeks ago Barnes and Noble still had December's
Sigma's are decent enough as long as they don't have electronics. If
they do, then worry.
-Adam
I think it depends more on the fitting IMHO, I have the 105/2.8 EX, 70-
200/2.8 EX and the 300/4 APO Macro (two of the 300's) 1.4x 2x EX
converters, never had any trouble with any of them. At
I think it depends on the sample ;-). Sigma is known to have significant
sample variation :-).
Cheers.
Boris
John Whittingham wrote:
Sigma's are decent enough as long as they don't have electronics. If
they do, then worry.
-Adam
I think it depends more on the fitting IMHO, I have the
Paul,
It really depends on the goals one sets for oneself. My ultimate goal is
to make *all* the processing during RAW conversion time. That is, all
the tweaking, sharpening, just everything, I want to do just once - when
I convert from RAW to PSD and then to JPG for printing or directly to
Hi,
today I bought a used Olympus E-1 with a 14-54 lens (28-108 35mm
equivalent fov). It's a very nice camera. Only 5 megapixels, but the
results seem very good, and it handles beautifully - really a
photographer's camera, in my opinion. The lens is excellent.
I strolled around London taking
Bob,
That's a nice set of street scenes!
I have several times nearly bought an Olympus E-1. It was the hottest
contender next to Pentax when I was choosing what to buy in late
2004 ... the E-1 body is a truly professional quality camera with
every good bit I wanted. My reservation was, and
No. 2 is really nice, Bob.
I like many of the others, too.
-Brendan
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
today I bought a used Olympus E-1 with a 14-54 lens
(28-108 35mm
equivalent fov). It's a very nice camera. Only 5
megapixels, but the
results seem very good, and it handles
On Jan 27, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
... I am not comparing Godfrey's LR and ACR conversions of the
presented RAW
file. No, not really. I thought it was a suitable thread to make my
remark, but indeed it is very off-topic of the original thread. ...
That wasn't at all
How dry is it going to be in the winter?
If it is really dry, I hope you are not troubled by Electro Static Discharge
(ESD). You know, those nice shocks you get when you walk around on a carpet
and touch the water tap, or someone else. Or you get them from friction
between your pants and the
I see what you're getting at, Boris. That's a valid point. As a
one-step solution, Lightroom is probably better. By the way, you might
want to convert to tiff rather than jpeg. That way you won't lose
anything when you save the file.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Some nice shots, Bob. I think 5 megapixels is optimum for the size of
the sensor in a point and shoot. My Panasonic is a 5, and I'm very
pleased with it for a pocket camera.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
today I bought a used Olympus E-1 with a 14-54 lens (28-108 35mm
Thanks. For me it's the 11-22mm and 14-54mm lenses and the lens mount
the confirmed my decision to go with Olympus. I still have the E-500
with the 14-45mm kit lens, and I'll keep them. In a month or 2, before
I go to the Alps, I'll buy the 11-22mm lens, and then that's it,
probably, until the E-1
Thanks. I like it too.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brendan MacRae
Sent: 27 January 2007 20:01
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Olympian
No. 2 is really nice, Bob.
I like many of the others, too.
If you want to do all the work in Lightroom, why export? Lightroom
supports very nice printing functions that operate from the original
files (whatever format you want) all within the environment.
I export PSD, [EMAIL PROTECTED], ProPhoto RGB files from Lightroom when I
am in the situation
Sounds like you have a kit that does exactly the right thing for you,
Bob!
I also love that 90 degrees across the diagonal field of view a
lot, it's one of my favorites, which is why the only new lens I
bought when I first got the Pentax was the DA14. I use the DA21 more
now, mostly due
My K10D underexposes 2/3 stop with this screen, so I'm looking to sell
it now. I paid about $130 for it a year ago. It's clean, no
scratches or marks. Split prism with microprism collar, no Optibrite
treatment or crop marks.
asking $75USD + shipping, obo.
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/27/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some nice shots, Bob. I think 5 megapixels is optimum for the size of
the sensor in a point and shoot. My Panasonic is a 5, and I'm very
pleased with it for a pocket camera.
Paul
The E-1 is no point and shoot camera. It's Olympus'
On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:08 AM, John Francis wrote:
... Mind you, the important qualifier there is well-written. ...
Aside from the fact that I think you're the *only* person who ever
said to me that they found C++ easy to read, I agree with this part
100%. That said, it's easy to make a mess
As promised, I shot a bit with the SMC Pentax 28/3.5 today. This one is
wide open at 1/15th, ISO 1600:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5513023size=lg
This one is f8 at 1/80th, ISO 200, with some transform perspective to
straighten the verticals:
Boris
I like it - good use of selective focus and I like that you can make
out the branch and trunk in the background without making the image
busy.
Alastair
On 1/28/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16420full=1
This time I processed it in
Yes, after reading a few more messages, I realized that this was the
Olympus SLR. I assume the sensor is similar in size to an APS-C?
Sounds like a nice piece of equipment. It should be great for wedding
photographers with that 4/3 format, which converts easily to 8x10 or
11 x14.
Paul
On
the picture of Grace is beautifully lit.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
Sent: 27 January 2007 21:27
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: a couple with the K28/3.5
As promised, I shot a bit with
Thanks Bob. Good old window light. I'm very pleased with how this
lens performs wide open. It's still a winner, thirty-five years later.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 4:58 PM, Bob W wrote:
the picture of Grace is beautifully lit.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not quite right Cory - second press on the INFO button overlays the
histogram.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 9:44 AM
Subject: RE: Differences between
Hi Paul
did you choose to focus on the clock rather than the house in the
second shot? At first glance it looked soft overall until I found the
sharp clock. It's so off to the right in the frame though it's hard
to tell what was the main subject. Agree with Bob on the lighting on
Grace.
Yes, I focused on the clock. Perhaps the wrong choice here, but it
seemed like a good idea at the time:-). I started out shooting the
clock and eventually expanded the shot to include the house. I
probably should have revised my thinking as well.
Paul
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:09 PM,
test -- please ignore
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 1/27/07, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My K10D underexposes 2/3 stop with this screen, so I'm looking to sell
it now. I paid about $130 for it a year ago. It's clean, no
scratches or marks. Split prism with microprism collar, no Optibrite
treatment or crop marks.
asking $75USD
Are you not keen on dialing in +2/3 on the K10D while you have the
screen in place?
Alastair
On 1/28/07, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My K10D underexposes 2/3 stop with this screen, so I'm looking to sell
it now. I paid about $130 for it a year ago. It's clean, no
scratches or
We rarely ignore anything on the PDML:-). Your test was successful.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Micah Kleit wrote:
test -- please ignore
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 28/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, after reading a few more messages, I realized that this was the
Olympus SLR. I assume the sensor is similar in size to an APS-C?
Sounds like a nice piece of equipment. It should be great for wedding
photographers with that 4/3 format,
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Mat Maessen wrote:
On 1/27/07, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My K10D underexposes 2/3 stop with this screen, so I'm looking to
sell
it now. I paid about $130 for it a year ago. It's clean, no
scratches or marks. Split prism with microprism collar,
Hi All
http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/73625976
A boating-theme still life - this yacht was tied up in the Pohara
Harbour, Golden Bay New Zealand right next to one of Jacques Costeau's
old ships which is being used as a floating espresso shop!
Pentax K10D ISO100 DNG
FA 24-90 @ 58mm,
Yesterday I tried several times to upload a photo to the web and
failed. I asked my webmaster (guess that's what folks some call them)
if he would try it. He did and experienced the same problem. He somehow
learned that there have been a number of complaints about the new
Internet Explorer 7. I
On 1/27/07, Alastair Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you not keen on dialing in +2/3 on the K10D while you have the
screen in place?
Alastair
Well, part of my reason for selling it is that I no longer own any
manual focus lenses - so the split screen isn't as necessary -
especially if
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 28/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, after reading a few more messages, I realized that this was the
Olympus SLR. I assume the sensor is similar in size to an APS-C?
Sounds like a nice piece of equipment. It should
On 27/1/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi,
today I bought a used Olympus E-1 with a 14-54 lens (28-108 35mm
equivalent fov). It's a very nice camera. Only 5 megapixels, but the
results seem very good, and it handles beautifully - really a
photographer's camera, in my opinion. The lens is
On 1/27/07 5:38 PM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somewhat smaller than the Pentax APS sensors in fact, 18x13.5mm vs
23.5x15.7mm as such they have lower sensitivity and more noise at any
given ISO. It's a beautifully designed camera though, after owning my
E-10 and loving it
Hi Boris
quite good for a zoom and a nice background rendering too for me :-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 5:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Almonds in
On 28/01/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07 5:38 PM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somewhat smaller than the Pentax APS sensors in fact, 18x13.5mm vs
23.5x15.7mm as such they have lower sensitivity and more noise at any
given ISO. It's a beautifully
Why are your pictures so small Bob :-(
I would have liked to see them in their full beauty ;-)
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bob W
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 8:54 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: Olympian
Hi,
I hope people aren't getting numerous copies of e-mails, but I seem to
be having a problem with my usual address, so I'm hoping this new
address is better.
I seem to be having problems sending e-mail to the list; none of my
posts have made it since Friday, so I'm trying again.
Thibouille, I'm
Hello Bob,
Saturday, January 27, 2007, 9:53:51 PM, you wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/London/London/
Cheers,
Bob
Nice little gallery, I like 11 best. Would like to see it bigger
though, there seems to be a lot of detail in the background.
Have fun with your new camera:)
--
Attila
That's the way Lightbox spat them out. Any in particular you want to
see more closely?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Markus Maurer
Sent: 27 January 2007 23:25
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Olympian
Why
advocacy mode against microsoft plot to conquer the world
This behaviour is a microsoft feature to force you and your web provider
to upgrade the server software to be compatible with IE7, and in the
process become incompatible with IE 6, then force more people to upgrade
to IE7, then to
K.Takeshita wrote:
On 1/27/07 5:38 PM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somewhat smaller than the Pentax APS sensors in fact, 18x13.5mm vs
23.5x15.7mm as such they have lower sensitivity and more noise at any
given ISO. It's a beautifully designed camera though, after owning my
I've heard nothing but praise for this lens and have to say that the sample
pics I've seen taken with it are lovely. I'm doing more portraits (mainly
of my kids) lately and am also considering doing my first wedding this year,
so a fast, short telephoto is something I'd love to get.
The
There is a shortage of the FA 77 now due to rebates and the K series
introductions. But I would guess that tthey'll soon be available
again. If I wanted one, I'd go to BH and click notify when
available. That has always worked for me.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 7:04 PM, J and K Messervy wrote:
Nice shot, but a little soft. Is it at 1.4? Or at a very slow shutter
speed? Do you have shake reduction turned on? Not a bad start, but
keep working!
Paul
On Jan 27, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Micah Kleit wrote:
I hope people aren't getting numerous copies of e-mails, but I seem to
be having a
Geese, I'd hate to ask you a political question. ;-DD
Jack
--- Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
advocacy mode against microsoft plot to conquer the world
This behaviour is a microsoft feature to force you and your web
provider
to upgrade the server software to be
Excellent work - #0041 is my favorite.
- MCC
Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Hi all,
There was a great conjunction between Venus and the moon last Saturday.
Here is a selection of my coverage of the event, here in Marseille,
southern France:
I've had a lot of problems with IE7 - both the 64 bit version on my X64
machine and the 32 bit version on my 32 bit machine. I have several
browsers on both - Netscape, Firefox, Opera - to test drive my website
etc, so I just switch to those if need be.
How do you go back to IE 6? I commented
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
