Yes, quite nice. I think I could enjoy myself on that beach
I know that rules are meant to be broken but, in this case, the central
horizon does detract a bit. Also, I'd have preferred to see a bit more on the
left hand side.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
For those with the interest and the bandwidth, here is 611 at full chuff.
http://www.rail-videos.net/video/view.php?id=927
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/07 Wed AM 06:13:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: More stream power
NW was one of the
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/07 Wed AM 03:49:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: The law is not an ass
More importantly, are there many topless tropical fish stores in Liverpool?
I'll have that Pirahna at the back of the tank, please.
On 06/11/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
More importantly, are there many topless tropical fish stores in Liverpool?
No, they all have roofs. They have a saying in Liverpool - if you can't
see across the Mersey, it's raining. If you can, it's going to rain.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Yep, what Peter said. I admit I don't use the M135/3.5 much (I have a
few other 135s), but it is a great performer. I like the M200/4 (and
it's slightly more convenient brother A200/4) a lot. Both work well on
digital, and are really convenient walking-around lenses. Picked up the
M135 for
On Nov 7, 2007 4:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/5/2007 8:21:55 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://picasaweb.google.com.au/OzSavage/RedBullAirRace2007?authkey=Y4DihhF6Au
k
Some nice shots. Since I am not into planes, I
On Nov 7, 2007 5:42 AM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of these so-called silly laws seem remarkably useful to me:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7081038.stm
I'm sure there is an off colour comment to be made about:
Women in Vermont must obtain written permission from their husbands
to
ann sanfedele wrote:
I'm very sad -- just heard Fred McDarrah died. One of my early heros of
photo-journalism in New York...
ann
He was really THE chronicler of the various art and political movements
in the '60's and '70's, in N.Y. and other venues on the other coast...
Like most
P. J. Alling wrote:
Nothing special just a seascape.
And evidence of a running dog having passed? g
Very nice. I like the color of that sand...
keith whaley
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20aseascape.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited
It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp
image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash
from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks Henk. Looking at the high res image, I'd say the sharpest
point is the eyes. Mid body is probably about the same plane. I shot
most of these at 2.5. I'll eventually post a whole gallery. But I
wanted a couple with even more background blur. There is a noticeable
difference.
On Nov
Nice portrait. I also much like my FA 50/1.4 for portraits on digital.
But I wonder why you choose almost open lens at f1.8. There is
sufficient light available for eg f2.8 and this would bring even more
sharpness to the front of the face of the model and still have
sufficient blurring of the
Love the light colour.
I can also see a couple of different shots in that scene that would be
quite interesting.
Cheers,
Dave.
On Nov 7, 2007 12:45 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing special just a seascape.
Glad to help.
Lightroom's compare, grade and sorting facilities would help.
Particularly for this kind of shoot, I expect! I'd be lost without
it :: for my last photo assignment, I had to pick four frames out of
about 800. Just getting through 800 exposures without it would have
been a
I grew up in Rutland Vermont. When I was little, Dad took me to the River
Road Bridge many times where we would watch the steam trains being built in
the Rutland yard. Sometimes we went down Scales Avenue to watch the action
at the roundhouse and turntable. Grandfather had taken Dad to the very
On 07/11/07, Cory Papenfuss, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've found that for shots without harsh lighting that will cause
flare, the K50/1.4 performs well wide-open, with a nice bokeh. It's not
so good at flare-prone shots (e.g. photo of city lights at night flying
from above)
On 07/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Shooting on this project has ebbed, but I was out walking with the
DA*16-50 and made a couple more exposures that fit into the theme ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46b.htm
Comments, critique, etc always
P. J. Alling wrote:
I paid less than $70 for mine, actually.
Well, then, you got the better bargain... (god I love this list...)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Godders. I've only processed a few of these, but here's one at f2.5. I
think I prefer the bokeh here:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611957
the background has much better bokeh in this case. :-) Nice smile.
--
Christian
The Allegheny was built by Lima for the CO for hauling coal.
http://www.steamlocomotive.com/allegheny/
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re:
I think that Bokeh is a matter of taste. In fact I kind of like the
Donut Bokeh that you get from a Mirror Tele.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Christian.
I do have more space in the full frame, but I cropped it tight. Most of the
shots on the sample agency cards that the model gave me
I paid less than $70 for mine, actually. I don't use it much but for
what I paid, it's too good to sell.
Christian wrote:
Patrick Genovese wrote:
I've been offered the M135 f/3.5 and the M200 f/4 (price yet to be
determined)..
I''ve inspected the lenses and both are in great condition
Yeah, I'll have to give Lightroom another try. I used the trial version a few
times but never really learned the software. I'm still using PSCS 1, which is
fine as a conversion tool but crippled for tasks like this. I'm just so
comfortable with it that I hate to change.
Paul
--
Here's a shot with the 50/1.4, probably at f8 or so. But the lens performed
well with strong backlight.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2349216
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speaking of bokeh on 50mm's - I've just enabled
In a message dated 11/7/2007 3:35:57 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp
image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash
from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
Thanks Marnie. She does have a birthmark near her nose. I'm waiting to talk to
her before cloning it out. Since it's for a talent agency card, she may not
want to misrepresent her appearance. Don't know. Personally, I'd clone it out,
and I probably should have for showing it here. I just don't
frank theriault wrote:
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
Now the dilemma:
Um, when you load the
I like it, but it seems as though it doesn't quite
achieve its potential. More color and texture in the
rust, maybe? Or (going the other way) a BW
conversion?
This would be a really nice subject for a 645...
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Getting up to the roof of the
And to think I was expecting a wildlife shot...
The empty background isoltes the subject nicely, but
also keeps this from working as an action shot, for
me. The plane of focus seems to go through the
player's extended leg, too, so the trunk and face look
a bit soft.
Rick
--- Bob Blakely [EMAIL
Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp
image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash
from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222
It's sharp and well lit. Pretty girl
On Nov 7, 2007, at 5:41 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
I like this photo but it's one that I would crop. The Cinnabon sign
upper left pulls my eye away from the woman and her
Bettter than ugly tatooed girls badly photographed in cheap underwear. I like
the bokeh. The pose wasn't the best of the shoot, but I wanted to show the only
frame I shot at 1.8.
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: PESO - And We Have a Winner! - and a dilemma
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch
frank theriault wrote:
is there any way of retrieving the
original photo, as it was out of the camera? Or did I completely
pooch myself by hitting save, instead of save as (in which I'd
have created a new file, rather than replacing the original)?
You could try recovering the original file from
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: PESO: f1.8
It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp
image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash
from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
To me it's a genre that calls on us to throw away our well formed ideas and
perceptions of what constitutes good photography and throw them down the
drain. Sort of like referring to rap as music.
Ninety percent of this stuff I don't like. Oh I was walking down the street
and saw a couple of
On 11/7/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222
Sucky bokeh. Bob pointed out that the bokeh on the pictures of the macro
lens that was posted here a couple of days ago was bad, and they were also
taken with an FA50/1.4.
To my
Hi Scott,
A few days ago I started doing a few minor updates to my web site. It
ended up being a rather significant overhaul. I've done a significant
re-write to the stylesheets and simplified the HTML quite a bit (moving
most formatting off to the stylesheets).
WOndered if you'd have a look
Yeah, we don't like it. ;-)
Tom C.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark
Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Web page update: Have a look
Hi Scott,
A few days ago I started
Oops. That was supposed to be offlist.
Looks like I'll have to go through what everyone says and sort out what
advice to follow!
(Larger fonts! Smaller fonts! Different colors!)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Shooting on this project has ebbed, but I was out walking with the
DA*16-50 and made a couple more exposures that fit into the theme ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46b.htm
Comments, critique, etc always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Speaking of bokeh on 50mm's - I've just enabled myself with a K50mm f1.4
- anyone know if this lens is a decent performer? I intend to use it on
a 2x crop camera, so effective FOV will be about the same as a 100mm
lens on 35mm film. Probably used pretty wide open. Any comments?
Not you Peter.
--
Sorry - resent with better subject.
Speaking of bokeh on 50mm's - I've just enabled myself with a K50mm f1.4
- anyone know if this lens is a decent performer? I intend to use it on
a 2x crop camera, so effective FOV will be about the same as a 100mm
lens on 35mm film. Probably used pretty wide
Concerning the photo of the rare lens:
When doing technical photography (which is what this actually is) sharpness
is paramount. The entire item(s) of interest should be tack sharp. If
extranious OOF items are desired for artistic effect, this should be done
with proper placement of the OOF
Mark Roberts wrote:
I considered posting to the List, but then I'd get a lot of input from
many people whose opinions I don't really value much
MARK! oh wait a minute... h did you just insult us? :-P
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Of course, I'm the one telling the story, but that's true of most photographs.
They stimulate the imagination. If I see one of your beautiful mountain shots,
it may not tell me a specific story. But it may lead me to think of beautiful
places I've visited or the freshness of moutain air or the
I see we agree then. :-)
I guess my distaste for the genre is, that for all appearances, it does not
rely on the eye or skill of the photographer or the quality of the image
necessarily to be successful. And that bothers me because someone could put
ten of these in mattes and frames and show
After that I don't have to comment...
Cotty wrote:
Speaking of bokeh on 50mm's - I've just enabled myself with a K50mm f1.4
- anyone know if this lens is a decent performer? I intend to use it on
a 2x crop camera, so effective FOV will be about the same as a 100mm
lens on 35mm film. Probably
I've found that for shots without harsh lighting that will cause
flare, the K50/1.4 performs well wide-open, with a nice bokeh. It's not
so good at flare-prone shots (e.g. photo of city lights at night flying
from above)
Here's one of mumsy in overcast forrest conditions in
After further review...
2-6-6-6
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Francis
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:56 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: More stream power
I was wondering ...
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at
Hi,
The prices mentioned seem fair I''ll put in an offer and see what happens..
Regards
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp
image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash
from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222
...
Does anyone
The Lima built Allegheny (4-3-3-4, I think) was designed as a passenger
locomotive but were mostly used to haul coal. Strange, since creeping along at
those speeds they only produced about half the horsepower they were capable of.
They were one of the biggest most powerful steam locomotives
Thanks, Paul. Omni was sort of what I was thinking. I've owned a couple
of them, but were sold to enhance the sale of a couple flash units this
past year. Haven't replaced them yet.
FWIW, the bokeh not at all significant.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jack. I think the soft box is
Much better bokeh. I don't see any!
Nit: Her hat interrupts the light flora streak behind her. I noticed it
without planning a critique. May work fine for everyone else, however.
More comfortable pose.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Godders. I've only processed a few of these, but
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
Nice snap, but the Cinnabon does two things: makes it look like an ad for
Cinnabon, and makes me REALLY hungry.
Regarding the lost original: as others have said, use a file-recovery
software on your card unless you've taken more photos on it since you
downloaded
Thanks Adam,
4-8-4 and a passenger locomotive. Impressive!
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/7/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NW was one of the last of the great US roads to dieselize, although UP
would run steam longer after dieselization (UP tried just about
everything possible as motive power
So I guess that means that I'm not special after all...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Oops. That was supposed to be offlist.
Looks like I'll have to go through what everyone says and sort out what
advice to follow!
(Larger fonts! Smaller fonts! Different colors!)
--
The difference between
I think that if it's visually interesting, it works. I like this shot. The
position of the two yellow leaves and the tire tracks tells a bit of a story.
I see the one leaf as being blown away by a passing vehicle and the other
vulnerable to the next wild man on a bike. Seriously. And I like
Respectfully, you are the one telling a story... the photograph does not.
It's a perfect example of what I was talking about. Looking for deeper
meaning where this is none to be found.
You're free to enjoy it nevertheless. :-)
Tom C.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have one. I used it extensively before I bought an FA 50/1.4. I think it's
just a little softer wide open but not objectionably so. It's truly an
excellent lens. Boljidar's resolution numbers show it being just a few lines/mm
short of the FA and better, in fact, than the FA 77 limited. (Which
Actually it seems to have been a 2-6-6-6. So much for my memory, I photographed
the one at the Henry Ford Museum sever times.
Bill Owens wrote:
Should be 4-6-6-4.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: Wednesday, November
Thanks Christian. She was hesitant to smile broadly, but I think she's prettier
when she does.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Godders. I've only processed a few of these, but here's one at f2.5.
I was wondering ...
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:53:24AM -0500, Bill Owens wrote:
Should be 4-6-6-4.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 11/7/2007 7:28:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Marnie. She does have a birthmark near her nose. I'm waiting to talk
to her before cloning it out. Since it's for a talent agency card, she may
not want to misrepresent her appearance. Don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Christian.
I do have more space in the full frame, but I cropped it tight. Most of the
shots on the sample agency cards that the model gave me were very tight
crops. I think that's because the prints aren't all that big and they want to
get a good look at
Thanks Christian.
I do have more space in the full frame, but I cropped it tight. Most of the
shots on the sample agency cards that the model gave me were very tight crops.
I think that's because the prints aren't all that big and they want to get a
good look at the face.
I kind of like the
Thanks Jack. I think the soft box is made by Omni. It's one of those things
that fit over the flash head with velcro attachments. The bokeh is as shot.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your typically well lit, sharp image. What sort
Paul,
Nice photo, but you need a bit of snow for the background. ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/7/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp
image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash
from the 540
going save as one better is to never work on an original. creating a
copy in a working directory away from the directory where you store
originals ... and remembering to identify the original as connected to
the processed image.
yep I have messed up more than once.
Bran
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hum, let's think about that for a moment...
Yes, I believe he did.
Christian wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I considered posting to the List, but then I'd get a lot of input from
many people whose opinions I don't really value much
MARK! oh wait a minute... h did you just
Here's some face and background detail at about 200%
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611292size=lg
On Nov 7, 2007, at 6:55 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Nice portrait. I also much like my FA 50/1.4 for portraits on digital.
But I wonder why you choose almost open lens at f1.8. There is
Seems each image should be creative to the point of conveying an
intended message.
To do less, it seems to me, allows no credit to the photographer.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, I'm the one telling the story, but that's true of most
photographs. They stimulate the imagination.
Red faced and stuttering, eh? ];-)
G
On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Oops. That was supposed to be offlist.
Looks like I'll have to go through what everyone says and sort out
what
advice to follow!
(Larger fonts! Smaller fonts! Different colors!)
--
PDML
Thanks Jack. I've thought abou extending the grass background to the top of
frame. I'm undecided on that. A higher camera position didn't work for the look
we wanted.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Much better bokeh. I don't see
Aside from the fact that I hate stylesheets it looks very good.
Unfortunately I can't remember exactly what the layout was before but
this does strike me as being a bit different. Still a clean easy to
navigate interface, with easy to read typefaces and good contrasting colors.
Mark Roberts
Mike,
Marvelous!
You have to wait for it,
and then the experience is sensory overload!
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/7/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those with the interest and the bandwidth, here is 611 at full chuff.
http://www.rail-videos.net/video/view.php?id=927
From: Adam Maas
Your typically well lit, sharp image. What sort of soft box are you
using? On camera flash or boxed' on a stand?
Between us, did you smooth out some bakeh in the background? I won't
tell. ;-))
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to
I wanted to thank everyone who commented on this one. It was a bit of
an experiment, to see if bisecting the image with the horizon line could
be overcome with the other elements of the composition. Seems the
general consensus is no. The shot wasn't earth shattering so I'm not
that
There are quite a few good video clips on there. It's worth a rake around.
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/07 Wed PM 01:19:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: More stream power
Mike,
Marvelous!
You have to wait for it,
and then the
So I've been reading the manual for the new Sony A700 (Very nice camera btw,
unlike the unimpressive A100) and noticed that it has PA and PS Program shift
modes, which are for all intents and purposes HyperProgram. Turning the
aperture dial drops the camera into Av mode, and the shutter dial to
On 07/11/07, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
I grew up in Rutland Vermont. When I was little, Dad took me to the River
Road Bridge many times where we would watch the steam trains being built in
the Rutland yard. Sometimes we went down Scales Avenue to watch the action
at the
If you offer to kiss a baby, I'll shoot you...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Christian wrote:
h did you just insult us? :-P
Well, perhaps *some* of you. But I'll never reveal which ones...
(But of course, everyone who's responded so far is a trusted associate
whose opinion I value
On 07/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I think that if it's visually interesting, it works. I like this shot.
The position of the two yellow leaves and the tire tracks tells a bit
of a story. I see the one leaf as being blown away by a passing vehicle
and the other
On 07/11/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thinks it's a genre that attracts people because it gives them something
duller and more boring to focus their interest on than their own lives.
Then they look at the image as if it contains some deeper meaning.
Oh my God, you're even more fulla
Putting the horizon straight through the middle isn't always a bad thing, and
isn't
necessarily here either. You did it with intention and if it's accomplished
your goals
don't worry about what anyone else thinks.
What I see it doing here is juxtaposing a static composition with active
Thanks Godders. It's very helpful to get some perspective from the list. With
more than 500 shots to review, my mind boggles:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'Tis indeed much nicer, in all respects. Nicer rendering
'Tis indeed much nicer, in all respects. Nicer rendering qualities,
better pose, a little warmer rendering.
G
On Nov 7, 2007, at 8:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Godders. I've only processed a few of these, but here's one
at f2.5. I think I prefer the bokeh here:
On 07/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
WOndered if you'd have a look and see what you think.
I considered posting to the List, but then I'd get a lot of input from
many people whose opinions I don't really value much (I tried that
experiment on the DP Review Pentax forum).
;-)
Thanks Godders. I've only processed a few of these, but here's one at f2.5. I
think I prefer the bokeh here:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611957
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Sandy Harris
I have both those. Paid $50 each in 1990 in EX+ condition with original
Pentax hard case, but it was a friend working in a photo/camera store that
sold them to me out of the used case. Both saw a lot of use on my MX. The
135 seemed a nice portrait lens on a FF body... ;-) and the 200 was all I
Should be 4-6-6-4.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: More stream power
The Lima built Allegheny (4-3-3-4, I think) was designed as a passenger
In a message dated 11/6/2007 10:44:09 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/6/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1101072ad1.html
make 'em pay, baby - that's really revolting
ann
In a message dated 11/7/2007 6:13:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-
h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto
On Nov 7, 2007 9:31 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sucky bokeh. Bob pointed out that the bokeh on the pictures of the macro
lens that was posted here a couple of days ago was bad, and they were also
taken with an FA50/1.4.
It's to bad, because it is a nice portrait length.
Does
I am selling my crumpler december quarter laptop/camera bag.
I bought it two years ago and used it precisely twice.
Preparing for my upcoming SJ trip I decide it would be the ideal
travel bag. One small hitch. Since I bought it I replaced my laptop
with a toshiba 17 widescreen which doesn't quite
That should have read: Bettter than ugly tatooed girls badly photographed in
cheap underwear.-))
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bettter than ugly tatooed girls badly photographed in cheap underwear. I like
the bokeh. The pose wasn't the best of
Patrick Genovese wrote:
I've been offered the M135 f/3.5 and the M200 f/4 (price yet to be
determined)..
I''ve inspected the lenses and both are in great condition ... What''s
their performance like and what would be a reasonable price to pay for
them ?
I used the 200/4 M on film a lot.
Oops! Wound up on the list anyway!
Don't know nothin' about web design, but...
Nice look generally.
Photography is on the list at the top left, but
Photo specific is a whole different thing at the
bottom left. Then there's also the Gallery section at
top right...
What is listed in the
In a message dated 11/7/2007 6:43:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Getting up to the roof of the cell block on Alcatraz
was a treat.
Aside from the landscapes and view of the bay, there
are details
there which are
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
