Well, now ... that's quite nice!
-- Walt
On 12/8/2010 2:20 PM, Miserere wrote:
http://nedbunnell.posterous.com/pentax-photo-book-for-the-holidays-0
Mark was wondering if they'd received the book he sent, and here's the
answer. The book looks even better in person than it did online,
unlike
: A Swallowtail in Respite
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 11:45 AM
Oops ... forgot the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200, 1/320, Aperture
priority, unknown aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Here's another
in Respite
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 11:45 AM
Oops ... forgot the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200, 1/320,
Aperture
priority, unknown aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Here's another
: A Swallowtail in
Respite
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 11:45
AM
Oops ... forgot
the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200,
1/320,
Aperture
priority, unknown aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert
wrote
... forgot
the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO
200,
1/320,
Aperture
priority, unknown aperture
setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter
Gilbert
wrote:
Hi
all,
Here's another butterfly shot
I'm
considering
submitting to the PPG and thought
I'd get
some
opinions
In Russia, cat names owner.
-- Walt
On 12/7/2010 6:21 AM, Leon Altoff wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We are about to buy a female Russian Blue cat and want a Russian name
for her. We are buying her with money earned from ringing church
bells for weddings and thought that a bell related name would
I'd like to see Susan Boyle try that!
Actually ... let me walk that back a little.
-- Walt
On 12/7/2010 12:34 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
This woman has real talent:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVpjHXPT1ocfeature=player_embedded
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
Pentax: Where's the fire?
On 12/5/2010 3:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful photographer.
Or how about Pentax 645D, Hasselblad on a budget.
--
Sent
I'll happily trade my beloved K-x for one of those blobby old
K-5's. Because that's just the sort of guy I am.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2010 5:46 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Miserere wrote:
I would start a thread on PF requesting people to test their K-5 and
post the result together with the serial
I does what I can. :-)
On 12/6/2010 6:38 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 19:09, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll happily trade my beloved K-x for one of those blobby old K-5's.
Because that's just the sort of guy I am.
-- Walt
Yeah, you have a big heart, Walt.
Wow. Three days, two lenses and 25 shots to figure out what ought
to be discernible in 3 shots through one lens over the course of, what,
fifteen minutes?
I want that guy reading my MRI's.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2010 7:24 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I quote;
I have spent last 3 days to see
Of course, if one were to look for a bright side in all of this,
they might put two-and-two together and realize that what this all
really boils down to is some pretty good deals on refurbs in the
not-too-distant future.
And the circle of life goes on.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2010 8:21 PM,
, Walter Gilbert, discombobulated, unleashed:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the
floor. Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the
focusing ring on the lens sticks at the far and near end.
Walt, the one and only time I ever dropped my
Fortunately, I know a vet who was able to talk me through it.
On 12/5/2010 4:24 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 4/12/10, Walter Gilbert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Now, if my cat comes out of hiding, all will be back to normal.
I gather that to remove a Pentax SMC lens from a cat's butt in fact
Ha! Just not *my* cat.
On 12/5/2010 4:33 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the floor.
Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the focusing
This was one of those instances when cats suddenly decide they need to
be in a different place, RIGHT NOW!
-- Walt
On 12/5/2010 7:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I have to be really carefull where i leave stuff. Lucy likes to bat
stuff off tables and such.
Dave
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:17 PM,
consumer grade films?
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 8:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Great. Looks like I'm staring down the barrel of another expense to
go along with my newly acquired pursuit of film photography: good
printer, ink, and paper.
Seems there ought to be a way
That is just a great shot.
To say the least, it relates an experience I'm not likely to have
anytime soon, as there appear to be more people in that hallway than in
my entire town.
-- Walt
On 12/5/2010 8:46 AM, DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
On 12/5/2010 10:40 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Real black and white (i.e. - not the c41 bw) has the potential to be
sharper than color because of the way it's made.
Thanks, David. I can see I'm going to need to do a little research to
determine what constitutes real bw vs. C41. I know the
Ha! I thought it was a mirrored hallway full of elevators! :-D
Oddly enough, my point still stands. ;-)
-- Walt
On 12/5/2010 11:07 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Take another look, Walt. Appears to me to be a mirrored elevator.
Jack
--- On Sun, 12/5/10, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice image, Nick.
I didn't realize the Walmart machines correct mistakes for the
photographer.
How nice of them.
On 12/4/2010 8:33 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
http://blog.nickdavidwright.net/2010/12/leave-light-on.html
This shot has set in my files since I shot it. It is another
in such foolishness.
:-\
On 12/4/2010 11:37 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Dec 4, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Very nice image, Nick.
I didn't realize the Walmart machines correct mistakes for the photographer.
How nice of them.
All automatic processing machines average out the values
Welcome aboard, Kent!
First of all, you don't want that old M-50/1.7 -- let me take that off
your hands.
Secondly, with regard to editing software, you might give The Gimp a
try. Being a WinXP guy, I don't know if it would be as much of a
resource hog as Bibble, but I'm sure someone on
I do like that a lot, Paul. So much so that I'm tempted to cut off
all contact with you, henceforth.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 11:34 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
From this summer's dream cruise, which played out in the rain. Perhaps the
nicest Studebaker of them all.
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the
floor. Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the
focusing ring on the lens sticks at the far and near end.
Goddammit.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the floor.
Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the focusing ring
on the lens sticks at the far and near end.
Goddammit.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
before I'd even set up
a real shot with it.
Again, I do appreciate the gesture, and I thank you. But, I may just be
lucky this time.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 9:03 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thing is, relatively speaking, it might as well have been a $1000
lens.
Boy, I
averted.
Now, if my cat comes out of hiding, all will be back to normal.
Thanks to everyone who replied and offered help and/or condolences, and
apologies to anyone my choice of profanity may have offended.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 8:17 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x
if the focus field remains flat. Use a
tripod and make sure the camera is square to the wall.
Paul
On Dec 4, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Well, somehow, the lens seems to be working properly. It's loosened up
quite a bit after a lot of manipulation (though the rubber around the focusing
Ha! :-D Great shot!
When I was in Arkansas, I went to a drive-thru safari that had a walking
zoo you could go through. At the end of the walk, we came to a pen that
housed some monkeys next to a pen that housed a tiger cub and lion cub
together, with a gate separating them. One of the
Thanks again. :-)
I'm a big believer in funky lenses. If the optics are good, I couldn't
care less what the rest of it looks like. And, besides -- beggars can't
be choosers.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 11:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Good to hear... hope you are lucky - my funky one will be
Agreed!
What was the lens?
On 12/3/2010 1:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Wow! That is indeed a stunning image.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Ken Wallerkwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
A very good, vivid well focused image !
Kenneth
never seceded, it didn't have to (re-!)join.
Am I missing something?
Igor
Fri Dec 3 10:47:53 CST 2010
Walter Gilbert wrote:
This sort of reminds me of the ongoing dispute here in the US
between Kentucky and Illinois. Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky,
but spent most of his life
Well, if you ever decide to rid yourself of all your material
possessions in order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, I call dibs.
-- Walt
On 12/3/2010 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Agreed!
What was the lens?
For this?
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog
Thankfully, he had it within his heart not to say so.
-- Walt
On 12/3/2010 2:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 3, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Agreed!
What was the lens?
He probably just used a lensbaby with the teleconverter, just to show us up.
--
Larry Colen l
I was born in Virginia -- out of which Kentucky was carved -- yet,
neither place seems all that anxious to claim me.
-- Walt
On 12/3/2010 4:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
This sort of reminds me of the ongoing dispute here in the US
between Kentucky and Illinois
This sort of reminds me of the ongoing dispute here in the US
between Kentucky and Illinois. Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky,
but spent most of his life and political career in Illinois. Illinois
claims to be the Land of Lincoln ... but, we still have his old log
cabin birthplace
I've used my Promaster 7-element 2X teleconverter with my 50-200mm
kit lens to shoot birds and gotten *decent* results as long as the birds
cooperated and as long as I stayed away from the farthest reaches of the
lens. Of course, the maximum aperture on the 50-200 is f/4, so I
couldn't
On 12/2/2010 1:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
From: Mark Robertsm...@robertstech.com
Cotty wrote:
But you're right on the money with regards to the puns.
he's shilling...
Bob said pensively.
When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm
not one to buck the
Speaking of which, do TC's have as noticeable an impact on IQ when
used on film bodies as they do on DSLRs?
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 4:28 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 2 December 2010 15:53, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because
of the simple fact
Duly noted, and much appreciated.
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 4:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Yes!
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Teleconverters?
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday,
Hi all,
Being not particularly mathematically inclined (to put it very
charitably), I was wondering if any of you could point me toward a sort
of online idiot's guide to understanding and calculating exposure
values, depth of field, and other basics along those lines. I figure
having at
Thanks, Ecke ... that will be helpful down the road, no doubt.
I guess what I'm looking for is a combination of both. Nothing overly
scientific -- like down to the atomic level, or anything.
Maybe if I can explain the way I've grasped the concept of the effect of
aperture size on depth
On 12/2/2010 6:52 PM, eckinator wrote:
I'm at a bit of a loss for a better
imagebut the general idea is that closing the aperture cuts out the
stray rays so to say
Hmm ... it alleviates photon overcrowding, in a sense.
dang... tell them that after a while it becomes intuitive knowledge
and
. Much of it will benefit you in digital photography
as well. The principles of light and exposure are the same, even though the medium is different.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Being not particularly mathematically inclined (to put it very charitably), I
Thanks for that info, Godders.
I just about betcha five bucks the local used book store has a copy of
Basic Photography on the cheap, and have already bookmarked the
photo.net page. I'll send them an email telling them to go to hell as
soon as I finish reading it all. ;-)
-- Walt
On
Great shots, and great story, Larry!
And, I now have a ready explanation for when people inevitably ask me,
Why are you always carrying a camera around?
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 7:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't *only* photograph mushrooms. Yesterday as I was leaving Costco I
noticed the
That's an interesting distinction in that the shots they're
interested in would probably best fit in the news/journalism genre, even
though they're being used in a book. There is definitely a timeliness
to them, but no relative rarity at all. In fact, they could undoubtedly
get on the
Oh, yeah. Given the prices on textbooks, I'd say the production
budget is a fairly secondary consideration. You probably should have
started out in the high six figures.
-- Walt
On 12/1/2010 8:46 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at 18:57, paul stenquist wrote:
The ASMP is a
I feel pretty comfortable at $50-per. I don't think it's enough to
scare them off even if it is higher than they're willing to pay.
And, hey ... you never know. They could develop a conscience and
negotiate upward! ;-)
On 12/1/2010 8:58 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010
Hmm ... $335 a year.
At the moment, it's a bit beyond my range. I think I'd be better off
putting that money toward a car for the time being.
But, now I know what happened to Annie Leibovitz.
-- Walt
On 12/1/2010 9:18 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
paul stenquist wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at
Great to hear, Stan!
Hope the recovery goes smoothly, and your first follow-up is the only one.
See if you can parlay this ordeal into the royal treatment for a couple
of days, or so.
-- Walt
On 12/1/2010 8:08 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Thanks Miserere and all. I am back, sorta.
My
OK ... now that you've gotten me to try my hand at film
photography, I need a scanner. Well, I have one now ... sort of.
I've managed to inherit an HP Scanjet G3110, which does have a
transparency carrier. Problem is, everything I've read about it says
it's not very good at scanning
Thanks for that info, Nick! Very helpful.
I've found out that my local camera shop carries a decent variety of b/w
film supplies and develops for a pretty reasonable price.
Maybe at some point, I'll get into developing my own film -- starting
out with one of those cans.
Thanks again.
Happy Hannukah to you as well, Boris -- along with any other list
members celebrating.
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 1:34 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-57-happy-hannukah.html
Have a great year end holiday season, everyone!
Boris
--
PDML
Hi all,
I just got an email from the senior editor of a publishing house
(Hachette Book Group in NY) stating some interest in possibly using some
of the photos I took at the local political rallies at the end of
October. She wrote asking for copies of three particular images, with
the
less. In any case, specify usage as
first North American rights. That way you retain ownership and can sell them
again if someone else sees them and wants to use them.
Paul
On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I just got an email from the senior editor of a publishing house
Thanks for all the advice, y'all.
I went ahead with the price Paul suggested for the simple fact that the
images they mentioned weren't all that unique and similar ones could
be found if needed. They were simple pictures of signs being held up by
rally attendees that didn't require any
Thanks, Godfrey. That's something I'll definitely have to file away
for future reference.
But, I suspect the type of photographs you've sold for books would be of
a different sort than the ones they've expressed interest in -- which is
to say that the images themselves were of a
Hi all,
Just wanted to share a whimsical little shot I took at the Razorback
gift shop in Eureka Springs. Given my whereabouts, this is close as I'm
likely to get to capturing the legendary cormorant in pixels. But, ya
does whatcha can with whatcha got.
Well, I would love to get this myself as it strikes me as another
can't-miss deal. Unfortunately, I'm strapped and already put the money
I could used toward my M-50/2. But, I figured someone on the list might
be interested.
shipping via
USPS.
(sob!)
On 11/29/2010 12:02 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Well, I would love to get this myself as it strikes me as another
can't-miss deal. Unfortunately, I'm strapped and already put the
money I could used toward my M-50/2. But, I figured someone on the
list might be interested
batteries.
1- clear filter for the 135mm or 50mm lens.
1- original (OEM) neck strap, never used. (did anyone ever use these?)
1- original Asahi Pentax K-1000 users manual, in very good condition
1- camera bag, green/brown.
On 11/29/2010 12:02 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Well, I would love to get
Boy, does that bring back some childhood memories. I pretty much grew
up on naval bases and got to see those guys fairly regularly. It's one
of the more thrilling spectacles I've ever seen.
And, a great shot of the action besides. It certainly makes me wish I'd
been there.
-- Walt
On
Cool find, Nick.
Just so you'll know, I went and bought a roll of film today, and a
battery for the exposure meter.
All they had was Fuji Superia X-tra 400 (it was a Dollar General
Store). I'll shoot through it, get it processed at Sam's Club, and see
how I like it. Then, I'll probably
I like this a lot. It's evocative.
If I had to change anything at all, it would be to crop out the person
on the left, walking ahead of the boy. I think that would lend to the
sense of isolation.
Nevertheless, I enjoyed the shot.
-- Walt
On 11/28/2010 9:52 AM, SV Hovland wrote:
Wow! I had no idea how badly those places could screw up a print!
I mean, I knew they could do it. But, good Lord! I figured technology
had taken some of that capacity away from them by now.
It's a small consolation to know that, when I get my prints back and
they look like crap
, or cheapdirty alternative.
-- Walt
On 11/26/2010 7:00 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Thanks! Although, to my infinite consternation, I've discovered
there's no way to get Photoshop 7 to handle DNG files, and I can't
afford to plunk down the requisite cash for any
Well, not unanimously. Viewed as a group, I can see where it might
be heavy-handed. But, taken individually, I didn't see any shots where
it didn't work.
I can see where a little more subtle effect would have more appeal to
most people, though. But then, subtlety has never been my strong
If I *had* to vote off two: (1) Mantis (2) Bear
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 10:19 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
In the spirit of reality show trends, your votes are needed...
I'm off to yet another little zoo for more critter pics - but may not
get any... otoh, I may...
so if you were to vote off
I'd never force my Usher's Green Stripe on any other poor, hapless
soul. ;-)
(It's actually amazingly good ... *for the price*.)
On 11/27/2010 2:06 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
I like . . . my scotch extra affordable
As of approximately 6:00 PM central time this evening, I'll be the
proud owner of a Pentax K1000 and what I suspect will be the 50mm f/2
(though, hoping for a pleasant surprise on the lens). Having spoken to
the owner, it's been very lightly used, is fully functioning, and in
need of a
Thanks for the reminder!
I'd forgotten all about that.
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 2:56 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Why convert to jpg in Elements if you're going to do further editing in
PS7? Every time you save a jpg you're throwing away data. I'd suggest
saving in a lossless format (tif or
BTW -- I didn't inquire as to which lens it was as I didn't want to
tip the guy off that he might be able to get more out of it. I figured,
for the price, I should just shut up and not push.
On 11/27/2010 3:09 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
As of approximately 6:00 PM central time this evening
Well, I've just returned with my new K1000 and the attached M-50/2,
and all looks to be in order. The camera itself is in fine shape,
though you can tell it's been sitting for a while -- some dustiness in
the leather. I'm sure it could stand a good overall cleaning, though I
doubt the
.
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 7:23 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
As of approximately 6:00 PM central time this evening, I'll be the
proud owner of a Pentax K1000 and what I suspect will be the 50mm f/2
(though, hoping for a pleasant surprise on the lens). Having spoken
Thanks, Larry!
I'm really anxious to get the thing out in the field and to see what
kind of bokeh it produces at f/2. I'm also curious to see how my
Takumar 135-2.5 will behave on the K1000. I also have a Promaster
70-300/4-5.6 with an aperture ring that I'd like to try on the K1000 as
Baby steps! Baby steps!
:-D
On 11/27/2010 8:01 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Haha... Walter, us analog shooters have you now!!
The Epson V500 is still on sale at Adorama for $124! Just got mine in
the mail this morning, great film scanner for the money.
Now we need to get you thinking
You may be right. I hope you are. But, at the same time, I'd like
to learn the skill.
Come to think of it, I have the perfect place for a darkroom... ;-)
On 11/27/2010 8:06 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Don't worry. You'll load it up with film, take a few shots and then a
year later you'll
That is great to hear! I have found the 135 to be a tad long on the
K-x, but now you've got me super curious about it on the K1000.
Suddenly, I feel like a real-live Pentaxian!
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 8:24 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
This is so cool. M50 and 135 f/2.5 were my two main
My God, Charles! Everything about that gallery is beyond cool!
A thousand thanks for sharing that.
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 8:44 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Most everything here was taken with both of those (M-50, 135-2.5) lenses:
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/1982/queen/
Thanks, Steve.
Although, even as a well documented curmudgeon, I can't begrudge someone
for getting a steal better than I managed to get. Especially when I'm
as happy with the lens as I am. :-)
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 9:00 PM, steve harley wrote:
coincidentally, this afternoon i just
Best to you, Stan! Here's hoping for smooth sailing!
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 10:42 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Leaving for Cleveland tomorrow (Sunday) a.m., my rescheduled surgery will be
Monday morning. The Clinic has extensive wifi, but I don't think I'll take my
laptop in with me.
Try to be
That is some kinda beautiful shot!
Very nice work.
-- Walt
On 11/25/2010 10:58 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5200913194/
First snow storm in Yosemite.
I would love to hear your comments and critique.
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks! Although, to my infinite consternation, I've discovered
there's no way to get Photoshop 7 to handle DNG files, and I can't
afford to plunk down the requisite cash for any of the more recent Adobo
releases. They're a tad spendy.
Picasa 3 will handle them, of course, but then I'm
Hmm ... I'll check into that. I wonder if I might even be able to
find a slightly less-recent release of Elements that handles them.
Thanks for the info, Godfrey.
(I bet the Adobo release is even cheaper, still!)
-- Walt
On 11/26/2010 12:06 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The current
That sounds like a pretty fair work-around. I'll have to give it a try.
Thanks for the suggestion!
-- Walt
On 11/26/2010 1:33 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
convert in Pentax Photo Lab, save as a TIFF and do
further editing in PS7
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
old versions of
Elements, and if you can find anything later than version 4 or 5
it's probably going to be as expensive as the current version (9).
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:13:03PM -0600, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hmm ... I'll check into that. I wonder if I might even be able to
find a slightly
later than version 4 or 5
it's probably going to be as expensive as the current version (9).
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:13:03PM -0600, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hmm ... I'll check into that. I wonder if I might even be able to
find a slightly less-recent release of Elements that handles them
I hadn't thought about looking into standalone converters. That may
be a good option.
Thanks for the ideas! I'll report back with any good findings. I'm a
freeware hound from way back. ;-)
-- Walt
On 11/26/2010 3:48 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Beware, I like Raw Therapee, but I was unable
version of Elements 9
and will tinker around with it for 30 days, or so. If I like it and
have the extra cash to spend on it, I'll go ahead and register it. If
not, I'll use a freeware, or cheap dirty alternative.
-- Walt
On 11/26/2010 7:00 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
around with it for 30 days, or so. If I like it and have the extra cash to
spend on it, I'll go ahead and register it. If not, I'll use a freeware, or
cheap dirty alternative.
-- Walt
On 11/26/2010 7:00 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Thanks! Although, to my infinite
Wow, Christine!
Wonderful rendering. Loved them all!
-- Walt
On 11/26/2010 8:45 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
I wasn't much interested in photographing people today, and I never do
shopping on Black Friday. Very cold today, but sunny. Really had a
fun day with the camera today, and even
Happy Thanksgiving to you and all the other PDML'ers who recognize
the holiday.
I've been doing gastric stretching exercises all week long, to make sure
I have room for it all.
-- Walt
On 11/25/2010 9:32 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Just wanted to wish everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. I'm
Ya know, Paul ... this doesn't make it easy for me to be thankful
for all the things I *do* have.
Time to break out the Festivus pole and kick off the airing of grievances.
-- Walt
On 11/25/2010 10:29 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
Grace and Grandma study the ads that came with today's papers.
Hi all,
Just came across a local classified ad for a Asahi Pentax K1000 with
50mm prime (don't know which one) for $40.
I don't really see how I could go wrong, assuming the lens is
functional. Any thoughts?
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
. Alling wrote:
If the camera is functional you can still sell them in a college town
for more than that.
On 11/25/2010 1:26 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Just came across a local classified ad for a Asahi Pentax K1000 with
50mm prime (don't know which one) for $40.
I don't really see
Don't you K-5'ers understand? I should be giving thanks for my K-x
right now. Instead, I find I'm awash in soul-eating envy.
-- Walt
On 11/25/2010 12:40 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
OK, resized down to 1000x1500 pixels for the previous link:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/K5_00898_1.jpg
New link
or otherwise.
-- Walt
On 11/25/2010 1:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Just came across a local classified ad for a Asahi Pentax K1000 with 50mm prime
(don't know which one) for $40.
I don't really see how I could go wrong, assuming the lens
Hi all,
I just discovered that Ned Bunnell has a photo blog at Posterous. I
thought I'd pass along the info in the event anyone was unaware because,
as the late, great Johnny Carson would say, I did not know that.
Also, I didn't see any of the other Posterous users on the list
subscribed
301 - 400 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
