Wow. The MLU idea is a great one and probably pretty simple to do also.
rg
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 22 Sep 2004 at 14:18, Steve Jolly wrote:
This is pure speculation, but I suspect that what Pentax have done is
performed the Bayer interpolation with 16-bit precision and then kept
the extra
Kodak used to supply a deevelopment kit for their digital cameras. (I
down loaded it once, it seemed to be quite primitive).
Graywolf wrote:
Why not just download the firmware update and browse through it? I
would bet you could figure out enough from it to hack the camera.
Calculators allow
Anyone know what type of processor Pentax is using in the *istD? I want
to see if I could reverse compile the firmware to take a look under the
hood. I'm very interested in playing around with the firmware and
seeing what it would take to add incremental functionality.
Its too bad they dont
Thanks, I had not seen that one yet.
rg
David Dixon wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Anyone know what type of processor Pentax is using in the *istD? I
want to see if I could reverse compile the firmware to take a look
under the hood. I'm very interested in playing around with the
firmware and seeing what
Actually, they do allow you to do just about anything that can be put
into the R/W memory. The ROM is off limits for obvious reasons. But
there is enough functionality in the R/W to replace much of the ROM if
you really want. PDA's are another area where you can pretty much
convert it to
On 21/9/04, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually, they do allow you to do just about anything that can be put
into the R/W memory. The ROM is off limits for obvious reasons. But
there is enough functionality in the R/W to replace much of the ROM if
you really want. PDA's are another
6 matches
Mail list logo
