Bryan Carter Vyhmeister
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 5:00 PM
I am going to Turkey for a Middle East Study Tour having to do with
archaeology in August. I am taking my MZ-S with BG-10 and possibly a
second MZ-S with BG-10 (depending on finances). I am wondering if taking
the 31mm f/1.8 Limited,
On a recent trip I took only the 28-105 FA 4-5.6 and the M200/4, as at
that time it covered everything I had, except a 135 and a 400mm, which
would have been just too heavy. I also took the AF330FTZ flash, and
used 400 and 800 ASA Ektapress film. I found that covered most things
pretty
Hong Kong for details of their bamboo scaffolding on a 35 storey
building!
Never thought that could be the tourist attraction. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
-
This
On 15 Jun 2002 at 1:07, Alan Chan wrote:
Hong Kong for details of their bamboo scaffolding on a 35 storey
building!
Never thought that could be the tourist attraction. :)
It seems to be an Aussie affliction, the first time I saw them I was gazing up
in utter amazement and so was a guy
It seems to be an Aussie affliction, the first time I saw them I was gazing
up
in utter amazement and so was a guy next to me, he commented to me about it
in
a broad Aussie accent :-)
Its a marriage that seems incongruous to most westerners, thousand year old
technology being employed in the
Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I would drop the 43 in favour of the 24-90. If you have 3
cameras travel with the 24-90 on one and the 70-200 on the other. That
way you are always ready for all focal lengths.
Rob,
I hear this a lot, making me suspect that when traveling, I must
Rob,
It's been quite a while since I've saved someone's views into the Which
focal lengths to carry question. But your comments were so insightful I've
saved them in bold red. You may have even persuaded me to sell my Rikenon
28-100/4.
Rob Studdert wrote:
After a few days with the combo that
I am going to Turkey for a Middle East Study Tour having to do with
archaeology in August. I am taking my MZ-S with BG-10 and possibly a
second MZ-S with BG-10 (depending on finances). I am wondering if taking
the 31mm f/1.8 Limited, 43mm f/1.9 Limited, and 77mm f/1.8 Limited prime
lenses
a tad too close for
me, i'd pick one of them and something really wide on top of that.
just my 2p.
mishka
From: Bryan Carter Vyhmeister
Subject: For Travel, Limiteds Limiting?
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:49:24 -0700
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
On 14 Jun 2002 at 13:59, Bryan Carter Vyhmeister wrote:
I am going to Turkey for a Middle East Study Tour having to do with
archaeology in August. I am taking my MZ-S with BG-10 and possibly a
second MZ-S with BG-10 (depending on finances). I am wondering if taking
the 31mm f/1.8 Limited,
From: Bryan Carter Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:59:53 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: For Travel, Limiteds Limiting?
I am going to Turkey for a Middle East Study Tour having to do with
archaeology in August. I am taking my MZ-S
The last time I had a 2 weeks trip to Japan with my friends and I brought 1
body, 1 flash, 4 prime lenses only - Domke F6, Z-1p, AF200T, FA*24, FA43,
FA77, FA100. While I enjoy the speeds and sizes of these lenses, switching
lenses were always a problem (especially when the streets were
12 matches
Mail list logo
