Toine
[to...@repiuk.nl]
Sendt: 27. april 2011 18:46
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
Yep. And correcting the CA manually gives beter results.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Link:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/141875-new-lightroom-update-includes-trillion-pentax-lens-profiles.html
smc PENTAX-DA L 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED
smc PENTAX-DA L 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED
smc PENTAX-DA L 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
smc PENTAX-DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED
smc PENTAX-DA 50-200mm
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll
It could also be that they found some errors and updated the correction files.
Myself, I never owned the kit lenses at all and would never miss the
corrections.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand.
Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that
minimal correction is needed. Second is that Pentax and/or Adobe
Or it could be that Pentax is lower on the priority list than Canon or
Nikon, and they got the profiles from Pentax later.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
How you omit the kit
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
It could also be that they found some errors and updated the correction files.
No, profiles for the 18-55 lenses were not present in LR 3.3.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 27, 2011, at 8:26, Stan Halpin wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand.
Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that
minimal correction is needed. Second is that
On Apr 27, 2011, at 9:12, Charles Robinson wrote:
BTW - is there any way to highlight a group of shots and turn on the lens
profile correction for all of them en masse?
(Answering my own question)
Select all images shot with the particular lens.
Develop one of them, select profile
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and
the end result is very ugly...
Toine
On 27 April 2011 08:48, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
Link:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote:
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and
the end result is very ugly...
It's quite difficult to fathom what else one could do for a lens correction
on a fisheye.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote:
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and
the end result is very ugly...
It's quite difficult to fathom what else one could do for a lens
Yep. And correcting the CA manually gives beter results.
On 27 April 2011 17:42, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote:
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete
14 matches
Mail list logo
