I *do* understand exactly what ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE means. I chose
those words deliberately and with malice aforethought ...
There's nothing wrong with the computer, it's just old. I was using the
older version of Firefox because I didn't want all the added overhead
processing that comes with
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013, John wrote:
On 7/27/2013 12:01 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, John wrote:
I finally gave in to the badgering installed the latest version of
Firefox. Got rid of the nag tab, but it ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE slower
to load anything than the previous version I was
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
You still haven't answered the implied question: are you being literal or
figurative? The only way you could be literally accurate is if there is
something wrong, there's just no way for an upgraded Firefox to be a
hundred
John,
Are you old enough to remember the cartoon 'Little Abner'.
I think that's where I met Chief Rain-in-the-Face, always
followed around by his own rain clouds.
You need to make yourself a sunnier climate.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:12 AM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
I
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:20:05AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
You still haven't answered the implied question: are you being literal or
figurative? The only way you could be literally accurate is if there is
something wrong, there's just no way for an upgraded Firefox to be a
hundred times
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:20:05AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
You still haven't answered the implied question: are you being literal or
figurative? The only way you could be literally accurate is if there is
something wrong, there's just no way for
, 2013 4:14 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Firefox - a follow up
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:20:05AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
You still haven't answered the implied question: are you being
literal or figurative? The only way you could be literally
I think you're confusing Joe Btfspik with Lonesome Polecat.
Actually, I had let the subject go until someone told me I didn't know
what the words mean. I may be wrong on a subject, but I do know what my
words mean.
On 7/27/2013 1:00 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
John,
Are you old enough to remember
On 7/27/2013 3:47 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:20:05AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
You still haven't answered the implied question: are you being literal or
figurative? The only way you could be literally accurate is if there is
something wrong, there's just no way for an
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, John wrote:
I finally gave in to the badgering installed the latest version of
Firefox. Got rid of the nag tab, but it ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE slower
to load anything than the previous version I was using.
One order of magnitude would be ten times slower. Orders plural
I finally gave in to the badgering installed the latest version of
Firefox. Got rid of the nag tab, but it ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE slower to
load anything than the previous version I was using.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
11 matches
Mail list logo