The first version is a bit washed out but the second is too dark. I'm
not sure about the sharpening
either has it's merits.
frank theriault wrote:
As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I
initially posted yesterday, in two ways:
First, on the original, I sharpened
What Paul said -- you need more detail in the shadow. If you can't do
Shadows/Highlights go for somewhere between the two versions.
Nice shot, frank!
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 8/14/2005 4:14:20 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Frank,
There's
Hi Frank,
As others, I'd prefer something midway through both of the images. The
sharp one almost looks artificial.
But in any case--I hadn't had the chance to see this the first time
you posted. It's fantastic! Excellent photo, and a great example of
color that works, somehow it feels like in
Frank,
I prefer the original. Or actually, somewhere in between to be quite
honest. The improved version is overly sharpened and saturated,
leaving many of the details and tonal range messed up, IMO. Nice pic tho.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
As a result of an off-list discussion, I
On 8/15/05, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
I prefer the original. Or actually, somewhere in between to be quite
honest. The improved version is overly sharpened and saturated,
leaving many of the details and tonal range messed up, IMO. Nice pic tho.
Thanks, everybody for your
As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I
initially posted yesterday, in two ways:
First, on the original, I sharpened only the jumper, and not the
background, with the result that the background is more OOF-looking
than on the print. On Version 1.1 I've sharpened the
On Aug 14, 2005, at 2:01 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3634511size=lg
For reference, here's the original:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631907size=lg
Hmm. I tend to like the original rendering more. I think it does a
better job of
Hi Frank,
There's something to be said for the new version. I like the
sharpneing, and I like the reduced highlights. I would choose it over
the original. But I think you can do better. In the new version, you've
lost all the shadow detail in the leaper's face. I'd go back to the
original and
need a
version 1.2 ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 11:01 PM
To: PDML
Subject: PESO: Leap of Faith - Version 1.1
As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I
initially posted
On 8/14/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
snip But I think you can do better.snip
Oh my God.
A highschool flashback.
cheers,
frank
vbg
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I think you went just a little too far with the new one. I like the summer
brightness of the first but I think just a touch of curves would help.
Same with the sharpening. A bit too much and even a touch too much on the
jumper in the original as there is a halo in front of his body.
A great
11 matches
Mail list logo
