On 11/2/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
You Brits seem to have raised being spanked by a middle aged lady to the
point of religious experience.
WW
Sort of like life in the Robb household, no?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 11/2/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most of my words were spent defending myself against misconstruals.
I met misconstruals once. She was nice :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:59:25 -, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have
a winner) With a
Matron will put some ointment on.
You're right. There's always
keep missing the point that I wrote Marco
and was planning on participating? Stop acting like I was not.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner
: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With apologies to Mark
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:04:07 -0600
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
What I don't understand is the ridicule I received from you and at
least one other on the list
On 11/2/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nobody's listening. I gave up on this thread a while ago, and suggest you
do likewise. There's not a scrap of evidence that any regular PDMLer
wrote rude messages, but people are rushing about saying we should
apologise to Pentax.
In that case I aoplogize for innocent people being killed in Iraq. It's
partly my fault...
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner
People weren't listening all along. :-)
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With a
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:00:29 -
Tom,
Nobody's
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:17:39 -, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nobody's listening. I gave up on this thread a while ago, and suggest
you
do likewise. There's not a scrap of evidence that any regular PDMLer
wrote rude messages, but
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy who did it owns up. If I have to
keep the whole school here all day, I will. And if I hear another word out
of you you'll be in detention every weekend, including
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:34:44 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy who did it owns up. If I have
to
keep the whole school here all day, I will. And if I hear
John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:34:44 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy who did it owns up. If I
have to
keep the whole school here all day, I will.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:15:38 -, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:34:44 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
Thank God for that. We can all go home now.
John
Nobody's going home, Forbes, until the boy
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With a
Matron will put some ointment on.
You're right. There's always a silver lining.
You Brits seem to have raised being spanked by a middle aged
Boris Liberman wrote:
Tom, Bill, don't you agree that it cannot possibly *really* hurt any of
you (or any of the fellow PDMLers) if you gave few 800x600 med-high
quality JPGs to Marco... Really, guys, put the legalistics aside and
think of it...
The grand total time we spent arguing this out
On 2/11/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
There are so many things you should apologize for, Cotty.
This is a good start.
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 2/11/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In that case I aoplogize for innocent people being killed in Iraq. It's
partly my fault...
Only partly?
g,dr
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I didn't really apologize, I aoplogized. :-)
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With a
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:25:36 -0500
On 2
C.
From: Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With apologies to Mark
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:49:22 +0930
Boris Liberman wrote:
Tom, Bill, don't you
On 11 Feb 2006 at 19:23, frank theriault wrote:
On 2/11/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd like to apologise.
There are so many things you should apologize for, Cotty.
This is a good start.
I vote for Cotty as official PDML apologist, and he who doth not wear Pentax
Hi!
What I don't understand is the ridicule I received from you and at
least one other on the list when I suggested that Pentax Canada did
not follow the normal protocol I would have expected.
As has been explained to you at least as often as you have brought the
point up is that this was
21 matches
Mail list logo
