David, if I could take digital picture with my MX, KX, SuperA beleive
me I would.
The thing is, this is the last thing manufacturers want us to get. If
something like this hits the street, a lot less people will buy DSLRs.
As for sensor performance, just get the next version of this RE35 or
From: Rob Studdert
On 10 April 2011 22:23, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude
materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work.
Which is why a true FF sensor of this type is a virtual
On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
You're confusing economic infeasibility with impossible. Every day I use
stuff that was impossible when I started in photography.
If there's really a market for something like this, some genius will
eventually figure out how
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
You're confusing economic infeasibility with impossible. Every day I use
stuff that was impossible when I started in photography.
If there's really a market for something
From: Rob Studdert
On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen
on one of my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF
sensor, and cram the electronics into the fairly large battery
and clock box.
On 10 April 2011 22:23, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude
materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work.
Which is why a true FF sensor of this type is a virtual impossibility.
--
Rob
On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of
my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the
electronics into the fairly large battery and clock box. Expand the Dial Data
On Apr 9, 2011, at 15:46 , Rob Studdert wrote:
On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of
my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the
electronics into the fairly
On Apr 4, 2011, at 13:34 , John Sessoms wrote:
From: David Parsons
Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an
old film camera
From: Bruce Walker
On 11-04-03 7:09 PM, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote:
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no information is
available (at all) and the contact page says
Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in
error also an actual 1.2 Mp product
http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
One of the classic items that defines vaporware.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in
error also an actual 1.2 Mp product
http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp
--
PDML
From: Toine
Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in
error also an actual 1.2 Mp product
http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp
Never got beyond the prototype ... and I don't think it was even a
*working* prototype.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts
or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too
much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would
have paid to be able to use all those bodies again without film.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts
or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too
much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would
have paid to be able to use
Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an
old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)?
What do you do with cameras that don't have
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:49 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
would economical.
That was kind of my point. Don't the phase one backs go for about $20K? So
for the
Larry Colen wrote:
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough
to hide the fact that it's a hoax.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough
to hide the fact that it's a hoax.
It's apparently an advertising firm, and they seem to be getting a lot of
Larry Colen wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough
to hide the fact that it's a hoax.
It's apparently an advertising firm, and they seem to
From: David Parsons
Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an
old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)?
What do you do with cameras
If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P
and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses, right now.
Actually, though, there is a new sensor technology in the labs that
could be used for this once it is . A nanno-dot technology
manufactured by a process which deposits
Photovoltaic cells can be produced on thin amorphous film, so I suppose a
sensor made from amorphous material is possible.
Paul
On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P
and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses,
If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P
and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses, right now.
Actually, though, there is a new sensor technology in the labs that
could be used for this once it is . A nanno-dot technology
manufactured by a process which
Looks like it went much farther than anyone really intended:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/general-photography/139096-digital-film-gets-new-lease-life.html#post1453566
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
This is very intriguing
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no
information is available (at all) and the contact page says will be available
later this year without even mentioning what year
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:00 -0700, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
I'm pretty sure that this was another April 1 fun site.
(not that I wouldn't be interested if it was really..er, real).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Not really. If you check the name and http on that page, you will end up at
a German design firm -- and that's not sensor design -- where they tell you
of their efforts and how ... pünktlich zum 1. April wird die entsprechende
Pressemitteilung ... sent
On 11-04-03 7:09 PM, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote:
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no information is
available (at all) and the contact page says will be available later
Looks like silicon film, I think they came close to shipping something,
maybe, 4-6mp with a serious crop factor, but only worked in a limited
number of cameras. Still I'd love to have something like that for my
LX, though I doubt that anything will ever come of it.
On 4/3/2011 7:00 PM, Larry
31 matches
Mail list logo
