Build it Larry, and they will come.
Oh, yes!, he ejaculated.
A dialogue Mark.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Whether the idea works or not, I'd wager it's patentable.
Build it Larry, and they
A misplaced one, however.
There is a difference between come and - that other spelling.
On Oct 30, 2012, at 14:31 , Steven Desjardins wrote:
Build it Larry, and they will come.
Oh, yes!, he ejaculated.
A dialogue Mark.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
So, you'd have sensor based IS trying to keep the sensor stable during
an exposure, and at the same time, moving the sensor to introduce AA?
What does 'mechanical AA do that the optical method doesn't do? What
would be the advantage of it?
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Larry Colen
On Oct 28, 2012, at 12:48 PM, David Parsons wrote:
So, you'd have sensor based IS trying to keep the sensor stable during
an exposure, and at the same time, moving the sensor to introduce AA?
What does 'mechanical AA do that the optical method doesn't do? What
would be the advantage of
On 28/10/2012 1:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 12:48 PM, David Parsons wrote:
So, you'd have sensor based IS trying to keep the sensor stable during
an exposure, and at the same time, moving the sensor to introduce AA?
What does 'mechanical AA do that the optical method
On Oct 28, 2012, at 3:26 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 28/10/2012 1:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 12:48 PM, David Parsons wrote:
So, you'd have sensor based IS trying to keep the sensor stable during
an exposure, and at the same time, moving the sensor to introduce AA?
Larry Colen wrote:
I thought that what an AA filter did was specifically to blur the image on
the
order of a pixel width so that no transition was narrower than a pixel.
I.e.
acting as a low pass filter to ensure that there are no patterns of a
higher
frequency than the sampling rate.
The
On 28/10/2012 4:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 3:26 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 28/10/2012 1:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 12:48 PM, David Parsons wrote:
So, you'd have sensor based IS trying to keep the sensor stable during
an exposure, and at the same time,
On 28/10/2012 4:43 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
I thought that what an AA filter did was specifically to blur the
image on the
order of a pixel width so that no transition was narrower than a
pixel. I.e.
acting as a low pass filter to ensure that there are no patterns of a
On Oct 28, 2012, at 3:52 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 28/10/2012 4:43 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
I thought that what an AA filter did was specifically to blur the
image on the
order of a pixel width so that no transition was narrower than a
pixel. I.e.
acting as a low
On 28/10/2012 5:05 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 3:52 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 28/10/2012 4:43 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
I thought that what an AA filter did was specifically to blur the
image on the
order of a pixel width so that no transition was narrower
On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:18 PM, William Robb wrote:
You are still missing that what you are describing is camera shake, while
what an AA filter does is more akin to a very mild soft focus filter.
And the difference is that a soft focus filter works in two dimensions rather
than one?
A soft
on 2012-10-28 17:40 Larry Colen wrote
A soft focus filter gives more of a guassian distribution to a point signal
rather than a linear one?
the mechanical AA could be moving the sensor in a circle of one pixel diameter
(or something similar) at a rate of one revolution per shutter speed
an
On Oct 28, 2012, at 5:15 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-10-28 17:40 Larry Colen wrote
A soft focus filter gives more of a guassian distribution to a point signal
rather than a linear one?
the mechanical AA could be moving the sensor in a circle of one pixel
diameter (or something
On 28/10/2012 5:40 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:18 PM, William Robb wrote:
You are still missing that what you are describing is camera shake, while what
an AA filter does is more akin to a very mild soft focus filter.
And the difference is that a soft focus filter works
On Oct 28, 2012, at 17:45 , Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 5:15 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-10-28 17:40 Larry Colen wrote
A soft focus filter gives more of a guassian distribution to a point signal
rather than a linear one?
the mechanical AA could be moving the sensor in
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 17:45 , Larry Colen wrote:
Whether the idea works or not, I'd wager it's patentable.
Build it Larry, and they will come.
Oh, yes!, he ejaculated.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 28, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Whether the idea works or not, I'd wager it's patentable.
Build it Larry, and they will come.
All I need is a K5-IIs, the source code to the firmware and a dev box.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML
18 matches
Mail list logo
