gfen wrote:
I haven't figured out the best way to hand them files, though, I know it
prints at 300dpi, but I don't knwo if I should give them 300dpi .tifs, or
1200dpi .tifs (1200 is the highest my crappy flatbed gives me, it also
gives me massive amounts of what I can only assume are newton
I think the 1280 and 1290 use an ink cartridge with a chip in it. This
stops you using third party inks. Not a great problem unless you want
to use the true black and white inks that specialist companies make. If
you do a lot of black and white, the 1270 is best I think.
A word on pigment
prints out of them but they are 2/3's the OEM price
so its all good
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: Which Photo quality printer?
I think the 1280 and 1290 use an ink cartridge
?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: Which Photo quality printer?
gfen wrote:
I haven't figured out the best way to hand them files, though, I know it
prints at 300dpi, but I
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the 1280 and 1290 use an ink cartridge with a chip in it. This
stops you using third party inks. Not a great problem unless you want
to use the true black and white inks that specialist companies make. If
you do a lot of black and
they hold the ink cartridge and touch the contacts on the cartridge and
don't remove or access the chip at all. i don't see how more specific you
can get.
Herb...
Pal.
I have the Canon BJC8200 and its successor the S800.They
both produce nice 8x10's(max size)The 800 is at 1200x2400
were the 8200 is 1200x1200.
They both take 6 cartridges and are about $20.00 Can each with life
of about 45=48 pictures per tank.
I have yet to see a demo of the 9000 but may
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Which Photo quality printer?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:22:51 -0400
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The chip reprogrammers, EPROM burners, aren't enough to get the job
done
by themselves. You
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should've mentioned that I confirmed this number, however, in multiple
places.. the Frontier systems do in fact print at 300dpi.
Evidently, teh Frontier will just re-sample images at higher dpi down to
300. Still not sure if its better to give
TI has a new 6 or 7 ink printer out: The 5550, I believe.
As I recall, it does 6x4 borderless, and will print up to
8x10. About $150, and supposedly in the Epson/Canon quality
class. And I don't believe the carts are chipped.
-Lon
gfen wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Dan Scott wrote:
to add a tiny smidgen of unsharp masking to get the smaller rez image
What exactly does unsharp mask accomplish?
the name is unfortunate and is derived from true darkroom lingo dealing
with a negative sandwich. Unsharp mask increases
gfen wrote:
snip
The other thing I'm having difficulty getting my head around is WHERE and
HOW I should size images and do the workflow.. I've been doing my best to
research it out on photo.net
snip
I too, have researched photo.net, and I don't think it's the best resource.
Two places
Pål,
My experience is that the Epsons give the absolute best quality. I
have owned 3 in the past. There is a caveat with them, however. The
heads are not user replaceable. If you get a bad clog (can happen and
did to me on 2 different printers), you have to send them in for
service. That
At 05:41 PM 10/23/02 +0200, you wrote:
I am considering buying a photo quality printer. I'm a total novice in
these matters so I need advice. Needless to say, I want best quality
possible at the lower possible price. Any suggestions?
Pål
The Epson 2200 (aka 2100 outside the US) is the best
My wife uses a Canon S800 with 6 colors. The cartridges can be replaced everyone
without paying for a new head. Want to say: several printers use a combined head +
cartridge (hp for example) so you pay every time for both. Well, you have a perfct
condition then but usually the heads can be
Hi Pl,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:41:38 +0200, Pl Jensen wrote:
I am considering buying a photo quality printer. I'm a total novice in these matters
so I need advice.
I would recommend the Epson line, more specifically the A3 sized photo-printers.
The Epson 2100 (European name) is the latest
Although other brans come close, Epson has won nearly every comparison
I've ever seen. I love my 1200. I think the latest version that can take
13 inch wide paper (in any length) is the 1290.
Paul Stenquist
Pål Jensen wrote:
I am considering buying a photo quality printer. I'm a total novice
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pål,
My experience is that the Epsons give the absolute best quality.
I'll add another vote for Epson. I have the 1270. Since I've gotten adept at
scanning slides and using Photoshop I have lost all interest in tradional
chemical (wet) photo prints.
--
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 23, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: Which Photo quality printer?
I am considering buying a photo quality printer. I'm a total novice in these
matters so I need advice. Needless to say, I want best quality
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 05:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pål,
My experience is that the Epsons give the absolute best quality.
I'll add another vote for Epson. I have the 1270. Since I've gotten
adept at
scanning slides and using Photoshop I
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 02:42 PM, gfen wrote:
I haven't figured out the best way to hand them files, though, I know it
prints at 300dpi, but I don't knwo if I should give them 300dpi .tifs,
or
1200dpi .tifs (1200 is the highest my crappy flatbed gives me, it also
gives me massive
21 matches
Mail list logo
