On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pentax K10D, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 100, 1/180 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4734a.htm
Very graphic rendering, quite nice really. I like that you're pushing
some new stylistic boundaries in your work. :-)
I've seen book
Scott Loveless wrote:
I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing photography and
finishing photographs for web publication. A recent, erm, thread got me
steamed up enough to post this. Basically, how much can you accomplish
without spending any more money than it cost you to obtain
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:17:26 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote
Which makes sense. It's unlikely that one would want continuous
autofocus with a remote trigger. CAF is a function that requires
one's hands on the camera to track the action.
On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:12 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
It's just perfect.
Toine
On 4/23/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5885529
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
--
Toine
http://leende.net/peso
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Very good. Tree #73 ? I Would like to see the other 72 trees!
Toine
On 4/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from the upcoming Tree collection...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/20b.htm
Comments, critique and good fertilizer all welcomed.
best,
Godfrey
Hi Mark,
I've managed to snap the hotshoe off a Super A (Twice)! The first time
I hadn't put it away properly and it had an AF80C ring flash on it. I
had to run about 200 metres through soft mud to get to a phone to call
for an ambulance - one of the people I was with had a suspected blue
I've been trying to see just how difficult it would be to handhold
the big bling lens (FA 250-600/5.6) and it actually isn't as
difficult as I had imagined.
I managed to capture this GBH in flight with it and the K10D. SR
seems to help quite a bit (as does decent light):
From: eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/25 Wed AM 04:41:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: newbie question on aperatures
Been looking at some wide angle lenses for my DL, and been noticing that
while any truly wide angle lense is awfully expensive (yeah, I
From: Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I now have one AF360FGZ mounted on a bracket to one side of the lens. I
have modified the flash so I can plug in a second flash tube which sits
on the other side of the lens giving me a 2 flash setup without the
weight of 2 flashes and the need to
Nice shot. I would draw in the tip of that left wing and add some
background water above it. You could clone the feather ends from
other places on the bird. If an ISO 400 shot is underexposed by a
stop or so, you'll get noise. Otherwise, they always look pretty
clean to me. Can't tell if
This needs a subject.
Paul
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nice shot. I would draw in the tip of that left wing and add some
background water above it. You could clone the feather ends from
other places on the bird. If an ISO 400 shot is underexposed by a
stop or so, you'll
It looks fine to me, JayT :-). Actually it looks really very fine.
I have latest 1.11 firmware in my K10D but I did not notice any
differences in the noise at higher ISO values.
Cheers.
On 4/25/07, Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to see just how difficult it would be to
Nice Bruce, kind of a lithograph... Regards, Bob S.
On 4/24/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took this shot right at the edge of the continent looking out into
the Pacific ocean. I was trying to convey the emptiness that I saw
from this withered old tree and the big ocean beyond.
I like this one also. How did you get the conversion to appear warm tone
? It looks like it was printed on a good warm tone photo paper.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Bob.
I had forgotten to take the camera off spot metering. I suppose that
accounts for the blackish back ground, but thats what worked for me.
Might try ythis one in the Markham Fair this fall.
Dave
On 4/24/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, a nice shot!
Someone posted an edge recovery tool a while back, I don't know if
that would help.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/contents/DNG-Recover-Edges.shtml
Eric.
On 25/04/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot. I would draw in the tip of that left wing and add some
Nice mood.
Thanks.
In my very own personal taste it could use a little bit more of constrast.
Now that you mention it, I think I might prefer it that way myself. I
didn't do much work on the image file (which is a scan from bw film.)
How about
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions asked on the PDML in
quite a while, and might give the list a few chuckles. Apart from one
sandwich in 1957, I've never had a roast beef sandwich. I've eaten a wide
variety of food in many different countries, but never a roast beef
sandwich.
Good morning, Bruce ...
First, I like that you're experimenting a little, and this was a good scene
to play around with. I like the scene, but am not particularly fond of the
rendering. It reminds me of printing a contrasty scene in the darkroom
using Agfa Brovira #6 (some people will get that
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
However, I haven't a clue about a dressing. I recall that roast beef goes
well with horseradish, maybe mustard, but beyond that I haven't a clue.
What dressings and accompaniments might you suggest for a nice, tasty roast
beef sandwich.
Mustard and horseradish both
Hi Godders
Great concept. I looked at the pic before reading your entire post, and
though that it was a remarkable situation to capture four planes in such a
pattern Nice idea ;-))
Shel
On 4/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I was out for my Saturday morning
walk in Guadalupe River
All photos hold a certain interest for me. In this case, intrigue and
emotional interest are just not there.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, even without getting the point, does the image interest you or
not?
--
Bruce
Tuesday, April 24, 2007, 10:06:01 PM, you
From: eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/25 Wed AM 04:41:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: newbie question on aperatures
Been looking at some wide angle lenses for my DL, and been noticing that
while any truly wide angle lense is awfully expensive (yeah, I know,
I don't eat a lot of roast beef, mostly just turkey. I am impressed
that you can remember the *year* you last had one though :)
http://www.pbs.org/everydayfood/recipes/roast_beef.html
have fun!
Russ
On 4/25/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK gang, this may be one of the
I don't get the feeling of emptieness you are going for, for me it is
more of a hot summer day. nice picture and effect Bruce, I like it
Russ
On 4/24/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took this shot right at the edge of the continent looking out into
the Pacific ocean. I was trying
I think that combo works very well. Nice shot. Seems sharp enough for printing.
I don't see the noise your talking about on my monitor.
Now the D2H at 400, thats a different story.
Davbe
On 4/25/07, Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to see just how difficult it would be to
My favorite: Rye bread, Russian dressing, roast beef,
a slice of Swiss cheese, topped with cole slaw. Messy
but delectable!
Rick
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions
asked on the PDML in
quite a while, and might give the list a few
I like black pepper and a smidge of mayo. If its from a store, i'l
throw a slice of lettuce on it. If its from a left over roast in the
oven at home, no lettuce.
Dave
On 4/25/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions asked on the PDML in
It is to me Bruce.
.
Dave
On 4/25/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, even without getting the point, does the image interest you or
not?
--
Bruce
Tuesday, April 24, 2007, 10:06:01 PM, you wrote:
JD Don't believe I'd have gotten the point, Bruce, without your
JD explanation.
I third the lens.
I paid $185 Canadian, included shipping, from RUGIFT in Russia.
Three weeks door to door.
I think i got a good one, as the pictures look decently crisp.
Dave
On 4/25/07, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/25 Wed AM
Do you have to wait a 1/2 hour before touching a camera with that
sandwich, Rick.
LOL
Dave
On 4/25/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My favorite: Rye bread, Russian dressing, roast beef,
a slice of Swiss cheese, topped with cole slaw. Messy
but delectable!
Rick
--- Shel Belinkoff
On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:40 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Suprisingly, the Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 is one of the cheapest lenses
available and is also very good. You just need to be aware that
individual samples can vary in quality, so you need to buy one that
you can try first or go to a decent
I'm partial to roast beef on rye with mayo, horseradish and pickles. A thin
slice of cheddar is also good. Ditto, very thin onion slices.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions asked
I suppose I already know the answer, but I thought I'd ask anyway:
Is there any way to generate a small RAW or DNG file either from the camera
or through image editing software? I'm thinking it would be nice if one
could post such a file that's reasonably-sized for web use
Shel
--
PDML
Pixmantic's Raw Shooter Essentials processes *ist-D and Ds images to
3038x2015 size images. I've been assuming that it's been giving all
the edge pixels automagically so they don't need to be recovered.
Eric Featherstone wrote:
Yes, a nice shot!
Someone posted an edge recovery tool a while
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Scott,
Daffodils are pretty cool flowers to shoot. The background
latticework and porch posts are too overpowering in this instance.
Perhaps colorizing just the flowers would give it a needed separation.
As it stands, the dark/light patterns of the background
On a nice fresh crusty roll (or a portion of a French stick):
- Cream cheese (or mayonnaise, or both)
- Hot or wholegrain mustard (depends on my mood)
- My mothers home made tomato relish or cauliflower pickle (could be
hard to find in the US :-)
- Roast beef
- Beetroot (A very Australian
Nice green. We're deep into summer where things are turning brown
from the heat.
Bong
On 4/24/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/800x533-_IGP9160.jpg
Wish you lovely spring green time.
Thanks, but it's
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions asked on the PDML in
quite a while, and might give the list a few chuckles. Apart from one
sandwich in 1957, I've never had a roast beef sandwich. I've eaten a wide
variety of food in many different countries, but
Hi Toralf,
I actually like the first one, maybe with just a bit more contrast but
less than 2b. 2c is way too bright and kills that mood.
Bong ;-)
On 4/25/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice mood.
Thanks.
In my very own personal taste it could use a little bit more of
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: newbie question on aperatures
I third the lens.
I paid $185 Canadian, included shipping, from RUGIFT in Russia.
Three weeks door to door.
I think i got a good one, as the pictures look decently crisp.
My feeling is that the
Paul's suggestion is pretty much my choice, too. Use rye bread
w/caraway seeds. I'm not a fan of straight horseradish, so I mix it
w/the mayo to get a tangy spread, change the cheddar to colby-jack
cheese, no pickles on the sandwich, but a really good kosher dill on the
side.
Har!
Bong (from the Philippines)
On 4/25/07, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or may just for the heck of it. Under that theme , I probably would not
have shot with film, but maybe not.
I was actually just checking which white balance worked best in the diner.
Turns out AWB was the
Thanks Toine.
Tom C.
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Let there be Light
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:53:36 +0200
It's just perfect.
Toine
On 4/23/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAW files always contain the same data. The bodies prior to the K10D
output PEF files which can be transformed to DNG with lossless
compression with Adobe's DNG Converter, which reduces size by
approximately 40%. The K10D will produce PEF files with lossless
compression or uncompressed DNG
Warm the roast beef, slice a soft but toasted crust ciabatta bread
roll, a touch of salt and pepper, a sprinkle of shredded swiss
cheese, maybe a touch of mayo... mmm, satori. ;-)
G
On Apr 25, 2007, at 5:31 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions asked
Godfrey, were you using this lens on
FF film or APS digital?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:34 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: newbie question on aperatures
On Apr 25,
I'll vote for 2b.
Toralf Lund wrote:
Nice mood.
Thanks.
In my very own personal taste it could use a little bit more of constrast.
Now that you mention it, I think I might prefer it that way myself. I
didn't do much work on the image file (which is a scan from bw
This isn't a camera list, is it? It's a culinary society with a
Pentax addiction.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sort of with PS CS3 it's enhanced Adobe Camera Raw converter.
In ACR make you adjustments to the original RAW file and save it as a
.tif (or .jpg). Then using Adobe Bridge and the updated ACR you can
open the .tif file (with ACR) and save it as a .dng.
I just tried it, and an original K10D
Hi Toralf,
I actually like the first one, maybe with just a bit more contrast but
less than 2b. 2c is way too bright and kills that mood.
Yeah, I wanted it dark because that was what the scene looked like and
felt like at the time... 2c is a rescan with a completely different
setup. I
Wasn't it Pentax that came out with the pancake lens?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
This isn't a camera list, is it? It's a culinary society with a
Pentax addiction.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like it. Quite a bit. For me, though, it is a tad t high key and I
would bring it down a bit. Too much detail is being lost, a little more detail
would be good.
(I took a second look to be clearer.) I think the branches of the tree are
merging with the background a little too much.
In a message dated 4/23/2007 1:46:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5885529
Tom C.
===
Very nice god rays as one of my photography teachers called this type of
thing. Well done.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 4/24/2007 8:22:50 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The lure of the flowers is too strong! They're little DSLR magnets.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5057197184448144050
Any and all critiques most welcome. Thanks for looking.
On 4/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't a camera list, is it? It's a culinary society with a
Pentax addiction.
Too true. I've been a lover of food longer than I've been interested
in Pentax. (as my waistline will attest :-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Nice, frank. The guy's face is a little dark. This is one I would edit in
some software, like Elements or PS. Use hightlight/shadows to lighten his face
a tad, rotate the whole pic a tad to level it, and crop a tad.
But a good moment.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
=
Here it is using
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: WAY OT, but not inflamatory: Roast Beef Sandwich
Wasn't it Pentax that came out with the pancake lens?
That was Nikon (40mm/2.8 GN).
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
There is one exception to this rule, the Canon 1D mkIII has an sRAW mode
that provides a 2.5MP RAW file from a 10MP sensor.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
RAW files always contain the same data. The bodies prior to the K10D
output PEF files which can be transformed to DNG with lossless
Sorry for forgetting to add the subject prior to sending.
Paul,
I like the idea of completing the wing (although cheating a bit) for
a nicer composition. Yes, I believe I did have my settings on a half
stop under and the noise is pretty much visible only on the full size
image. I process my
In a message dated 4/20/2007 3:08:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet another PESO, (at least something here is on topic today).
Photographed in their natural habitat, a bit early in the season though...
I had the same thoughts as Paul. Very cool lens to boot!
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 3:14:29 AM, you wrote:
PS Nice shot. I would draw in the tip of that left wing and add some
PS background water above it. You could clone the feather ends from
PS other places on the bird. If an
Yes, Pentax could drop the camera division all on their own, without Hoya.
I just can't figure out what I'd do with an endoscope though.
Tom C.
I could figure out but probably wouldn't want to know for sure ... ;)
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
lol ... but we were talking about Pentax cameras, eh? ;-)
G
On Apr 25, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
There is one exception to this rule, the Canon 1D mkIII has an sRAW
mode
that provides a 2.5MP RAW file from a 10MP sensor.
RAW files always contain the same data. The bodies prior
In a message dated 4/23/2007 12:54:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sclessin seen from the top of an old mine dump.
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8689239
Your comments and suggestions are as always most welcome.
Ralf
=
Beautiful,
too much to do, too little time
PLEASE if there is GFM stuff, could we start a GFM attendees list so I'm
not out of the loop on it?
with GFM in subject line
A couple of heavy things happened here to a friend and I have no time
for fun stuff right now
but anyone got color wheel things send me
Dave, but what if you downsized the TIFF file before making a DNG out
of it? I think this is what Shel is asking about.
Boris
On 4/25/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sort of with PS CS3 it's enhanced Adobe Camera Raw converter.
In ACR make you adjustments to the original RAW file
In a message dated 4/23/2007 3:33:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Taken from the S.Marco tower in Venice, looking down at the passers-by in
S.Marco Square:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/misc/misc18e.htm
Apart from the obvious increased contrast and BW conversion, the
Very cool, shot, Godfrey! Would have been even better if the plane(s) were
right over the road, but I guess one can't have everything. I like this, well
done.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
==
I was out for my Saturday morning walk in Guadalupe River Park, San
Jose, this time carrying
Hi Bruce,
I find the effect overly harsh. If you had not told me that the ocean was
part of the shot, I would not have known it was the ocean, as it looks like
an indeterminable background area.
I like the idea and would suggest a lighter touch in the alteration of the
photo.
Tom C.
Godfrey,
I like the shot also. It has quite an anthropomorphic quality about
it. My only qualm would be the slight dark spot in the upper right of
the image which draws my eye away from he subject. Not sure if it
could be dodged out or not. Regardless the images works well.
JayT
Tuesday,
Actually they had a pretty good histogram, and were backlit. I had to
lighten the image and decrease contrast to bring out a little more
detail in the bird's front surfaces. I decided to do that, rather than
building a mask or using a fill flash action in Photoshop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/24/2007 11:41:48 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17401full=1
I thought I might call it An optical formula ;-).
Have your honest and brutal say, please.
Thanks.
Boris
===
Interesting shot,
This is excellent image but I see very little connection between the
image and story, Bruce. I really like the image as it fits very well
with a series of images I produced some time ago using similar
rendering. But the story... The story hardly fits the image.
On 4/25/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL
Nice shot! He's just a teeny weeny little guy, isn't he?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
This guy was very tame and allowed me pretty close
with the 100mm f3.5
Macro. iso 400, f/10, around 1/60th with SR on. His
head is slightly soft or
else he moved. The macro is proving to be
A DNG file constructed this way is simply an encapsulated RGB data
file with lossless compression. It isn't a RAW file. You might as
well just save as a JPEG at maximum quality, or JPEG2000.
G
On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Dave, but what if you downsized the TIFF file
http://tinyurl.com/2la524
From Reuters...
The move to overthrow Pentax's current management comes after Watanuki told
Sparx in a meeting last week that he rejected the earlier merger plan though
he hadn't mapped out an alternative to Hoya's proposal, the source said.
Although Watanuki has
In a message dated 4/24/2007 1:13:25 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just another sign of boredom (on a rainy day):
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=samson2
- T
==
Having looked at the originals and the other versions, I rather like the
original. A tad
Yeah, I agree. But Shel wasn't asking about making high quality .jpg's :-)
On 4/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A DNG file constructed this way is simply an encapsulated RGB data
file with lossless compression. It isn't a RAW file. You might as
well just save as a JPEG at
Tom C.
Thanks!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Let there be Light
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:02:42 EDT
In a message dated 4/23/2007 1:46:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps I wasn't clear. What I want(ed) to know was if there is some way
to generate a true raw file, in either a format like PEF or DNG either
directly from the camera or by resizing the file in some editing software
(without changing to TIFF or JPEG or any other such format) to make it
Looking at all three, they don't express to me that feeling of dark
with glistening wetness that I think it what you're trying for. They
just seem flat and dullish in appearance.
I like the composition though, so I bunged about in a heavy handed
way with curves adjustment tools and did some
Funny, the market share of DSLRs is supposed to be much higher. I
expect mis-information being used used as an attack. Reuters doesn't
give a source for that 2.3% figure anywhere do they. Most likely they
got that number from a party trying to sway shareholder sentiment. It's
always a good
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:00:56AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't clear. What I want(ed) to know was if there is some way
to generate a true raw file, in either a format like PEF or DNG either
directly from the camera or by resizing the file in some editing software
(without
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:55 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
... The composition was initially appealing (I don't mind the
sloping porch)
but there's just too much else that's wrong with it. It'll
probably go
in the circular file sooner or later. Thanks again for looking, and
thanks for the
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't clear. What I want(ed) to know was if there is some way
to generate a true raw file, in either a format like PEF or DNG either
directly from the camera or by resizing the file in some editing software
(without changing to TIFF or JPEG or any other such
A true raw file would have to contain data for every pixel recorded.
You could reduce the number or pixels recorded but then it wouldn't be
raw. Pentax doesn't seem to allow capture of only a portion of the
sensor data, if that's even actually possible, based on the sensor design.
Shel
I suppose if Pentax used a system comparable to Nikon: using part of
the sensor data allowing faster frame rate, then such a RAW file would
make sense.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Then the answer is no, there isn't.
Or rather, what we got is about as good as you're going to get right
now. ;-)
A K10D RAW file, converted to losslessly compressed DNG format, is
going to be about a 9Mbyte file. If you have a good broadband
connection and the person wanting to post
I dont think there would be any reason why a raw file
could not be resized down for other uses, but it technically wouldnt be
a RAW file anymore if any sensor captured data was lost in
the process and of course it would be if sized down.
some sort of lossless compressed 16 bit format simliar
to
Hi,
(Side note: I love the fact that Pentax put an IR remote sensor both
front and back. It makes working in the field with a tripod and the
mirror-up prefire a joy. One less bloody wire and device dangling
from the camera and likely to get caught on my clothes or a bush,
etc., as I move
An April 17 market JP Morgan report has the following figures:
Pentax DSLR market share: 5%
Pentax Digital Camera market share: 3%
Operating profit margin on compact digital cameras:
Canon20.1%
Nikon 1.6%
Casio8.5%
Pentax 1.9%
Olympus 9.2%
Operating profit margin for
Hi Torlaf,
Yes, something between the original and 2b would be what I had in
mind, although if I have to choose from the ones posted I would choose
the original one, with my suggestion was just being picky, I like
the photo and the mood 99% as it is originally.
Cheers
On 4/25/07, Toralf Lund
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Since I'm experimenting with some ideas in Photoshop today, I hope
you don't mind a bit of mashing about on your photo too. A crop, some
delicate rendering of tonal scale, addition of both noise and blur,
punching around with a vignette produced this, which I find
Sorry, no photos of a scantily clad young lady. I bought a funky old bike for
a couple dollars earlier today and thought I'd share some pics. These are
completely unedited and worthy of no praise at all. If you wanna talk about
bikes, though..
No; I can lick my fingers in just 90 seconds!
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have to wait a 1/2 hour before touching a
camera with that
sandwich, Rick.
LOL
Dave
On 4/25/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My favorite: Rye bread, Russian dressing, roast
On 25/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://i.pbase.com/o6/87/63987/1/77722546.D073MrKz.GBHFlight1.jpg
Superb shot.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Not mine of course. It's Jay's. But you knew that.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://i.pbase.com/o6/87/63987/1/77722546.D073MrKz.GBHFlight1.jpg
Superb shot.
--
Throw away the bread and have it with Yorkshire puddings, gravy, and
roast potatoes.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: 25 April 2007 13:31
To: PDML
Subject: WAY OT, but not inflamatory: Roast Beef
You can get something very like that for real at Heathrow.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: 25 April 2007 13:38
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 20 - GDG
Hi Godders
Great
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
