On 13/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Christian. It's not snow, however. Hasn't snowed here in Silly
Valley at this elevation in many years.
Uncut diamonds.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On Nov 14, 2007 4:40 PM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Information here:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25597175
I saw that.
All I can say is it's very agricultural.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks. But then again what are these settings of sharpening and
contrast that you set so that histogram is as close as possible to the
RAW data?
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If you leave the JPEG settings at full resolution and normal
defaults, approximately 8-12x will be close to 1:1
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/14 Wed AM 12:08:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
These were also made on the Sunday morning walk ...
Sorry Doug but that is a non-argument. You have done two different things.
Would you have argued the same if you had taken a video camera and filled 10
DVDs with cine footage?
Print the lot out, factor in your time at a reasonable rate, _then_ come back
and tell us how much it cost. I'll
True but then, you can eliminate the shots which are garbadge and you
won't print those.
Film don't let you filter those garbage shots (on a cost POV).
So that's not the whole story but there's already an economy IMO.
On Nov 14, 2007 10:03 AM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Doug but
Thanks, Mark!
Mark Roberts wrote:
Only 12 photos, but they're good ones:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/07/in_pictures_magnum_photos___60th_anniversary/html/1.stm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Nov 14, 2007 6:20 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. But then again what are these settings of sharpening and
contrast that you set so that histogram is as close as possible to the
RAW data?
The in camera contrast, saturation sharpening settings?
Press Menu, and they're
He eliminated (many of) those in-camera. The point is still that 3000 files is
not the same as 3000 prints or slides. Produce equal numbers of the same end
product before you tell me that it is cheaper.
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/14 Wed AM 10:15:32 GMT
To:
Digital noise, or grain if you like, is one thing. Banding is another.
I viewed this shot again today on my monitor at work I couldn't see
the banding. But it's not calibrated I also couldn't see any detail
in the shadows.
I could see the banding when I opened it in PS and just looked at the
On Nov 14, 2007 2:30 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I like chimping
Mark!
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
As Adam noted, the way pixel are arrayed in an image encourages
patterning to some extent. Pixel peepers can find all manner of
things. Viewers of photographs don't worry about them.
Paul
On Nov 14, 2007, at 6:07 AM, David Savage wrote:
Digital noise, or grain if you like, is one thing.
mike wilson wrote:
He eliminated (many of) those in-camera. The point is still that 3000
files is not the same as 3000 prints or slides. Produce equal numbers
of the same end product before you tell me that it is cheaper.
It's cheaper because you don't *have* to produce *any* prints.
--
PDML
That's such a load of BS Paul.
I've seen and taken many high ISO shots that both have haven't
displayed vertical banding. Unlike regular noise, the banding pattern
is, to me at any rate, highly undesirable very difficult to counter
in post processing.
And I didn't need to scrutinise it at the
mike wilson wrote:
Print the lot out, factor in your time at a reasonable rate,
_then_ come back and tell us how much it cost.
I wasn't printing them then, either. That per-roll cost was purely for
the film, developing, and medium resolution scanning.
I'll let you off with capital
LOL
A new way to damn with faint praise!
Certainly no complement here in the US.
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 14, 2007 2:10 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 4:40 PM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Information here:
Was an experiment just for reactions.
Thanks, Bob
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
Link works about 1 of 3 times for me.
No problem though, I don't care much for the picture...
The rest of your stuff is so much better.
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 13, 2007 6:56 PM, Jack
With my unlimited access to secret information g, and sudden urge to
share it, I would like to congratulate Gianfranco Irlanda with his
birthday today. He hasn't posted much lately, but I hope he's still
lurking.
Happy birthday Gianco! Sorry I don't recall your age, but you're
younger than me
These comparisons are fun. When I bought my first digital camera I
built a spread sheet that calculated my total cost per shot for both
film and digital.
More or less the same thing, just expressed differently.
Cost per shot on digital continues to decrease with time. Cost per
shot on film
Then I guess the rest of us are blind:-)
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's such a load of BS Paul.
I've seen and taken many high ISO shots that both have haven't
displayed vertical banding. Unlike regular noise, the banding
On Nov 14, 2007 2:14 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylwek, I am taking this lens with me on the trip to Prague and it just
seems to me ;) that it will be my primary lens for the trip.
I hope you also have something wider to take with you.
I hope that very soon I'll have enough
Some interesting photos from Paris's Mois de la Photo:
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?storyID=9513
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digital Noise (Was Re: PESO: Bowling Night)
Then I guess the rest of us are blind:-)
Some of us just know better than to get involved in these sorts of
discussions with you Paul.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hmmm, well, I am joining in greeting Gianfranco, but I wonder as to
sources and sudden inclination for the so called secret information ;-)
Happy Birthday, Gianfranco!
Boris
AlunFoto wrote:
With my unlimited access to secret information g, and sudden urge to
share it, I would like to
- Original Message -
From: George Sinos
Subject: Re: Paid For
These comparisons are fun. When I bought my first digital camera I
built a spread sheet that calculated my total cost per shot for both
film and digital.
More or less the same thing, just expressed differently.
Cost
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: My new toy
On Nov 14, 2007 2:14 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylwek, I am taking this lens with me on the trip to Prague and it just
seems to me ;) that it will be my primary lens for the trip.
I hope you also
On Nov 14, 2007 11:02 PM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my unlimited access to secret information g,
Maybe knarf's foil hats aren't so silly after all :-)
Happy B'day Gianfranco.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Interesting is right. While I find some of them excellent, I don't like them
all. But it's nice to see what the Paris critics find compelling.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some interesting photos from Paris's Mois de la
Always gotta make it personal, don't you Bill. I'm just discussing digital
noise.
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digital Noise (Was Re: PESO: Bowling Night)
Happy birthday, Gianfranco. I miss seeing your work here. We need some
Gianfranco pics!
Paul
-- Original message --
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With my unlimited access to secret information g, and sudden urge to
share it, I would like to congratulate
Well, I don't like them all either, but, as you said, they are all interesting.
I did particularly appreciate the ones by Berlin, Chun, Garcin and Avedon.
Dan
On Nov 14, 2007 9:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting is right. While I find some of them excellent, I don't like them
all.
In a message dated 11/13/2007 9:36:40 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They are beautiful, Marnie! Just beautiful.
Boris
Thanks, Boris.
Marnie aka Doe
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be
On Nov 14, 2007, at 2:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 6:20 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. But then again what are these settings of sharpening and
contrast that you set so that histogram is as close as possible to
the
RAW data?
The in camera contrast,
William Robb wrote:
I'm pretty sure I would still be on my second computer (I'm up to #5 now),
had it not been for digital photography and it's ever increasing vacuuming
up of resources, so for me I can add around 7K for that, plus another 2K for
a laptop for onsite use.
However, I like
Haven't heard from Frank for a while. He's still
updating his blog, but his pix aren't showing up, just
the text.
Rick
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:18 AM, mike wilson wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47c.htm
The tree trunks are pleasing, but leaves in snow? Godders? Kinda
cliche for you isn't it? :-)
Snow in SoCal would definitely not
Thanks for this. Good info. I hadn't realized that the jpeg settings affected
the histogram.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 14, 2007, at 2:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 6:20 PM, Boris Liberman
Mike,
I bought the Panny L1 and an Olympus 11-22 mm lens in mid-May. A week
later I shot a job on spec with them. Last month I closed a licensing
deal on one exposure from that shoot that paid 70% more than the
total cost of the equipment. I've not produced any paper prints at
all, the
Could be. Obviously there's noise there. I see it more as blotching than
banding. In any case, iIt doesn't take the form of the kind of vertical banding
one can induce by shooting the inside of a lens cap and then pushing it.
My comments in regard to this were never meant to be defensive in
Rick Womer wrote:
Haven't heard from Frank for a while. He's still
updating his blog, but his pix aren't showing up, just
the text.
Rick
The images are showing up for me, I just checked his blog a few minutes ago.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/14 Wed PM 03:26:45 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG
On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:18 AM, mike wilson wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
I like the tree trunks. Interesting textures and nice rendering.
I don't dislike the leaves. It's a nice picture but perhaps not unique enough
to prove compelling.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:18 AM,
I've saved a huge amount of money shooting digital, but i've been frugal in
regard to computer equipment. My dual 1.25 Mac G4 is perfectly adequate for
processing the 16-bit 144 meg digital images that my RAW conversions yield.
I've had it for quite a few years. I bought it at least a couple of
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/14 Wed PM 12:44:03 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Paid For
mike wilson wrote:
He eliminated (many of) those in-camera. The point is still that 3000
files is not the same as 3000 prints or slides. Produce
No, but he's not comparing it to 3000 prints or slides. He's comparing it to
3000 frames of neg film (before the prints). Consumers are the only ones to
print every frame individually.
Even his typical shooting (30x36exp rolls) would cost $600 for the event.
That's essentially the cost of a
FWIW: I noticed the vertical banding in the dark areas of Paul's photo.
Looks odd to me in that the bands are spaced quite far apart. Perhaps
it's EMF from fluorescent lighting or some other source?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/14 Wed PM 03:10:26 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Paid For
No, but he's not comparing it to 3000 prints or slides. He's comparing it to
3000 frames of neg film (before the prints). Consumers are the only ones
Just FYI:
The reason for this is that the histogram and saturation blinkies are
calculated from the preview JPEG embedded in the RAW file.
Godfrey
On Nov 14, 2007, at 7:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this. Good info. I hadn't realized that the jpeg
settings affected the
It's been a while since I've posted any pictures of my grandson
Darius. He's such a big boy now (4 yrs). We went to have a look at
our soon to be newest family member, a male Black Tan Shiba Inu
puppy that is 4 weeks old. We'll be bringing him home in a couple
more weeks. Now we'll have
Indeed, I often noticed that whatever is blinking on camera screen is
not blinking in the LR ;-).
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Just FYI:
The reason for this is that the histogram and saturation blinkies are
calculated from the preview JPEG embedded in the RAW file.
Godfrey
--
PDML
I'm getting, FORBIDDEN, no permission to open (?)
Jack
--- Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been a while since I've posted any pictures of my grandson
Darius. He's such a big boy now (4 yrs). We went to have a look at
our soon to be newest family member, a male Black Tan Shiba
For the built-in flash image, this is really quite good!
So, you're going to have 3 dogs... Hmmm. How many humans will be there
to *actually* tend to the dogs? ;-)
Boris
Jay Taylor wrote:
It's been a while since I've posted any pictures of my grandson
Darius. He's such a big boy now (4
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/gloucestershire/7094258.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Intriguing... The sky is so different between the RHS and LHS of the
image that it almost seems as two separate photographs.
Yet another excellent work from you, Ralf. You're arguably the master of
this kind of photography!
Boris
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Thank heavens those stupid long
For the moment I thought that the next thing you were going to do,
Daniel, is to ask us to guess which were pure photographs and which were
(heavily) manipulated ones ;-).
I also like only select few of the whole 9...
Boris
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Some interesting photos from Paris's Mois
Hmmm, I think it is not really minimalist... I seem to be at lack of
words here...
The way you see intrigues me here...
Boris
Adam Maas wrote:
*Minimalism* Every So Often.
http://flickr.com/photos/mawz/1978477986/
Larger/Direct lLink
David Savage wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 2:14 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylwek, I am taking this lens with me on the trip to Prague and it just
seems to me ;) that it will be my primary lens for the trip.
I hope you also have something wider to take with you.
I hope that very
What the hell is chimping?
Regards,
Bob...
--
Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!
-- Guess the author!
-- Guess the source!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Thanks Paul!
Paul Stenquist wrote:
All very nice. I like week 41 the best. A unique perspective.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Ann, my reply is between your lines.
ann sanfedele wrote:
I think this is the most successful one:
Week 43: http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=19358full=1
And it looks to me that it should be in the same exhibit, if you will,
as the one Cotty took and
showed here yesterday or the
Thanks Rick.
41 - Perhaps, indeed, I should have asked my wife to take a picture of
me. I so much wanted to photograph my reflection, and indeed it did not
occur to me that I could ask for help. Hmmm, a mental note to self is in
order here.
42, 43 - thanks!
Boris
Rick Womer wrote:
Boris,
Brian Walters wrote:
You want 'honest and brutal? I think they're all crap.
Well, that's brutal but not very honest. :-)
I like all three but with a slight preference for No.43. The contrasting
light and shadow is just wonderful.
Well, the point is that I usually want honest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really like 43, Boris. Nice interweaving not only of fronds, but shadows.
Well caught.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Thanks... I tried many shots of palms before, but this one seems to be
at least presentable.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Boris,
The first is very graphic. I like the overlay of window(?) pane light
on the square...a sort of layering.
My first impression of the 2nd was that the light was draining down a
drain in the brickwork, with only a small puddle left.
Regards, Bob S.
For some reason
Thanks, Dave!
David J Brooks wrote:
On 10/31/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Here are some more weeks:
Week 41: http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=19356full=1
Self portrait or. I like this one. Love the line work.
Week 42:
Bong, Like I mentioned in my another reply on the same matter, the wider
lens could've been more interesting for #45. But then I would have to
struggle with redundant objects...
Your comment about #44 leaves me profoundly intrigued. What hmmm does it
mean to be profound?
Cheers!
Boris
Bong
Igor Roshchin wrote:
I like the 45 one.
I have a few thoughts about it:
1. I wonder if it would have been better to catch the light
reflection that is at the lower part reflecting from the water or
from the boundary of the water and the brick, rather then from
the brick alone.
2. The two
Doug, my reply interspersed...
Doug Franklin wrote:
Week 41: http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=19356full=1
I like the concept but it's just not clicking for me. I think it would
suit me better if you could find an angle where you didn't get yourself
in the reflection. Not all pale
Thanks. Though I should say that the fact that words were necessary for
the second one to work for you makes it less successful... It's like
success but on one condition ;-).
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Week 44:
Bob, chimping is the process of reviewing the photographs just taken on
the small screen of your digital camera. It has the same root as word
chimp-anzee...
Boris
Bob Blakely wrote:
What the hell is chimping?
Regards,
Bob...
--
Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!
looking at the (digital) photos you just took to check you got it right.
the joke being if you like it you are going oooh oooh imitating the
sound a chimp makes.
ann
Bob Blakely wrote:
What the hell is chimping?
Regards,
Bob...
--
Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!
--
Hey gang!
It's the 14th and I don't have any photos for the December PUG.
http://pdmlpug.org/?p=17
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
Almost heaven, West Virginia
Blue Ridge Mountains, Shenandoah River
Life is old there, older than the trees
Younger than the
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Sylwek, I am taking this lens with me on the trip to Prague and
it just
seems to me ;) that it will be my primary lens for the trip.
I hope you also have something wider to take with you.
No, Dave, I've nothing wider than 21mm in prime
Gaud, I hate wasps. Nice capture though.
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
One from this weekends bug hunt (~120kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg
K10D, Voigtlander 125mm f2.5 Macro, 1/200 @ f8, ISO 400
All comments welcome.
Cheers,
Dave
--
The
Hmm...
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/arts/2005/07/images/071114photo_2.jpg
I think I'm onto something ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/large/38a.jpg
:-)
Godfrey
On Nov 14, 2007, at 6:15 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Some interesting photos from Paris's Mois de la Photo:
Mark Roberts wrote:
FWIW: I noticed the vertical banding in the dark areas of Paul's photo.
Looks odd to me in that the bands are spaced quite far apart. Perhaps
it's EMF from fluorescent lighting or some other source?
Make that EMI (electromagnetic interference)
From the spacing of the lines,
I don't see it either --
I'm late coming into this and not reading every post...
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
No beers at this point:-). But I was working rapidly and trying for
some motion blur induced by subject movement. But I can see that I'm
the one who moved here.
I don't see the
No, it isn't very good, but it's sure crappy!
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately different doesn't always make a good photograph, (you
could look at my entire body of work for example).
Jack Davis wrote:
This was once an active practice range which is located in
It was shot at 1/30th. I just checked and found that the subsequent frame shows
even more magenta noise. (Same people, same black shirts.)
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6637600size=lg
Some of the noise appears to look like widely spaced bands, but in other places
it looks more like
Was that Frank wandering the streets of SF that night? Cross dressing
too...
Wonders will never cease. ]:-)
G
On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Frank has become the rage in Paris?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Frank has become the rage in Paris?
Regards,Bob S.
On Nov 14, 2007 12:43 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm...
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/arCts/2005/07/images/071114photo_2.jpg
I think I'm onto something ...
Ha! I thought you were about to tell us you'd nearly made it!
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 14 November 2007 17:41
To: pentax list
Subject: OT - Nearly made the Darwin List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the grey square very much. The placement of the shadow is
perfect. A nice composition and interesting visual. I'm not as sure
about the other shot. The puddling in the foreground doesn't interest
me to any great extent, and of course the background is out of
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Digital Noise (Was Re: PESO: Bowling Night)
Always gotta make it personal, don't you Bill. I'm just discussing digital
noise.
Sometimes it just works out that way.
William Robb
--
PDML
Seems like it's only a matter of time
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.blognow.com.au/peso1/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Paid For
Ironically, it's film that has been driving my computer upgrades lately.
Digital requires much less storage, RAM or processing power than
manipulating high-res scans. My MF scans are easily in the 150MB range,
and even
- Original Message -
From: Jay Taylor
Subject: PEOW:Grandson New Shiba Pup
It's been a while since I've posted any pictures of my grandson
Darius. He's such a big boy now (4 yrs). We went to have a look at
our soon to be newest family member, a male Black Tan Shiba Inu
puppy that
The peak colors around here were over a couple of weekends ago, but it
was raining so no good photos. Some species haven't even started, I
guess you wouldn't want to overload something. I hope this is at least
interesting in it's banality. (The tree is a burning bush I believe).
Beautiful color, nice scene. You might have placed the burning bush more to the
right. You could still do that with a crop. That would also get rid of that
square thing next to the road. You might also clone out the telephone wires.
That would greatly improve the shot. It's a fairly easy job
I have seen exactly that in both my own children's shooting habits and
my wedding/portrait work. I'm seeing less and less print ordering,
but lots of web galleries or computer based slideshows.
The digital angle makes this much easier, as the natural medium for it
is a computer monitor. The
Well put.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's nothing wrong with that logic because, odd as it may seem to
old 20th-century farts like you and me, the print is no longer the
preferred medium for viewing photographs, at
The third new one is the best crop. It just is.
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Thanks again for the feedback on the first Johanna pics.
I updated the Johanna gallery with tree new pictures. (Same occasion and
location, just a little later, but shot with another body, lens and film
type.) It's just
Glorious color! Where is this?
I miss the brilliance of color I once enjoyed in Iowa. Only down thing
about it was that it meant winter was close by. I quit enjoying that
when I was about 12.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The peak colors around here were over a couple of
On Nov 14, 2007, at 16:12, Charles Robinson wrote:
What is the control wireless mode for?
I've been playing around with it, and it seems that the flash attached
to the camera - the AF540FGZ - fires (and triggers the remote slave
flash) in either control or master mode.
I'm a little puzzled
Yes. In control mode, the on-board flash only comunucates info to the
external flash and is fired out of sync with the shutter.
In master mode the on-board flash also adds its exposure to the
scene. I think.(?)
Jack
--- Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the control wireless
What is the control wireless mode for?
I've been playing around with it, and it seems that the flash attached
to the camera - the AF540FGZ - fires (and triggers the remote slave
flash) in either control or master mode.
I'm a little puzzled as to what the control mode is for and the user
Roman Melihhov wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/600_8_mirror
Anyone uses Sigma 600mm mirror lense? SR should help with shake. Judging
from other birding photos I saw bokeh isnt so nice, but somehow reminds
me DA 16-45mm bokeh, yeah this DA lense too has this weird donut type
If you want to inflict pain during the holiday season,
substitute The Little Drummer Boy for John Denver!
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey gang!
It's the 14th and I don't have any photos for the
December PUG.
http://pdmlpug.org/?p=17
--
Scott Loveless
There's no argument that some aspects of digital photography have the
capacity to be cheaper than using film. But you could have sold the
rights to an image made with film for the same profit level and used the
same argument to prove that buying new film gear was worth it.
It still seems, to
Reviewing the shot(s) on my digital camera is the same as shooting a
Polaroid, only more efficient!
Chimping. It sounds like a term a photo luddite would coin.
Regards,
Bob...
--
Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!
-- Guess the author!
-- Guess the source!
From: Boris
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
