On Mon 2001-09-24 (09:19), Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Martin Trautmann wrote:
Real numbers are not required: If it's not enough light, the exposure
meter will double your time, whether the selected aperture is called 2.8
or 3.5, whether it is a faked or real number, as long as you do need
Hi,
I jusr received my Grip BG-10 and remote cable release. The battery grip has
a switch for Lithium or normal batteries. What should i set it to if i'm
using NiMH batteries?
Thanks,
Paul Jones
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotes:
The f number of the lens equals the focal length divided by the
diameter of the entrance pupil of the aperture.
...and it's important to note, that the entrance pupil is _not_ the
physical front element of the lens (although with long focal lengths
(and
What? Darkroom, digital darkroom, what's the difference? errr
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Plus, any
manipulation of the image that appears on the screen has not been done
via the manipulation of light, such as dodging or burning, but rather
by manipulating pixels through computer technology.
Mick ...
I think we all agree that for static subjects the idea works well.
But the real question (for me) is how Mark uses a digital camera to
prep a shot of something that's dynamic, and which may move or
disappear in a fraction of a second. Perhaps he doesn't ... I don't
know, and only Mark
William Robb wrote:
For myself, if the picture is created by silver imaging, it is a
photograph, if it is created by electronic capture, it is an
image. This is just how I keep things straight in my mind.
And that's pretty much the way I see it, although now many photographs
(in the sense of
Yep, in order to guage how good the piece was, he had to look around at
the audience to see their reaction. Must have been pretty nerve
wracking!
-Original Message-
From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2001 13:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digicams
Naw, he got Hinky from the movie The Fugitive. One of the Marshal
Service deputies says Hinky describing the fugitive, and Tommy Lee Jones
character asks the deputy the meaning of hinky and tells him not to use
words that have no meaning around him. Unfortunately I didn't recognize a
Pentax
- Original Message -
From: Norman Baugher
Subject: Re: Images or Photographs
What? Darkroom, digital darkroom, what's the difference?
errr
Norm
Careful folks, its a trollG
WW
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
-Original Message-
From: Mick Maguire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
My two cents worth: In a recent edition of Outdoor
Photographer there was a
pro landscape photographer (sorry I don't remember his name)
who used a
digital camera to compose / try shots before getting all his
So I had a little spare time checked this out.
It fits perfectly to MX, Super A/Super program, and LX FA1etc.
The finder image is reversed.
The 2.5x magnification is genuinely useful for fine focus.
The v/finder LCD display is not visible with Super A etc.
So there you have it.
Kind
The word photograph suggests to me a picture (image!) made via a
light-sensitive process. Film is light sensitive. CCDs are light
sensitive, but are the phosphors on a monitor? They glow because of
non-visible radiation, right? Printer paper certainly isn't light-sensitive
(ignoring the
- Original Message -
From: W Keith Mosier
Subject: OT: Hinky (was - Super Program/A problems)
Naw, he got Hinky from the movie The Fugitive. One of the
Marshal
Service deputies says Hinky describing the fugitive, and
Tommy Lee Jones
character asks the deputy the meaning of hinky and
Len Paris wrote:
Wow! The ink cartidges must be huge! Gallon-sized?
Nah, not /that/ big. I'd guesstimate that they're about 500mL each.
There are six individual cartridges, and they retail for about $100
Canadian per cart. If you want to make a print that's 100 feet long,
it's best to
I don't usually go for stuff like this, but this is really a bizarre
coincidence.
--Mike
The first plane to hit the WTC was Flight Q33NY
1. Open up WORD, as if beginning a new document...
2. Type, using capital letters, Q33NY...
3. Highlight it...
4. Enlarge the font size to 48...
5.
Thanks, to those who responded to my question about the digital image to
transparency situation. Several good suggestions. Out local high quality
digital lab doesn't offer the service because the quality is usually very
poor even with a ultra high resolution file. The tech recommended copying
Jeff wrote:
Hinky? Pooched? Wow, and I thought my Canadian was odd.
Whassamatter, doncha unnerstan it?
-Parking Lot Willie
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
I think you've been had Mike. The first flight was American Airlines
flight 11?
Norm
Mike Johnston wrote:
I don't usually go for stuff like this, but this is really a bizarre
coincidence.
--Mike
The first plane to hit the WTC was Flight Q33NY
1. Open up WORD, as if beginning a new
Theatrical motion pictures are shot on negative film. For other uses
transparency film was often used, but today is pretty much replaced by video
tape. The point I was making was that with two rapidly changing slide images one
can see a 1/10 stop difference in exposure. My point is valid! Your
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The first plane to hit the WTC was Flight Q33NY
[...]
This is:
1) Meanwhile rather old.
2) Wrong, search for 'Q33NY' and 'hoax' with your prefered search engine
or see URL:http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blwingdings.htm.
cheerio
ralf
--
Seems to me that images is a superset of
{photographs, paintings, holograms, stills from video,
photos that have been digitally manipulated, etchings,
drawings, digitally-created pictures, scenes frozen in
slowglass (okay, that doesn't exist yet), and even
see http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/wingding.htm
Christian Skofteland
System Administrator
ServerVault Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Norman Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This is too weird
I think
Shel Belinkoff quipped:
And, if I were to use finger paints to make a
picture, would that be a digital image?
Why yes, yes it would.
-- Glenn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Was the carburetor hinky, or just acting hinky?
-Rich
William Robb wrote:
I was quite surprised to hear that word used in the fugitive. I
picked the term up from a member of the Kings Crew Motorcycle
club (now a chaper of the Hell's Angels I believe) about twenty
years ago. He used
Hey, what's all this talk about images? For more than a century the
pictures we've taken with our cameras have been called photographs, or
photos. Of late, images have been used to describe or define our
pictures. When did this happen, and why? Is this some newspeak
resulting from digital
Oops, spoke too soon. I hate it when I do that:
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/wingding.htm#penn
Sorry! Carry on.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Now, if I used my LX and some Supra 400 to photograph the digital
image that I created with finger paints, I'd have a photo of a digital
image. Then, if I scanned the photograph, or the negative, would I
then have a digital image of a photograph of a digital image?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out http://www.snopes.com/
(particularly http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/wingding.htm where, at
the bottom, it says,
The last coincidence is strictly a manufactured one.
Although typing the characters Q33NY using the Wingdings
font does produce the string of images
I vaguely remember someone saying that you shouldn't use NiMH batteries.
Only Alkaline or Lithium. You get a lot of rolls out of a set of Alkalines.
I'm wondering why you feel the need for NiMH? I have been just fine with
alkalines even though I use NiMH in my AF500FTZ flash.
Bruce Dayton
Richard Klein wrote:
The word photograph suggests to me a picture (image!) made via a
light-sensitive process. Film is light sensitive. CCDs are light
sensitive, but are the phosphors on a monitor?
Oh, please, asking if the phosphors on the monitor are lights sensitive
is like asking if
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'd argue just the opposite since a photograph is painting with
light and a screen image is painting with pixels.
Why not change that to 'painting with clumps of silver' vs. 'painting
with pixels'? If there were no light involved, you wouldn't be able to
see the image
My favorite of the recent urban legends is the Nostradamus prophecy that
was actually written by a Canadian student in the early 1990s. (It's also
on snopes.com)
There are two schools of thought on Nostradamus: either (1) he had supernatural
powers which enabled him to prophesy the future with
http://24.0.232.44/cunningham/Tech/Shutter/ShutterTest.html
I'm going to do this in the next few weeks as well. Looks fun and useful.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
From Mirriam-Webster...
Main Entry: 1pho.to.graph
Pronunciation: 'fO-t-graf
Function: noun
Date: 1839
: a picture or likeness obtained by photography
Main Entry: pho.tog.ra.phy
Pronunciation: f-'ta-gr-fE
Function: noun
Date: 1839
: the art or process of producing images on a sensitized surface
Are you saying that the image files themselves are the reproductions, or
the actual image when viewed on the screeen is a reproduction? I'd argue
that the files may be reproductions of photographs, but that the screen
image is a photograph in its own right. [Chris Brogden]
The screen image
and just to round it off:
Main Entry: 1im.age
Pronunciation: 'i-mij
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French, short for imagene, from Latin
imagin-, imago; perhaps akin to Latin imitari to imitate
Date: 13th century
1 : a reproduction or imitation of the form of a person or
A while back I thought someone posted that one US store has this flash in
stock.
I haven't seen it listed at the normal places I look - BH, Adorama,
Camerawold.
Is this unit available yet? If so... where?
Thanks
MCC
- - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - -
Thanks to Nicholas and William for your explanations. Makes a little more
sense now. ;-)
Phyllis T
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
At 05:23 AM 9/25/01 -0700, you wrote:
Mark Cassino wrote:
Right on that. Traditional photography is
like trying to learn the piano without hearing
what you play. It would be like paying a piece,
sending in a tape, and a day or so later finally
hearing it. I also set and prep the
Flash is advertised at Ritz for 279..
Who makes the fastest, rectilinear, K-mount (or adaptable to K-mount)
lens in the 15mm - 21mm or so range? Who makes the fastest one for an
SLR regardless of mount? Thanks!
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the
In a message dated 9/25/2001 1:45:09 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Matthew wrote:
Mostly I don't care what term others use -- except for my irrational and
intense dislike of the half-word pic.
That one I can stand despite a certain cheese-factor when
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Hinky (was - Super Program/A problems)
William Robb wrote:
I was quite surprised to hear that word used in the fugitive. I
picked the term up
From: Doug Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:25:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I can't help but think of early Celts who
painted designs on their body with woad before going into battle.)
You mean like Seven Species of Small Furry Animals Gathered
Believe it or not...
Some years ago I saw a documentary movie about Nostradamus: one
of the prophecies (at least the interpretation of the prophecy)
stated that around the end of the XX century a NEW city should
have been destroyed by a man with a turban (or a similar
headgear)...
I still
Welcome back, John. How was the trip? Did the MZ-S perform as you'd hoped?
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:51 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Images or Photographs
From: Doug
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just left two pics in Photocritique.net
Please go and let me know what you think
Regards and thanks
Hey Albano:
Here's the first critique: I think a URL would help.
:-)
j
--
Don't be concerned about it. A lot of Nostradamus's writing, besides being
ambiguous in the extreme, has been the subjected to some exccedingly helpful
translations into other languages (with, of course, the benefit of 20/20
hindsight). Then it get passed on orally with the attendant alterations
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
. . . I no longer have any cameras or lenses so it's a moot point.
I know I've been away for a while; did I miss something?
--
John Francis . . . . . . . . . . (650) 429-4427
MyWay.com 444 Castro St. Suite 101,
Hi,
I put up three new galleries in my site.
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/911.html
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/fest.html
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/cal.html
Comments are appreciated and cherished.
I also edited out a lot of stuff from the site, and redid the way the
photos/pictures/images are
Christian Skofteland writes:
John Shaw says the he often uses a view camera to shoot landscapes because
it forces him to slow down and carefully compose before tripping the
shutter.
I find the same thing using a 6x7. I've noticed that it is just not practical in
some situations, like when
Must be that same alien intervention that caused the streaks on my recent
roll of Delta 400
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This has nothing really to do with this thread, but everything to do
with being surprised. Some time ago I developed a roll of Tri-X, and
was astounded to find the
Yeah, OK, we're not disagreeing then. The current Ansel Adams prints are
not photographs, but they are reproductions of his original photographs. He
committed them to film way back when, right? But you wouldn't get the
prints from the lab in a coffee table book; you'd get a mass-produced
There is a 14mm f/2.8 rectilinear Tamron that is excellent, but pretty
expensive. See BH and Adorama
for pricing.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Fastest Super Wide
Here you have the complete prophecies:
http://www.dreamscape.com/morgana/titan.htm#COMPROPH
HTH
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:18 PM
Subject: OT: Nostradamus (was: Re: This is
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Images or Photographs
Welcome back, John. How was the trip?
Far too short - I could easily have used another six weeks!
I didn't
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who makes the fastest, rectilinear, K-mount (or
adaptable to K-mount)
lens in the 15mm - 21mm or so range? Who makes the
fastest one for an
SLR regardless of mount? Thanks!
--
Sigma EX 20/1.8
Andreas Wirtz
-
This message is from the
Ed Matthew quipped:
In a message dated 9/25/2001 1:45:09 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Matthew wrote:
Mostly I don't care what term others use -- except for my irrational and
intense dislike of the half-word pic.
That one I can stand despite a certain
Hi William, Jeff, John, Bob, Frank...
Thanks for the answers - and the entertaining lesson in english. I will try to fix
the shutter button. I think it may have been pooched in my LowePro minitrecker,
which I use for Hillwalking, while lieing upside down in the boot of the car!
PS: My
I know that there was a loss of optical quality when the K series lenses
were replaced by the M series. Does the same apply to the 67 Takumar and SMC
Pentax lenses?
Regards,
Bob Rapp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Richard Klein wrote:
Yeah, OK, we're not disagreeing then. The current Ansel Adams prints are
not photographs, but they are reproductions of his original photographs. He
committed them to film way back when, right? But you wouldn't get the
prints from the lab in a coffee table book;
Hi,
Tuesday, September 25, 2001, 9:17:16 PM, you wrote:
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
. . . I no longer have any cameras or lenses so it's a moot point.
I know I've been away for a while; did I miss something?
Not much really. Shel has renounced Satan and all his
Bingo!
Thanks, Mark. As I was reading through Shel's original post, and subsequent
responses, I was composing a response mentally, that would have been quite
lengthy. But I think you summed up what I was gonna say in one succinct
sentence.
regards,
frank
Mark Roberts wrote:
Calling
...which reminds me, I'm having Kraft Dinner for supper tonight (ah, the life
of a bachelor!) - that's pasta too, right?
-frank
Mark Roberts wrote:
Calling photographs images is like calling spaghetti pasta. It's new
and trendy, but not inaccurate. The former term is a subset of the latter.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
...and, a slide projector emits light.
Are projected slides not photographs?
The slides are, but the projection isn't - it's a projected image.
...so, when making a print in an enlarger, the print is made from an
image projected onto the
Hi, Shel,
So, you have crayons too? I know you have a pen (a Parker, no?).
:-)
-regards,
frank
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I think it's time for my crayons and coloring book LOL
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert
Us too! Wife's working so #1 son and I are having roast beef with Kraft
MC.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...which reminds me, I'm having Kraft Dinner for supper tonight (ah, the
life
of a bachelor!) - that's pasta too, right?
-frank
Mark Roberts wrote:
Calling photographs images
Frank Theriault wrote:
...which reminds me, I'm having Kraft Dinner for supper tonight (ah, the life
of a bachelor!) - that's pasta too, right?
For all you non-Canadians, that's macaroni and cheese that comes in a box.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Thanks, Len, but 2.8 is too slow. Pentax has a 20/2.8 that's far less
expensive, albeit not as wide, but still wide enough for my needs.
Len Paris wrote:
There is a 14mm f/2.8 rectilinear Tamron that is excellent, but pretty
expensive. See BH and Adorama
for pricing.
--
Shel Belinkoff
Thanks, Andreas ...
On paper it looks OK, although it's got that dreaded autofocus. Do
you know anything more about it than what's on the Sigma web site?
There's no mention that I could find wrt size, construction, or
whether or not it contains plastic elements.
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
Who
John F. wrote:
Hello. My name is Darth Vader. I am your Father. Prepare to die.
Hey! Darth Vader meets Princess Bride is back! Hi, John.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
John F. wrote:
I know I've been away for a while; did I miss something?
We've all gone digital. To a man (and woman). No dissenters. Except Shel
naturally.
--Mike, who never* kids
*well, sometimes*
*okay, OFTEN then*
*he gets testy sometimes, too
-
This
I would think that wide open lens performance and flatness of field would be
as important at speed.
Thanks, Len, but 2.8 is too slow. Pentax has a 20/2.8 that's far less
expensive, albeit not as wide, but still wide enough for my needs.
--
Shel Belinkoff
-
This message is from the
I know that there was a loss of optical quality when the K series lenses
were replaced by the M series.
Is this a myth?
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-
This message
At 08:15 AM 9/25/01 -0500, Maris wrote:
Good point, Shel. Plus the digital camera and 35mm will each operate
uniquely and identical settings may not result in identical images anyway,
and using appropriate differing settings puts you back to square one -
taking the 35mm image alone.
This is
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 at 08:47:41 -0400, Bill Owens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Cesar scribes]...Well at least I remembered to
take the equinox picture for December.
Damn! I missed the December Pug. Number one son had me new car
shopping with him at the time. I did make October and
At 06:31 AM 9/25/01 -0700, Shel wrote:
Ahh ... I see the word learn in Mark's post, which makes your point,
although I do believe Mark is a pretty good photographer, so I
overlooked his need to learn.
We all need to keep learning, Shel :-)
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
Glenn wrote:
Ed M wrote:
Mostly I don't care what term others use -- except for my irrational and
intense dislike of the half-word pic.
It's when they spell it pict that it really bugs me.
(I can't help but think of early Celts who painted designs
on their body with woad before
Hi,
I didnt realise that NiMH batteries didnt have aslonger shelf life, i used
them in my MZ-5n and probaly got around 25rolls over 2 months or so before i
rechargged them, i recharged not because they had run out, just because i
thought they might.
After both the replies i got i probaly will
Yes, and the same alien intervention that keeps making money disappear from my
bank account only to reappear in Pentax's. Damned aliens!
BTW: I'm off to visit my parents in Georgia this weekend and plan on giving the
MZ-S a thorough workout. Full report later.
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H...
Back when I was getting brainwas- er um, a formal education in photography
(1974~) our instructor drilled us mercilessly to always say make images
and not the more common take pictures. It was an attempt to teach us
subliminal marketing. (images made must be worth more than pictures
I considered those as photographs.
I am finding here in U.S. they call it pictures.
I feel image is digital terminalogy.
From: Matamoros, Cesar A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Images or Photographs
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001
OK, I thought that you were shooting for widest, fastest, rectilinear.
There are no faster, or wider, rectilinears that I know about. I can't
afford one either. :)
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25,
Mike Johnston wrote:
We've all gone digital. To a man (and woman).
No dissenters. Except Shel naturally.
Yeah, I've taken up cave painting. There's something very rewarding
about using alder branches to apply freshly ground and mixed ochre to
the rough walls of a cave. I've had the power
- Original Message -
From: Photodane
Subject: Re: Super Program/A problems
Hi William, Jeff, John, Bob, Frank...
Thanks for the answers - and the entertaining lesson in
english.
If you can't fix it, it's toast!!
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
This is a hoax not a 'bizarre coincidence'.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:08 PM
Subject: This is too weird
I don't usually go for stuff like this, but this is really a bizarre
coincidence.
- Original Message -
From: Bob Rapp
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:39 PM
Subject: 67 Lenses
I know that there was a loss of optical quality when the K
series lenses
were replaced by the M series. Does the same apply to the 67
Takumar and SMC
Pentax lenses?
No. Except for
Kinda slams the door in the face of anyone not using ~your~ preferred
method, eh?
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 24 September 2001 11:04 PM
Subject: RE: lens brightness
Unless you set the aperture
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that there was a loss of optical quality when the K series lenses
were replaced by the M series.
Is this a myth?
I can say that the K28/3.5 is better than the M28/2.8.
Yes, but the M28/3.5 is superb. Is it different from the K?
I just gotta move to Canada! :)
Collin
Aaron asked:
Did he beat you up or loan you his woman afterwards? ;)
He bought me a beer and introduced me to his sister.
William Robb
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
This message is from the
- Original Message -
From: Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: 67 Lenses
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that there was a loss of optical quality when the
K series lenses
were replaced
I suppose everybody's seen this, but in case you haven't, big news: Canon
has just released its latest version of the full-dress pro EOS-1...
The EOS-1D digital.
Stand back! It's also got a new 16-35mm, which corresponds to a 21-45mm on
35mm.
Check out the preview on dpreview.com . Awesome
Hi,
Just went to my local Cash Convertors (chain of pawn shops) and they had a
Spotmatic SP with a Super Tak 50/1.4 all for the princely sum of $45au
($25us). The body is in pretty good shape, with no dings or dints and the
lense has no signs of yellowing.
Quite a productive lunch break :)
The lens is actually a 16-35mm on a 35mm camera, but it has an angle of view
equivalent to a 21-45mm lens on the EOS-1D.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:03 PM
Subject: UBERdigicam
I suppose
The Uberdigicam (Canon EOS-1D) will shoot 16 pictures (RAW mode) or 21
pictures (JPEG mode) at 8 fps. It will also record RAW and JPEG files
_simultaneously_. Its ISO equivalents are 200-1600, with 100 and 3200
available as custom settings. The flash sync is 1/500th. The new 16-35 has a
rubber
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I'm overwhelmed with chores before I leave next tuesday If
anyone wants to contact me between now and my return to NY at
the end of November please do two things Make sure you are
replying to me and not the list (in case there are some folk
wanting to comment on something
Any price on it?
Regards,
Paul Jones
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:26 PM
Subject: UBERdigicam
The Uberdigicam (Canon EOS-1D) will shoot 16 pictures (RAW mode) or 21
pictures (JPEG mode) at 8 fps.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Paul Jones wrote:
Any price on it?
IIRC, the suggested retail price was around $7000 US, but my Canon rep
said that he expects it to sell for roughly $7000 CAN, give or take a fair
bit. :)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Camera 7K US
Lens 2K US
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: UBERdigicam
Any price on it?
Regards,
Paul Jones
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A very interesting comment, Mark, and one I don't understand.
First, how can you prep a shot with one camera and then make a
second keeper with anything but a static subject. IOW, if you're
shooting a living, breathing entity, the second shot will not be the
same as
99 matches
Mail list logo
