You wrote:
It's big for a PS; not pocketable or anything like that but a bit smaller
than a ZX-5n with a lens. However the very fact that it's on the big side makes
it very comfortable to hold. It's extremely easy to use.
Thanks for putting size into relative terms that I can understand. I, too,
Hi,
Jostein wrote:
(I was going to
say stick men but that would certainly not be true in my
case.)
hehe...
we'll reserve that one for Cotty and Rob, Won't we...
Rob maybe, but Cotty says that he's big... =8-O
mike
Hi,
I endorse all of ERN's comments. If you can cope with the PS
methodology of photography and can live with having little input
to the process other than framing and choice of lighting, it is
at least as good as others in the arena. Wearing glasses, I
find the veiwfinder no worse than others.
I think we may be at crossed purposes here. I was not talking about the
new f1.8(?) big jobbie, but the old and long discontinued f2.8 version.
From your comment about the 'expensive-looking finish' I guess your
comments relate to the new EX DG lens.
Not that I would denigrate your comments
For those curious about the RMC Tokina 400mm F5.6
lens, here's a sample image I shot a coupla days ago:
http://jcoconnell.com/temp/bird012703.jpg
Looks pretty good to my eye. Not bad
for a lens which cost me only $125
This lens has one big advantage over
the also excellent SMCT 400, it's
Not true. These cameras also appeal to new users who don't already have
any lenses. Every day thousands of people move up from PS or buy an
SLR as they discover photography for the first time. Appeal outside
existing user base has to be a long term goal, you need to go for new
users - not those
- Digital SLR-
Q: When will PENTAX launch the new digital SLR in next spring?
A: We will release all the information including
launching periods next spring ( April 03).
Q: Are the current PENTAX lenses compatible with the new SLR?
A: Yes they are. The new SLR shares the same mount
In the initial review of the PZ-1, Pop Photo described the MTF
program and it did seem to work -- at least they described it as an
aperture priority mode with safety shifts. They dispelled early
rumors that the MTF program mode somehow analyzed the lens and
scene for the best quality; the
One possibility for the upcoming show is that there may be a new FILM body
from Pentax. Pal keeps hoping for an AF LX, and it's also possible that
there may be a new budget/serious camera one tier below the MZ-S (which I
can't afford).
So I've been trying to think about FA lens outfits recently.
I purchased this lens from KEH just a month or two ago, but because
of other purchases I've made since, I can't really afford to keep it
(and I have an SMC-M 35/2). It is indeed in excellent condition
(conservatively graded by KEH, as usual -- it could probably be
called EX+). I think I paid
I love this Leica, but I don't use it enough and I don't want to eBay
it. If there's any serious interest, please contact me off list. It's
a beautiful camera with only a few marks. The lens is gorgeous, and
was completely overhauled a couple of years ago by Sherry Krauter,
the Leica
The other thing I am extremely interested in is the new lens additions.
We should see specs for these at least...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It might be worth mentioning that the coming announcement we
are all waiting for with bated breath
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks. In PS6 who can suggest the best way to
acheive the effect of fading
the edges of the photo.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
Peter
There should be an action called viginette (spl?)
included with PS. If you can't find your copy I can
email it to
Thanks Paul.
I had a long think at lunch about what i had set the
ap. at.I think i was doubting the f22 and set somewere in
the f 11 range,with a couple at f 8 and f 5.6.
Darkroom class # 2 startes to night and it will be one
of the first rolls developed tonight.(I only have 10 stock piledg)
I'll
I read somewhere just this week about a DIY replacement for a motor drive
nicad pack. Can someone repost that link?
Also are new nicad packs available? If so anyone know the cost?
I think I found a good deal on a motor needing batteries.
Jeff *\\
Kudzu's Gallery www.kudzupatch.com/gallery
Mike would you consider this combo:
FA 24/2
FA 50/1.4 (no substitute for speed)
and an 1.7 AF teleconvertor for portraits.
Evan
Mike Johnston kindly wrote:
One possibility for the upcoming show is that there may be a new FILM body
from Pentax. Pal keeps hoping for an AF LX, and it's also
Bob wrote:
OK, folks. Who do you know out there on the web successfully selling
photographic prints? I can think of a couple interesting ones --
davebeckerman.com and danheller.com come to mind (besides, ahem, my own, of
course
Check out Bob Orsillo's site;
http://www.orsillo.com
Though he's
The marketplce right now is just like the CPU marketplace a few years ago.
AMD hits 200MHz; Intel, 250; AMD 350; Intel, 500, ad infinitum.
1. Currently Nikon is (it appears) the sales leader in 6Mp cameras.
They're pretty much all pro units, with the 5000 series being for the pro
shooter
not
I think the first thing you need to do is answer whether or not you want
a 'cropped' DSLR to put the lenses on too.
IF you get one of these then your 85 becomes a 130, your 50 becomes a 75
and your 35 becomes a 50. You have no wide angle anymore on this body.
So if you have a DSLR in your future
Nice enough shot. I've found that birds in Florida to be
a bit camera shy, having people chase them with blunderbuss
sized lenses wouldn't have something to do with it...
At 04:48 AM 1/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
For those curious about the RMC Tokina 400mm F5.6
lens, here's a sample image I
Mike,
If I were going with a 2 lens kit, the 43/1.9 and 77/1.8 Limiteds
would do a great job. The 43 is halfway between the 35 and your
beloved 50 and is a great lens in it's own right.
As for me, I went with the 35/50/85 route. The 43/50 is just not wide
enough sometimes and the 85 is one
But part of the fun of the Holga is that it's just so awful.
At 08:50 AM 1/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I just got done developing printing some snow shots from my
Rolfix folder camera. Scneider Radionar 105 lens, 6x6 or 6x9 format.
The results came out very nice. Shooting in 6x6 mode it's
Cheers guys.
From someone who should not really be allowed to play with toys he does not
understandg
Peter
I had read that the Super-Takumar on screw mount 1.8/55 and 2/55 were
made of it identical; I received this morning my 2me purchase on e-bay,
a Pentax SV with this famous Super-Takumar 2/55.
And in fact, one sees well inside before the diaphragm the ring to make
one under-model of it!!
You can se
I have not found teleconverters very good - it is a good idea but quality usually
suffers - long teles the exception.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Evan Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja:
on 29.01.03 15:34, Mike Johnston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One possibility for the upcoming show is that there may be a new FILM body
from Pentax. Pal keeps hoping for an AF LX, and it's also possible that
there may be a new budget/serious camera one tier below the MZ-S (which I
can't
In the initial review of the PZ-1, Pop Photo described the MTF program
and it did seem to work -- at least they described it as an aperture
priority mode with safety shifts. They dispelled early rumors that the
MTF program mode somehow analyzed the lens and scene for the best
quality; the
Mike wrote:
MJ It might be worth mentioning that the coming announcement we are all waiting
MJ for with bated breath may be somewhat frustrating to us. It's possible that
MJ Pentax will show a prototype under glass at PMA, but will remain very close
MJ to the vest about specifics.
MJ The reason
I've never been able to get my 9-year-old son interested in photographing
with his Spotmatic (actually, after four years of disuse--I gave it to him
when he was 5--I sold it), but he loves to take my digital camera and go
fill up a card. He's not attached to the pictures at all; he looks at them
At home we've always had PCs running Windows. I used to work in a newsroom
full of Macs. The PCs at home gave trouble from time to time, the Macs at
work
gave trouble from time to time, and in that entire three-year period I found
neither platform to be more reliable than the other. But I have
Mike,
I couldn't decide what I wanted so I started with the 50/1.4 and when that
one didn't fit the shoe I got the 35/2.0, for me the perfect (almost)
standard lens. Now I needed o wideangle and picked up the 24/2.0. What
about a portrait lens, I found a nice 100mm macro here at PDML and I
Which F lenses have MTF info encoded?
thanks
Paul
The MTF information is coded into the lens chips of FA lenses, and a few of
the F lenses. The PZ-1, PZ-1p, and MZ-S bodies read this information from
the lens. There is no analysis of scenes. I have used mtf mode on my 1p
often.
Joe
I read somewhere just this week about a DIY replacement for a motor drive
nicad pack. Can someone repost that link?
Also are new nicad packs available? If so anyone know the cost?
I just ordered 36 batteries to refurbish 3 power packs. They are
Ni-MH batteries, so don't have any memory effect
Hi Jeff,
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
navigate accordingly. I bought the cells from:
http://www.mrnicd-ehyostco.com/newpage3.htm
Very do-able, and very satisfying knowing the job is done. Cost me fifty
bucks in parts. Good luck.
Cotty
Yeah - they may have to, but will they?
-Original Message-
From: Alin Flaider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Well, they showed a prototype of MZ-SD two years ago, boosted the
loyalists here and everywhere, and then dumped them. This time
they'll have to do better than that.
I think the first thing you need to do is answer whether or not you want
a 'cropped' DSLR to put the lenses on too.
IF you get one of these then your 85 becomes a 130, your 50 becomes a 75
and your 35 becomes a 50. You have no wide angle anymore on this body.
So if you have a DSLR in your future
Hi!
Bruce, without disrespect, the aesthetical qualities of the snaps your
daughters shot with their DPS - how good are they?
Don't misunderstand me, I am not against Digital. However, I think
that instant feedback will have some kind of negative impact of, how to
put it, uninspired perhaps,
Pat asked:
BTW, does the flash on the 90-WR have the
usual evil red eye issues? g
I would assume it has the usual issues because it is, of course, a built-in
flash on a relatively compact camera. The flash can be turned off quite easily
(also can be combined with ambient light, by the way)
(My comment top-posted due to length of context)
One reason my 90WR doesn't get out much any more is that I now own an LX!
Cesar posted:
S, don't let Pentax know - I regularly take my LX and the MZ-S out in
the rain...
Once while photographing in Union Square in NYC, it was
Hi!
Something unusual happened to my latest submission to PhotoSIG. During
two days more than 150 people saw the picture (which is a lot to my
level) but only one of them said a word.
Here is the link:
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=660866
I'd like to know what do you think of it.
Hi!
Darn, I am not living in States. In Israel it is plain impossible.
Consumer is almost always wrong here...
Say, I've just recently sent a fax to the phone company. Unfortunately
we have only one phone company in Israel. Now, one month later they
did not do what they were asked to. So I
Rule #1: NEVER help a friend with their computer setup unless you have a
lot of time you don't mind wasting or don't mind losing them as a
friend.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
A family friend was having trouble with her iMac. I had to
set up a new
OK, lets try and narrow down the dates for this. Would it be
preferable, or make any difference, to do this during term time when
families with kiddies arent on holiday? If so then I guess we are
looking at June. Personally I cant do the weekends of the 14th or 21st.
For the sake of making a
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Something unusual happened to my latest submission to PhotoSIG. During
two days more than 150 people saw the picture (which is a lot to my
level) but only one of them said a word.
Here is the link:
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=660866
I'd
Shalom Boris,
I love scenes with misty or foggy rolling hills.
Your image has a distracting foreground. Maybe a longer lens would have
compressed it more for my liking.
Jeff.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Something unusual happened to my latest submission to PhotoSIG. During
two days more than
Cotty:
Well, before I set aside joking it must be said -- After your post we'll see
whether there's a Mac police or not ...
I agree with you. Thanks for coming out and admitting that Macs are machines
and therefore can break down just like ordinary mortals' PCs do.
For nearly a year I've been
Is it BW film? If you're not real concerned about grain, why don't you
push it one stop? That would probably make your f8 and f11 exposures
quite good. The f16 and f5.6 might be okay as well.
Paul
David Brooks wrote:
Thanks Paul.
I had a long think at lunch about what i had set the
ap. at.I
Mike wrote:
It's quite possible we may soon see the shape of the Pentax future, but in
its outlines only.
Yes, and lets remember that Pentax never said it would be ready for PMA (that was just
an assumption that has somehow become a fact) but shown in spring (where I live spring
starts the
Mike wrote:
One possibility for the upcoming show is that there may be a new FILM body
from Pentax. Pal keeps hoping for an AF LX, and it's also possible that
there may be a new budget/serious camera one tier below the MZ-S (which I
can't afford).
I'm not convinced the LX with AF will
The information that the Sf-10 two segment meter used
distance information for exposure evaluation is from
the sales brochure. It was also confirmed by a Pentax
employee I talked with (I have no experience with the
Sf-10).
Alexander
It had access to distance information. No
For my part, for snap-shooting a 85mm and 35mmm/2 two
lens outfit works great.
Besides, I understand that you prefer the
characteristics of the 50/1.4 (or 50/1.2) over that
of the 43/1.9 ltd. So I am almost sure you will like
the FA* 85/1.4 (more than the 77mm).
Enjoy,
Alexander
Mike Johnston
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
I'm not convinced the LX with AF will materialise at all ever.
However, my understanding is that there is a film sibling to the
digital slr. My impression is that this is a mid-line body perhaps
replacing the MZ-5n.
I've said it before: A
The 24/2 FA* is one sweet lens.
The money only hurts for a while.
--
Bob Keefer
Keefer Photography
www.bkpix.com
I mixed 5 gallons of the stuff, can't throw it away
now can I, I'll stop when it's done, about 3 gallons
to go.
--- Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't
use the hardner!
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
agfa 100 isn't to grainy, I just hate the
Hi,
It may be a generational thing with me, too. I took my first computer class
in art school at age 26, using 128k Macs. I was at Dartmouth when John
[...]
Little did I know, then, that someday the ancient
darkroom alchemy that I also enjoyed learning about would one day be
transported to
I missed the first half of this thread, but I was intending on building a
35mm system of the FA28/2.8, FA50/1.4 and FA105/2.8 macro eventually
combined with a 1.4x teleconverter.
(now, however, I've changed my plan... 645 A35/2.8, A75/2.8, A150/3.5 with
a 645-K adapter and an A50/1.4 will be a
On 29 Jan 2003 at 11:58, Andre Langevin wrote:
I read somewhere just this week about a DIY replacement for a motor drive
nicad pack. Can someone repost that link?
Also are new nicad packs available? If so anyone know the cost?
I just ordered 36 batteries to refurbish 3 power packs. They
I just ordered 36 batteries to refurbish 3 power packs. They are Ni-MH
batteries, so don't have any memory effect and give power for a longer
period of time when charged. I could probably do the job myself following
this how-do
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/lxnicdpack.html
but I've
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Alan Chan wrote:
Do NiMH require different charger from NiCad?
AFAIK, you can charge NiCads in a NiMH charger, but not the other way
around.
chris
Q: What kind of wide-angle lens will be prepared?
A: We are planning to introduce wide-angle zoom. Details
will be announced later.
Perhaps it's just me. But for as long as it's not full frame, I won't be
considering it.
regards,
Alan Chan
I've always preferred optical lenses on my cameras. Call me old
fashioned...
-frank
Mark Roberts wrote:
Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anyone check out the web page?
http://www.holgamods.com/index.html
I notice that the Holga uses the same optical lens that Juan Buhler
used
Which F lenses have MTF info encoded?
Not the F*300/4.5 for certain. It acts like 'A' lenses only.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
On 29 Jan 2003 at 13:47, Alan Chan wrote:
Do NiMH require different charger from NiCad?
Just an extension of charge time proportional to the increase in capacity over
the original cells. Of course old or new cells would benefit from a custom
intelligent charger but I've never been bothered
yup, but most can switch between them.
--- Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just
ordered 36 batteries to refurbish 3 power
packs. They are Ni-MH
batteries, so don't have any memory effect and give
power for a longer
period of time when charged. I could probably do
the job myself
I've bought a Compaq notebook running XP. And you know what? (Apple ad
quote) Everything those earnest-looking people standing in front of a white
background say in the Apple TV spots about their Macs also applies to my
notebook. It works like a dream.
Hi Eleanor,
Yeah, I think lots of
I just ordered 36 batteries to refurbish 3 power packs. They are
Ni-MH batteries, so don't have any memory effect and give power for
a longer period of time when charged. I could probably do the job
myself following this how-do
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/lxnicdpack.html
but I've
Yes, and lets remember that Pentax never said it would be ready for PMA
(that was just an assumption that has somehow become a fact) but shown in
spring (where I live spring starts the first of May).
Where I live, Spring starts when it is sprung.
:-)
Cotty
Hi, Jeff,
I like the foreground. It contrasts nicely against the layers of hills as
they gradually fade into the haze.
Hi, Boris,
I guess I'll damn with faint praise. It's a pretty picture: it would
make a nice postcard or calendar. As I said above, I like the strong
foreground, and the
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Something unusual happened to my latest submission to PhotoSIG. During
two days more than 150 people saw the picture (which is a lot to my
level) but only one of them said a word.
Here is the link:
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=660866
I'd like to
Rob Brigham wrote:
I think we may be at crossed purposes here. I was not
talking about the
new f1.8(?) big jobbie, but the old and long discontinued
f2.8 version.
From your comment about the 'expensive-looking finish' I
guess your
comments relate to the new EX DG lens.
snip
Sorry Rob,
I
I think all us Toronto boys are dealing with this off-list, but ~just in case~
there are any other folks from this area lurking, who want to get in on the fun, it
looks like we're going to head out to Oakville before (and maybe instead of - who
knows?) Chinatown, and make Aaron's life miserable
It will be hard to find one week-end that fits all. I suggest you pick
the time window that suits the largest number of people.
For my part, everything is free yet except 5th to 9th June.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi John,
What features do the Sigma EX lenses not support on the Nikon AFD and Canon
EF mounts?
I don't know if there are
any issues with Pentax bodies (do they even make these
lenses in Pentax AF mount?) but they won't provide all the
functions that a Nikon AFD lens has, nor a Canon EF.
Mike wrote:
One possibility for the upcoming show is that there may be a new FILM body
from Pentax. Pal keeps hoping for an AF LX, and it's also possible that
there may be a new budget/serious camera one tier below the MZ-S (which I
can't afford).
I'm not convinced the LX with AF
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just posted three photos of the five versions. In each case,
the order, from left to right, is -
1. VS1 70-210/3.5 V1
2. VS1 70-210/3.5 V2
3. VS1 70-210/2.8-4 V1
4. VS1 70-210/2.8-4 V2
5. VS1 70-210/2.8-4 QDOS
Hi, Ann,
Thanks for mentioning the distraction of the image overlapping the text - I'd
meant to mention that, as it does the same for me, but I forgot.
I've only gone to PhotoSIG a few times, and it's done that every time for me.
I use Netscrape, FWIW. It really bugs me, because I'd like to be
On 29 Jan 2003 at 11:58, Andre Langevin wrote:
I read somewhere just this week about a DIY replacement for a motor drive
nicad pack. Can someone repost that link?
Also are new nicad packs available? If so anyone know the cost?
I just ordered 36 batteries to refurbish 3 power packs. They
out of need I parted with the 5n.
Bummer.
Now I have no body. (just don't look @ my gut. please. You'll be better
for it. I promise.)
Anyway, I need something.
Preferably mechanical cheap.
I've also got an A50/1.7 for anyone wanting/needing one.
Collin
Hi,
Computers by their nature are so very complicated things
well, yes and no. g
---
Bob
Discrete Mathematics
Ah yes. This is when I'm in the checkout at Waitrose and trying
desperately to add up my purchases, my writhing digits - hidden inside a
pocket - propelled to full length, each in turn, then alternately coiled
with knuckles whitened as I invariably arrive at the figure of
Hi Mike,
I haven't read any of the replys you got, so maybe you'll hear it a
thousandth time, but what the hell.
My dream kit would be 24/28 + 50/1.4 + 77/85. I'm not sure if the 24
wouldn't be too wide for me, but then again - I rarely use wide angle, so I
might as well go really wide.
The
Thanks for posting those Fred. I just read the
third-party lens page section on this les/lenses
(http://medfmt.8k.com/third/cult.html#vivitar)
Makes me glad I haven't sold my VS1 72-210
Which version do you have, Mark?
Robert Monaghan's site seems to emphasize the first three versions
I've
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for posting those Fred. I just read the
third-party lens page section on this les/lenses
(http://medfmt.8k.com/third/cult.html#vivitar)
Makes me glad I haven't sold my VS1 72-210
Which version do you have, Mark?
Robert Monaghan's site seems to emphasize
Dear Tom,
Ha, Ha, Ha,
But seriously I saw it as a valid comment on a way to make money in
photography. I often get asked would I consider shooting a wedding. No way
in hell, I don't need the money or the aggravation that badly.
Thank You,
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: tom
It's a Holga, are we sure it isn't optional lens...
At 04:51 PM 1/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I've always preferred optical lenses on my cameras. Call me old
fashioned...
-frank
Mark Roberts wrote:
Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anyone check out the web page?
I think that for many who love the old cameras and lenses that's a given.
At 01:53 PM 1/29/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Q: What kind of wide-angle lens will be prepared?
A: We are planning to introduce wide-angle zoom. Details
will be announced later.
Perhaps it's just me. But for as long as it's
Boris,
A wise health therapist in the area was once asked What is the best
exercise? His reply showed great wisdom The one that you'll
actually do.
Thus it is with my daughters taking pictures. With the SLR's (bigger
cameras), I would have to take them out to shoot. With the small PS,
they
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Dear Tom,
Ha, Ha, Ha,
But seriously I saw it as a valid comment on a way to make money in
photography.
I didn't say it was invalid, but the answer to the question How do
you make money in photography? isn't often
Mike - I have a few suggestions.
Kit # 1: FA24/2, 43, 85/1.4. On the one hand, disadvantages are that the 43
is a slightly different newer era, but I don't have any direct experience
with it. For consistency, substitute an FA50/1.4 instead. On the other hand,
advantage is that these are all
Hi all. I'm in the market for an LX. Currently have
a Super Program an MX. Thinking about selling both
to acquire the LX, and I have a few questions for
current LX owners.
Have I read something about the LX having some kind of
on board circutry, or computer, that helps with
exposure? Is
Fred - I have an A version of your #3 - i.e., a VS 1 P/K-A R-P/K
70-210/2.8-4.0
As you described for the K version: no change in length when zooming, moving
the zoom collar out takes you from 210 to 70.
Other details: 62mm filter ring, macro focusing available at the 210 end of
things, just
Pål wrote:
I'm not convinced the LX with AF will materialise
at all ever. However, my understanding is that there
is a film sibling to the digital slr. My impression
is that this is a mid-line body perhaps replacing
the MZ-5n.
OK so what about this Flagship you have been telling
us
Me, too. Netscape Communicator 4.79.
Sad. I'd like to know what lies behind the photo!
keith whaley...
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Ann,
Thanks for mentioning the distraction of the image overlapping the text - I'd
meant to mention that, as it does the same for me, but I forgot.
I've
I am simplifying and consolidating. I haven't worked out minimum-price, etc.
on all of the following, but am slowly working toward an eBay listing this
weekend for most of the following. Some I am not quite ready to throw to the
wolves on eBay (in part because I am not sure what the approximate
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:51:32 -0600 (CST), Chris Brogden wrote:
Do NiMH require different charger from NiCad?
AFAIK, you can charge NiCads in a NiMH charger, but not the other way
around.
That's probably true if it's a peak detecting fast charger. These
chargers detect that the battery is
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty:
Well, before I set aside joking it must be said -- After your post
we'll see
whether there's a Mac police or not ...
I agree with you. Thanks for coming out and admitting that Macs are
machines
and therefore can
Below...
Regards,
Bob
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy!
- Benjamin Franklin
- Original Message -
From: Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I really like the photo, Boris. I love the soft colors, and the way you
cropped it makes it look like a panoramic shot. I also like the rays
shining through the clouds on the right of the picture. I feel it is a very
peaceful scene, and I like it a lot.
Kathy
- Original Message -
From:
About the quality of your results will an LX be better?
In a word no.
Ok, now for the only real exposure difference. The LX
measures the exposure while you're taking the photograph.
For most practical purposes this is meaningless for shutter
speeds above 1/60th of a second. For longer shutter
The 24 f2.8 K is very nice and only a stop slower.
At 09:29 PM 1/29/2003 -0600, you wrote:
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 08:34 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
What would you recommend? Keep in mind I want an _optimum_ 2- or 3-lens FA
kit for my uses, not something that will just get me by.
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
