The first guy is Offenbach early because he forgot his Chopin Liszt.
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/05 Mon PM 04:30:48 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Funny Signs
I wish I had photos of them, however:
Not new, but a good collection of good oldies:
A few
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/06 Tue AM 03:14:26 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Cutter
I had a hour or so in the evening on two days of my
Seattle meeting to do some shooting (as well as an
afternoon before the meeting started). On the
Thanks for some very interesting information
Rod
-Original Message-
From: David Bliss
Hi All,
Thought this document I just (finally) received from Pentax North America
might be useful to some of you:
http://dbsi.org/dist/pentax-k10d-parts-list-and-exploded-diagram.tif
Thanks,
david
Pretty pic. If you don't like the hikers, terminate them. A dab of
the cloning tool should do it.
Paul
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took this when I was working on my class project, and running
around
looking for trees on hills and on the sky line in late day
Congratulations, Boris. You might have a career as a New York runway
model! :-))
Paul
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Beats me how anyone 5'9 can be a size 4. Let alone... those
models have to
starve themselves.
Agree with Ann the second is too busy. Also the
I love the bright yellow on the dark background, and personally, I
like the small plane of focus. Somehow it works for me :) Beautiful
rg2
On 11/5/07, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it. Yes, vivid contrast. Frame it and put it on yer wall.
Weren't we preceeding such posts with
I use this:
http://www.armandocaro.net/software/
It's pretty slick in that all you have to do is run it in a
directory of photos, and it'll generate everything more or less
automatically. Also, it makes flat HTML files, rather than automated php,
database, etc, etc really
Rick Womer wrote:
I had a hour or so in the evening on two days of my
Seattle meeting to do some shooting (as well as an
afternoon before the meeting started). On the last
evening, I started walking along the waterfront before
sunset, and finished at dusk. This was one of the
last pix I
Paul, I might have HAD such a career. I gained 15 kilos since that
time. Though I think male models need to be less skinny than female
ones...
On Nov 6, 2007 1:03 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations, Boris. You might have a career as a New York runway
model! :-))
Paul
One of the guys at the red bull race had a 70-200 f2.8 with him (nice
lens BTW) I had a look at the collar. It is indeed too large. Oh
well.
Thanks for looking guy's.
Cheers,
Dave
On 11/4/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
I have the EF70-200 2.8 L IS and it has a
Thanks Brian.
I just wish she would have got her hands away from her face. I spent
quite a bit of time observing her (waiting for the right moment of
course) and that was the best I could get before she disappeared in
the crowd.
Cheers,
Dave
On 11/6/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The crowd shots are my faves too. It was good fun I'm inclined to go
again next year.
Thanks for looking.
Cheers,
Dave
On 11/6/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good shots! Everything is sharp, and the shutter
speed is still low enough to blur the props. The
crowd shots are
On 11/6/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a rough first pass selection of my shots from the day (17
images):
http://picasaweb.google.com.au/OzSavage/RedBullAirRace2007?
authkey=Y4DihhF6Auk
Never having shot motor sport of any description, I was pleased
with what I got.
Very nice, Rick!
G
Rick Womer wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6606532size=lg
K10D, FA 16-45, ISO 1600, f/4 at 1/3 sec handheld
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These guys came along hiking and ruined my shot. Placement isn't perfect but
that is where they stopped, and I was focused on the tree and the hill. :-)
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/romantic2.htm
Pretty shot, but the hikers don't really play a
Thanks Brendan.
I originally got the 10-17 for doing panoramas, I didn't take it out
with me unless that was my intent. Recently however I've been using it
more in different situations I'm liking the results.
Cheers,
Dave
On 11/6/07, Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fun stuff, Dave.
Slideshowpro and SlideShowPro director.
Director is a php / mysql based photo manager. Director generates the
content (large images and thumbnails on demand). Slideshowpro is the
flash client. See http://slideshowpro.net
I'm using it on my site http://www.repiuk.nl. It's (allmost) perfect.
Toine
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1101072ad1.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Mike,
Don't give away my secrets!
This is the full frame. I tried cropping out the
reflections (in the camera and in Lightroom), and it
became just a picture of a boat. There actually
wasn't much more reflection to include, but when I
included it the wider angle took in distracting
illuminated
Thanks, Godfrey!
I gave the 28/2.8 a fair amount of use, btw; maybe
some of those pix will be good enough to post anon.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice, Rick!
G
Rick Womer wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6606532size=lg
K10D, FA 16-45, ISO
Thanks, Adam!
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Womer wrote:
I had a hour or so in the evening on two days of
my
Seattle meeting to do some shooting (as well as an
afternoon before the meeting started). On the
last
evening, I started walking along the waterfront
before
I disagree; I think they add scale.
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These guys came along hiking and ruined my shot.
Placement isn't perfect but
that is where they stopped, and I was focused on
the tree and the hill. :-)
I look forward to seeing what you've done with it. :-)
Godfrey
On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Godfrey!
I gave the 28/2.8 a fair amount of use, btw; maybe
some of those pix will be good enough to post anon.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very
In a message dated 11/5/2007 10:04:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/romantic2.htm
And think: with one dab of the cloning tool, they would disappear.
Ah, murderess of love! ];-)
It's nice shot, with or without the
If you blow them up to pixel size they also appear to be half naked,
Marnie for shame ;-)
Rick Womer wrote:
I disagree; I think they add scale.
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These guys came along hiking and ruined my shot.
Huh huh ?? !@@ ??
What'd I miss ?
]'-)
G
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:26 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
If you blow them up to pixel size they also appear to be half naked,
Marnie for shame ;-)
Rick Womer wrote:
I disagree; I think they add scale.
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JAlbum is pretty easy to learn and use, but because of all options and
skins it takes some time to figure out your preferred settings.
Henk
www.dewindvanvoorne.nl/fotoalbum
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bran Everseeking
Sent: 06
mike wilson wrote:
The first guy is Offenbach early because he forgot his Chopin Liszt.
oy.
dan -
I like these even though most of them are _ intentionally _ funny
ann
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/05 Mon PM 04:30:48 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Funny
Doug Franklin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These guys came along hiking and ruined my shot. Placement isn't perfect but
that is where they stopped, and I was focused on the tree and the hill. :-)
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/romantic2.htm
Pretty shot, but the
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1101072ad1.html
make 'em pay, baby - that's really revolting
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
I like what I see exactly the way it is. So, please don't use any tools
except may be whatever you use in order to hang a big print.
I do wish that the pair of humans ;-) were a bit bigger but nonetheless
I find this rather ironic and lovely composition.
Boris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Nicely done though...
...
I know I didn't get the best shots - my auto focus messed me up a couple
of times and my unsteadiness did as well.
But it was such fun... I hadn't been out shooting for a while.
anyway ---
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2564371/1/217347394/Large
Marvelously timeless... You've done it, Sir William ;-).
Boris
William Robb wrote:
A while back, the railroad company decided to ressurect a steam locomotive
for some reason. Anyway, it did a cross country tour and passed through a
city near me.
I decided that an old train needed an old
On 06/11/07, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1101072ad1.html
he should have used a Canon lens to get a sharper shot ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 06/11/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
make 'em pay, baby - that's really revolting
I agree - the camera shake is disgraceful!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I also really like this one. It shows a lot of personality -- or
seems to do so at least.
Dan
On 10/16/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now this one I like, but I couldn't exactly tell you why.
frank theriault wrote:
Today seems to be profile day. ;-)
Toronto bike messenger
He's fortunate Sharapova didn't catch him at it. She could send his
head into the next county with that backhand.
Dan
On 11/6/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1101072ad1.html
make 'em pay, baby - that's
In a message dated 11/6/2007 9:10:55 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like what I see exactly the way it is. So, please don't use any tools
except may be whatever you use in order to hang a big print.
I do wish that the pair of humans ;-) were a bit bigger but
In a message dated 11/5/2007 7:25:50 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had a hour or so in the evening on two days of my
Seattle meeting to do some shooting (as well as an
afternoon before the meeting started). On the last
evening, I started walking along the waterfront
That's terrific :)
Jack Davis wrote:
Timely bit of nature which appears to portend an upcoming event..in
much of the world.
Shot as a lark only, but comments welcome!
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=255
K10D, FA 80~320 (@ 240), ISO 200, 1/3000 @ f/8.0
Timely bit of nature which appears to portend an upcoming event..in
much of the world.
Shot as a lark only, but comments welcome!
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=255
K10D, FA 80~320 (@ 240), ISO 200, 1/3000 @ f/8.0
__
In a message dated 11/5/2007 8:21:55 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G'day All,
As the subject says, the RBAR was in town I met up with some local
snappers headed down to check it out:
Here is a rough first pass selection of my shots from the day (17 images):
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO: Steam Power
Marvelously timeless... You've done it, Sir William ;-).
Thanks Boris!!
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
In a message dated 11/5/2007 11:20:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A while back, the railroad company decided to ressurect a steam locomotive
for some reason. Anyway, it did a cross country tour and passed through a
city near me.
I decided that an old train needed
Interesting. Similar shots can be taken on the court at a match and there's
nothing one can do about it.
Yes, the lawsuit is brought by Steve Biegel who charges that the firm's CEO,
Toyo Shigeta, took and distributed the photograph(s) and unfairly fired him
over the incident. Maria Sharapova
I really like this one:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1038message=25509831
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Continuing apace with more work from recent sessions ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46.htm
Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. Keys a plus.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Very observant of you :-). I would have walked right past it. Nicely executed
as well. I used to have Sweet Gums when I lived in Jersey. Great fall color.
They're not hardy here in Michigan. I believe you Californians call them Liquid
Amber. I think the real name is Liquidumbar.
Paul
In a message dated 11/6/2007 10:54:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Timely bit of nature which appears to portend an upcoming event..in
much of the world.
Shot as a lark only, but comments welcome!
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=255
Hey, gang! Gots another darkroom question. While my own darkroom is in
the works (and progressing most slowly) I've decided to start using a
public darkroom about 20 miles from home. Current plans are to continue
developing negatives at home, and only bring what I intend to print to
the
I always have a problem with shots like this, in liking them, and in
shooting them myself. While the eye is attracted to contrasts in shape,
color, and texture, the image often fails to have the impact or convey the
real beauty of what was seen. Maybe it's just hard to capture the 3D reality
in an
That's okay with fiber based paper. Resin coated paper can't be washed that
long. It will fog. Alternatively, you could string a piece of clothesline
across the back seat of your car and hang the prints with clothespins to dry as
you drive. Turn the heat up!
Paul
-- Original
Yeah..I noticed. A quick hand held grab with a grin. ;)
I tried to care, but failed.
Thanks, Marnie!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/6/2007 10:54:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Timely bit of nature which appears to portend an upcoming
Thanks, Paul, but you're too kind. ;)
Jack
--- Paul Crovella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's terrific :)
Jack Davis wrote:
Timely bit of nature which appears to portend an upcoming event..in
much of the world.
Shot as a lark only, but comments welcome!
Jack
Liquidambar, actually, but I too always will call them Liquid Amber.
Most such Sweetgum are well past their glorious peak and sporting few
leaves.
Thanks, Paul!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very observant of you :-). I would have walked right past it. Nicely
executed as well. I used to
I recognize it's missing all those things you mentioned and is only
offered as an obvious seasonal curiosity.
Actually, this image will likely not last the season. :)
Thanks, Tom for commenting.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always have a problem with shots like this, in liking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's okay with fiber based paper. Resin coated paper can't be
washed that long. It will fog. Alternatively, you could string a
piece of clothesline across the back seat of your car and hang the
prints with clothespins to dry as you drive. Turn the heat up! Paul
I donno. Maybe if he had some tattoos.(?) ;)
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really like this one:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1038message=25509831
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You're very welcome, Jack. :-)
I knew you knew. You notice how I lessened the blow by noting my own
failings in similar endeavors? ;-)
Tom C.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jack
Davis
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:52 PM
To:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:53, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Continuing apace with more work from recent sessions ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46.htm
Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. Keys a plus.
Yikes! Color!
I thought you had one of them-thar monochrome K10Ds.
All
Patrick Genovese wrote:
If you are carrying lots of gear a good heavy duty padded waist belt
is an absolute must. I just got myself a Lowepro Vertex 200AW it is
superb. The waist belt transfers the weight to your pelvis and there
is very little weight on your shoulders.
I can easily carry
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: Camera bags (yet again)
Thanks, Bill. If I recall correctly, you either have done or still do
some large format work. How do you carry it?
I'll have to ask my wife.
Seriously, I have a Zone VI
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=200851nseq=10
Not my photo, but a classic steam locomotive built at the Norfolk and
Western shops in Roanoke, VA. It was built in 1950 and was arguably the
most efficient steam engine ever built.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Doug Brewer wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Thanks, Doug. It looks like there's also a Mini-Trekker AW that has a
few more external lash points. Have you ever attached a tripod to yours?
Yep, many times.
Sorry to keep bugging you about this. Is yours the Classic or the AW?
--
Scott
Went out shooting Sunday for first time in about 1.5 to 2 months. Didn't get
much, but at least I shot again.
Just for fun. This sort of amused me.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/dash.htm
Comments okay, naturally.
Marnie aka Doe
On Nov 6, 2007 2:57 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's okay with fiber based paper. Resin coated paper can't be
washed that long. It will fog. Alternatively, you could string a
piece of clothesline across the back seat of your car and hang the
William Robb wrote:
A while back, the railroad company decided to ressurect a steam locomotive
for some reason. Anyway, it did a cross country tour and passed through a
city near me.
I decided that an old train needed an old picture look to it.
LoL Needs to take another run at it. ;-))
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went out shooting Sunday for first time in about 1.5 to 2 months.
Didn't get
much, but at least I shot again.
Just for fun. This sort of amused me.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/dash.htm
Some of these so-called silly laws seem remarkably useful to me:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7081038.stm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
It did for quite awhile, but AFAIK it's now on permanent display at the
Roanoke Transportation Museum. I'd love to see it run again. I haven't
seen any of the J series locos since they were taken over by diesels in the
late 50's.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 6, 2007 3:27 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita Guha wrote:
Thanks, Amita. That helps. The one bag I was able to look at that had
the tripod straps worked essentially the same way. Same thing I asked
Doug - Classic or AW? Lowepro's site is fairly vague.
AW. I got it
Yeah..we both bad!
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're very welcome, Jack. :-)
I knew you knew. You notice how I lessened the blow by noting my own
failings in similar endeavors? ;-)
Tom C.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Amita Guha wrote:
On 11/5/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Dave. See my reply to Doug. Had any problems carrying a tripod
attached to the outside of the pack?
I have the Mini-Trekker and I have attached the tripod to it with no
problem. It's kind of a pain if you want
Does that locomotive still operate for excursions?
JimA.
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=200851nseq=10
Not my photo, but a classic steam locomotive built at the Norfolk and
Western shops in Roanoke, VA. It was built in 1950 and
Prettied up with a streamlined exterior. In the '50's, the locomotive
manufacturers were trying to hold onto their customer base. Not as
much muscle visible here.
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/6/07, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=200851nseq=10
Not
I rather like the idea of being able to murder Scotsmen in York. I may
try it somebody.
And I'm absolutely in favour of herding cattle through London's
streets. The more the merrier. It used to be quite common, bringing
them to Smithfield along the drovers' roads.
Shakespeare used to live on
I've been offered the M135 f/3.5 and the M200 f/4 (price yet to be determined)..
I''ve inspected the lenses and both are in great condition ... What''s
their performance like and what would be a reasonable price to pay for
them ?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ann sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
The first guy is Offenbach early because he forgot his Chopin Liszt.
oy.
Sorry. I've been waiting decades to use that.
dan -
I like these even though most of them are _ intentionally _ funny
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Have to say I agree with Rick. I sold the bag because the only time I
ever use such a large bag, and particularly a backpack, is when I am
traveling where I use it simply as a carrier/transport bag. I have
better options for that now, and I carry less too. For what it does,
the LowePro
Scott,
I bought a LowePro CompuTrekker AW from Godfrey this
past summer, and did a lot of hiking with it. I had
my usual kit (K10D, 16-45, 70-200, 10-17, 50/1.7,
filters, batteries), jacket and warm shirt (in the
computer compartment), lunch and a water bottle (in
the bottom of the padded
If he was going to get sued and have his image all
over the place, at least he could have focused.
Sheesh. g
--- Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1101072ad1.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I had noticed that the problem wasn't as prevalen in recent years as it once
was. But I was using Ilford Multigrade IV when I last did darkroom work and
long soaks resulted in a look that I would describe as foggy. It was uneven,
only part of the paper would be damaged, which rendered the
Nice light and very nicely framed, Godfrey. Perhaps a
half stop darker would be better...?
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Continuing apace with more work from recent sessions
...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46.htm
Comments, critique, etc always
You should throw them away. I have used RC paper since 1975 and only
the older papers were subject to fog (maybe), particularly Kodak, i
will try to 'fogwash' some current Ilford paper. Perhaps it is the
loss of brightener in your papers. To me, loss of brightness is not
the same as fog.
Ed
Ed
She's gonna have a wet Xterra in any case, Scott,
because that print washer will slosh all over the
place.
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's okay with fiber based paper. Resin coated
paper can't be
washed that long. It will fog. Alternatively, you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very observant of you :-). I would have walked right past it. Nicely
executed as well. I used to have Sweet Gums when I lived in Jersey.
Great fall color. They're not hardy here in Michigan. I believe you
Californians call them Liquid Amber. I think the real name is
Agreed. I doubt that few would come out in favor of herding cattle down London
streets. But not many would many object to tropical fish store clerks going
topless in Liverpool. Good photo op. And I'm not suprised to hear that the
Queen's tail is the proplerty of the king :-).
Paul
Bob W wrote:
Some of these so-called silly laws seem remarkably useful to me:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7081038.stm
Are there many tropical fish stores in Liverpool?
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have a lot of fogged RC prints I can show you. Perhaps it's actually
separation that causes the fogged look, but fog is the visual result. You're
right. It takes about twenty minutes of soaking to ruin RC paper.
-- Original message --
From: Ed Matthew [EMAIL
Getting up to the roof of the cell block on Alcatraz was a treat.
Aside from the landscapes and view of the bay, there are details
there which are splendid to photograph:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46a.htm
Comments, etc, always welcomed.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML
Hey Bob,
In this case, the manufacturer was the railroad. The NW built a lot of
their own engines and all of their coal hoppers, all in the Roanoke shops.
At one time they had 4 of these J series engines, but only 611 is left
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I vaguely remember seeing a photo somewhere of one of the J engines without
the streamlined shroud. Looked like an ugly duckling!
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:52 PM
To:
Interesting. That makes the NW Mechanical Department the
manufacturer. 'See, we don't need any of those stinking diesel
locomotives! We can be just as pretty with steam.'
More seriously, I think the coal service of the NW operated steam for
longer than most railroads. Moving the heavy coal
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: PESO: Steam Power
William Robb wrote:
A while back, the railroad company decided to ressurect a steam
locomotive
for some reason. Anyway, it did a cross country tour and passed through a
city near me.
I decided that an old
ann sanfedele wrote:
Um Doug - that's what Marnie said :)
That's OK, I'm from the Department of Redundancy Department. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Transporting wet prints
Hey, gang! Gots another darkroom question. While my own darkroom is in
the works (and progressing most slowly) I've decided to start using a
public darkroom about 20 miles from home. Current plans are to
Both are very good, the 200 better than the 135, but neither is
particularly rare. I'd not pay more than 65-100 dollars for either.
Patrick Genovese wrote:
I've been offered the M135 f/3.5 and the M200 f/4 (price yet to be
determined)..
I''ve inspected the lenses and both are in great
Bob W wrote:
Some of these so-called silly laws seem remarkably useful to me:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7081038.stm
Hmmm. The Queen's tail is a whale's head? Surely not.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Boris Liberman wrote:
Marvelously timeless... You've done it, Sir William ;-).
William Robb wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/steamer.html
K10, 12-24mm lens.
Converted to grayscale and then filtered for colour.
I agree, Boris. That's an excellent shot.
--
Thanks,
Rick Womer wrote:
If he was going to get sued and have his image all
over the place, at least he could have focused.
Sheesh. g
Well he did, but that's Canon autofocus for you...
:-P
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1101072ad1.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
