In a message dated 4/6/2009 8:14:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
n...@neovenator.com writes:
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=1230
You will not be seeing the many photos that I hate (which is the vast
majority of them), even though the bride liked them all. I learned
In a message dated 4/6/2009 9:26:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
tbei...@sbcglobal.net writes:
15 so far, this is the list I have:
Stan Halpin
Mark Roberts, and son
Scott Loveless
John Sessoms
Christine Aguila, and husband
Cory (maybe)
Nico Lurker
Don Delurker
Mat M.
Stenquist (maybe)
Bob
David J Brooks wrote:
Now i just have to figure out what neighbour has my seed.
Rather late on this one but, completely out of context, Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
I wanted to take a shot toward the town from the car park at the other end of
the bridge. The problem was that right below where I took this photo were two
canoes/Canadiens tied up, with huge BRIGHT red-orange lifejackets in them. Not
the sort of spring color I was after...
Rick
Thanks for the update!
My friend in Viareggio said they just barely felt it, their
young son
awakened but didn't know why.
I've been thinking of all those displaced and killed by the quake. A
sad day.
Also the historical architecture that has been destroyed.
Godfrey
Some of
Instead of making an unsupported assertion why don't you provide a formula
for calculating depth of field? Then we will all be able to test your
assertion.
I have provided a formula which shows quite clearly that you are wrong. The
calculation uses coc as a factor. The formula for coc depends on
Unfortunately, it's enough to be member of the PDML if the infected
party is using a POP3/IMAP/Exchange client to read the List, rather
than using webmail. The mail address of a poster is stored in the
header of all mails and can be scavenged from the inbox and/or sent
elements by the 'bot.
* It seems this lens finaly would be formaly announced 24th april (2009 lol).
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=31519318
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/56427-its-official-da-60-250-launch-date-24th-april.html
* DPR (for what its worth) tested the
I did a BW conversion and varied the light in both versions, but I kept coming
back to an exposure that recorded the ravages realized due to age and weather.
I may attempt to get closer to the near front corner of the house and try for
some drama.
Thanks for commenting.
Jack
--- On Mon,
I've updated the GFM Nature Photography Weekend FAQ a little: A few more
photos, a couple of more links to other PDML photo galleries of the
event and a downloadable map.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/?p=58
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Afyer 35 years of experience, I dont need no stinking formula, everybody
knows the depth of field
is image locked once you make the exposure. To change it ( increase or
decrease the relative depth of field ), you have to change the in-camera
magnification or fstop before shooting. You cant
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
You can't argue with the numbers.
OR A BRICK WALL.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
You're actually saying if one zoom out (reduce the magnification of the
subject) and crop back to the desired composition the DOF will be
increased, right? So the pic taken with the zoom at 35mm will present
greater DOF than the one taken at 70mm, after you enlarge both to the
same subject
This is a simple issue. Bob is speaking of perceived depth of filed on
a viewed print. JCO is speaking of critical depth of field in respect
to the ability of a given lens to resolve detail. Both are correct,
but each is discussing an entirely different matter.
Let it go.
On Apr 7, 2009,
No point in hurling insults. JCO is right in respect to the ability of
a lens to resolve. Bob is correct in regard to viewing a print that's
hanging on a wall.
On Apr 7, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
You can't
YES - right.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Luiz Felipe
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field
You're actually
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/16612744
Enjoy,
Ralf
Nice catch. You couldn't have asked for better placement of the two
machines.
Christian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks, Marnie. I could have climbed the fence and gotten a low shot from the
near front corner of the house. Maybe I'll consider going back.
I varied the light and fiddled with BW, but this version simply best exposed
the scene. As I mentioned in another post, I want this sort of subject to be
NO I DISAGREE. Image DOF is the RELATIVE sharpness
of objects in front of, and behind, the actual plane
of focus. TO INCREASE OR DECREASE this relative
sharpness you have to change the incamera
magnification or f-stop. PRINT SIZE has nothing
to do with changing the DOF of an image. While
you can
I agree on no need to get personal. But print size has
zero to do with changing DOF. Smaller or larger, you cant
change the image DOF with printing techniques. In camera
magnification and f-number are the only factors...
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This is a simple issue. Bob is speaking of perceived depth of filed on a
viewed print. JCO is speaking of critical depth of field in respect to the
ability of a given lens to resolve detail. Both are correct, but each is
discussing an entirely
This theoretical crap is boring.
Quite wasting your time mass debating the theory go put it into
practice by taking some interesting photos.
DS
2009/4/7 JC OConnell hifis...@gate.net
NO I DISAGREE. Image DOF is the RELATIVE sharpness
of objects in front of, and behind,
First, I like them. Some - ok, most - could be enhanced, but then it's
very easy to do that on a desk, looking at ease from pic to pic and
discovering some major issue we didn't see live. :-)
First (now the first photo), I'd crop heavy, losing the cut stems from
the flowers and anything above
Correct, either you CAN change image DOF via printing
or you CANT. Forget the former.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
No point in hurling insults. JCO is right in respect to the ability of a
lens to resolve. Bob is correct in regard to viewing a print that's hanging
on a wall.
What criterion do you use to define the ability of a
Sunday was a beautiful spring day (unlike today when we awoke to
freaking snow on the ground!). I wondered if this was baby's first
spring day out to the Market?
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/04/proud-parents.html
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
ps: note the circle of
THEORETICAL CRAP? Screw you, this is REAL WORLD BASIC
photograhpy techniques. I would think that any photographer
needs to know how to control DOF. You cant just go
take pictures without some basic knowledge of what
controls what in your images. And the fundemental
knowledge of what can be changed
I dont agree with that terminology, it's his not mine.
DOF is relative sharpness of foreground and background
objects in an image compared to the objects in the plane
of focus. ( just my working terminology FWIW).
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:13 AM, JC OConnell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
THEORETICAL CRAP? Screw you, this is REAL WORLD BASIC
photograhpy techniques. I would think that any photographer
needs to know how to control DOF. You cant just go
take pictures without some basic knowledge of what
controls
Whatever floats your boat sweetie.
2009/4/7 JC OConnell hifis...@gate.net:
Screw you
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:14 PM, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=1230
You will not be seeing the many photos that I hate (which is the vast
majority of them), even though the bride liked them all. I learned VOLUMES
shooting this
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:17 AM, JC OConnell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I dont agree with that terminology, it's his not mine.
DOF is relative sharpness of foreground and background
objects in an image compared to the objects in the plane
of focus. ( just my working terminology FWIW).
So, if a
2009/4/7 frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com:
But you can bang my head with all the numbers and theories you want,
until I go do it over and over, I'm not going to get it. Some
people like the theory behind things, and that's fine, too. But we
can't forget what the underlying theory is
...there IS a light at the end...
LF
Doug Brewer escreveu:
David Savage wrote:
2009/4/7 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but
mediocre, pool myself.
Wow,
No idea why but I like 6255.
Toine
2009/4/7 John Celio n...@neovenator.com:
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=1230
You will not be seeing the many photos that I hate (which is the vast
majority of them), even though the bride liked them all. I learned VOLUMES
shooting
Im NOT the guy who was demanding formulae. As far
as fstop goes, yes most people know that stopping
down increases DOF and opening up decreases it, but
the only other factor that affects DOF, in-camera
image magnification, is not very well known. That's
mainly why I posted on this thread.
JC
2009/4/7 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
David Savage wrote:
2009/4/7 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but
mediocre, pool myself.
Wow, Flickr really does have
you are trying to define some sort of absolute DOF
which really doesnt exist unless you consider a certain
COC as perfect.
The entire thread and original post was all about
the relative DOF ( how to increase or decrease
DOF in an image relative to ANY reference DOF ).
JC O'Connell
Its important to remember, that while good technique
cant improve a bad image, bad technique CAN
destroy a good image. Technique isnt everything, but
it doesnt hurt to get it right.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
This is true.
2009/4/7 JC OConnell hifis...@gate.net:
Its important to remember, that while good technique
cant improve a bad image, bad technique CAN
destroy a good image. Technique isnt everything, but
it doesnt hurt to get it right.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:49 AM, JC OConnell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
you are trying to define some sort of absolute DOF
which really doesnt exist unless you consider a certain
COC as perfect.
Actually, I'm claiming the opposite. That any definition depends on
assumptions of the acceptable
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Hunt
The entire thread and original post was all about
the relative DOF ( how to increase or decrease
DOF in an image relative to ANY reference DOF ).
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:47 AM, JC OConnell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
Im NOT the guy who was demanding formulae. As far
as fstop goes, yes most people know that stopping
down increases DOF and opening up decreases it, but
the only other factor that affects DOF, in-camera
image magnification,
In this respect we are on the same wave length. It's the type of image that
either triggers a rewind of our migratory existence or imparts a mortality
melancholy.
Some try to find pictorial drama while others are comfortable lapsing into a
pensive stream of trenchant thought of the life
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:52 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 4/5/2009 7:01:54 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
pentko...@gmail.com writes:
Found the old email and link.
http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/photoshop-elements-curves.html
Site is still active, but it looks
For the sake of clarity, I neglected to post
the definition of in-camera image magnification (M).
in-camera image magnification is the ratio
of object size to image size. Longer lenses
and shorter object distances increase magnification,
shorter lenses and longer distances decrease magnification.
I see a circle of cute and happy. ;) DOF appears quite appropriate to me.
Bloom on the white hood doesn't even bother me.
Really nice, Frank!
Jack
--- On Tue, 4/7/09, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - Proud Parents
On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:13 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Sunday was a beautiful spring day (unlike today when we awoke to
freaking snow on the ground!). I wondered if this was baby's first
spring day out to the Market?
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/04/proud-parents.html
Cute hat! ];-)
Nice moment Frank. To my eye the crop works great, placing the three
adult faces as a frame for the baby. And it has the
cute-baby-with-bear-ears appeal ;-)
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:13 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Sunday was a beautiful spring day (unlike today when we
Earthquakes, Canadians, what kind of place is this.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
I've updated the GFM Nature Photography Weekend FAQ a little: A few more
photos, a couple of more links to other PDML photo galleries of the event
and a
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Earthquakes, Canadians, what kind of place is this.
Well, the Canadians could always fall in the gaping fissures formed by
the earthquakes.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
...glad to read the two of you agreeing. Now David, may I use that photo
of yours as desktop background for a while? I tried to laugh quietly but
my co-workers perceived the tears in my eyes and I had to show them the
thread.
They also would like to use the photo as background for a while...
Sure, go ahead.
Cheers,
Dave
2009/4/7 Luiz Felipe luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br:
...glad to read the two of you agreeing. Now David, may I use that photo of
yours as desktop background for a while? I tried to laugh quietly but my
co-workers perceived the tears in my eyes and I had to show them
- Original Message -
From: John Celio
Subject: GESO: Wedding Rookie
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=1230
You will not be seeing the many photos that I hate (which is the vast
majority of them), even though the bride liked them all. I learned
VOLUMES shooting
Oh I informed the model of your request this was her reply:
OH MAN I take that as a f*king compliment!!
You've helped brighten someone's day.
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
2009/4/7 Luiz Felipe luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br:
...glad to read the two of you agreeing. Now David, may I use that photo of
David Savage wrote:
I remotly controlled it too.
The Jedi mind trick is an amazing thing.
DS
yes, it often helps you see the light at the end of the tunnel...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
...it is... (with all respect, please...)
David, you can't possibly imagine the kind of laughter around here on
the account of select excerpts the thread AND the photo. Thanks for your
(and her) kind permission. :-)
LF
David Savage escreveu:
Oh I informed the model of your request this
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Earthquakes, Canadians, what kind of place is this.
Well, the Canadians could always fall in the gaping fissures formed by
the earthquakes.
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:28:15AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
You survived and the bride liked the work.
Treat it as the victory it is.
Mark!
-- Graydon
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:28:28PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
2009/4/7 frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com:
But you can bang my head with all the numbers and theories you want,
until I go do it over and over, I'm not going to get it. Some
people like the theory behind things, and
2009/4/7 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:28:28PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
2009/4/7 frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com:
But you can bang my head with all the numbers and theories you want,
until I go do it over and over, I'm not going to get it. Some
people
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:32:48PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
2009/4/7 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but
mediocre, pool myself.
Wow, Flickr really does
Can we watch the language on list, SOMETIMES?
Thanks.
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
**Worried about job security? Check out the 5 safest jobs in a
recession.
Scott Loveless wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Earthquakes, Canadians, what kind of place is this.
Well, the Canadians could always fall in the gaping fissures formed by
the
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
We took the bus from Oxford to the old market town of Wallingford, and walked
a 6 mile loop from there on Sunday. The first bridge there was built by the
Romans; this version is a modern knockoff from 1809.
I decided
In a message dated 4/7/2009 6:13:23 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
Sunday was a beautiful spring day (unlike today when we awoke to
freaking snow on the ground!). I wondered if this was baby's first
spring day out to the Market?
David Savage wrote:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3650/3406984942_4162539cb9_b.jpg
I'm the one in red on the left with the radio shutter release in hand :-)
Casual Friday in Australia, huh?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Earthquakes, Canadians, what kind of place is this.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Earthquakes, Canadians, what kind of place is this.
Well, the Canadians
Mark Roberts wrote:
BTW: Doug Brewer has contributed a photo to the FAQ. Scroll down to just
below the map thumbnail for a shot of Nico, Doug and myself on the
mountain. http://www.robertstech.com/blog/?p=58
Nico, Cory and you.
Doug would have been the guy behind the camera.
--
PDML
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
BTW: Doug Brewer has contributed a photo to the FAQ. Scroll down to just
below the map thumbnail for a shot of Nico, Doug and myself on the
I like the ones you have chosen to show up John. The bride in window
worked out well, and i like the peak a boo shot around the barn.
Dave
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:14 PM, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=1230
You will not be seeing
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Clone out the hose and box. It's five minutes of work.
Paul
I'd have to take a week of work to do that.:-)
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:06 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Thursday was, b-e-a utiful. Plus 14 C and lots of sun.
The weather channel called for a bit of rain today, so i decided
Thursday would be a good day to lay down some grass seed, have it get
some moisture and get a good
I like the DOF her Frank. Also i like how you have the LHS framed up
with the other lady.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:13 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Sunday was a beautiful spring day (unlike today when we awoke to
freaking snow on the ground!). I wondered if this was
I like it Rick.
The curve could be the fish eye, or it was built like that, makes you think.
Dave
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
We took the bus from Oxford to the old market town of Wallingford, and walked
a 6 mile loop from there on Sunday. The
My kinda house.:-)
I like the bit of fence in the fore ground.
Dave
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Beautiful calm 78F afternoon. Had to get out and around for awhile.
Am including a link to a long since abandoned homestead on Tarke Rd.
So completely
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:06 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Thursday was, b-e-a utiful. Plus 14 C and lots of sun.
The weather channel called for a bit of rain today, so i decided
Thursday would be a
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:56 AM, 27...@comcast.net wrote:
I added a few black and white photos to my newest folder.They were all shot
with Tri-x film and I made 11 x 14 prints of them. I photographed each print
with the K20D and 100mm F2.8 Pentax Macro lens.
Here is a link to one in the
Good shot. Like the tree trunk back ground.
Lots of detail in the leaf.
Dave
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Check put http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken with a K20D, 600mm f4.0 SMC FA lens, 1/4000 sec, f 8.0, 1600 ISO
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:56 AM, 27...@comcast.net wrote:
I added a few black and white photos to my newest folder.They were all shot
with Tri-x film and I made 11 x 14 prints of them. I photographed each print
with the K20D and 100mm F2.8 Pentax Macro lens.
Here is a link to one in the
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
I got tired of looking at my same old blog design, so I re-did it, modifying
a different theme. If you like, please head over to
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
and have a look.
Thanks,
I still don't see the flies.
But it
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
I got tired of looking at my same old blog design, so I re-did it, modifying
a different theme. If you like, please head over to
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
and have a look.
Thanks,
I still
Newer spec is out, SDXC and btw, file format is exFat (based on middle
aged FAT as usual).
Vista SP1 already support exFat by the way.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
The word Fire on the big red trucks
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
are you sure you don't see the flies?
thanks for looking
There they are, on the right!
I feel better about it now.
Still looks great.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
On Apr 7, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3650/3406984942_4162539cb9_b.jpg
I'm the one in red on the left with the radio shutter release in
hand :-)
Casual Friday in Australia, huh?
Brilliant!
Godfrey
--
www.gdgphoto.com
Thanks, David! I included that just for you.. ;))
Jack
--- On Tue, 4/7/09, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Tarke Homestead
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 9:55 AM
My kinda
2009/4/7 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but
mediocre, pool myself.
Wow, Flickr really does have a pool for everything.
LOL
Here's my latest boring photo:
Cleverly done, Frank. Love the Christmas light scene.
Knowing your photo prowess, I must assume you intend the HDR effect on
Heather's.(?)
Jack
--- On Tue, 4/7/09, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO's Some Black
Sir,
MY burden of proof is no greater than yours.
If you cant provide any reliable proof
that my contention is not true, then
your word is no better than mine. I dont need
any more proof to support my contention than
you need to support yours.
This is very simple. DOF is all about magnfication
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:24 PM, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2526444_XRhmm/1/507669324_Wedby/Medium
I have some nerve peso-ing when I've hardly been here - but anyway...
have at it
HAR! Ashley look pretty darned happy in her new box. Wonderfully
Cute stuff, Ann. Thanks for posting!
Jack
--- On Tue, 4/7/09, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
From: ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: peso - thinking inside the box
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 12:24 PM
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
Evening walk and I caught this inspiration...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/047-halfmoon.jpg
Half Moon Overhead - Sunnyvale 2009
Panasonic G1 + Olympus G.Zuiko 40mm f/1.4
ISO 200 @ f/2 @ 1/320 second
Very nice!
Thanks Paul!
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I missed this one. I like it. Quite a group of characters there. I
especially like the guy on the left who's apparently on the verge of passing
out:-). Nice moment, with two conversations going on. Well
LOL ... I like it, the subject and then the picture make a very
amusing joke. :-)
G
On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:24 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2526444_XRhmm/1/507669324_Wedby/Medium
I have some nerve peso-ing when I've hardly been here - but anyway...
have at it
At least it's not Godders and I this time ;-)
-Adam
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field
On 7/4/09, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Let it go.
Mark
Mark !
Just 'Mark', Mark.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
sharpness has to be defined to define a particular
DOF. But when you want to increase or decrease DOF,
the whole sharpness/COC thing washes out, only camera f-stops
and camera image magnification changes get you there.
Im not buying into the argument that if you make anything
tiny enough the
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field
On Apr 7, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 7/4/09, Luiz Felipe, discombobulated, unleashed:
...glad to read the
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
