Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-06 Thread Dario Bonazza
Mark Roberts wrote: I agree. I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL on digital. I'd tweak your sentence as follows: I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL on the *istD. With the *istDS, the plain old TTL works very well, enough you can hardly find any difference. Dario -- PDML

RE: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread Henk Terhell
AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ Thanks for that reply mate. I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl and with the camera in auto mode. Surely that is the basic requirement for them to get right? Oh well, I'll just keep dialling in flash

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread Thibouille
Metz will come out with some upgrade sooner or later. All I want is just TTL. Henk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J and K Messervy Sent: 05 January, 2007 1:23 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

RE: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread Henk Terhell
/RiceHighs_Pentax_K100D_Full_Revi ew.html#P-TTL_Exposure_Accuracy Henk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thibouille Sent: 05 January, 2007 12:24 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ Well, you won't get just TTL with a K10D

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Henk Terhell Subject: RE: K10D with AF540FGZ I was considering buying a Pentax P-TTL flash because my good old Metz 32MZ-3, working so fine in TTL-mode with the *istD, let me down now with the K10D. In A-mode this flash unit is working OK with the K10D

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread P. J. Alling
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J and K Messervy Sent: 05 January, 2007 1:23 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ Thanks for that reply mate. I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread David Savage
On 1/6/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I want is just TTL. Too bad Pentax no longer includes the TTL sensor in the mirror box... Considering how hit and miss it was on the D, it's not much of a loss IMO. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread P. J. Alling
It worked quite a bit better on the Ds. David Savage wrote: On 1/6/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I want is just TTL. Too bad Pentax no longer includes the TTL sensor in the mirror box... Considering how hit and miss it was on the D, it's not much of a loss

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread P. J. Alling
: 05 January, 2007 12:24 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ Well, you won't get just TTL with a K10D. With a K10D you can use manual, auto or P-TTL. You will NEVER be able to use TTL with a K10D, the camera does not support it. 2007/1/5, Henk Terhell [EMAIL

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread Mark Roberts
David Savage wrote: On 1/6/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I want is just TTL. Too bad Pentax no longer includes the TTL sensor in the mirror box... Considering how hit and miss it was on the D, it's not much of a loss IMO. I agree. I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread John Francis
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:43:21PM +0100, Henk Terhell wrote: Well, that will be another reason to keep my *istD as backup. See also the critical notes on the absence of support of TTL in the newer Pentax models, and the underexposure of P-TTL of the K100D built-in flash in the article by

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread David Dixon
J and K Messervy wrote: I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit indoors and out. First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a little disappointing. I'm finding that for a shot indoors of my kids or similar at quite close range,

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread Brian Walters
Except that lack of TTL flash turns some of the not-so-old Pentax flashes (such as my 330 FTZ) into purely manual guns which are actually less useful than some of the really old guns (like the AF280T) which at least have an auto sensor in the gun. The 330 FTZ gives good results in TTL mode on

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: John Francis Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:43:21PM +0100, Henk Terhell wrote: Well, that will be another reason to keep my *istD as backup. See also the critical notes on the absence of support of TTL in the newer Pentax

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-05 Thread David Savage
I know. My AF 500 FTZ now sits idle most of the time. I use it now and then in manual as a slave studio flash. Cheers, Dave On 1/6/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Except that lack of TTL flash turns some of the not-so-old Pentax flashes (such as my 330 FTZ) into purely manual guns

K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread J and K Messervy
I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit indoors and out. First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a little disappointing. I'm finding that for a shot indoors of my kids or similar at quite close range, bouncing off the white ceiling,

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: J and K Messervy Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit indoors and out. First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a little disappointing. I'm finding that for a shot

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread Adam Maas
William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: J and K Messervy Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit indoors and out. First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a little disappointing. I'm

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread J and K Messervy
easy enough to do. - Original Message - From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:13 AM Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ - Original Message - From: J and K Messervy Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ I received

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread Brendan MacRae
Have you tried making sure that you're using the catch panel when bouncing off the ceiling? I've found that it works perfectly this way. It sends just enough diffused light directly toward the subject (and adds a nice catch light in the eyes). I use it this way and have no need for compensation

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread J and K Messervy
I use the bounce card but usually have my iso set to 100. - Original Message - From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:03 PM Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ Have you tried making sure that you're using

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: J and K Messervy Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ Thanks for that reply mate. I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl and with the camera in auto mode. Surely that is the basic requirement for them to get right? Oh well, I'll just

Re: K10D with AF540FGZ

2007-01-04 Thread Brendan MacRae
] To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:03 PM Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ Have you tried making sure that you're using the catch panel when bouncing off the ceiling? I've found that it works perfectly this way. It sends just enough diffused