Re: Global crash imminent?

2002-10-09 Thread Chris Burford
Nobody is obliged to post anything to this list, but I would point out that Louis Proyect has failed to address the important subject of this thread title, which he himself formulated. Is a global crash imminent or is it not? I took it up and examined whether a global crash is imminent, why

Re: etiquette

2002-10-09 Thread Chris Burford
At 08/10/02 21:59 -0700, you wrote: I don't see any reason for the nastiness. Please keep it calm. I don't want to have to have to unsub people. I would also appreciate emphasis on content, including content of differences. Although suspicions and intuitions are inevitable, to avoid guilt

RE: Whither ecological economics?

2002-10-09 Thread Mark Jones
Brian M Czech wrote: Just out of curiosity, why is there so little discussion of the ecological economics movement on this list? My memory isn’t the greatest, but I don’t recall ever hearing any mention of Herman Daly, Robert Costanza, Richard Norgaard, the International Society for

Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
I know some people are probably sick of the topic, but reading through all those posts, I can't help but think at least two individuals mucked it up more than added to it (not Daniel's recent post, which did add considerably). We discussed this on another list, I've forgotten the name, and this

Re:employment

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
And what makes me think that a lot of these patriotic big spenders would be unemployed, too, if they had to get a real job? But then again, what would any of their bosses be good at? CJ US military in brothel bills scandal More than $13,000 was spent at two brothels US Navy

Re: Re: Global crash imminent?

2002-10-09 Thread Louis Proyect
Chris Burford: What I read however is from my point of view a rehearsal of assertions about who is more marxist than whom and who is more revolutionary than whom. Perhaps it would help if you stopped using the name of Marx or Engels in a kind of ritual incantation in nearly every post. Since I

Re: RE: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
DD writes: CJ: I know some people are probably sick of the topic, but reading through all those posts, I can't help but think at least two individuals mucked it up more than added to it (not Daniel's recent post, which did add considerably). DD: Thanks, but hang on a minute. If by two

Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Perelman
I thought Daniel did an excellent job of responding to this note. I don't think any one or two people mucked anything up but the discussion just got ugly step by step. On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:07:47AM -0700, Charles Jannuzi wrote: I know some people are probably sick of the topic, but

Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
--- Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought Daniel did an excellent job of responding to this note. I don't think any one or two people mucked anything up but the discussion just got ugly step by step. I don't think Daniel responded at all well to my note because he ostensibly

Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
JD I don't agree with that theory. I have no doubt that the US's extremely large jail populations and active duty military help keep unemployment quite a bit lower than if the US fit the OECD pattern in these areas. It doesn't, not by a long shot. Especially in the prison pop. But the main

Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian: Indeed, lots of the problems of modernity are the uses to which logic, scientific thinking etc. have been put and those problems are not reducible to the problems created by capitalism. Carl: Yes, I think the basis of many of modern society's

Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
and what is the alternative to scientific thinking? That's the horror of it all. As Huxley suggested in Brave New World, there doesn't seem to be any choice between the dehumanization of science and reversion to simple savagery. As I said, I don't have any answer to this. Carl I start

RE: Re:employment

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31142] Re:employment but they also provide jobs for the sex workers... Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: Charles Jannuzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09,

Re: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Louis Proyect
I start by proclaiming that science does not equal rationalism. In fact, they can be quite exclusive of each other. Spend one day at a university dominated by a college of science, and you'll have to agree with me. CJ Unfortunately critical thinking toward bourgeois science (and there *is*

RE: Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31147] Re: Re: employment Michael Perelman wrote: I thought Daniel did an excellent job of responding to this note. I don't think any one or two people mucked anything up but the discussion just got ugly step by step. Hey, just yesterday a Zionist professor told me

RE: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31150] Re: employment I don't agree with that theory. Charles J writes: I have no doubt that the US's extremely large jail populations and active duty military help keep unemployment quite a bit lower than if the US fit the OECD pattern in these areas. It doesn't,

RE: Re: employment (apologies: long)

2002-10-09 Thread Davies, Daniel
-Original Message- From: Charles Jannuzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 October 2002 15:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:31148] Re: employment best you could say it was an argument from previously established authority Absolutely, because I have no real specialist

RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: Western Rationality Carl had written: Yes, I think the basis of many of modern society's worst difficulties is the pernicious objectification of the individual that results from the scientific method, in all its many forms -- especially including the social

Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Christian Gregory
Finally, think about how so many of these concepts are culturally determined. If 'unemployment' in the US were determined the way it is in Japan, the figure would jump about 1% with one calculation. I'm not sure I follow the argument that, b/c Japanese statisticians define employment

RE: Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31127] Re: Re: employment Michael: Several times in the past, I mentioned that the unemployment rate should include something to adjust for the quality of available jobs. My idea never resonated. I am sure that it could not be calculated with any exactitude, but I

re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Walker
Daniel Davies wrote, I have never, ever, in any series at all, been aware of a single area of macroeconomic statistics in which the USA is not head and shoulders above the rest of the world in terms of timeliness, My understanding was that Statistics Canada is the best in the world,

Re: RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] The issue of attaining zero unemployment is not about measuring it. Rather, it's about figuring out a better way to organize society that doesn't organically involve unemployment (open or hidden). Hear, hear, Jim. Yes, let's keep our eyes on the prize!

RE: Re: Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31131] Re: Re: Re: employment Thiago Oppermann: Wouldn't the quality of unemployment also be relevant? A rate of 1% where the unemployed end up indentured to credit companies might be a lot worse than 5% if they are free to enjoy productive unemployment. ... there's

RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: Western Rationality My sour view of quantification certainly owes something to the fact that I scored far, far lower on my math than my verbal SAT and have been socially marginalized ever since :) I know you're kidding, but the SAT is a great example of the single number

Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Carrol Cox
Ian Murray wrote: Who the hell are you to unilaterally -- no, monopolistically -- decide what is and is not a legitimate question on this list? Is this list not a manifestation of a collective practice or are we, in your readings of post on this list, all solipsistic-monadic deceptive

RE: RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Eric Nilsson
Title: RE: "Western Rationality" Jim wrote, ...eight separate kinds of intelligence, Jim modestly fails to note his own contribution to this issue: there are also multiple kinds of stupidities. Eric /

Is God Triune?

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: Is God Triune? it's about time that pen-l discussed a worthwhile question! Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: Carrol Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:12

8 ways to smear Chomsky

2002-10-09 Thread Louis Proyect
CounterPunch, October 9, 2002 Eight Ways to Smear Noam Chomsky by LAWRENCE MCGUIRE I just read a recent article in The Nation, 'The Left and 9/11' (September 23, 2002) by Adam Shatz, which purports to be a measured analysis of the differences between the so-called 'Left' in the United States

RE: RE: RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: "Western Rationality" yeah, I've been stupid in many ways. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message-From: Eric Nilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:17 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:

RE: 8 ways to smear Chomsky

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31158] 8 ways to smear Chomsky I'm a big Chomsky fan, but we have to be aware of his limitations without accepting Shatz-type crap. For better or for worse, Chomsky is most concerned with what's logical and what fits available empirical evidence, while avoiding a double

Re: RE: 8 ways to smear Chomsky

2002-10-09 Thread ravi
Devine, James wrote: But the problem is that Chomsky doesn't seem to care about his own P.R. -- or that he mostly preaches to the converted. This creates openings for the Shatzes and Walzers of the world. but thats exactly the gap we (the fans of chomsky) need to fill, isnt it, like lou

Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Hoover
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/08/02 05:33PM How the hell does a simple discussion about data evoke such nastiness? Michael Perelman i'll try to avoid making an analogy here for reasons that should be obvious... i can't help but recall fanon's assertion that violence is turned inward in colonial

Re: Re: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread joanna bujes
At 10:56 AM 10/09/2002 -0400, you wrote: Unfortunately critical thinking toward bourgeois science (and there *is* such a thing has been associated with postmodernist relativism, Not really. There is the work of Feyerabend and a tremendous amount of ground breaking by the phenomenlogists and by

Re: RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread joanna bujes
Even more generally, the single number fallacy fits with the general capitalist philosophy that the value of everything should be measured by its contribution to profits. Yup. Joanna

Re: Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread joanna bujes
At 02:41 PM 10/09/2002 +, you wrote: That's the horror of it all. As Huxley suggested in Brave New World, there doesn't seem to be any choice between the dehumanization of science and reversion to simple savagery. As I said, I don't have any answer to this. Oh, that's just silly. We have

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 02:41 PM 10/09/2002 +, you wrote: That's the horror of it all. As Huxley suggested in Brave New World, there doesn't seem to be any choice between the dehumanization of science and reversion to simple savagery. As I said, I don't have any answer to

2 Americans Win Nobel for Economics

2002-10-09 Thread ravi
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=530e=2cid=530u=/ap/20021009/ap_on_bi_ge/nobel_economics 2 Americans Win Nobel for Economics Wed Oct 9, 1:24 PM ET By MATTI HUUHTANEN, Associated Press Writer STOCKHOLM, Sweden (AP) - Two Americans won the Nobel prize for economics Wednesday

RE: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Mark Jones
Michael Hoover wrote: i'll try to avoid making an analogy here for reasons that should be obvious... i can't help but recall fanon's assertion that violence is turned inward in colonial society; people kill each other rather than their subjugators... Yes, as Marx used to say, it's the

RE: Re: RE: 8 ways to smear Chomsky

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31171] Re: RE: 8 ways to smear Chomsky Devine, James wrote: But the problem is that Chomsky doesn't seem to care about his own P.R. -- or that he mostly preaches to the converted. This creates openings for the Shatzes and Walzers of the world. but thats

Re: RE: Re: employment (apologies: long)

2002-10-09 Thread Paul Phillips
On 9 Oct 02, at 16:14, Davies, Daniel wrote: -Original Message- From: Charles Jannuzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 October 2002 15:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:31148] Re: employment best you could say it was an argument from previously established

RE: RE: Re: employment (apologies: long)

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31157] RE: Re: employment (apologies: long) Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- Daniel Davies writes: ... My understanding of what the BLS unemployment rate is meant to measure is

Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Perelman
As usual, Michael H. is correct. I tried to say something similar a couple days ago when Doug suggested that the left had a tendency to root out heretics. I cryptically suggested that it was not some political tendency but rather it reflected powerlessness. On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:38:55PM

Re: Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Louis Proyect
Michael Perelman wrote: As usual, Michael H. is correct. I tried to say something similar a couple days ago when Doug suggested that the left had a tendency to root out heretics. I cryptically suggested that it was not some political tendency but rather it reflected powerlessness. I guess

Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread joanna bujes
At 06:01 PM 10/09/2002 +, you wrote: From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 02:41 PM 10/09/2002 +, you wrote: That's the horror of it all. As Huxley suggested in Brave New World, there doesn't seem to be any choice between the dehumanization of science and reversion to simple

Recapitulation

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Perelman
I think that the thread on unemployment data was very useful if you can filter out the unnecessary nastiness. Whether the United States or Canada has the best statistical agencies, I leave to others. Focusing on the single number, I think we all agree, presents a very limited perspective.

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31184] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality Joanna writes: A critique of the development of science under capitalism would take much more than an email. Suffice it to say that what we refer to as SCIENCE today is a specific historical form suffering from specific

Re: Re: Re: Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Perelman
Nice post, Lou, except for the personal dig at the end. I remember when the New Republic was my fave. Kopkind and Ridgeway were great. On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 06:26:18PM -0400, Louis Proyect wrote: Michael Perelman wrote: I guess that a different kind of left is being described here than

Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Walker
Michael Perelman wrote, As usual, Michael H. is correct. I tried to say something similar a couple days ago when Doug suggested that the left had a tendency to root out heretics. I cryptically suggested that it was not some political tendency but rather it reflected powerlessness. I

Sign of the times?

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Walker
Ad for a credit union in an local weekly: INVEST SMART *** this whole global-economy- COLLAPSING-THING might take a while coastcapital savings Tom Walker 604 255 4812

Forwarded from David Altman (Chaplin)

2002-10-09 Thread Louis Proyect
Final Speech of The Great Dictator by Charlie Chaplin Schulz Speak - it is our only hope. The Jewish barber Hope... I'm sorry but I don't want to be an Emperor - that's not my business - I don't want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone if possible, Jew, gentile, black

October 16, 2001: an anniversary they'd rather forget?

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Walker
Enron Jolt: Investments, Assets Generate Big Loss --- Part of Charge Tied To 2 Partnerships Interests Wall Street By John Emshwiller and Rebecca Smith 10/17/2001 The Wall Street Journal Page C1 (Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones Company, Inc.) Enron Corp. yesterday took a $1.01 billion charge

Forwarded from Rakesh Bhandari on Western Reationality

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Perelman
Hi Michael, I thought you may want to forward these book recommendations on the topic of Western Rationality to pen-l. Morris Kline Mathematics: Loss of Certainty Ernest Gellner Reason and Culture Harold I Brown Rationality JW Burrow Crisis of Reason: European Thought, 1848-1918 Georg Lukacs

Demonstration to Stop the WAR (Fri., Oct. 11)

2002-10-09 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
Please Distribute widely: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Columbus, Ohio 10/7/2002 DEMONSTRATION TO STOP WAR ON IRAQ WHAT: On Friday October 11, 2002, Statewide coalition calls on all people of conscience to participate in a DEMONSTRATION to stop the war on Iraqi children. American taxpayer dollars

Last Call to Unboard

2002-10-09 Thread Brian M Czech
Shoveling Fuel for a Runaway Train: Errant Economists, Shameful Spenders, and a Plan to Stop Them All is now coming out in paperback, so I’m sending off one last round of announcements (though I reserve the right to have a memory relapse if necessary). I’m tired of acting like a salesman. It’s

Re: RE: Whither ecological economics?

2002-10-09 Thread Brian M Czech
Thanks, Mark, for the other voice in the wilderness. I think my question has been answered. The progressive in PEN alludes to other than sustainability issues (although it's true that just about anything can be portrayed as pertinent to sustainability by tossing in a ceteris paribus here and

Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
--- Christian Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally, think about how so many of these concepts are culturally determined. If 'unemployment' in the US were determined the way it is in Japan, the figure would jump about 1% with one calculation. I'm not sure I follow the

Fw: VIRUS ALERT]

2002-10-09 Thread Ralph Johansen
- Original Message - From: William Mandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: undisclosed-recipients: Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:24 PM Subject: [Fwd: VIRUS ALERT] FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS BELOW, I FOUND THAT I TOO HAD THIS VIRUS, AND ELIMINATED IT FROM DRIVE AND RECYCLE BIN. IN ACCORDANCE

bonds may rise further as deflation comes to America - Stephen Roach

2002-10-09 Thread Ralph Johansen
from Eric Fry, Daily Reckoning: *** And along comes Stephen Roach to explain why bonds may continue to rise, as deflation comes to America: The American economy now has a record exposure to global competition. In the second quarter of 2000, America imported a third as many goods as it

Re: employment

2002-10-09 Thread Charles Jannuzi
--- Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't agree with that theory. Charles J writes: I have no doubt that the US's extremely large jail populations and active duty military help keep unemployment quite a bit lower than if the US fit the OECD pattern in these areas. It