# from Andy Armstrong
# on Friday 09 March 2007 04:47 pm:
I'm just adding support for specifying the TAP version number[1] to
TAPx::Parser. It seems reasonable that the version, if present,
should be the first thing in the TAP.
I think that should always be the case. While I don't forsee
On 9 Mar 2007, at 23:17, Michael G Schwern wrote:
*) A TAP version
http://perl-qa.yi.org/index.php/TAP_version
Before we add any TAP extensions we need a way to identify what
version of
TAP we're outputting. Discuss and implement.
Done. The supported syntax is as per that page. In the
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
I think that should always be the case. While I don't forsee needing to
do it differently, I think it's safe to assume: if we ever need to
break that for some reason, then it's a newer version of TAP.
Taking that logic a step further, I vote YAGNI on the complete
Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 9 Mar 2007, at 23:17, Michael G Schwern wrote:
*) A TAP version
http://perl-qa.yi.org/index.php/TAP_version
Before we add any TAP extensions we need a way to identify what
version of
TAP we're outputting. Discuss and implement.
Done. The supported syntax is as
On 10 Mar 2007, at 22:57, Michael G Schwern wrote:
I'm counting back through TAP changes and I'm up to version 6.
I'll do a final sweep through the changes to t/TEST and
Test::Harness to
find out what else was added so we can solidify this for historical
purposes.
Or we can just declare
I've done a bit or work on the Wiki. The TAP proposals have been grouped
into ones that are considered worth implementing, ones that are still ideas
and ones that have been rejected / supplanted. Don't like the decisions I
made? Edit it, its a wiki.
I've also written out a proposal for the
