In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], demerphq
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/06, David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Kennedy wrote:
A testing system should only be sending FAIL reports when it believes it
has a platform that is compatible with the needs of the module, but when
it
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam
Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if there is a problem with Module::Install, you have to update all
your dists with the new version - solve one problem, create two new
ones :)
But if there is a problem with EU::MM or Module::Build, you have to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam
Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The big advantage I see here is it's not you doing the work, it's
everybody else.
I generally don't have too much of a problem doing incrementals...
cd trunk/Module-Name
ppichangeversion 0.14 0.15
perl
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure what stupid consists, but my system wouldn't have
problems
handling 512 MB of memory.
I'd prefer that you not decide that my system needs 512Mb to use this,
even if you can handle that on your side.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My real-grand-plan was always to have a CPANDB module that does exactly the
following:
I think the latest version of my cpan(1) script does everything you
show, although it doesn't use a local database. It would be nice to
have all
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam
Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody would care about dependencies if they never failed (except for
the issue of installation time).
I have a couple of clients that are very skittish about outside
dependencies in general. They have to get thrid-party
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adrian Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Aug 2006, at 09:04, Vishal Mehta wrote:
[snip]
1) What is the role of Perl in testing?
[snip]
It's a programming language.
People use perl to test programs written in perl.
People use Perl to test. No
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Klausner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added a few things, most notably the new has_license metric (thanks
again to Gabor Szabo for implementing it).
(BTW, there was quite a drop in the CPANTS game highscore lists, as lots
of dists don't come with a license
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris
Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
Any metric that catches bad things, particularly bad technical
things, is going to be just fine.
Metrics that try to push good behavior are fraught with trouble,
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adriano
Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/06, Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it would be reasonable to also check for a POD-Heading named
LICENSE, but that's definitly more error-prone.
Tell one place where people should look to have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris
Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:13 AM, David Golden wrote:
Given what you use, perhaps qr/AUTHOR_TEST/ is a good idea.
That's cool. Then I could do Cif ($ENV{AUTHOR_TEST_CDOLAN}){ ... }
in my .t files and just set that to 1 in
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], chromatic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to pull up a text entry box online with the
contents of the POD, fix any typos inline, then submit it to the server which
can generate a patch and perhaps redirect me to rt.cpan.org? I think I'd
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris
Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:58 PM, brian d foy wrote:
Even better would be something like Pod::Spellchecker. I've started
the
project several times but never had that much motivation to finish it.
Things would be simple
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/06, Chris Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not an EU::MM bug -- it's a new M::B feature.
What should you do? You're not going to like this answer:
Don't use recursive test directories. :-)
Does
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Shlomi Fish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See http://xrl.us/sw5o for a recipe for integrating make runtest and make
distruntest targets into a Makefile.PL-generated Makefile that makes use of
Test::Manifest.
That Test::Manifest stuff in XML::RSS is old. Instead,
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the To, Cc, and Newsgroups headers for details. ]]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Florian Scharinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David, any pointer how I can create a custom Bundle:: ?
The documentation of CPAN.pm defines the Bundle format, or
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam
Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Kennedy wrote:
So, seeing as you are going to take over Test::Harness as well, is NOW
where I ask you for the PITA-related capturing of a copy of the TAP
streams? :)
Let me just clarify what I'm wanting here, for
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy
Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Nik Clayton wrote:
[ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is
weak, and I can't find it ]
Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support
tests
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nik
Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support tests in
subdirectories of t/?
I don't know of a standard idiom, but I created Test::Manifest so I
didn't have to live with MakeMaker's method of getting
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Shlomi Fish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://svn.perl.org/modules/XML-RSS/trunk/Makefile.PL
You have:
--
{
package MY;
sub test_via_harness {
my($self, $perl, $tests) = @_;
return qq|\t$perl -MTest::Manifest | .
qq|-e
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Luke
Closs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/23/07, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dominique Quatravaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-23 11:35]:
And, uh, how about this:
use lib 't';
use mock::LWP::Simple;
That will not call the importer in the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ovid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that the following does not trigger this:
use UNIVERSAL::require;
use CGI qwno_such_function;
CGI has the nifty feature of auto-generating functions from its import
list to turn them into HTML generating functions:
use
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ricardo
SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-28T22:39:01]
Is there a de facto standard for custom extensions to META.yml? (I
didn't see one in the spec.) An example might be fields beginning
with a capital letter or X-foo
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ricardo
SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-03T13:31:15]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ricardo
SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
extensions:
CPAN::Reporter:
cc_author: 0
I think in some cases
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the bottom of a test file:
{my $finish = 1; END {$finish or die \n unplanned exit}};
Yeah, you have to remember to put it at the end of the file, but it may
be easier than counting tests. Thoughts?
You don't
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ricardo
SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-04T12:09:26]
I'm not talking about the particular field name, but the idea that I'd
want to say in META.yml Don't send me mail, or whatever setting I
want.
Instead of having
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying that you want a per-author META.yml or that you don't
want to have to say don't send me mail in two places in each
distribution, or both?
I'm not proposing anything. I think I siad that before.
I just don't
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Piping all diagnostics to STDOUT solves nothing except maybe allowing runtests
to display warnings again. You still can't tell the difference between a
comment (what currently is # foo printed to STDOUT) and a failure
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
The most bangs I can count instantly by looking at them is four.
For five bangs and up, all I see is âlots of bangs.â I have to
count character by character to tell them apart. Visually,
I
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the To, Cc, and Newsgroups headers for details. ]]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], chromatic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 14:54:27 demerphq wrote:
Er, so you want a metric to tell people about how their rejected
upload
On 5/31/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 May 2007, at 21:42, brian d foy wrote:
I've just been running cpants_lint.pl before I upload anything. If it
doesn't say perfect, that fails. :)
Yes, damn you :)
I'll volunteer for a bit of poking of Test::Kwalitee if it doesn't
need
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nathan S.
Haigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A suggestion was to have different levels of
strictness in Test::Kwalitee and have different sets of metrics being
tested by
default at each of those levels. However, I didn´t get into this and simply
hard-coded some of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], chromatic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 10:47:00 Andy Armstrong wrote:
You could send them to me if you fancy? I'm guessing chromatic's
pretty busy.
I lost most of my outstanding patches a couple of weeks ago too, and only
just
noticed.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian Malpass
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started crafting Test::Pod::URI to extract URIs from POD and check
them to make sure they work. However, my CPAN-fu has been weak today, so
I thought I'd mail here and see if anyone knew of anything out there
that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy
Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Mike Malony wrote:
So I'm working my project, and I've got one other more junior coder
with
me.
Has anyone tried writing test files as part of their spec's?
An overview document
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ovid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagine this:
./Build testdeps
That would be a custom action which would load a special Test::More
wrapper which, at the end of each test program, cache %INC.
I named mine Test::Prereq. :)
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adriano
Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing some Author stuff would be rarer than having author tests. So
maybe we could standardize on something like t/author and when other
value is desirable, a key/value pair may be specified in META.yml (and
in
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adriano
Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/07, brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adriano
Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...smells a lot like Test::Manifest, which is just test. In
t/test_manifest, you just list
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Cyberiade . it Anonymous Remailer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN
which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being
self-explanatory. it would be nice to add points for
modules which have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WRT the intent of forcing the user to get approval for their module: while
it's nice to ask for opinions for your module, it sucks to hold up sharing
your new module with the world while waiting for humans to respond.
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], demerphq
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/21/07, brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The effect of this kwalitee metric would be that fewer modules are
registered as I or Adam just stop paying attention because it's too
much work now.
Maybe you need more
.
This is something that I want to run right in my sandbox. The process
is really easy: unpack the distro, use the appropriate perl with
Makefile.Pl, and capture the results to make the report. So, who's
already done this? :)
--
brian d foy, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe to The Perl Review: http
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Cantrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number::Phone::UK::Data contains a big chunk of binary gibberish at the
end of the file (it's an embedded DBM::Deep database), in a __DATA__
segment. That includes several lines that match /^=/ and so might
look like
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ovid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sure that many of you are aware of this, but I wanted to remind you
that with the upcoming release of Test::Harness 3.0,
Test::Harness::Straps is going away.
Do you mean that Test::Harness 3.0 won't have it but it
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matisse
Enzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CPAN::Mini is designed to mirror a public CPAN, not to be part of a
search path, which is what I want.
that's what urllist in the CPAN.pm config is for.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've been organizing my thoughts about this and have gotten this far:
http://scratchcomputing.com/tmp/extra_testing.txt
The profile at the end of that looks interesting, and I immediately
thought about a way in
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aside(
You wouldn't have to say anything about
tests that don't need anything special, just tests that are special.
Why would non-special tests be in xt/?
I mean special as in different from everything else in the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy
Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have this ticket in the Test::Harness RT queue:
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=29633
Martin Thurn is asking for a SKIP_OUT directive that would skip all
remaining test files and return a PASS.
Well, if
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# from Andy Armstrong
# on Wednesday 31 October 2007 16:51:
But what about a more general mechanism? A TAP directive that means
'schedule these other tests'. So then you'd have a controller test
which was the only one
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy
Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Nov 2007, at 14:12, Michael Peters wrote:
Yeah, but from the user's PoV this is pretty easy:
# t/controller.t
use Test::Steering;
include ('xt/frob') if frob_avail();
include ('xt/slow') if
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:53:42PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
and:
Foo::Bar is in distribution AUTHOR/Foo-Bar which also contains
Foo::Bar::Baz, so I only need to declare one of them to get both.
This is also an
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], A. Pagaltzis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-13 21:10]:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:53:42PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
and:
Foo::Bar
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an announcement that my modules will no longer try to be backwards
compatible with 5.5.x.
Fair enough. Can you make a list of the last versions of all of those
that should work with Perl5.005? I suppose that's
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brian d foy wrote:
Fair enough. Can you make a list of the last versions of all of those
that should work with Perl5.005? I suppose that's the current list
right now.
Pretty much. If anyone wants to put
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matisse
Enzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I want is to EXCLUDE certain directories from @INC during the
build process, specifically anything under /Library/Perl, especially
in the sub-processes that CPAN::Shell creates when building each
distribution. The
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matisse
Enzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 23, 2007, at 8:19 AM, brian d foy wrote:
If this were my problem, I think my first attempt would be writing my
own CPAN.pm script that set the environment and config just the way I
wanted it.
If you mean
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like what you really want is a new config option. The
cpan script is just a pass-through to CPAN::Shell.
That's not really true. Although I use CPAN::Shell for some things,
cpan isn't just passing things along. My
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the To, Cc, and Newsgroups headers for details. ]]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew
Hampe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there an existing, or planned setting, for the CPAN utilities, that
will cause it to ignore any already installed
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Klausner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:58:39AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
For those attending the Oslo hackathon, please see the new schedule page:
Are there any plans on short talks introducing people to the various
I've managed to edit the video from the closing remarks at the Oslo QA
Hackathon.
http://vimeo.com/1043143
It's nothing fancy, but it's the first video I've made and next time it
will be better :)
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sending this to both the module-authors list so you can be
aware of the new metrics and the perl-qa list as they might
have a few words as well
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having those warnings during tests is a problem that should be somehow solved.
I'd like to have a cpan-testers report whenever my test suite issues
warnings. It's not a new category. If the tests all pass it's still a
PASS.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Fenwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Does anyone think this is a bad idea?
I think it's an exceedingly bad idea.
The more things I have to pay attention to in CPANTS, the less likely
that I'm going to do anything about it. You might like using it, but
I'm not
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Fenwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm very much not happy to get bug reports and test failures and big red
bars
against my distributions because an automated heuristic which applies only
to
some cases decided that it knows better about how to write
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Fenwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On that note, surely we could save a lot of anguish with regards to many of
the CPAN tests just by making the optional ones[1] actually optional? As a
completely off-the-bat suggestion that could be controlled by META.yml:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Klausner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The goal of deducting a kwalitee point for 'no_cpants_errors' is to get
authors to report CPANTS bugs.
Why do you need authors to report those? After a run, you have a list
of all of the errors already.
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want nothing in my inbox that I have not explicitly requested.
I want to choose how I get reports, if at all, and at what frequency.
I'm going to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Lester
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd hate to lose those in my email because other people don't want to
filter their mail.
I'd hate to get spammed because other people don't want to sign up to
receive them.
You keep saying spam, but that's not the right
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicholas Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
I recognize that CPAN is a volunteer effort, but it does seem to me there
is a implicit responsibility on the part of the author to maintain the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], chromatic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I could see somehow that my distribution implicitly runs on
Perl 5.001 (or explicitly runs only on 5.11.0), or that it has no Makefile.PL
or Build.PL, or any of the other dozens of packaging quirks that can cause
problems,
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:17 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:52:05 brian d foy wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], chromatic
If I could see somehow that my distribution implicitly runs on
Perl 5.001 (or explicitly runs only on 5.11.0), or that it has
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], (Andreas J. Koenig)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:15:04 -0700, brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], (Andreas J. Koenig)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:54:40 -0700, brian d foy
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Rolsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ThatÄôs CPANTS, the useful part of it anywayĶ except that the
feedback cycle is even *much* slower there than with the Testers.
Is not!
Check out Test::Kwalitee on cpan. I've taken to adding that to my
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way it looks right now, I want my CC's back. :(
Well, I guess we win some and we lose some.
Just brainstorming for the moment, but if we had
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicholas Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it seems that this bug is only fixed as a side effect of that change, and
it's not actually tested for. What's the best way to write a test that fits
within the current frameworks to prevent any regression?
It's not
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Randy J.
Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I settled on the name Test::Formats. At present, the module provides
Test::Formats and Test::Formats::XML. The latter has all the testing-hooks
for checking XML documents against DTDs, XML Schema descriptions and RelaxNG
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], nadim khemir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was discussing one of my modules with a friend and he asked how many tests
I
had. I answered 500 hundred but it then hit me that to have the module
working I had to rely on other modules written by other people.
In article 200812121032.00515.enoba...@gmail.com, Eric Wilhelm
enoba...@gmail.com wrote:
# from Ovid
# on Friday 12 December 2008 04:37:
Running a single test means that I ... want to run that test.
... Here are conditions I see crop up in tests:
 POD_COVERAGE ... FAST_TESTS ...
Is anyone doing continuous testing of Perl modules with TeamCity? I've
just started a project using that, and while it looks straightforward,
I don't want to reinvent anything that anyone else has done.
Specifically has anyone:
* made stuff to turn TAP into TeamCity messages?
* tracked
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the To, Cc, and Newsgroups headers for details. ]]
In article 4b8c3be2.7010...@pobox.com, Michael G Schwern
schw...@pobox.com wrote:
I'm planning out my hackathon trip, and I figure it would be silly to fly all
the way to Vienna, hack, and
In article
k2i5d4beb41004290438sfd5fa38dj93c60571c10b...@mail.gmail.com, David
Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
Quick thoughts:
2. ExtUtils::MakeMaker and Module::Build - Serious!
 HP-UX, and probably other OS's too, do not allow installation of
 shared objects when the object
d foy brian.d@gmail.com
http://www.pair.com/~comdog/
In article 4d4492ac.6080...@pobox.com, Michael G Schwern
schw...@pobox.com wrote:
Do people not care? Is it going over everyone's heads? Is everyone just
waiting for it to be done? Does it not seem like TB2 is relevant?
I want Test::Builder 2. I'm just full up with everything else I'm
In article 9c335568-ae99-4bce-9ad0-58e776e44...@matisse.net, Matisse
Enzer mati...@matisse.net wrote:
Is there an existing way to do the equivalent of:
cpanp --prefix=/tmp/MyCollection --ignore-already-installed Module::One
Module::Two ...
I don't know how you would do it with cpanp.
I
In article 02c001cc1a59$6865b810$39312830$@activestate.com, Jan
Dubois j...@activestate.com wrote:
AFAICT there is no good index for backpan though.
There's a good index, but it lives on one of my private computers and
is rather large. :)
In article BANLkTinzErQAnW4qthz=t1jdd8p3iou...@mail.gmail.com, David
Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
* You run the dependency analysis tool against your tarball, using the
perl as a base and using the local+BackPAN to resolve dependencies.
* Tool spits out the ordered list of tarballs
correctly, too, and I imagine testing those would benefit modules such
as Pod::Checker.
--
brian d foy brian.d@gmail.com
In article 20111205154758.gh17...@bytemark.barnyard.co.uk, David
Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
There's at least one other significant difference: CPAN has an
up-to-date index. BackPAN doesn't.
Well, CPAN's index is also BackPAN's index. That is, neither of them
include all of the
In article 20120112232237.GA5030@swoosh, Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
philippe.bru...@free.fr wrote:
- as a side remark, it would be great if the companies that use perl
would give back some of the money they saved by not having to pay for
a Perl license especially for an event like this one,
In HARNESS_OPTIONS we can set -jN to note we want parallel tests
running, but how can a particular module, which might be buried in the
dependency chain, tell the harness it can't do that?
It seems to me that by the time the tests are running, it's too late
because they are already in parallel
90 matches
Mail list logo
