Re: The relation between CPAN Testers and quality (or why CPAN Testers sucks if you don't need it)

[brian d foy]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Rolsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> > That’Äôs CPANTS, the useful part of it anyway’Ķ except that the
> > feedback cycle is even *much* slower there than with the Testers.
> 
> Is not!
> 
> Check out Test::Kwalitee on cpan. I've taken to adding that to my 
> maintainer-only tests for my distros.

And you can run cpants_lint.pl yourself too. Module::Release now
has that built in as well.