POD Formatting (was Re: Literal Values)

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Lazzaro
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: Or number the sections like this: =section # blah =section ## subblah =section ### subsubblah =section ## subblah2 =section # blah2 And let the author only worry about sectioning and not about numbering at all. I like that decently. Obviously, making authors

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Luke Palmer
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm From: Angel Faus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: vLex.com Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:03:30 +0100 X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.12, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/ I've written a frist version of the 1.1 - Literal

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:03:30PM +0100, Angel Faus wrote: This is just a tentative draft, so feel free to delete/add at your own taste. Does it look ok? Any comments? (including grammar errors, of course) I've tweaked the first bit on literal integers a bit, see what you think.

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:03:30PM +0100, Angel Faus wrote: Does it look ok? Sure. Any comments? (including grammar errors, of course) Here are mine. --- =subsection Literal Values =head1 Literal numbers =head2 Integers Integers can be

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:11:24PM +, Andrew Wilson wrote: For example: my $i = 2:101110; # binary my $j = 3:1210112; # tertiary my $k = 8:1270; # octal Printing these would give 46, 1310, and 696 respectively. Hmm. As companion to specifying

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 12:03 PM, Angel Faus wrote: =subsection Literal Values =head1 Literal numbers =head2 Integers Rather than using =head, each should be a subsection. What should be the syntax for closing a section? =section title ... =end-section

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Joseph F. Ryan
Angel Faus wrote: I've written a frist version of the 1.1 - Literal Values subsection (in Michael's schema). Alright, I have the tests done to match this section of the documentation. Well, everything except 'bit', since the last time I checked (and this could be resolved by now), there was

RE: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Brent Dax
Michael Lazzaro: # What should be the syntax for closing a section? How about the empty string? Isn't the end of a section defined by EOF or when the next section starts? --Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] @roles=map {Parrot $_} qw(embedding regexen Configure) Wire telegraph is a kind of a very,

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 04:08 PM, Brent Dax wrote: Michael Lazzaro: # What should be the syntax for closing a section? How about the empty string? Isn't the end of a section defined by EOF or when the next section starts? I mean if you can have sections inside sections, how do you

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:56:28 +, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: Alright, I have the tests done to match this section of the documentation. Well, everything except 'bit', since the last time I checked (and this could be resolved by now), there was some debate over Boolean types, and I know bit was

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Joseph F. Ryan
chromatic wrote: On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:56:28 +, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: For the most part, they look fine to me. I'm a little concerned about some of the numeric tests: output_is('CODE', 'OUT', Simple Floats); print 4.5; print 0.0; print 13.12343 CODE 4.50.013.12343 OUT I'd be more

RE: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Brent Dax
Michael Lazzaro: # On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 04:08 PM, Brent Dax wrote: # Michael Lazzaro: # # What should be the syntax for closing a section? # # How about the empty string? Isn't the end of a section # defined by EOF # or when the next section starts? # # I mean if you can

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Luke Palmer
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:22:53 -0600 From: Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] What happens with this one: 256:255.255..0 # same as 256:255.255.0.0 ? # or error? On the contrary, it's

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:38:00PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:22:53 -0600 From: Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] What happens with this one: 256:255.255..0 # same as 256:255.255.0.0 ?

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Dave Whipp
output_is('CODE', 'OUT', Simple Floats); print 4.5; print 0.0; print 13.12343 CODE 4.50.013.12343 OUT I'd be more comfortable with a newline between the numbers, just in case. It's not an issue in the string tests. Alright, fine by me; I was wondering on that myself. Done

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Larry Wall
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:20:04PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: : =head2 String as vector of ordinals : : Literals of the form Cv1.2.3.4 are parsed as a string : composed of characters with the specified ordinals. This : is an alternative, more readable way to construct : (possibly unicode)

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Sean O'Rourke
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Michael Lazzaro wrote: What should be the syntax for closing a section? I'm partial to the LaTeX approach, where you specify the level and the computer figures out the rest. It seems like either level or closing-tag is sufficient by itself. Levels put all the information