POD Formatting (was Re: Literal Values)

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Lazzaro
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: Or number the sections like this: =section # blah =section ## subblah =section ### subsubblah =section ## subblah2 =section # blah2 And let the author only worry about sectioning and not about numbering at all. I like that decently. Obviously, making authors

Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Angel Faus
I've written a frist version of the 1.1 - Literal Values subsection (in Michael's schema). It discusses the different ways of creating literal numbers and strings in perl6. There are no tests, and the format may be outdated. I will gladly resubmit this in a more complete form. I have

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Luke Palmer
Literal Values =head1 Literal numbers =head2 Integers Integers can be represented by its decimal representation, such as: s/Integers/An integer/ my $x = 14; # stores the integer 14 in $x See the Lquotes section for a full explanation of the interpolation mechanism and a list

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Andrew Wilson
. =subsection Literal Values =head1 Literal numbers =head2 Integers There are many ways to specify literal numeric values in perl, but they default to base 10 for input and output. Once the number has been read by perl it becomes just a magnitude. That is it loses all trace of the way it was originally

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:03:30PM +0100, Angel Faus wrote: Does it look ok? Sure. Any comments? (including grammar errors, of course) Here are mine. --- =subsection Literal Values =head1 Literal numbers =head2 Integers Integers can

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:11:24PM +, Andrew Wilson wrote: For example: my $i = 2:101110; # binary my $j = 3:1210112; # tertiary my $k = 8:1270; # octal Printing these would give 46, 1310, and 696 respectively. Hmm. As companion to specifying

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 12:03 PM, Angel Faus wrote: =subsection Literal Values =head1 Literal numbers =head2 Integers Rather than using =head, each should be a subsection. What should be the syntax for closing a section? =section title ... =end-section

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Joseph F. Ryan
Angel Faus wrote: I've written a frist version of the 1.1 - Literal Values subsection (in Michael's schema). Alright, I have the tests done to match this section of the documentation. Well, everything except 'bit', since the last time I checked (and this could be resolved by now

RE: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Brent Dax
Michael Lazzaro: # What should be the syntax for closing a section? How about the empty string? Isn't the end of a section defined by EOF or when the next section starts? --Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] @roles=map {Parrot $_} qw(embedding regexen Configure) Wire telegraph is a kind of a very,

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 04:08 PM, Brent Dax wrote: Michael Lazzaro: # What should be the syntax for closing a section? How about the empty string? Isn't the end of a section defined by EOF or when the next section starts? I mean if you can have sections inside sections, how do you

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:56:28 +, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: Alright, I have the tests done to match this section of the documentation. Well, everything except 'bit', since the last time I checked (and this could be resolved by now), there was some debate over Boolean types, and I know bit was

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Joseph F. Ryan
chromatic wrote: On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:56:28 +, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: For the most part, they look fine to me. I'm a little concerned about some of the numeric tests: output_is('CODE', 'OUT', Simple Floats); print 4.5; print 0.0; print 13.12343 CODE 4.50.013.12343 OUT I'd be more

RE: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Brent Dax
Michael Lazzaro: # On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 04:08 PM, Brent Dax wrote: # Michael Lazzaro: # # What should be the syntax for closing a section? # # How about the empty string? Isn't the end of a section # defined by EOF # or when the next section starts? # # I mean if you can

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Luke Palmer
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:22:53 -0600 From: Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] What happens with this one: 256:255.255..0 # same as 256:255.255.0.0 ? # or error? On the contrary, it's

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:38:00PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:22:53 -0600 From: Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] What happens with this one: 256:255.255..0 # same as 256:255.255.0.0 ?

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Dave Whipp
output_is('CODE', 'OUT', Simple Floats); print 4.5; print 0.0; print 13.12343 CODE 4.50.013.12343 OUT I'd be more comfortable with a newline between the numbers, just in case. It's not an issue in the string tests. Alright, fine by me; I was wondering on that myself. Done

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Larry Wall
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:20:04PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: : =head2 String as vector of ordinals : : Literals of the form Cv1.2.3.4 are parsed as a string : composed of characters with the specified ordinals. This : is an alternative, more readable way to construct : (possibly unicode)

Re: Literal Values

2002-11-12 Thread Sean O'Rourke
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Michael Lazzaro wrote: What should be the syntax for closing a section? I'm partial to the LaTeX approach, where you specify the level and the computer figures out the rest. It seems like either level or closing-tag is sufficient by itself. Levels put all the information