Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/src basic.t

2003-09-26 Thread Dan Sugalski
On 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Index: interpreter.h +typedef opcode_t *(*native_func_t)(struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter, + opcode_t * cur_opcode, + opcode_t * start_code); + This bit's made gcc a

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/src basic.t

2003-09-26 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Index: interpreter.h +typedef opcode_t *(*native_func_t)(struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter, + opcode_t * cur_opcode, + opcode_t *

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/src basic.t

2003-09-26 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Index: interpreter.h +typedef opcode_t *(*native_func_t)(struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter, + opcode_t * cur_opcode, +

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/src basic.t

2003-09-26 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A the point that this typedef was in, opcode_t hadn't been defined. Yes. But what makes me wonder is, why my gcc 2.95.2 compiled that alltogether. Maybe ccache messed it up. ... I moved it, and installed an alternate version for non-core enbed includes,

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/src basic.t

2003-09-26 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:42 PM +0200 9/26/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A the point that this typedef was in, opcode_t hadn't been defined. Yes. But what makes me wonder is, why my gcc 2.95.2 compiled that alltogether. Maybe ccache messed it up. It's GCC. I expect it to behave