On 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Index: interpreter.h
+typedef opcode_t *(*native_func_t)(struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter,
+ opcode_t * cur_opcode,
+ opcode_t * start_code);
+
This bit's made gcc a
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Index: interpreter.h
+typedef opcode_t *(*native_func_t)(struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter,
+ opcode_t * cur_opcode,
+ opcode_t *
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Index: interpreter.h
+typedef opcode_t *(*native_func_t)(struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter,
+ opcode_t * cur_opcode,
+
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A the point that this typedef was in, opcode_t hadn't been defined.
Yes. But what makes me wonder is, why my gcc 2.95.2 compiled that
alltogether. Maybe ccache messed it up.
... I
moved it, and installed an alternate version for non-core enbed includes,
At 8:42 PM +0200 9/26/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A the point that this typedef was in, opcode_t hadn't been defined.
Yes. But what makes me wonder is, why my gcc 2.95.2 compiled that
alltogether. Maybe ccache messed it up.
It's GCC. I expect it to behave