Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-16 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András

Hi,

I think, that David's version is matches with my opinion. I don't think, 
that beginners would be a better name for it, but maybe more 
practical, as it's a more evident name.


Bye,
  Andras

David Storrs wrote:

On Jun 15, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:


And here they are...  this is just a draft -- feel free to flame/edit/
tear it apart liberally.  These are also written assuming we don't
create a perl6-general list (but it shouldn't be hard to adapt them
should one be created).



Well, I'd suggest the following.  (Anything not mentioned stays as  you 
wrote it.)



perl6-language
This is the theory of list. Discussion of the design of the  perl6
language, and its desired (or unwanted) feature list. If you have
patches and/or suggestions for improving the Perl 6 design  documents
(Apocalypses, Synopses, etc.), send them here.



perl6-howto
This is the practice of list.  Come here to ask How do I...,  What
does XYZ mean?, or Why doesn't this work?  Novices are  especially
welcome.

(Note:  I envision this list being much like beginners@perl.org, but  I 
never liked that name because it seems like it would drive away  those 
who have a question but do not consider themselves beginners.   On the 
other hand, maybe it's more important to explicitly welcome  novices.  I 
could go either way:  maybe the above list should be  'perl6-beginners')






Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-16 Thread Fagyal Csongor

Hi,


Hi,

I think, that David's version is matches with my opinion. I don't 
think, that beginners would be a better name for it, but maybe more 
practical, as it's a more evident name.


Hmmm, I think beginner is a little negative. What about professional 
Perl5 programmers, who wish to learn Perl6? Wouldn't like the name :-))


How about 'perl6-usage',  'perl6-programming' or... hmmm, simply 'perl6'?

- Fagzal


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-16 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András

Hi,

Fagyal Csongor wrote:

I think, that David's version is matches with my opinion. I don't 
think, that beginners would be a better name for it, but maybe more 
practical, as it's a more evident name.


Hmmm, I think beginner is a little negative. What about professional 
Perl5 programmers, who wish to learn Perl6? Wouldn't like the name :-))


How about 'perl6-usage',  'perl6-programming' or... hmmm, simply 'perl6'?


I like perl6-programming, as it means, that it's ok to post there 
general programming questions (related to perl6), too. And maybe my 
original proposal, perl6-general is OK, too.


Bye,
  Andras


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-15 Thread Michele Dondi

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, [iso-8859-2] BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:

Where should I ask, that what's PGE means? Yes, I know, it's Parrot Grammar 
Engine, and I know what it is, but a beginnner maybe not. And I think that


Which makes me think that first or later it may be worth to start a FAQ 
for questions like these even if they're not frequently asked. And indeed 
a perl6-general may be a starting point for writing one.



Michele
--

Is e+pi a rational or irrational number?

Yes, it is.
- Robert Israel in sci.math, Re: A Number Problem


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-15 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András

Hi Michele,

Where should I ask, that what's PGE means? Yes, I know, it's Parrot 
Grammar Engine, and I know what it is, but a beginnner maybe not. And 
I think that


Which makes me think that first or later it may be worth to start a FAQ 
for questions like these even if they're not frequently asked. And 
indeed a perl6-general may be a starting point for writing one.


I agree. Is it possible the setup an SVN repo for the FAQ, that would be 
mirrored the the web page?


Anyway, if the perl.org webmasters not interested in it, or it is a big 
work to setup a mailing list and/or a FAQ like this, I can offer the 
infrastructure for it, and I can setup it in a day.


Bye,
  Andras


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-15 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:04:34AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
 
 Perhaps what we need is updated descriptions of the various mailing
 lists on perl.org (http://dev.perl.org/perl6/lists/)?  I'll draft
 some proposed changes to that page.

And here they are...  this is just a draft -- feel free to flame/edit/
tear it apart liberally.  These are also written assuming we don't
create a perl6-general list (but it shouldn't be hard to adapt them
should one be created).

perl6-announce
Moderated list for news of new lists, working groups, and so on. 
Summaries from the top-level working groups are also posted here.

perl6-language
Discussion of the perl6 language, focusing primarily on the
design of the language itself and its desired (or unwanted)
features.  General questions about the Perl 6 language tend
to come here, as well as patches and suggestions for improving
the Perl 6 design documents (Apocalypses, Synopses, etc.).

perl6-internals
Discussion of the design, development, and implementation of
Parrot, the virtual machine underlying Perl 6 and other
interpreted languages.  Messages here focus on implementing
and testing the Parrot virtual machine, patches to the Parrot
implementation, porting Parrot to other target platforms, 
the components and design features needed for Parrot to 
support higher-level languages, and selected high-level language
compilers (e.g. Tcl, Lisp, etc.).

perl6-compiler
Discussion of the development and implementation of Perl 6
compilers and runtime components, including Pugs and the
Parrot Grammar Engine (Perl 6 rules).  Questions, bug
reports, and patches regarding existing Perl 6 compilers and 
runtime components go here.


Pm


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-15 Thread David Storrs

On Jun 15, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:


And here they are...  this is just a draft -- feel free to flame/edit/
tear it apart liberally.  These are also written assuming we don't
create a perl6-general list (but it shouldn't be hard to adapt them
should one be created).


Well, I'd suggest the following.  (Anything not mentioned stays as  
you wrote it.)



perl6-language
This is the theory of list. Discussion of the design of the  
perl6

language, and its desired (or unwanted) feature list. If you have
patches and/or suggestions for improving the Perl 6 design  
documents

(Apocalypses, Synopses, etc.), send them here.


perl6-howto
This is the practice of list.  Come here to ask How do I...,  
What
does XYZ mean?, or Why doesn't this work?  Novices are  
especially

welcome.

(Note:  I envision this list being much like beginners@perl.org, but  
I never liked that name because it seems like it would drive away  
those who have a question but do not consider themselves beginners.   
On the other hand, maybe it's more important to explicitly welcome  
novices.  I could go either way:  maybe the above list should be  
'perl6-beginners')




new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-14 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András

Hi,

I would have some general Perl6 programming questions. Where should I ask 
them? It's not about language design, not about compiling/compilers and 
even not related to the internals.


As more and more people will start hacking Perl6, I think, that it would 
be useful to having a list for this.


In this particular case, I would like to ask about creating a langugage 
construct (maybe there's a desgin pattern for it, maybe not) for a web 
templating system can be expanded by the user.


Bye,
  Andras


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-14 Thread Fagyal Csongor

Hi,

Just wanted to say the same. All my questions starting as How to... 
and Is this... are just to trivial to ask here :)


OTOH as there is no global Perl5 list (AFAIK, at least), these things 
should go to the regional mail-lists - later on. However, at this 
phase of develpment of Perl6/Pugs/Parrot/Andtherest, we would just 
overload those who are not (yet) interested in Perl6 with a continuous 
fear of getting Warnocked ;)


Andras++

- Fagzal


Hi,

I would have some general Perl6 programming questions. Where should I 
ask them? It's not about language design, not about 
compiling/compilers and even not related to the internals.


As more and more people will start hacking Perl6, I think, that it 
would be useful to having a list for this.


In this particular case, I would like to ask about creating a 
langugage construct (maybe there's a desgin pattern for it, maybe not) 
for a web templating system can be expanded by the user.


Bye,
  Andras





Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-14 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Fagyal Csongor wrote:
 Just wanted to say the same. All my questions starting as How to... 
 and Is this... are just to trivial to ask here :)
 
 - Fagzal
 
 I would have some general Perl6 programming questions. Where should I 
 ask them? It's not about language design, not about 
 compiling/compilers and even not related to the internals.
 
 Bye,
   Andras


If you're IRC-able, then get on irc.freenode.net and join #perl6. People
there are always happy to blather on about perl6 stuff that is related
to pugs/perl6 development (including general perl6 programming
questions).

-Scott
-- 
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-14 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:54:45PM +0200, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
 I would have some general Perl6 programming questions. Where should I ask 
 them? It's not about language design, not about compiling/compilers and 
 even not related to the internals.
 
 As more and more people will start hacking Perl6, I think, that it would 
 be useful to having a list for this.

As you mention, general Perl6 programming questions probably don't
belong on perl6-compiler, as that list is focused more on compiler
implementation issues (Perl6, Pugs,  PGE) than on how does the
language work.

So, that leaves either perl6-language or a new list.  Personally I
could see it going either way -- even though general Perl6 programming
questions aren't directly about language design, it may still be
useful to language designers to see the types of questions that 
people are asking and to see how well the language design can work in
practice.  Or maybe that's not needed.  But I tend to lean away from
list proliferation where possible.

So, I'd suggest putting general questions about Perl 6 on perl6-language.  
In saying this, however, I think it's important to try to distinguish
questions about Perl 6 from questions about the various implementing
components such as Pugs, PGE, and any forthcoming Perl 6 compiler(s).
For some time these implementations will be only approximations of
the Perl 6 language design, so they're not authoritative as far
as testing understanding of Perl 6.  (But they are often very
illustrative and educational. :-)  So, questions like XYZ doesn't
seem to work in Pugs or PGE probably belong on perl6-compiler.

So, as a general rule of thumb, I'd say that if a question involves
getting something to actually run with the available Perl 6 tools,
then that question belongs on perl6-compiler.  Otherwise, perl6-language
(or a new list for that purpose) is the place to go.

Perhaps what we need is updated descriptions of the various mailing
lists on perl.org (http://dev.perl.org/perl6/lists/)?  I'll draft
some proposed changes to that page.

Pm


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-14 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András

Hi,


So, that leaves either perl6-language or a new list.  Personally I
could see it going either way -- even though general Perl6 programming
questions aren't directly about language design, it may still be
useful to language designers to see the types of questions that
people are asking and to see how well the language design can work in
practice.  Or maybe that's not needed.  But I tend to lean away from
list proliferation where possible.



So, I'd suggest putting general questions about Perl 6 on perl6-language.
In saying this, however, I think it's important to try to distinguish
questions about Perl 6 from questions about the various implementing
components such as Pugs, PGE, and any forthcoming Perl 6 compiler(s).
For some time these implementations will be only approximations of
the Perl 6 language design, so they're not authoritative as far
as testing understanding of Perl 6.  (But they are often very
illustrative and educational. :-)  So, questions like XYZ doesn't
seem to work in Pugs or PGE probably belong on perl6-compiler.


Where should I ask, that what's PGE means? Yes, I know, it's Parrot 
Grammar Engine, and I know what it is, but a beginnner maybe not. And I 
think that there are a lot of questions around like this, but people feel, 
that those questions don't fit to the lists. Or maybe not, don't know. I 
agree, that it is useful for the designers to see the questions, but if it 
will be a separate list, it still won't be impossible for them.


Anyway, I understand why you wrote what you wrote, so as there will be no 
decision, I'll ask my questions on perl6-compiler.


Bye,
  Andras


Re: new mailing list: perl6-general?

2005-06-14 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András

Hi,

Anyway, I understand why you wrote what you wrote, so as there will be no 
decision, I'll ask my questions on perl6-compiler.


I mean, perl6-language.

Bye,
  Andras