On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 20:03, Jeremy Haile wrote:
Is it feasible to add a reindex concurrently that doesn't lock the
table for the rebuild, then locks the table when doing a second pass to
pickup rows that were changed after the first pass? Or something like
that
IIRC, the objection was
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I installed Fedora Core 5 Linux to my x86 Desktop machine, it
automatically included PostGreSQL. What is the proper way to
uninstall?
Because you are probably a new user of Fedora, you should use
graphical interface called pirut - if should
Paul Lambert wrote:
G'day folks,
I'm faily new to the world of Postgre so excuse me if these questions seem
ignorant.
My current employer develops a software package which runs on OpenVMS on HP
Alpha/Itanium servers and contains a custom
database comprised of various format text and
Mike Poe wrote:
The designer of the SQL 2000 database decided to store binary data
(images) directly in this table. When I attempt to replicate it to my
PG database, SQL replication agent throws an error:
The process encountered invalid column data in bcp file
'path\to\bcpfile.bcp'.
I
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 14:26 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:39:45AM +, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Russell Smith wrote:
Strange idea that I haven't researched, Given Vacuum can't be run in a
transaction, it is possible at a certain point to quit the current
Right,
You also have to realize that your first query might return zero results,
and MySQL (and maybe this is correct SQL behavior) balks at an empty value
set where table_id in ().
I would expect that giving the DBMS the whole picture of what you want to
do, should allow it to make better
select * from table where table_id in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ...)
I usually try to rewrite this kind of queries to
select whatever from table t1 join
(select table_id from x where x) t2 using (table_id)
And 3 out of 4 this performs better on Oracle and PostgreSQL.
Would be curious
Russell Smith wrote:
2. Index cleanup is the most expensive part of vacuum. So doing a
partial vacuum actually means more I/O as you have to do index cleanup
more often.
I don't think that's usually the case. Index(es) are typically only a
fraction of the size of the table, and since 8.2 we
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Paul Lambert wrote:
G'day folks,
I'm faily new to the world of Postgre so excuse me if these questions seem
ignorant.
My current employer develops a software package which runs on OpenVMS on HP
Alpha/Itanium servers and contains a custom
database comprised of
David Fetter wrote:
EnterpriseDB is now offering support packages for the main branch of
PostgreSQL.
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/postgre_pricing.do
Huh, it's interesting that they managed to get the Postgre stuff in
the URL!
--
Alvaro Herrera
On 1/22/07, Harald Armin Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
select * from table where table_id in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ...)
I usually try to rewrite this kind of queries to
select whatever from table t1 join
(select table_id from x where x) t2 using (table_id)
And 3 out of 4 this
Chad,
select * from table where table_id in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ...)
I usually try to rewrite this kind of queries to
select whatever from table t1 join
(select table_id from x where x) t2 using (table_id)
Because the results would be different than a subselect, less work
This may seem like a question unrelated to Postgresql, but I have recently
noticed a project that is having a discussion about how their code should
be developed. They are (unfortunately) developing first with MySQL, because
that is what they are familiar with (I assume), but that inevitably
Tom Lane wrote:
imageguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So... unless I am missing something, I would suggest you CANNOT us
plpython (or perhaps any other pl language ??) to process transactions
I think the point you are missing is that every function already runs
within a transaction. You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/07 03:43, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Paul Lambert wrote:
G'day folks,
I'm faily new to the world of Postgre so excuse me if these
questions seem ignorant.
My current employer develops a software package which runs on
OpenVMS on HP
Tom Lane wrote:
imageguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my testing so far, it seems that each call to plpy.execute('INSERT
INTO ') is committed immediately.
On what do you base that (erroneous) conclusion?
The fact that a transaction can see its own updates does not mean they
are
Hello,
I tried to execute ALTER TABLE emp DISABLE TRIGGER after_ins_emp on PostgreSQL
7.4.13 and I realised that feature isn't include yet in this version.
How can I enable/disable a trigger in this version of PostgreSQL? Should I set
the attribute tgenabled from pg_trigger directly?
Hope you
On 21 Jan 2007 at 15:11, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:27:41PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On 1/21/07, mbneto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a dumpall file generated from a 8.0 version that I need to import
back to a 7.4 server.
Is there a way to do that?
Hi,
I've just stumbled across the Mimer SQL Validator (commercial product):
http://developer.mimer.com/validator/
Not that I know it...
Anyway, there are different things (like PHP scripts or stored
procedures and such), which do a whole lot of other logic and/or
processing which influences
How good is postgresql security?
For example, If I have data that I do not anyone to see, including the programmer/dba, is it enough
to change the password to the only user?
If they have access to the raw files is there a way for them to somehow see the
data?
can they copy the files to another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/07 07:09, Paul Lambert wrote:
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Paul Lambert wrote:
[snip]
I'd imagine there aren't too many VMS programmers around that
would be willing to port Postgres either, but if anyone out there
with experience in VMS
am Mon, dem 22.01.2007, um 16:10:15 +0200 mailte Sim Zacks folgendes:
How good is postgresql security?
For example, If I have data that I do not anyone to see, including the
programmer/dba, is it enough to change the password to the only user?
If they have access to the raw files is there a
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 04:10:15PM +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
How good is postgresql security?
Good, within limits.
For example, If I have data that I do not anyone to see, including the
programmer/dba, is it enough to change the password to the only user?
If they have access to the raw files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/07 08:22, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 04:10:15PM +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
How good is postgresql security?
Good, within limits.
For example, If I have data that I do not anyone to see, including the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/07 05:49, Peter Rosenthal wrote:
Right,
You also have to realize that your first query might return zero results,
and MySQL (and maybe this is correct SQL behavior) balks at an empty value
set where table_id in ().
I would expect
I've created my own type: y_octet_16. Now I'm trying to create a CAST
function for this type, but I'm not quite getting it.
The input function for my type takes a 32 char hex string as input.
CREATE TABLE bt (
name
TEXT
NOT NULL,
val
y_octet_16
NOT NULL
);
CREATE INDEX
OK, this looks better:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION getregistrationtagging()
RETURNS SETOF ty_usertracking AS
$BODY$
DECLARE objReturn ty_usertracking%rowtype;
BEGIN
for objReturn IN
SELECT date_part('day',trackdate) as ty_day,
date_part('month',trackdate) as
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:05:30PM -0800, Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Sunday 21 January 2007 15:56, gustavo halperin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have another question about triggers, how can I pass arguments ?? I
read about some struct TriggerData *CurrentTriggerData, but I didn't
found any
am Mon, dem 22.01.2007, um 15:58:32 +0100 mailte Moritz Bayer folgendes:
But still the question:
Is it possible to put a loop into a loop? Or doesn't it make sense at all?
Yes, is possible, why not? And sometimes it make sense...
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Russell Smith wrote:
2. Index cleanup is the most expensive part of vacuum. So doing a
partial vacuum actually means more I/O as you have to do index cleanup
more often.
I don't think that's usually the case. Index(es) are typically only a
fraction of the
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:30:53AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
The answer depends heavily on what the programmer/dba can do.
Any superuser of the DB can see any data
Any user that can access the raw files can see any data
Any user that can poke into memory can see any data
Any user that
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote:
I've created my own type: y_octet_16. Now I'm trying to create a CAST
function for this type, but I'm not quite getting it.
Quick question: do you mean:
val
y_octet_16
^^
VALUES
( 'aaa', encode(
On 22 Jan 2007 at 16:10, Sim Zacks wrote:
How good is postgresql security?
For example, If I have data that I do not anyone to see, including the
programmer/dba, is it enough
to change the password to the only user?
If they have access to the raw files is there a way for them to somehow
Ron Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've created my own type: y_octet_16. Now I'm trying to create a CAST
^^
% INSERT INTO bt( name, val ) VALUES
( 'aaa', encode( y_uuid_generate(), 'hex' )::y_byte_16 );
ERROR: type y_byte_16 does not exist
I have a customer who is wants to migrate his MSSQL database to
PostgreSQL and we'll replace his application ASP with PHP. The issues
should be limited as there are no stored procedures or triggers in
MSSQL, just structure and data should be all that is needed to migrate.
I have never migrated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/07 09:55, Jan Muszynski wrote:
On 22 Jan 2007 at 16:10, Sim Zacks wrote:
How good is postgresql security? For example, If I have data
that I do not anyone to see, including the programmer/dba, is
it enough to change the password to the
David Goodenough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This may seem like a question unrelated to Postgresql, but I have recently
noticed a project that is having a discussion about how their code should
be developed. They are (unfortunately) developing first with MySQL, because
that is what they are
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 04:36:20PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote:
I've created my own type: y_octet_16. Now I'm trying to create a CAST
function for this type, but I'm not quite getting it.
Quick question: do you mean:
=?iso-8859-1?q?Germ=E1n_H=FCttemann_Arza?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I tried to execute ALTER TABLE emp DISABLE TRIGGER after_ins_emp on
PostgreSQL
7.4.13 and I realised that feature isn't include yet in this version.
How can I enable/disable a trigger in this version of PostgreSQL?
On Monday 22 January 2007 07:04, Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can pass literal string arguments to a trigger function. See
the CREATE TRIGGER documentation and, for PL/pgSQL, TG_ARGV and
TG_NARGS. For C see Writing Trigger Functions in C; search for
tgnargs and tgargs.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 15:16:37 +0200,
Andrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the tables would be on the server, the same as was already being done.
Using a separate table makes it more future proof.
To access tables in server, you need to login into server.
To login into server, you need
On 22 Jan 2007 at 10:15, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/22/07 09:55, Jan Muszynski wrote:
On 22 Jan 2007 at 16:10, Sim Zacks wrote:
How good is postgresql security? For example, If I have data
that I do not anyone to see, including the programmer/dba, is
it enough to change the password to
Original Message From: Moritz Bayer
But still the question:
Is it possible to put a loop into a loop? Or doesn't it make sense at all?
I'm not sure what the OP was about, but Yes, it it possible to put a loop into
a loop. See:
Wanting to do something similar I recently submitted a large patch to the
mysql2pgsql project. It will now handle conversion of a mysqldump file
complete with data for the quite large and diverse DB I was using it with.
I'm sure there are still corner cases, but you should give it a try:
Ron Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That cleared one hurdle, but I'm still not there yet.
% select 'fe43d07c0c624786bebfcb3357a2a13a'::y_octet_16;
y_octet_16
--
fe43d07c0c624786bebfcb3357a2a13a
That's not invoking any cast function, but the
Hi, I'm hoping someone can help me wrap my head around some #s I'm using
to track database activity. I have a script that runs hourly and
queries pg_stat_database and checks age(datfrozenxid) in pg_database.
It logs those stats and the next hour, when it runs, it takes the
differences to
Hello group,
I've got a new problem where I hope someone can give me a solution.
I have witten a function which should give back a type created by me. To get
the data into the type, I have to go through a loop, which holds other
loops.
Simplified (not really), it looks like this:
CREATE OR
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:40:08AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That cleared one hurdle, but I'm still not there yet.
% select 'fe43d07c0c624786bebfcb3357a2a13a'::y_octet_16;
y_octet_16
--
Here is Josh Berkus' solution for randomly picking a single row from a
query. I think the FAQ (www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#item4.1)
could be updated with a link to this solution, which is more practical
for large queries.
www.powerpostgresql.com/Random_Aggregate
Here is a
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Russell Smith wrote:
2. Index cleanup is the most expensive part of vacuum. So doing a
partial vacuum actually means more I/O as you have to do index cleanup
more often.
I don't think that's usually the case. Index(es) are typically only a
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 16:32 +, Peter Rosenthal wrote:
Wanting to do something similar I recently submitted a large patch to
the mysql2pgsql project. It will now handle conversion of a mysqldump
file complete with data for the quite large and diverse DB I was using
it with. I'm sure there
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Russell Smith wrote:
2. Index cleanup is the most expensive part of vacuum. So doing a
partial vacuum actually means more I/O as you have to do index cleanup
more often.
I don't think that's usually the case.
Is the original application ASP or SP.NET? It makes a difference,
particularly if it was developed to take advantage of ASP.NET 2. It might
conceivably be ASP.NET 3, but since that is brand new I can't see anyone
paying to replace an ASP.NET 3 application that was just created. If it is
Hi Andreas,
if it is possible, can you tell me what error I 've put in my first
function?
Thanks,
Mo
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Any docs or other helpful info is welcome, just
looking for some advise.
One think I would recommend is to make sure when creating the new table
structure that you make
sure not to use capitalized object names. Because MS SQL server can be
case insensitive I
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 12:18 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
In any case, for the statement Index cleanup is the most expensive part
of vacuum to be true, you're indexes would have to take up 2x as much
space as the heap, since the heap is scanned twice. I'm sure
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree it index cleanup isn't 50% of vacuum. I was trying to figure
out how small, and it seems about 15% of the total table, which means if
we have bitmap vacuum, we can conceivably reduce vacuum load by perhaps
80%, assuming 5% of the table is
Yep, agreed on the random I/O issue. The larger question is if you have
a huge table, do you care to reclaim 3% of the table size, rather than
just vacuum it when it gets to 10% dirty? I realize the vacuum is going
to take a lot of time, but vacuuming to relaim 3% three times seems like
it is
Hello,
does somebody know of an extension for postgres that allows the use
of printf-like format strings?
PL/Perl comes to mind, but how could one take care of the variable
argument count?
Thanks for any advice!
Sincerely
Alexander Presber
---(end of
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yep, agreed on the random I/O issue. The larger question is if you have
a huge table, do you care to reclaim 3% of the table size, rather than
just vacuum it when it gets to 10% dirty? I realize the vacuum is going
to take a lot of time, but
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 13:27 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yep, agreed on the random I/O issue. The larger question is if you have
a huge table, do you care to reclaim 3% of the table size, rather than
just vacuum it when it gets to 10% dirty? I realize the vacuum is going
to take a lot of
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 10:01, Shashank wrote:
It seems MySQL just dropped the ball on
the free version of their product, and it
Not sure what you mean. I can download their latest versions without
any trouble.
Additionally, they feel that Oracle is such a threat that they have dumped
On Monday 22 January 2007 12:59 pm, Alexander Presber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thus communicated:
Hello,
does somebody know of an extension for postgres that allows the use
of printf-like format strings?
PL/Perl comes to mind, but how could one take care of the variable
argument count?
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Jan 2007, 10:25:33 -0600 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
I didn't give an opinion on whether or not the whole approach was a good
idea or not, since there wasn't enough detail in the original question.
What I want to do is the following:
1. Login in from a program on a client as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Alexander Presber asked:
does somebody know of an extension for postgres that allows the use
of printf-like format strings?
PL/Perl comes to mind, but how could one take care of the variable
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 12:13 -0500, Ted Byers wrote:
Is the original application ASP or SP.NET? It makes a difference,
particularly if it was developed to take advantage of ASP.NET 2. It might
conceivably be ASP.NET 3, but since that is brand new I can't see anyone
paying to replace an
I have found the following technique works well for me:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION audit_log_sprintf(text,integer) RETURNS TEXT as $$
my $fmt = shift;
my $id = shift;
my $msg = spi_exec_query(SELECT array_upper(msg_args,1) FROM audit_logs WHERE id
= $id,1);
my $nArgs =
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:30 +0800, Shashank Tripathi wrote:
The problem is when the number of rows exceeds 30 million, MySQL
performance degrades substantially. For most people, this is not an
issue. PG is solid with huge databases, but in my experience, even the
most optimized subselect on PG
Greetings,
I've had a strange error crop up recently on a table 'Item' which
contains about 60 rows and lives in a development database I'm currently
working on. Since the DB was last freshly created from a dump file
several days ago I've added/dropped/altered a few tables (not
necessarily
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/07 07:09, Paul Lambert wrote:
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Paul Lambert wrote:
[snip]
I'd imagine there aren't too many VMS programmers around that
would be willing to port Postgres either, but if anyone
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 06:55 -0800, brian stone wrote:
Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a
postgresql database? I need an active active configuration; master-
master with fail over. The project I am working needs to support a
very large number of transactions a
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:17:05AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
EnterpriseDB is now offering support packages for the main branch
of PostgreSQL.
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/postgre_pricing.do
Huh, it's interesting that they managed to get the Postgre stuff
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yep, agreed on the random I/O issue. The larger question is if you have
a huge table, do you care to reclaim 3% of the table size, rather than
just vacuum it when it gets to 10% dirty? I realize the vacuum is going
to take a lot of time, but vacuuming to relaim 3%
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yep, agreed on the random I/O issue. The larger question is if you have
a huge table, do you care to reclaim 3% of the table size, rather than
just vacuum it when it gets to 10% dirty? I realize the vacuum is going
to take a lot of time, but vacuuming to relaim 3% three
Gregory Stark wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree it index cleanup isn't 50% of vacuum. I was trying to figure
out how small, and it seems about 15% of the total table, which means if
we have bitmap vacuum, we can conceivably reduce vacuum load by perhaps
80%, assuming 5%
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 06:42:09PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Hold that thought! Read Heikki's Piggyback VACUUM idea on new thread...
There may be other functions that could leverage a similar sort of
infrastructure. For example, a long DB mining query could be
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yep, agreed on the random I/O issue. The larger question is if you have
a huge table, do you care to reclaim 3% of the table size, rather than
just vacuum it when it gets to 10% dirty? I realize the vacuum is going
to take a lot of time, but
I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL also
lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have them but from
my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
I need atomic actions across an N number of application servers. The goal here
is scalability,
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:17:05AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
EnterpriseDB is now offering support packages for the main branch
of PostgreSQL.
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/postgre_pricing.do
Huh, it's interesting that they
We have a large number (50+) of pre-8.2 clusters. How can I
best/most easily identify those indices most bloated and in need
of reindex/rebuilding?
Ed
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
brian stone wrote:
I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL
also lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have
them but from my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
I need atomic actions across an N number of application servers. The
goal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/07 14:01, Paul Lambert wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/22/07 07:09, Paul Lambert wrote:
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Paul Lambert wrote:
[snip]
[snip]
We've got pretty new hardware - DS15's, DS25's, Itaniums and so
forth. But we
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:17:05AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
EnterpriseDB is now offering support packages for the main branch
of PostgreSQL.
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/postgre_pricing.do
Huh, it's interesting that
Dave Page wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:17:05AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
EnterpriseDB is now offering support packages for the main branch
of PostgreSQL.
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/postgre_pricing.do
Huh, it's
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:37 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
brian stone wrote:
I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL
also lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have
them but from my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
I need atomic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Stark
Sent: maandag 22 januari 2007 19:41
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas; Russell Smith; Darcy Buskermolen;
Simon Riggs; Alvaro Herrera; Matthew T. O'Connor; Pavan
Deolasee; Christopher
I dont have the replication setup on my machine right now but I guess as far
as I remember you can surely check for the master and slave nodes from a
Slony schema table.
Shoaib Mir
EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com)
On 19 Jan 2007 08:25:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
No, the tables would be on the server, the same as was already being done.
Using a separate table makes it more future proof.
To access tables in server, you need to login into server.
To login into server, you need postresql user name and password sent by
client and thus stored in client
John, you may not like it but we are in a competitive marketing environment
with MySQL (even if both products are open source), and also with Oracle,
SQL*Server, etc.
The MySQL folks will take every chance they get to point out instances where
PostgreSQL performance is inferior to MySQL (and
I am trying to figure out how to use a regex and an ANY(), without any
luck, to determine if at least one element of an array (on the right)
matches the given constant pattern (on the left).
I think the problem is because the pattern expects to be on the right
side with the target on the left,
Benedict Faria wrote:
I need to use a postgreSQL equivalent for Updatetext and
ReadText in MS SQL Server. Any pointers on what the PostgreSQL
equivalent is?
Hi Benedict,
I don't see an exact equivalent to MS SQL Server's UpdateText (and
ReadText) commands in pgsql or any other PostgreSQL
I think any comparison between mysql and postgresql is faulty. I have used
mysql for a very long time. As my skills matured and I was entrusted with
larger projects, I could no longer make an intelligent case to use mysql over
postgresql. I needed more from my database.
Most arguments in
Nicolas Barbier wrote:
2007/1/19, Paul Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A number of months ago I was pointed towards Postgre as a reliable
database
server
Please don't use the word Postgre:
url:http://stoned.homeunix.org/~itsme/postgre/.
greetings,
Nicolas
My apologies, being relatively new to
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Paul Lambert wrote:
G'day folks,
I'm faily new to the world of Postgre so excuse me if these questions seem
ignorant.
My current employer develops a software package which runs on OpenVMS on HP
Alpha/Itanium servers and contains a custom
database comprised of
i am fatching record's from data base between two date range for
registration_date coloum and than group by an count it using
count(registration_date) i have to show all dates even if date is not there
in registration_date ,it should show date and 0 in count.,how can i do it
plz healp...
Hi,
I have a slow response of my PostgreSQL database 7.4 using this query below
on a table with 80 rows:
select count(*)from tbl;
PostgreSQL return result in 28 sec every time.
although MS-SQL return result in 0.02 sec every time.
My server is a DELL PowerEdge 2600 with bi-processor Xeon
Hi,
This is my first venture into PostgreSQL.
I built and installer PostgreSQL 8.2.1 as part of a Xythos
installation. I added a user called xythos and now I'm trying to add
the initial databases that the product requires. From the command line,
I executed the commands:
createdb -U xythos -E
Strictly speaking, Unicode is a whole family of code pages. Unicode
generally means multi-byte character encoding. UTF-8 is the most common
encoding implementation of Unicode at the moment. UTF-16 is also
popular, but very few systems need that many characters or wish to
devote that many bytes
Engada wrote:
I'm faily new to the world of Postgre so excuse me if these questions seem
ignorant.
My current employer develops a software package which runs on OpenVMS on
HP Alpha/Itanium servers and contains a custom
database comprised of various format text and binary files. I.e.
Rob Tanner wrote:
createdb -U xythos -E UNICODE XythosDocumentStoreDB
createdb -U xythos -E UNICODE XythosGlobalDB
When I look at what I've done with psql -l, I get
List of databases
Name | Owner | Encoding
---+--+--
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
