On 13.12.2010 09:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 13.12.2010 08:44, Fujii Masao wrote:
pg_archivecleanup removes unnecessary WAL files from the archive, but not
from pg_xlog directory. So, after failover,
Hello
this is little bit offtopic, sorry.
I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in core
- like Perl, Python or Javascript. So, I don't think, so migration of
hstore to core is good idea.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2010/12/13 Jan Urbański wulc...@wulczer.org:
It would be
Robert Haas wrote:
I'm wondering why md.c is converting the results from an exact value to a
floating
point, only to have xlog.c turn around and convert back to an integer.
I think it could just return milliseconds directly, or if you're
worried about a checkpoint that takes more than 24 days
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
If the only consequence is that you get some extra WAL files in the archive,
until pg_archivecleanup runs again, I think we can just live with it.
We might get some extra WAL files also in pg_xlog.
Hey Pavel,
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
Hello
this is little bit offtopic, sorry.
I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in core
- like Perl, Python or Javascript. So, I don't think, so migration of
hstore to core is good idea.
Could you tell
On 2010-12-13 03:28, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I'm not real familiar with contingency tables, but it seems like
you could end up needing to store a huge amount of data to get any
benefit out of it, in some cases. For example, in the United States,
there are over 40,000 postal codes, and some
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
The incremental FK checks are designed on the assumption that the
constraint condition held before; they aren't likely to behave very
sanely if the data is bad. I'd want to see a whole lot more analysis of
the resulting behavior before even considering an
On 2010-12-13 03:28, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I'm not real familiar with contingency tables, but it seems like
you could end up needing to store a huge amount of data to get any
benefit out of it, in some cases. For example, in the United States,
there are over 40,000 postal codes, and some
2010/12/13 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
But allow me to harbor doubts that they really
intend to allow someone to force a constraint to be considered valid
without any verification.
Table constraints are either enforced or not enforced. Domain
constraints and assertions are always enforced.,
Hi All,
drainSelfPipe() function will read the data and remove it from the
descriptor?
Coz the signal (SIGUSR1) is writing sata to selfPipe descriptor but unable
to wake up latch on select system call.
Data is not avaialable at select in WaitLatch fun. Coz it is read by
drailSelfPipe().
So How
On 13 December 2010 10:30, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Seriously, real-world use cases such as Kevin's one seems to warrant
that we are able to create a table withouth enforcing the FK. That's
horrid, yes, that's needed, too. Maybe some operations would have to be
instructed
2010/12/12 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
to the current v9.1 development cycle.
It seems to me that the next commit after the label-switcher-function
patch ought to be a contrib module that implements a basic form of
SE-Linux
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
I'm wondering why md.c is converting the results from an exact value to a
floating
point, only to have xlog.c turn around and convert back to an integer.
I think it could just return milliseconds
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Rob Wultsch wult...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
In fact it's possible now to disable FK enforcement, by disabling the
triggers. It's definitely a footgun though. Just the other day I was asked
how
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch, but that issue with limited number of backup
blocks needs to be resolved. The straightforward way would be to change the
WAL format to increase the limit.
Eh, is that
On 13.12.2010 15:04, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch, but that issue with limited number of backup
blocks needs to be resolved. The straightforward way would be to change the
WAL
On 13.12.2010 15:20, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 13.12.2010 15:04, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch, but that issue with limited number of
backup
blocks needs to be resolved. The
(2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/12/12 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
to the current v9.1 development cycle.
It seems to me that the next commit after the label-switcher-function
patch ought to be a contrib module that
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 06:08, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
The other infrastructure patch that has been mark ready for commit then
commented further upon by Tom is $subject, even if the function provided
as been renamed to pg_execute_sql_file().
Please find attached the
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
Hey Pavel,
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
Hello
this is little bit offtopic, sorry.
I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in core
- like Perl, Python or Javascript. So, I don't think, so migration
Itagaki Takahiro itagaki.takah...@gmail.com writes:
I think the version is almost OK, but I have a couple of comments:
- Why do you need directory_fctx in genfile.h ?
I then use it in extension.c, this way:
typedef struct extension_fctx
{
directory_fctx dir;
ExtensionList
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:35 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
What about having the following keys supported in the control file:
upgrade_version = 'script.version.sql'
upgrade_all = 'script.sql'
Why not just use an upgrade script naming convention? Think: Convention over
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:21:05AM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Do you have any more improvements in the pipeline?
I'd like to add $arrayref = decode_array_literal('{2,3}') and
maybe $hashref =
On Monday 13 December 2010 15:27:48 Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
Hey Pavel,
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
Hello
this is little bit offtopic, sorry.
I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in
Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca writes:
Mainly, because of the situation where I have may versions that can
all be upgraded from the same script. I'ld much rather distribution
just 3 scripts (install + 2 upgrades), and a control file with
something like this (pretend I'm on version 2.6)
On 12/13/2010 09:42 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote:
I used to work on a patch that converts postgres arrays into perl array
references:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg01552.php
I have a newer patch, which is, however, limited to one-dimensional resulting
arrays. If there's
Interesting argument.
I can ask, how many people knows what is tsvector or tsquery ?
Or how many people knows what is polygon or path ?
The answer is: everyone who need or using it.
Hstore is a proven and well designed solution. And in fact I am
surprising why it does not in core yet?!
2010/12/13 Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de:
On Monday 13 December 2010 15:27:48 Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
Hey Pavel,
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
Hello
this is little bit offtopic, sorry.
I am thinking, so we need a
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, that's recommended in the document, but I don't want to use that.
Because that might make new master fail to archive WAL file because of
existence of half-baked file in the archive, after failover. This can happen
On Monday 13 December 2010 16:01:35 Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/12/13 Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de:
On Monday 13 December 2010 15:27:48 Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
Hey Pavel,
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
Hello
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
Interesting argument.
I can ask, how many people knows what is tsvector or tsquery ?
Or how many people knows what is polygon or path ?
TSearch isn't good example. There are not a common interface for fulltext.
The answer is: everyone who
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
But that creates a new problem: There's a maximum of three backup blocks
per WAL record, but a GiST page can be split into any number of child
pages as one operation. You might run out of backup block slots.
Attached is an
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Again, I'ld love for the version to support some sort of prefix or
wildcard matching, so I could do:
upgrade-1.* = $EXT-upgrade-1.sql
upgrade-2.* = $EXT-upgrade-2.sql
Problem is: what to do if a single
name and interface - hstore is designed as external module - a
internal class can be designed different.
Could you actually name such a difference rather than pointing to some airily
hint of one? That would make it way much easier to see where you want to go.
My idea is:
somevar['key'] =
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
Well, until this point we've discussed failure cases involving 'AND'
conditions. What about 'OR' conditions? I think the current optimizer
computes the selectivity as 's1+s2 - s1*s2' (at least that's what I
found in backend/optimizer/path/clausesel.c:630).
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Here's my understanding.
It's not initdb that's really complaining. The timezone files are not inputs
to initdb. It's the postgres that initdb invokes that's complaining.
Postges will look for the share file in two
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
The proposed solution is based on contingency tables, built for selected
groups of columns (not for each possible group). And the contingency
table gives you the ability to estimate the
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
On Dec13, 2010, at 00:16 , Robert Haas wrote:
And in fact it strikes me that we might not have much choice about how
to fix this. I think we are not going to retroactively change the
behavior of ALTER DATABASE .. SET ROLE in a released version, but yet
we
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:54 +, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 13 December 2010 10:30, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Seriously, real-world use cases such as Kevin's one seems to warrant
that we are able to create a table withouth enforcing the FK. That's
horrid, yes, that's
Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca writes:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:35 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com
wrote:
Why not just use an upgrade script naming convention?
Mainly, because of the situation where I have may versions that can
all be upgraded from the same script. I'ld much
Excerpts from BRUSSER Michael's message of lun dic 13 12:34:49 -0300 2010:
I'm not sure if our current approach would work with v8.4. This is what we do
in the nutshell:
- build Postgres
- do not run install
- collect all generated libraries, executables and input files and pack them
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
Could you actually name such a difference rather than pointing to some airily
hint of one? That would make it way much easier to see where you want to go.
My idea is:
somevar['key'] = value
value = somevar['key'];
or with constructor
somevar
BRUSSER Michael michael.brus...@3ds.com writes:
I'm not sure if our current approach would work with v8.4. This is what we do
in the nutshell:
- build Postgres
- do not run install
- collect all generated libraries, executables and input files and pack them
along with other app
-
On 12/13/2010 01:31 AM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 05:30, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 12/04/2010 11:11 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
One exports the copy functions from the core, and another
implements file_fdw using the infrastructure.
Who is actually
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, KaiGai Kohei kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
(2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/12/12 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
to the current v9.1 development cycle.
It seems to me that the next
On 11/01/2010 10:10 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Hiroshi Inouein...@tpf.co.jp wrote:
The problem which was fixed by your old patch is at runtime not
at compilation time. Is it fixed with gcc 4.5?
Now it works as far as simple test, including core functions and
My most serious pro about hstore in core is a better dump/restore
support. Also, since we have so much better hstore and people started
to use it in their projects, it'd be great to have built-in feature in
PostgreSQL, which mimic key-value or document-oriented database.
Oleg
On Mon, 13
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun dic 13 12:50:43 -0300 2010:
I see no advantage of this over a script per version combination, so
long as you allow scripts to \include each other.
Hmm, are the upgrade scripts going to be run via SPI?
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
(a) ALTER TABLE ... ADD FOREIGN KEY ... NOT VALIDATED INITIALLY;
will add a FK but NOT run the check - we mark it as check pending.
Lock held: ShareRowExclusiveLock
Seems about right. Not sure whether the lock strength
There are a lot of operators and functions to work with hstore.
Does it worth it to implement similar things only to make it
possible using operator [] ?
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
name and interface - hstore is designed as external module - a
internal class can be
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Hmm. I don't think that's going to expose enough for what I want to be
able to do. I actually had in mind exposing lower level routines like
CopyReadAttibutesCSV/CopyReadAttributesText and allowing the Foreign
Data Wrapper to manipulate the raw
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I see no advantage of this over a script per version combination, so
long as you allow scripts to \include each other.
I guess the following should do:
SELECT pg_execute_sql_file('upgrade-1.sql');
But I rather prefer the 2-liner control file, myself:
On Dec13, 2010, at 16:40 , Tom Lane wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
On Dec13, 2010, at 00:16 , Robert Haas wrote:
And in fact it strikes me that we might not have much choice about how
to fix this. I think we are not going to retroactively change the
behavior of ALTER DATABASE ..
On 12/13/2010 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net writes:
Hmm. I don't think that's going to expose enough for what I want to be
able to do. I actually had in mind exposing lower level routines like
CopyReadAttibutesCSV/CopyReadAttributesText and allowing the Foreign
2010/12/14 Shigeru HANADA han...@metrosystems.co.jp:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:03:29 +0200
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I propose the attached API instead. This has a clear separation between
plan and execution. I'm sure we'll have to extend the API in the future
2010/12/13 Shigeru HANADA han...@metrosystems.co.jp:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:47:53 +0200
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-12-01 at 12:30 +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
From a user's view, this is very long way to see a simplest foreign
table. I know it is based on the
On 12/13/2010 12:54 AM, Glen Knowles wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What are the values of _S_IREAD and _S_IWRITE, anyway? I'm still
wondering how come the previous coding with hardwired constants
behaved
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 11/01/2010 10:10 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
BTW, with out without the above fix, regression test failed with
weird error if the server is built with gcc 4.5. However, server
can run if I started it manually with PGPORT or -o --port=X.
We might
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
There are a lot of operators and functions to work with hstore.
Does it worth it to implement similar things only to make it
possible using operator [] ?
yes
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
name and interface - hstore is
On 13 December 2010 16:08, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
2. pg_validate_foreign_key('constraint name');
Returns immediately if FK is valid
Returns SETOF rows that violate the constraint, or if no rows are
Here is what you should do:
1. Build Postgres with --prefix set to some empty directory.
2. Run install.
3. Bundle up the resulting install tree as part of your tarball. Do not
editorialize upon the relative locations of its contents.
4. Drop the install tree wherever you want on the target
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think you need to refactor the operation so that there's one WAL
record per child page, or something along that line. I concede this
might be diffcult :-(
If it's only the backup blocks that matter couldn't you generate
On 12/13/2010 12:16 PM, BRUSSER Michael wrote:
Here is what you should do:
1. Build Postgres with --prefix set to some empty directory.
2. Run install.
3. Bundle up the resulting install tree as part of your tarball. Do not
editorialize upon the relative locations of its contents.
4. Drop
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:15:29PM +, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 13 December 2010 16:08, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
2. pg_validate_foreign_key('constraint name');
Returns immediately if FK is valid
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
There are a lot of operators and functions to work with hstore.
Does it worth it to implement similar things only to make it
possible using operator [] ?
yes
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the first patch (relpersistence-v4.patch) is ready to commit,
So I've now committed it.
and the third patch to allow synchronous commits to become
asynchronous when it doesn't matter
We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
synopsis of where we are with the others, all IMO of course.
- fix for seg picksplit function - I don't have confidence this change
is for the best and can't
On 13.12.2010 19:19, Greg Stark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think you need to refactor the operation so that there's one WAL
record per child page, or something along that line. I concede this
might be diffcult :-(
If it's only the backup
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 13.12.2010 19:19, Greg Stark wrote:
If it's only the backup blocks that matter couldn't you generate noop
WAL records with just the full page image in them. Once all those are
generated then generate the actual split operation
On 12/13/2010 12:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
- SQL/MED - core functionality - Seems clear to move this to the next
CF and keep working on it.
[...]
- SQL/MED - file_fdw - Discussion is ongoing, but I see no harm in
marking this Returned with Feedback for now in anticipation of a new
version
On 12/13/2010 12:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net writes:
On 11/01/2010 10:10 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
BTW, with out without the above fix, regression test failed with
weird error if the server is built with gcc 4.5. However, server
can run if I started it
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:10:44PM -0800, Nathan Boley wrote:
Another quick note: I think that storing the full contingency table is
wasteful since the marginals are already stored in the single column
statistics. Look at copulas [2] ( FWIW I think that Josh Tolley was
looking at this a couple
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 12/13/2010 12:16 PM, BRUSSER Michael wrote:
Would it be a completely crazy idea if I try to modify Postgres to look at
some env. var
(similar to PGDATA) and if exists and path is valid look there for the
timezone files?
Yes, that's only the
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 12/13/2010 12:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
- SQL/MED - core functionality - Seems clear to move this to the next
CF and keep working on it.
[...]
- SQL/MED - file_fdw - Discussion is ongoing, but I see no harm in
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
There are a lot of operators and functions to work with hstore.
Does it worth it to implement similar things only to make it
possible using
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 12/13/2010 12:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
It smells a little bit like an optimization bug. Does dialing down to
-O0 make it go away?
Sadly, no. I'm testing downgrading the compiler now.
Mph. FWIW, I see that my last build of Postgres for Fedora 14
On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
My most serious pro about hstore in core is a better dump/restore
support. Also, since we have so much better hstore and people started
to use it in their projects, it'd be great to have built-in feature in
PostgreSQL, which mimic key-value
On 13.12.2010 19:48, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangasheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 13.12.2010 19:19, Greg Stark wrote:
If it's only the backup blocks that matter couldn't you generate noop
WAL records with just the full page image in them. Once all those are
generated then
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 13.12.2010 19:48, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah. Wouldn't the original page-split record have been carrying full
page images already?
Yes.
BTW, the original split record doesn't run into the limit because it
doesn't use the
On 13.12.2010 20:30, Tom Lane wrote:
Can we fix it so that each child page is updated, and its downlink
inserted, as a separate atomic action? That'd require each intermediate
state to be consistent and crash-safe, but I think you really need the
intermediate states to be consistent anyway
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 17:15 +, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 13 December 2010 16:08, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
2. pg_validate_foreign_key('constraint name');
Returns immediately if FK is valid
Dne 13.12.2010 16:34, Tom Lane napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
Well, until this point we've discussed failure cases involving 'AND'
conditions. What about 'OR' conditions? I think the current optimizer
computes the selectivity as 's1+s2 - s1*s2' (at least that's what I
found in
Dne 13.12.2010 16:38, Tom Lane napsal(a):
The reason that this wasn't done years ago is precisely that nobody's
figured out how to do it with a tolerable amount of stats data and a
tolerable amount of processing time (both at ANALYZE time and during
query planning). It's not hard to see what
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:37:52PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
synopsis of where we are with the others, all IMO of course.
[snip]
- Writeable CTEs - I think
Dne 13.12.2010 18:59, Joshua Tolley napsal(a):
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:10:44PM -0800, Nathan Boley wrote:
Another quick note: I think that storing the full contingency table is
wasteful since the marginals are already stored in the single column
statistics. Look at copulas [2] ( FWIW I
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:37:52PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
synopsis of where we are
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
We're now just a day or two from the end of this CommitFest and there
are still a LOT of open patches - to be specific, 23.Here's a brief
synopsis of where we are with the others, all IMO of course.
Thanks for doing this!
- Extensions - Still under
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:48 AM, aaliya zarrin aaliya.zar...@gmail.com wrote:
drainSelfPipe() function will read the data and remove it from the
descriptor?
Yes...
Coz the signal (SIGUSR1) is writing sata to selfPipe descriptor but unable
to wake up latch on select system call.
The signal
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:48 AM, aaliya zarrin aaliya.zar...@gmail.com wrote:
When pg_is_in_recovery in the table changes to zero(status change)??
At the time when recovery stops?
Ah... yep.
If switch over has to be done then, after receivibg the signal and telling
the postgres to run the
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
There are a lot of operators and functions to work with hstore.
Does it worth it to
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
So, who's in to finish up and commit this patch in this round? :)
I certainly am ready to support last minute changes, given some are
required. And if they are too big for the schedule, better shake the
patch out now rather than let it
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com:
There are a lot of operators and
Tom Lane wrote:
argue that there was a regression. It's certainly a performance bug
though: nobody would expect that giving a query *more* work_mem would
cause it to run many times slower.
I wouldn't be that surprised - otherwise it'd just be hard-coded to
something large.
Especially since
David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com writes:
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
So, who's in to finish up and commit this patch in this round? :)
I'll try to do another review this week.
Thanks!
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise,
On Dec 12, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
There might be some advantage in having it move buffers
to a freelist that's just protected by a simple spinlock (or at least,
a lock different from the one that protects the clock sweep). The
idea would be that most of the time, backends just
On 12/13/2010 01:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net writes:
On 12/13/2010 12:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
It smells a little bit like an optimization bug. Does dialing down to
-O0 make it go away?
Sadly, no. I'm testing downgrading the compiler now.
Mph. FWIW, I see that
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 22:29, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net writes:
On 12/13/2010 12:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
It smells a little bit like an optimization bug. Does dialing down to
-O0 make it go away?
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Further digging shows some weirdness. This doesn't appear to be
compiler-related. I've rolled back all the way to gcc 3.5. It is
triggered by the following line in pg_regress.c, commenting out of which
causes the problem to go away (although of
Tomas,
(a) find out what statistics do we need to collect and how to use it
(b) implement a really stupid inefficient solution
(c) optimize in iterations, i.e. making it faster, consuming less
space etc.
I'll suggest again how to decide *which* columns to cross: whichever
columns
On 12/13/10 9:37 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
- synchronous replication - and...
- synchronous replication, transaction-controlled - If we want to get
this feature into 9.1, we had better get a move on. But I don't
currently have it in my time budget to deal with this.
I thought we'd covered most
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
