Re: C vs C vs C x

2002-01-27 Thread Nicholas Clark
then they can use single , surely? Nicholas Clark -- ENOCHOCOLATE http://www.ccl4.org/~nick/CV.html

Re: Perldoc and backporting

2003-08-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
perldoc if they wanted it. Can anyone see any reason not to do this? If it's easy for you to do, and you're up for it, go for it. I think that it would be a good idea. Nicholas Clark

Re: Pod::Webserver 3.04 pre-release

2006-02-11 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:46:50PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: I wasn't sure if Mock::* was the best name to use. Also, the patch as supplied was intended to give the minimum changes to the POD part of the code whilst keeping everything working, more as a proof of concept than a final

Re: podlators/Pod::Simple backwards compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH] 5.8.8: Debian patches)

2006-04-27 Thread Nicholas Clark
of this? I was wondering what subtle but known differences exist between the behaviour of the POD modules in 5.8.8, and those in blead. Nicholas Clark

Re: deprecating LSection

2009-12-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:52:51AM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote: On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote: Gosh, I didn't know Pod-Simple included those. I'd much prefer it be core, to keep the reference separate from an implementation. (I wouldn't object to Pod-Spec, but I

Re: Why does Pod::Checker deprecate section numbers in links to man pages?

2010-06-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
that you can't predict how your document will be parsed, and effectively mean that you can't write some totally legitimate code examples without it mistakenly being treated as a link. Nicholas Clark

Re: Why does Pod::Checker deprecate section numbers in links to man pages?

2010-06-02 Thread Nicholas Clark
to remove Pod::Parser from the core for 5.16 Nicholas Clark

Re: `=item 1. Text` Doesn't Produce Ordered List Item

2010-07-20 Thread Nicholas Clark
between the two) Nicholas Clark

Re: no deprecation warning for Lsection

2011-05-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
is that no-one wants to start on it, but given that it is the future, everyone thinks that doing anything in the direction of (a) is a waste of effort. Which stalls. Nicholas Clark

Re: please test perl5.git's Pod-Html

2012-02-22 Thread Nicholas Clark
git installed, you can get a snapshot from HTTP. Current snapshots are linked on http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git as snapshot. The specific version Ricardo mentions is this one: http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/snapshot/ac2b477c8b4b647797d42877de5b1a1d34c94073.tar.gz Nicholas Clark

Re: Version comments in POD output

2012-12-28 Thread Nicholas Clark
upstream, at which point the generated by comments are useful to upstream.) Nicholas Clark

Re: How do I get Pod::Simple to extract pod from its containing file?

2013-03-06 Thread Nicholas Clark
as to the easiest way to do so using modules that will continue to ship with the Perl 5 core (unlike Pod::Parser)? No-one answered this, did they? Is it possible to extract the pod by subclassing Pod::Simple, and the subclass being a null parser that prints out the Pod that it was given? Nicholas Clark

Re: Tables in PODs

2013-09-20 Thread Nicholas Clark
nicely), but I know approximately zero roff, so I don't know how easy it is (or isn't) Or how good plain text output for tables is. Nicholas Clark