Hello Peter and others,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 11/23/2013 12:38 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
/etc/postfix/header_checks:
/^To: \S+\.\S+\.\S+\.\s...@gmail.com mailto:s...@gmail.com$/i DISCARD
/etc/postfix/main.cf http://main.cf:
Alexander Farber skrev den 2013-11-23 11:08:
postmap seems not to like the whitespace after To:,
should I replace that space by s+ as workaround?
nope you dont postmap a pcre, regexp, cidr file
Please read the below article carefully. It will save you a lot of trouble.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
On Nov 23, 2013 3:39 PM, Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Peter and others,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
Does this doc really apply to my situation?
(I'd like to discard some of the mails sent out by my CMS)
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM, tejas sarade tejas.a.sar...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
Regards
Alex
Am 23.11.2013 06:49, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
jeffrey j donovan skrev den 2013-11-21 18:40:
someu...@ncem-pa.org: host mail.ncem-pa.org[204.186.202.37] said: 554
5.7.1 someu...@ncem-pa.org: Recipient address rejected: Failed SPF
check; beth.k12.pa.us, Redundant applicable 'v=spf1'
Hi,
Can someone share a very good postfix 2.10 installation guide for managing
2-5million emails per day? My current postfix is unable to handle such
large volume as lot of emails are getting stuck in the incoming folder and
thus the deliveries are delayed upto 2-3 days. My current postfix
Alexander Farber:
thank you! So I have moved the line
/^To: \S+\.\S+\.\S+\.\s...@gmail.com$/i DISCARD
to the file /etc/postfix/access, but when I run
That is the wrong format. As documented in access(5) this requires
an email address or domain name, not an email header.
# postmap
The most important thing when sorting out delay is to check logs for delay.
It will give the processing time each Postfix component spent on email.
Also check the full header of delayed mail.
Read this two manuals.
Postfix Performance tunning guide
http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html
I would like to know current recipient restrictions. What is the output of
following command.
grep smtpd_recipient_restrictions /etc/postfix/main.cf
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Alexander Farber
alexander.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this doc really apply to my situation?
(I'd like to
Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
Hi,
Can someone share a very good postfix 2.10 installation guide for managing
2-5million emails per day? My current postfix is unable to handle such
large volume as lot of emails are getting stuck in the incoming folder and
thus the deliveries are delayed upto 2-3
Am 23.11.2013 13:39, schrieb Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
Can someone share a very good postfix 2.10 installation guide for managing
2-5million emails per day? My current
postfix is unable to handle such large volume as lot of emails are getting
stuck in the incoming folder and thus
the
How do i take that information from my server? I am new to this, can you
guide me. Also if possible can you provide a good postfix configuration for
my kind of setup. I am setting up a new server now with the latest postfix
stable release. DO you think the default configuration would be ok.
On
Am 23.11.2013 15:25, schrieb Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
I am going to have atleast 5 servers now to share the load, how do i split
the MX?
Can you guide me, do you have any documentation?
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:51 PM, li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net
Am 23.11.2013 13:39,
Hi
We will have all *legit* mails only. Currently we are sending around 1.5 -
2 million emails per day and 5 million would be an expansion. We handle
these for our clients. So with current congestion going on, we are
expanding. Bounces are being handled by a program already. I have to now
THank You, we have filled these forms. But still we are facing delay in
delivery, can you suggest with the postconf -n output that i have shared.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
Hi,
Can someone share a very good postfix
w : for load
free -m : for memory usage.
First of all keep the default configuration, later on you can optimize it.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Kranti Kiran Patnaik
krantikiranpatn...@gmail.com wrote:
How do i take that information from my server? I am new to this, can you
guide me.
#w
09:29:42 up 9 days, 6:48, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
# free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 4041 3018 1022 0207 2415
-/+ buffers/cache:395 3645
Swap: 6000
Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
THank You, we have filled these forms. But still we are facing delay in
delivery, can you suggest with the postconf -n output that i have shared.
The reason for delays is in the MAILLOG file.
Look for the breakdown of the delays=a/b/c/d logging.
The format of the
Sir,
From my logs i found some as mentioned below.
delays=3994/44/0.09/1.5,
delays=4238/0.23/0/0.02
delays=2944/48/0.01/0.01
delays=903/0.08/0/0.01
delays=4893/48/0/0.01
Please advise.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
THank
Then there is no point in collecting usage details now.
Can you tell me if the the source of the mails.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Kranti Kiran Patnaik
krantikiranpatn...@gmail.com wrote:
#w
09:29:42 up 9 days, 6:48, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
# free -m
Source of the mails is from our clients who send it to their clients for
recruitment.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:40 PM, tejas sarade tejas.a.sar...@gmail.comwrote:
Then there is no point in collecting usage details now.
Can you tell me if the the source of the mails.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at
I do see these kind of delays also in some lines.
delays=11656/252/0.06/0.02
delay=65892, delays=65875/14/0.15/2
Please advise.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Kranti Kiran Patnaik
krantikiranpatn...@gmail.com wrote:
Sir,
From my logs i found some as mentioned below.
No, I mean mails are locally generated on server, or from local network to
which server is connected, or from internet.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Kranti Kiran Patnaik
krantikiranpatn...@gmail.com wrote:
Source of the mails is from our clients who send it to their clients for
Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
Sir,
From my logs i found some as mentioned below.
delays=3994/44/0.09/1.5,
That is your problem. If
1) You have master.cf transports with low process limit (or low
per-destinaton concurrency),
AND
2) Those transports have c/d delays that are more than a fraction
of
cat /etc/postfix/master.cf
#
# Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the format
# of the file, see the master(5) manual page (command: man 5 master).
#
# ==
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup
From local network.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:49 PM, tejas sarade tejas.a.sar...@gmail.comwrote:
No, I mean mails are locally generated on server, or from local network to
which server is connected, or from internet.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Kranti Kiran Patnaik
Mails are spending too much time in incoming queue.
May be this will help.
http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Kranti Kiran Patnaik
krantikiranpatn...@gmail.com wrote:
I do see these kind of delays also in some lines.
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:40:52 +0530
tejas sarade tejas.a.sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Then there is no point in collecting usage details now.
Can you tell me if the the source of the mails.
For God's sake: Please learn how to trim quoted text. Thank you!
And please read this:
$ grep smtpd_recipient_restrictions /etc/postfix/main.cf
# through Postfix. See the smtpd_recipient_restrictions parameter
# relay mail to. See the smtpd_recipient_restrictions description in
$ postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory =
Wietse Venema:
Kranti Kiran Patnaik:
Sir,
From my logs i found some as mentioned below.
delays=3994/44/0.09/1.5,
That is your problem. If
1) You have master.cf transports with low process limit (or low
per-destinaton concurrency),
See here:
default_destination_concurrency_limit
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Alexander Farber
alexander.far...@gmail.com wrote:
$ grep smtpd_recipient_restrictions /etc/postfix/main.cf
# through Postfix. See the smtpd_recipient_restrictions parameter
# relay mail to. See the smtpd_recipient_restrictions description in
It will not
postconf |grep smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
OK, got it.
Add the following line in main.cf file to add new recipient restriction
which will use pcre table.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
pcre:/etc/postfix/pcre_recipients, permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination
Then create a file /etc/postfix/pcre_recipients
Am 23.11.2013 20:18, schrieb tejas sarade:
OK, got it.
Add the following line in main.cf http://main.cf file to add new recipient
restriction which will use pcre table.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
pcre:/etc/postfix/pcre_recipients, permit_mynetworks,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:55 AM, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 23.11.2013 20:18, schrieb tejas sarade:
OK, got it.
Add the following line in main.cf http://main.cf file to add new
recipient restriction which will use pcre table.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
I see, thanks to you both!
The #danger doc not probably doesn't apply here, but still good to know.
Hi there,
I am trying to setup a postprox based filter only for one recipient but it
fails me altogether, no matter what I do. The last setup I have is routing
messages by way of a transport map directive such as
acco...@test.au postprox:[127.0.0.1]:10027
where in master.cf I have
postprox
On 11/23/2013 11:08 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
thank you! So I have moved the line
/^To: \S+\.\S+\.\S+\.\s...@gmail.com mailto:s...@gmail.com$/i DISCARD
to the file /etc/postfix/access, but when I run
# postmap /etc/postfix/access
I get the warning:
postmap: warning:
Zitat von Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org:
With smtpd(8) there are no implicit exclusions so you can build the
full list yourself if you want. For example with opportunistic TLS
(may):
$ server_ciphers() {
local use skip ciphers exclude e
case $1 in
On 11/24/2013 08:18 AM, tejas sarade wrote:
You can use the DISCARD instead of REJECT.
I wouldn't recommend that, unless there is a very specific reason for it
as a rule of thumb it's rarely a good idea to DISCARD mail. In this
particular case REJECT will work just fine, REJECT followed by a
On 11/24/2013 08:25 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
have fun with reject_unauth_destination too late and
check_recipient_access says PERMIT instead DUNNO
a major mistake and becuase it is made too often smtpd_relay_restrictions
was included in the lastest releases
Am 23.11.2013 22:48, schrieb Peter:
On 11/24/2013 08:25 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
have fun with reject_unauth_destination too late and
check_recipient_access says PERMIT instead DUNNO
a major mistake and becuase it is made too often smtpd_relay_restrictions
was included in the lastest
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:40:05PM +0100, Andreas Schulze wrote:
But when I disable RC4 in smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers (I assume) it's
also not used when I enforce encrypt mode !? This script don't say so.
Yes, you're right, the script did not cover that case accurately,
the code from smtpd(8)
Zitat von Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org:
For bonus points, you could look at smtpd_tls_askccert and
smtpd_tls_req_ccert. If either is set to yes, append ':!aNULL'
to the raw openssl cipher list.
could you please tell more about that?
Andreas
Ian Baldwin:
localhost:10027 inet n n n - - spawn
user=vscan argv=/usr/local/sbin/postprox -v -c
...
Nov 24 07:01:13 aminoacid postfix/smtp[21274]: 80F96303AE7:
to=acco...@test.au, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10027, delay=303,
delays=1.9/0.02/301/0,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:08:56PM +0100, Andreas Schulze wrote:
For bonus points, you could look at smtpd_tls_askccert and
smtpd_tls_req_ccert. If either is set to yes, append ':!aNULL'
to the raw openssl cipher list.
could you please tell more about that?
Not much more to tell,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:42:23PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
for askcc in smtpd_ask_ccert smtpd_req_ccert
Make that:
for askcc in smtpd_tls_ask_ccert smtpd_tls_req_ccert
--
Viktor.
47 matches
Mail list logo
