On 10/04/24 22:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 10.04.24 17:46, Mr. Peng via Postfix-users wrote:
I have been using spamhaus, spamcop, sorbs as the RBL providers for
antispam.
But some of the customers speak to me about the FP issues caused by RBL.
Do you think the three
On 23/11/23 17:20, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 23/11/23 14:22, Gerald Galster via Postfix-users wrote:
Q2:
given the minuscule work-load, is there any preference/preclusion
between employing the 'usual' x86 processor or 2 Arm Ampere
processors? Both offer Linux. Cost is effectively
On 23/11/23 11:56, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
DL Neil via Postfix-users:
Slightly off-topic.
My bottom-of-the-line VPS is being deprecated. Making me grumpy because
it has been working so well (+updates) for all these years!
...
Q1:
can an email server be run off IPv6
Slightly off-topic.
My bottom-of-the-line VPS is being deprecated. Making me grumpy because
it has been working so well (+updates) for all these years!
Very low volume Postfix/Dovecot for a half-dozen domains, plus a
rarely-used Apache serving only static pages, and the occasional
Have been updating the .cf files (mostly ciphers, but also...)
Our old friend "UGFzc3dvcmQ6" is back.
(previously bounced-off without appearing in daily pflogsumm)
Grrr!
...
unknown[146.247.146.134]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
14-0-135-011.static.pccw-hkt.com[14.0.135.11]:
The "Postfix Howtos and FAQs" is out-dated and requires
correction/editing. To assist the web-master:-
FAQs
Ralf Hildebrandt's Postfix shrine [not found]
Training
Idea & Innovation Consulting [SedoParking]
MS Exchange Integration
Running a PERL-based LDAP client [page not
Thanks - will re-focus investigation.
(evidently web-searching led in wrong direction)
--
Regards =dn
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 13/03/2023 12.05, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 7:02:41 PM EDT Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
wrote:
...
My recommendation to the OP would be to reconsider what they are trying to
accomplish and what's the simplest way to do so. Through this thread I
Which setting will extend the amount of time allowed for Thunderbird to
connect to send and/or receive messages from Postfix?
NB postfix uses Submission -> smtpd
(I've found references to Relay cf Submission but don't appreciate
difference)
or should it be an lmtp setting vis-a-vis Dovecot?
On 13/03/2023 02.10, Antonino Di Mauro via Postfix-users wrote:
unfortunately I don't know this topic, but I'm really willing to study.
Please do you have any documentation on this?
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/
I'm no expert on Postfix, but can talk about databases. To help with
On 08/03/2023 01.09, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Phil Stracchino :
On 3/6/23 11:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
This week, the Postfix mailing lists will be migrated from Majordomo at
Cloud9.net to Mailman at Sys4.de. Thanks to Cloud9.net for hosting the
Postfix lists for 24 years, and thanks to
On 12/01/2023 13.16, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:46:03PM +1300, DL Neil wrote:
That depends on whether you used virtual_alias_maps or alias_maps. Also,
there is a limit on the queue file size (with a name message_size_limit
that would more accurately
On 12/01/2023 12.24, Wietse Venema wrote:
DL Neil:
Having managed two destinations, how far can this reasonably go? Five,
six, ten addresses?
Is there a limit to the number of addresses?
That depends on whether you used virtual_alias_maps or alias_maps. Also,
there is a limit on the queue
Have followed @Dan's thread (similar subject).
Started me thinking of uses for Postfix as a small-scale reflector.
This domain's small-scale postfix is MySQL-based (domains, users,
aliases). Postfix on CentOS (so not latest release) feeding Dovecot.
Just for the learning-experience, set-up
Postfix on VPS is lightly-loaded, currently running happily with SPF,
DKIM, DMARC, etc; and delivering inbound messages to Dovecot. MUAs
submit outbound messages using STARTTLS and port 25.
To suit certain ISPs, plan to expand to (also) enable port 465
(described as "implicit TLS") and/or
On 06/11/2022 14.33, Noah wrote:
I am migrating my aliases file from a textfile to mysql.
One of the things I liked about the textfile is I could comment out a
line and put notes as to why I disabled the alias. is there a similar
method that I can do in mysql - disable the alias and put
The daily pflogsumm report shows that (in recent days) 60~93% of
attempts to connect are rejected, and bounce-off Postfix's settings, eg
450 4.7.1 <00nyBxbT>: Helo command rejected: Host not found;
proto=SMTP helo=<00nyBxbT> (total: 1)
1 115.213.249.159 (<>)
The EHLO string
On 16/04/2022 10.53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 04:30:19PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> However, it is *very* common for a BBC email to have a To header with
>> no email address in it at all,
>
> This violates RFC5322 and earlier versions. The "To:" header must
> contain at
Have a multi-domain Postfix+Dovecot+MySQL+SpamAssassin working nicely.
Added OpenDKIM and it works, passing some 'tests', but not others. I
notice that outgoing mail appears to be signed twice. Is this correct?
The two signatures are otherwise identical but with marginally different
timestamps
On 03/01/2022 10.41, Felix Ingram wrote:
> Thanks Max,
>
> I’m making something similar to a disposable email service, which is why I
> need to accept mail for any user. There’s still some validation for domains,
> etc, so I’m not too worried about accepting everything. I was looking to use
>
I have commented out virtual_alias_domains and mail is now passing to
Clam AV (although failing due to a Clam AV error) so this appears to
be solved.
Still very confused why it would be different on this server though.
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 23:31, Neil Farmstrong wrote:
>
> Dear
here any way Dovecot, Clamav
or Amavis configurations might have broken something?
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 22:52, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Neil Farmstrong:
> > I have set up Postfix / Dovecot on Centos a number of time, a few
> > weeks ago I set up a Debian server with Postfix / D
I have set up Postfix / Dovecot on Centos a number of time, a few
weeks ago I set up a Debian server with Postfix / Dovecot and it went
fine. I'm doing the same again today but keep getting bounces when
sending to any virtual domain on the new server, with the error:
Recipient address rejected:
On 04/12/2020 16:11, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:26 AM David Neil wrote:
When I follow the instructions and attempt a "Delist request for
spamsources.fabel.dk" they quickly assure me that they won't spam me,
but seem to demand a GMail account. So, one secu
Testing my email domain reveals all the DMARC, SPF, etc, recs are
correct and working.
However, there is one blacklist that lists my domain/IP-address, and has
done for some time. (so there's no time-out for good behavior then! I've
had the IPaddr for some years, but who knows what was
I picked this up from documentation somewhere:-
/etc/cron.daily/postfix_pfs_edh_regenerate
#!/bin/bash
cd /etc/postfix
umask 022
for legth in 512 1024 2048
do
openssl dhparam -out dh_$legth.tmp $legth && mv dh_$legth.tmp dh_$legth.pem
chmod 644 dh_$legth.pem
done
--
Regards =dn
be appreciated.
Thank you.
Neil
[root@fairwindsoft2 ~]# postconf -d | grep mail_version
mail_version = 2.10.1
The relevant log:
Feb 4 15:16:12 fairwindsoft2 dovecot: pop3(neil): Disconnected: Logged out
top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/6, size=221590
Feb 4 15:17:03 fairwindsoft2 postfix/smtp[6671
o reject the message. But the messages still end up in my
inbox.
What am I missing here? How do I get check_recipient_access to reject the
addresses specified in the recipient_checks table?
(Postfix 2.11.0 running on Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS)
Thanks,
Neil.
Logs and config follows:
/var/log/mail.lo
On Tuesday 17 Nov 2015 15:50:22 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 03:26:55PM +0000, Neil Smith wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 17 Nov 2015 14:43:50 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >
> > > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > > > permit_sa
t before "check_recipient_access"? :-)
If you don't mind, could you please explain why that's a problem? The
recipient checks addresses aren't for any of the mxbackup domains. I don't
understand how allowing forwarding of mail for backup.com will mean the
acceptance of mail for example.com.
Thanks,
Neil.
On Tuesday 17 Nov 2015 20:50:32 Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:44:12 +
> Neil Smith <neil.post...@njae.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Postfix seems to be ignoring the smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > check_recipient_access instruction.
> >
> di
On Tuesday 17 Nov 2015 21:04:00 Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:56:01 +
> Neil Smith <neil.post...@njae.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > > did you ran postmap for the hash table?
> >
> > Yes, several times, and restarted postfix afterwards.
> &g
: mdcm.MailHandler. Program will exit.
I don't get it.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972) 834-1565
We lend money to investors to buy or refinance single family rent houses.
No origination fees, quick approval, no credit check.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us
:
warning: do not list domain in BOTH mydestination and
virtual_alias_domains
Any idea why the virtual_alias_domains is not working?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage
any help you can offer.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
for the clarification. I updated my files and everything
seems to be working great now.
Thank you for the info.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
which uses the same certificate so Outlook does know about
the root CA.
I am not sure how to fix what is going on.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage
.
If I try to send a message using the manual commands, I still get
Error: no valid recipients
Like I said in my earlier message to Patrick, Outlook does not complain about
the
certificate when I use pop3s to get a message.
I am not sure what to do now.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil
.
I am going to investigate, but appreciate if you have any suggestions.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us
on the server.
I guess I will have to configure postfix to use that.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us
Wietse:
I see, port 587 is the submission port. I will use that.
Thanks for the info!
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
-Original Message-
The (legacy) smtps
this certificate as a CA signed
certificate?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
Hi,
A while back I accidentally configured my mail client to send my email as
user@example (instead of u...@example.com), leading to me sending out about
two dozen messages before I started getting mail back from people saying
they couldn't reply and had to retype my address.
I was wondering if
Hi,
I want to have postfix listen on an additional port (say 785) for SMTP
submission by clients. At first I thought all I had to do was add another
line in master.cf that looked the same as the submission line, but change
the port somewhere.
But then I read in the docs for master.cf it seemed
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
On 2010-09-28 6:04 AM, Neil wrote:
I want to have postfix listen on an additional port (say 785) for SMTP
submission by clients.
You mean in *addition* to the submission port (587)? Or was that a typo
and you
are sent to try us. I'll probably give it a go when Ubuntu 9.10 comes out,
which should include Postfix 2.6.
Thanks, both, for the suggestions.
Neil.
--
Neil Smith http://www.njae.me.uk
Milton Keynes Roleplaying Games Club http://www.mk-rpg.org.uk
= permit_mynetworks permit_mx_backup \
reject_unauth_destination
permit_mx_backup_networks = other.com other.org
maximal_queue_lifetime = 21d
bounce_queue_lifetime = 3d
Any suggestions?
(It's Posfix 2.5.1)
Thanks,
Neil.
--
Neil Smith
on
the from address.
Now what I want is to do that, but also send a copy of all (outgoing) mail
that isn't sent by a certain address to that addresses mailbox (which would
basically give me an always up-to-date backup that I could use to read mail
at when the need arises).
Thanks,
Neil
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Gilles Albusac
gilles.albu...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Is it possible to set up Postfix to choose an SMTP relayhost when routing
outbound mail based on the domain name of the sender ?
If you're okay with using addresses instead of domains, I think
I'm having some trouble configuring my server for SSL on the
submission port. I think it's my SSL configuration because using TLS
on Thunderbird worked fine, but SSL on Thunderbird (and Mail.app)
fails. I suspect it has to do with the error listed below; which I
got by trying to send a mail
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:36:58AM -0800, Neil wrote:
I'm having some trouble configuring my server for SSL on the
submission port. I think it's my SSL configuration because using TLS
on Thunderbird
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 02:37:37PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Neil wrote:
Okay, how can I get SSL enabled/working then?
Uncomment the smtps entries in your master.cf
It should looks pretty much like
On 17 Nov 2008, at 05:05, Stephen Liu wrote:
--- Daniel V. Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From: Stephen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:49:21 AM
Subject: Evolution unable to login mail server.
[snip]
#
.
But, to be clear, I'm not advocating monitoring his personal mailbox,
whatever it may be.
Neil.
On 7 Nov 2008, at 02:54, mouss wrote:
Neil wrote:
By pure luck, I had an epiphany and figured it out.
good. Can you provide details so that other people who get into the
same problem find the answer in the archives?
Well, it's very setup-specific...
The short of it is that I used
to you.
-Neil.
At what point does the Sender: header usually get added to the mail?
Because some (and so far the only pattern is It shows up when
subscribing to the SpamAssassin Mailing List.) of my mails at getting
that header attached (and with a bad address) and it's annoying me...
Sorry for being
On 6 Nov 2008, at 10:07, mouss wrote:
Neil wrote:
Because some (and so far the only pattern is It shows up when
subscribing to the SpamAssassin Mailing List.) of my mails at
getting that header attached (and with a bad address) and it's
annoying me...
what do you exactly mean? almost
On 6 Nov 2008, at 13:47, Neil wrote:
On 6 Nov 2008, at 09:23, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Neil wrote:
At what point does the Sender: header usually get added to the
mail?
Because some (and so far the only pattern is It shows up when
subscribing to the SpamAssassin Mailing List
On 20 Oct 2008, at 10:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michele:
Hi list,
I have a system that receive mails from internal network and
deliver them
directly on Internet. Sometimes mx server for some domains, refuse
mails for
users. It's there the possibility, by postfix, to relay that mails
to a
On 20 Oct 2008, at 18:24, Linux Addict wrote:
Hi, Looks like our MX servers are hit hard by a specific email
address which is sending frequent mails trying to use our relay
effectively many mail servers seems to be blacklisting.
Oct 20 18:20:05 mx01 postfix/qmgr[6512]: DBB784BE68E:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 18:45, Linux Addict wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 18:39, Linux Addict wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 18:24, Linux Addict wrote:
Hi, Looks like our MX
On 13 Oct 2008, at 15:00, Joey wrote:
Joey wrote, at 10/13/2008 01:42 PM:
Many school and government sites (not to mention China) can't seem to
configure rDNS and FCrDNS properly. I have given up trying to contact
offending sites. Too often, they decide the solution is simply to
drop
the
On Oct 13, 2008, at 16:43, Issac Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that it doesn't make sense to ban an entire country, but
what about banning an ISP that won't crack down on spammers?
Then, if you're running a legit business, don't work with ISPs that
have lax rules, and everybody is
On 21 Sep 2008, at 05:39, mouss wrote:
My current config is:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination
you can at leats add (after reject_unauth_destination)
# reject unknown addresses before querying dnsbls
What's the best way to see what spam traits my mail server and mails
are exhibiting? Is there some place I can submit a mail or send a
test mail and get back some sort of report, or the like?
(To avoid a couple separate mails, I merged some of the list replies.
Also, apologies for the delay.)
On 15 Sep 2008, at 06:52, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 13:59 -0300, Diego Ledesma wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently
and on a network administered by someone
else.) At the moment, I haven't even put a webserver on the VPS
because I'm afraid it will raise the risk profile to my server. =\
Any advice? What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Neil.
(While I know list etiquette is generally to send your replies
How do you know it's not someone who honestly wants a webmail account..?
-N.
On Sep 6, 2008, at 5:35 AM, Andrea Gozzi wrote:
Hi all.
Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail
service where they can register for a free account.
Up until now I was just saving their
69 matches
Mail list logo
